Skip to main content
Account

Table 1 Process conditions and electrical I - V results found in different electrical studies of vertical metal-PS-Si(P) structures

From: Non-oxidized porous silicon-based power AC switch peripheries

Paper reference

P-type substrate

CEl

Jetch (mA/cm2)

P(%)

dPS(nm)

tPS (μm)

ML

PS contact (according to the authors)

I-V results

Model

OS

ρS(Ω cm)

Range (V)

WF

Ben-Chorin et al.[14]

100

5

HF (49%) + ethanol (1:1)

30

?

3 to 5

0.5 to 15

Au NiCr In

Quasi-ohmic

[−100, +100]

Quasi-lineara

BC

Ben-Chorin et al.[14]

100

0.075

HF (49%) + ethanol (1:1)

100

?

3 to 5

0.5 to 15

Au NiCr In

Quasi-ohmic

[−100, +100]

Quasi-lineara

BC

Balagurov et al.[15]

111

0.005

HF (48%) + ethanol (5:1)

13

30

>10

1.5 to 30

Au Al

Ohmic

[0, +100]

Linearb

AN

Bouaïcha et al.[7]

100

1

HF (40%) + ethanol (1:1)

?

48

2 to 5

?

Al

Ohmic

[0, +5]

Nonlinear

BC

62

75

Remaki et al.[16]

100

0.02

HF (50%) + ethanol (2:1)

75

50

MESO

1 to 10

Au

Schottkyc

[−0.5, +0.5]

Quasi-lineard

BC

Anderson et al.[17]

100

30 to 40

HF (45%)

10

36

?

0.5 to 5

Al

Schottky

[−0.5, +0.5]

Nonlinear

BC

Anderson et al.[17]

111

0.01 to 0.03

HF (45%)

10

23

?

0.5 to 5

Al

Schottky

[−0.5, +0.5]

Nonlinear

AN

Pulsford et al.[18]

?

25

HF + H2O + ethanol (2:3:5)

20

?

?

1.5 and 135

Ca Mg Sb Au Ag

Ohmice

[0, +1]

Nonlinear

BC

Stievenard and Deresmes[19]

100

0.01

HF (40%) + ethanol (1:1)

20

45

MESO

30

Al

Schottky

[−1, +1]

Quasi-lineard

AN

Islam et al.[20]

100

6 to 10

HF (48%) + ethanol (1:1)

10

?

MESO

30 to 50

Al

Quasi-ohmic

[−50, +50]

Quasi-linear

BC

  1. All the available information about the starting material (the substrate orientation OS and its resistivity ρS), the anodization conditions (the electrolyte composition CEl and the etching current density Jetch), the PS features (the porosity P, the pore diameter dPS, and the PS thickness tPS), the electrical contacts (the metal layer ML used to contact PS and the resulting electrical contact observed according to the authors), and the electrical I V results (the studied voltage range and the waveforms WF of the I V characteristics) are given. Two models coming from Anderson et al. (AN)[17, 19] and Ben-Chorin et al. (BC)[21] are used to interpret all the observations. aExcept for PS thickness lower than 2 μm; bspace-charge-limited current is observed for PS thicknesses lower than 28 μm; cnot true in ambient air (quasi-ohmic); donly in ambient air; eimpact of the metal barrier is visible at higher voltage. The question marks were added to avoid bad interpretations of our classification as different behaviors may be observed in the same paper.

Navigation