- Nano Express
- Open Access
Influence of the ratio of gate length to drain-to-source distance on the electron mobility in AlGaN/AlN/GaN heterostructure field-effect transistors
Nanoscale Research Lettersvolume 7, Article number: 434 (2012)
Using measured capacitance-voltage curves with different gate lengths and current–voltage characteristics at low drain-to-source voltage for the AlGaN/AlN/GaN heterostructure field-effect transistors (HFETs) of different drain-to-source distances, we found that the dominant scattering mechanism in AlGaN/AlN/GaN HFETs is determined by the ratio of gate length to drain-to-source distance. For devices with small ratio (here, less than 1/2), polarization Coulomb field scattering dominates electron mobility. However, for devices with large ratio (here, more than 1/2), longitudinal optical (LO) phonon scattering and interface roughness scattering are dominant. The reason is closely related to polarization Coulomb field scattering.
Owing to potential applications in high power and high frequency electronic devices associated with outstanding material properties, AlGaN/GaN heterostructure field effect transistors (HFETs) have attracted extensive research to improve the device performance [1–3]. The strained AlGaN/AlN/GaN heterostructure with a thin AlN interlayer has been the popular material structure for AlGaN/GaN HFETs due to the improved transport properties of two-dimensional electron gas (2DEG) and electron mobility [4, 5]. According to our former report, it is found that the ratio of gate length to drain-to-source distance has an important influence on electron mobility and determines the dominant scattering mechanism in the AlGaN/AlN/GaN HFETs with the drain-to-source distance of 100 μm . However, the above influence on the electron mobility in AlGaN/AlN/GaN HFETs with different drain-to-source distances has not been investigated. Meanwhile, mainstream microwave power AlGaN/AlN/GaN HFETs are in small-size drain-to-source distances . Therefore, it is of great importance to investigate the influence of the ratio of gate length to drain-to-source distance on the electron mobility in AlGaN/AlN/GaN HFETs with different drain-to-source distances. In this study, rectangular AlGaN/AlN/GaN HFETs with different drain-to-source distances and gate geometrical areas were fabricated, and the influence of the ratio of gate length to drain-to-source distance on the electron mobility in AlGaN/AlN/GaN HFETs with different drain-to-source distances was investigated.
The heterostructure layer employed in this study was grown by molecular beam epitaxy on a (0001) sapphire substrate. The structure consists of a 40-nm AlN nucleation layer, followed by a 3-μm undoped GaN layer, a 0.5-nm AlN interlayer, and a 22.5-nm-thick undoped Al0.28 Ga0.72 N layer. Hall measurements indicated a sheet carrier density of around 1.1 × 1013 cm−2 and an electron mobility of 1,800 cm2/V·s at room temperature. For device processing, mesa isolation was performed using Cl2/BCl3 reactive ion etching. The source and drain ohmic contacts were formed by depositing Ti/Al/Ni/Au using e-beam evaporation and lift-off and then were annealed in a rapid thermal annealing system. With transmission line method patterns, the specific resistivity of the contacts was measured to be 7 × 10−5 Ω·cm2. The source and drain contacts were rectangular: 100 μm wide and 50 μm long. Drain-to-source distances with 60, 20, 15, and 9 μm were prepared. Ni/Au (60/160 nm) Schottky contacts of varying areas were then deposited symmetrically in the middle between the source and drain ohmic contacts by e-beam evaporation. The Schottky contact sizes in AlGaN/AlN/GaN HFETs with a 60-μm drain-to-source distance are 12/100 (length/width), 24/100, 36/100, and 48/100 μm which are marked as 60-a, 60-b, 60-c, 60-d, respectively. The Schottky contact sizes in AlGaN/AlN/GaN HFETs with a 20-μm drain-to-source distance are 4/100 (length/width), 8/100, 12/100, and 16/100 μm which are marked as 20-a, 20-b, 20-c, 20-d, respectively. Schottky contacts of 3/100 μm (length/width) were deposited in AlGaN/AlN/GaN HFETs with 15- and 9-μm drain-to-source distances which are marked as 15-a and 9-a, respectively. Capacitance-voltage (C-V) measurements were performed at room temperature using an Agilent B1520A (Agilent Technologies, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA) at 1 MHz, and current–voltage (I-V) measurements for the AlGaN/AlN/GaN HFETs were also performed at room temperature using an Agilent B1500A semiconductor parameter analyzer.
Results and discussion
Figure 1 shows the C V curves of the Ni Schottky contacts with different areas for the devices with drain-to-source distances of 60, 20, 15, and 9 μm, respectively. The C V measurements were obtained using the source contact and the Ni Schottky contact. The different threshold voltages of samples 20-c and 20-d with respect to samples 20-a and 20-b were due to the different strains under the Schottky contacts caused by the different Schottky contact areas . The 2DEG electron density (n2D) under different gate biases with different Ni Schottky contact areas can be obtained by the integration of the measured C V curves , and the calculated results are shown in Figure 2.
The I V characteristics for the rectangular AlGaN/AlN/GaN HFETs with different drain-to-source distances were measured and shown in Figure 3. The saturation current is higher with shorter gate length due to the long distance between the drain and gate edge. The abnormality of 60-d and 20-d may be due to the nonuniformity of the AlGaN/GaN heterostructures or the ohmic contacts. The electron mobility of the 2DEG in the strained AlGaN/AlN/GaN heterostructures can be calculated with the I V characteristics and 2DEG electron density as described in . Due to the low specific resistivity of the ohmic contacts (7 × 10−5 Ω·cm2), the source and drain resistances were ignored during the calculation. The calculated results are shown in Figure 4. Also, the 2DEG electron mobility of the rectangular AlGaN/AlN/GaN HFETs with drain-to-source of 100 μm in  was also shown in Figure 4a, and from the smallest to the largest in Schottky contact sizes, they are marked as 100-a, 100-b, 100-c, and 100-d.
As one can see from Figure 4, the 2DEG electron mobility increases with gate voltage for the devices with small ratio of gate length to drain-to-source distance (here, less than 1/2),but it decreases for the one with large ratio (here, more than 1/2). It is well known that there are mainly five kinds of important scattering mechanisms to affect the 2DEG electron drift mobility in AlGaN/GaN HFET samples, and these scattering mechanisms are ionized impurity scattering , dislocation scattering , polarization Coulomb field scattering [6, 9], longitudinal optical (LO) phonon scattering, and interface roughness scattering . The ionized impurity scattering and dislocation scattering can be ignored in our samples as discussed in . The variety of electron mobility according to the gate bias can be explained as follows.
The Schottky gate produced a partial strain relaxation in the AlGaN layer, and then the polarization charges at AlGaN/AlN interface are distributed irregularly (spatial correlation is only partial) . Thus, an additional scattering potential (polarization Coulomb field scattering potential) in comparison with the un-gated heterostructure is formed. For polarization Coulomb field scattering, the electron mobility rises with the increasing electron density, but it decreases for the LO phonon scattering and the interface roughness scattering [6, 9]. For the devices with large ratio of gate length to drain-to-source distance, the gradient of the polarization charge density is relatively small; therefore, the scattering associated with polarization Coulomb field is relatively weak . As a result, the LO phonon scattering and the interface roughness scattering dominate the 2DEG electron mobility, leading to the monotonic decrease for the mobility. For the devices with small ratio of gate length to drain-to-source distance, the gradient of the polarization charge density is large. Thus, the polarization Coulomb field scattering is the dominant carrier scattering mechanism, which results in the monotonic increase for the mobility of the 2DEG electrons with gate voltage. For a given gate bias, the electron mobility of the 2DEG decreases with the reducing Ni Schottky contact area as shown in Figure 4; this can be explained by the weaker polarization Coulomb field scattering corresponding to the larger Ni Schottky contact area. Therefore, the conclusion can be made that the dominant scattering mechanism in the AlGaN/AlN/GaN HFETs is determined by the ratio of gate length to drain-to-source distance. With the ratio of less than 1/2, the polarization Coulomb field scattering dominates the 2DEG electron mobility in the AlGaN/AlN/GaN HFETs, while with the ratio larger than 1/2, the LO phonon scattering and the interface roughness scattering are dominant in the devices.
In summary, Ni Schottky contacts of different geometrical areas were deposited on strained AlGaN/AlN/GaN heterostructures with different drain-to-source distances. With the measured C-V curves and the I-V characteristics of AlGaN/AlN/GaN HFETs, we have investigated the influence of the ratio of gate length to drain-to-source distances on the electron mobility of the 2DEG in rectangular AlGaN/AlN/GaN HFET devices. We found that the dominant scattering mechanism in the AlGaN/AlN/GaN HFETs is determined by the ratio of gate length to drain-to-source distance. For the devices with small ratio (here, less than 1/2), the polarization Coulomb field scattering dominates the 2DEG electron mobility. For the devices with large ratio (here, more than 1/2), the LO phonon scattering and the interface roughness scattering are dominant.
Ambacher O, Foutz B, Smart J, Shealy JR, Weimann NG, Chu K, Murphy M, Sierakowski AJ, Schaff WJ, Eastman LF, Dimitrov R, Mitchell A, Stutzmann M: Two dimensional electron gases induced by spontaneous and piezoelectric polarization in undoped and doped AlGaN/GaN heterostructures. J Appl Phys 2000, 87: 334–344. 10.1063/1.371866
Gonschorek M, Carlin JF, Feltin E, Py MA, Grandjean N, Darakchieva V, Monemar B, Lorenz M, Ramm G: Two-dimensional electron gas density in Al1 − xInxN/AlN/GaN heterostructures (0.03 ≤ x ≤ 0.23). J Appl Phys 2008, 103: 093714. 10.1063/1.2917290
Mizutani T, Ito M, Kishimoto S, Nakamura F: AlGaN/GaN HEMTs with thin InGaN cap layer for normally off operation. IEEE Electron Device Lett 2007, 28: 549–551.
Shen L, Heikman S, Moran B, Coffie R, Zhang NQ, Buttari D, Smorchkova IP, Keller S, DenBaars SP, Mishra UK: AlGaN/AlN/GaN high-power microwave HEMT. IEEE Electron Device Lett 2001, 22: 457–459.
Lee JS, Kim JW, Lee JH, Kim CS, Oh JE, Shin MW, Lee JH: Reduction of current collapse in AIGaN/GaN HFETs using AIN interfacial layer. Electron Lett 2003, 39: 750–752. 10.1049/el:20030473
Lv YJ, Lin ZJ, Zhang Y, Meng LM, Luan CB, Cao ZF, Chen H, Wang ZG: Polarization Coulomb field scattering in AlGaN/AlN/GaN heterostructure field-effect transistors. Appl Phys Lett 2011, 98: 123512. 10.1063/1.3569138
Chung JW, Hoke WE, Chumbes EM, Palacios T: AlGaN/GaN HEMT with 300-GHz fmax. IEEE Electron Device Lett 2010, 31: 195–197.
Lin ZJ, Zhao JZ, Corrigan TD, Wang Z, You ZD, Wang ZG, Lu W: The influence of Schottky contact metals on the strain of AlGaN barrier layers. J Appl Phys 2008, 103: 044503. 10.1063/1.2841328
Zhao JZ, Lin ZJ, Corrigan TD, Wang Z, You ZD, Wang ZG: Electron mobility related to scattering caused by the strain variation of AlGaN barrier layer in strained AlGaN/GaN heterostructures. Appl Phys Lett 2007, 91: 173507. 10.1063/1.2798500
Jena D, Gossard AC, Mishra UK: Dislocation scattering in a two-dimensional electron gas. Appl Phys Lett 2000, 76: 1707–1709. 10.1063/1.126143
Ridley BK, Foutz BE, Eastman LF: Mobility of electrons in bulk GaN and AlxGa1−xN/GaN heterostructures. Phys Rev B 2000, 61: 16862–16869. 10.1103/PhysRevB.61.16862
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 10774090 and 11174182), the National Basic Research Program of China (grant no. 2007CB936602), and the Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education (grant no. 20110131110005).
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
YL designed this study and drafted the manuscript. ZL instructed this study and revised the manuscript. LM and CL performed the sample preparation. ZC and YY carried out the experimental measurements. ZF and ZW participated in the critical discussions. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.