Skip to main content

Ferromagnetism and semiconducting of boron nanowires


More recently, motivated by extensively technical applications of carbon nanostructures, there is a growing interest in exploring novel non-carbon nanostructures. As the nearest neighbor of carbon in the periodic table, boron has exceptional properties of low volatility and high melting point and is stronger than steel, harder than corundum, and lighter than aluminum. Boron nanostructures thus are expected to have broad applications in various circumstances. In this contribution, we have performed a systematical study of the stability and electronic and magnetic properties of boron nanowires using the spin-polarized density functional calculations. Our calculations have revealed that there are six stable configurations of boron nanowires obtained by growing along different base vectors from the unit cell of the bulk α-rhombohedral boron (α-B) and β-rhombohedral boron (β-B). Well known, the boron bulk is usually metallic without magnetism. However, theoretical results about the magnetic and electronic properties showed that, whether for the α-B-based or the β-B-based nanowires, their magnetism is dependent on the growing direction. When the boron nanowires grow along the base vector [001], they exhibit ferromagnetism and have the magnetic moments of 1.98 and 2.62 μB, respectively, for the α-c [001] and β-c [001] directions. Electronically, when the boron nanowire grows along the α-c [001] direction, it shows semiconducting and has the direct bandgap of 0.19 eV. These results showed that boron nanowires possess the unique direction dependence of the magnetic and semiconducting behaviors, which are distinctly different from that of the bulk boron. Therefore, these theoretical findings would bring boron nanowires to have many promising applications that are novel for the boron bulk.


Boron is very special in the periodic table as the nearest neighbor of carbon and has exceptional properties of low volatility, high melting point, stronger than steel, harder than corundum, and lighter than aluminum. Hence, studies on boron nanostructures have become more and more attractive in the recent years[113]. Among them, boron one-dimensional nanostructures are expected to have broad applications for their high conductivity, high aspect ratios, and excellent performance in harsh conditions[1420]. In the last several years, so many experimental studies have performed on the one-dimensional boron nanowires, and a great progress has been obtained up to now[2127]. Just recently, the vertically aligned single-crystalline boron nanowire arrays have been especially prepared[21]. Therefore, further explorations theoretically and experimentally on the one-dimensional boron nanostructures appear to be timely and desirable. However, the possible configurations and stability, as well as the electronic and magnetic properties of boron nanowires, which are important for the experimental preparation and technological applications, have not been reported so far. As a result of the well-aligned single-crystalline boron nanowires reported[21], in this contribution, we perform a theoretical study on the stability and magnetic and electronic properties of boron nanowires growing from the unit cells of stable B bulks.


Herein, we firstly get the different boron nanowires from the growth of the unit cell of the bulk boron, respectively, along different base vectors. Well known among the various boron allotropes, the most stable phases of the boron bulk are the α-rhombohedral (α-B) and β-rhombohedral (β-B) boron[28]. The α-B is the simplest one that consists of a distorted B12 icosahedron per unit cell, forming an fcc-like structure. The β-B is the most commonly found modification and can be considered as an fcc-like structure consisting of the B84 quasi-spheres together with the B10-B-B10 chains located in the octahedral interstices formed by the B84 spheres[29]. In the following study, we respectively attain three different boron nanowires from the growth of the unit cell of the ground states of α-B and β-B along different base vectors. We then carry out the first-principles investigation of the stability and electronic and magnetic behaviors of the considered boron nanowires. Additionally, the dependence of the electronic and magnetic properties on the growth direction of boron nanowires is discussed. These investigations are expected to provide valuable information for future applications of boron nanostructures.

We perform the first-principles spin-polarized density functional theory (DFT) using the SIESTA computation code[3032], which is based on the standard Kohn-Sham self-consistent DFT. A flexible linear combination of numerical atomic-orbital basis sets is used for the description of valence electrons, and norm-conserving nonlocal pseudopotentials were adopted for the atomic cores. The pseudopotentials are constructed using the Trouiller-Martins scheme[33] to describe the interaction of valence electrons with atomic cores. The nonlocal components of pseudopotential are expressed in the fully separable form of Kleiman and Bylander[34, 35]. The Perdew-Burkle-Ernzerhof form generalized gradient approximation corrections are adopted for the exchange-correction potential[36]. The atomic orbital set employed throughout is a double-ζ plus polarization function. The numerical integrals are performed and projected on a real space grid with an equivalent cutoff of 120 Ry for calculating the self-consistent Hamiltonian matrix elements. For boron nanowires under study, periodic boundary condition along the wire axis is employed with a lateral vacuum region larger than 25 Å to avoid the image interactions. The supercell of boron nanowires respectively contains one unit cell of α-B and β-B as translational unit growing along different directions. To determine the equilibrium configurations of these boron nanowires, we relax all atomic coordinates involved using a conjugate gradient algorithm until the maximum atomic force of less than 0.02 eV/Å is achieved. In the calculations of the total energies and the energy band structures, we use four k sampling points along the tube axis according to the Monkhorst-Pack approximation. Cohesive energy (E c ) is calculated according to the expression, E c = (Etotal− n × E B ) / n, where Etotal is the total energy of the considered boron nanowire, n is the number of B atoms, and E B is the energy of an isolated B atom.

Results and discussion

Firstly, we construct the stable configurations of the bulk α-B and β-B. The optimized configurations in the present study keep the same perfect structure as previously proposed[28, 29]. Also, according to the structural characteristic of the bulk α-B and β-B, in the following study, six possible representative nanowires are considered. Three were obtained from the unit cell of α-B, growing along three base vectors, respectively. The other three were from the unit cell of β-B, also growing respectively along the base vectors. The corresponding boron nanowires are denoted according to the based bulk boron and their growth direction, named by α-a [100], α-b [010], α-c [001], β-a [100], β-b [010], and β-c [001]. For all these constructed boron nanowires, we perform a complete geometry optimization including spin polarization. Their equilibrium configurations are respectively shown in Figure1a,b,c,d,e,f, where the left and right are respectively the side and top views for the same configuration. These results thus reveal that the optimized configurations of the six under-considered boron nanowires still keep the same perfect B-B bond structure as those in the bulk boron. To evaluate the stability of these boron nanowires, we calculate their cohesive energies by determining the cohesive energies according to the definition discussed previously. The calculated cohesive energies are listed in the first column of Table1. For comparison, in Table1, we also give the cohesive energies calculated at the same theoretical level of the bulk α-B and β-B. A negative cohesive energy value indicates that the chemical energies processed to form the boron nanowires are exothermic in reaction. The cohesive energies of all the considered boron nanowires are negative and have the absolute value larger than 6.70 eV/atom. This indicates that the dispersive B atoms prefer to bind together and form novel nanostructures, which can be seen from literatures about the multi-shaped one-dimensional nanowires[2127]. Simultaneously, by comparison, the cohesive energies of the considered boron nanowires are a little smaller than those of the bulk α-B and β-B, which are the two most stable of the various B bulks. Therefore, we conclude that all these under-considered boron nanowires are chemically stable. However, due to the relatively higher cohesive energy, some of the considered boron nanowires may be metastable, and experimental researchers need to seek the path of synthesizing these materials. Nevertheless, the typical one-dimensional structural characteristic and the attractive electronic and magnetic properties, as shown below, may stimulate experimental efforts in searching for a synthesizing path of this material.

Figure 1
figure 1

Optimized configurations of the considered boron nanowires (red circles). (a) α-a [100], (b) α-b [010], (c) α-c [001], (d) β-a [100], (e) β-b [010], and (f) β-c [001]. Herein, for the same configuration, the left and right are respectively corresponding to the side and top views.

Table 1 Cohesive energies and total magnetic moments of considered boron nanowires and of bulk α-B and β-B

To lend further understanding of the nature of the boron nanowires considered above, we studied the electronic structures of all configurations using the spin-polarized calculations. The calculated total magnetic moments of the six nanowires are listed in the second column of Table1. It is obvious that for the three boron nanowires obtained from the unit cell of α-B, the nanowires α-a [100] and α-b [010] have the total magnetic moments of approximately equal to zero, while the nanowire α-c [001] has a distinctly different total magnetic moment of 1.98 μB. Moreover, for the three boron nanowires obtained from the unit cell of β-B, the same trend about the total magnetic moments occurs. The nanowires β-a [100] and α-b [010] both have the total magnetic moments also approximately equal to zero, and the nanowire β-c [001] has the total magnetic moments of 2.62 μB. Additionally, in Table1, we also presented the calculated total magnetic moments of bulk α-B and β-B. Thus, these results indicate that both of the two kinds of boron bulks have no magnetism, with the total magnetic moments equal to zero.

For the two magnetic nanowires, α-c [001] and β-c [001], we also set the initial spin configurations to the antiferromagnetic (AFM) order. The difference of the total energy between AFM and ferromagnetic (FM) (ΔE = EAFM − EFM) is 0.031 and 0.100 eV, respectively, corresponding to nanowires α-c [001] and β-c [001]. This result indicates that both of the two magnetic nanowires are in the FM ground state. To lend further understanding about magnetic properties of the considered boron nanowires, we calculate the projected total electronic density of states for all considered boron nanowires, as plotted in Figure2. Clearly, we can see that for both of the two magnetic nanowires, the majority (spin-up) state and minority (spin-down) state are not compensated, which resulted in the residue of net spin states, as seen in Figure2c,f. However, as shown in Figure2a,d,e,f, the other boron nanowires are spin-compensated, with the spin-up and spin-down states equally occupied.

Figure 2
figure 2

PDOS of the considered systems. (a) α-a [100], (b) α-b [010], (c) α-c [001], (d) β-a [100], (e) β-b [010], and (f) β-c [001]. Positive and negative values represent the DOSs projected on the spin up and down, respectively. The Fermi levels are denoted by the vertical dashed line.

To pursue the physical origin of the magnetic moments of the two magnetic boron nanowires, we plot the isosurface of spin density of the supercells of the two magnetic boron nanowires, respectively, as shown in Figure3a,b. The isovalue is set to 0.30 e/Å3. It thus is obvious that for the boron nanowire α-c [001], the total magnetic moment of the system is essentially contributed from the atoms near two vertexes of one diagonals of the cross section. The spin density is symmetrically distributed around the two ends of the diagonals. For the boron nanowire β-c [001], the spin density is mainly distributed near one vertex of the diagonals in the cross section, which is in agreement with the previous report[37]. The key to understand why the magnetic boron nanowires have the magnetic moments around the vertexes of one diagonals of the cross section is the atomic structural characteristic and especially the structural deformation of the magnetic boron nanowires tailored from the bulk boron. By analyzing, we find out that the reasons of the induced magnetic moments are mainly from two aspects. One is the unsaturated chemical bonds of the atoms at the vertexes of the diagonal, which make the electron states redistributed and cause the asymmetry of the spin-up and spin-down states. Another aspect is the local magnetic moments around the ends of the diagonal act by the interaction of spin-spin coupling, which enhances the total magnetic moments of the two magnetic boron nanowires and makes them show distinct and much larger total magnetic moments.

Figure 3
figure 3

The isosurface of spin density ρ=ρρof the supercells of the two magnetic boron nanowires (red circles). (a) α-c [001] and (b) β-c [001]. The isovalue is set to 0.30 e/Å3.

To complete the description of the study on boron nanowires, it is important to analyze their electronic properties of all configurations. The electronic energy band structure of the considered boron nanowires are shown in Figure4, in which the Fermi levels are denoted by the dashed line in this figure. Herein, for boron nanowires having no magnetic moments, we recalculated the band structure by performing DFT without spin polarization, as shown in Figure4a,b,d,e. While for both of the two magnetic nanowires, we give the band structures calculated using the spin-polarized DFT. The calculated band energy structures are shown in Figure4c,f, wherein the left and right respectively represent the bands of spin-up and spin-down electron states. Clearly, we can see that most of the boron nanowires under study are metallic with the electronic energy bands across the EF, as shown in Figure4. However, as seen in Figure4c, the band structure of the boron nanowire α-c [001] is obviously different from that of the other metallic nanowires. In detail, the boron nanowire α-c [001] is a narrow bandgap semiconductor with a direct energy gap of 0.19 eV at X point. Due to the well-known shortcoming of DFT in describing the excited states, DFT calculations are always used to understand the bandgaps of materials. Therefore, the bandgap value, 0.19 eV, obtained from the present calculations may be underestimated. However, this value clearly indicates that the electronic property of the boron nanowire α-c [001] is distinct from that of the bulk boron and other under-considered boron nanowires. In addition, the electronic properties of these considered boron nanowires obtained from the unit cell of the bulk α-B are also direction-dependent. Thus, these results of direction dependence of the electronic and magnetic properties of boron nanowires would be reflected on the photoelectronic properties of these materials and bring them to have many promising applications that are novel for the bulk boron.

Figure 4
figure 4

The band structures near the Fermi level. (a) α-a [100], (b) α-b [010], (c) α-c [001], (d) β-a [100], (e) β-b [010], and (f) β-c [001]. For (c) and (f), the left and right respectively represent the bands of spin-up and spin-down electrons. The dashed lines represent the Fermi level EF.


In summary, we have performed a systematic study of the stability and electronic and magnetic properties of boron nanowires using the spin-polarized density functional calculations and found that the considered boron nanowires possess the direction dependence of ferromagnetic and semiconducting behaviors, which are distinctly different from those of the boron bulk that is metallic and not magnetic. The physical origins of ferromagnetic and semiconducting properties of boron nanowires were pursued and attributed to the unique surface structures of boron nanowires. Thus, these theoretical findings seem to open a window toward the applications of boron nanowires in electronics, optoelectronics, and spin electronics.


  1. Evans MH, Joannopoulos JD, Pantelides ST: Electronic and mechanical properties of planar and tubular boron structures. Phys Rev B 2005, 72: 045434–045439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kunstmann J, Quandt A: Broad boron sheets and boron nanotubes: an ab initio study of structural, electronic, and mechanical properties. Phys Rev B 2006, 74: 035413–035426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lau KC, Pati R, Pandey R, Pineda AC: First-principles study of the stability and electronic properties of sheets and nanotubes of elemental boron. Chem Phys Lett 2006, 418: 549–554. 10.1016/j.cplett.2005.10.104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cabria I, López MJ, Alonso JA: Density functional calculations of hydrogen adsorption on boron nanotubes and boron sheets. Nanotechnology 2006, 17: 778–786. 10.1088/0957-4484/17/3/027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Szwacki NG, Sadrzadeh A, Yakobson BI: B80 fullerene: an ab initio prediction of geometry, stability, and electronic structure. Phys Rev Lett 2007, 98: 166804–166807.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Tang H, Ismail-Beigi S: Novel precursors for boron nanotubes: the competition of two-center and three-center bonding in boron sheets. Phys Rev Lett 2007, 99: 115501–115504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Yang X, Ding Y, Ni J: Ab initio prediction of stable boron sheets and boron nanotubes: structure, stability, and electronic properties. Phys Rev B 2008, 77: 041402–041405. R.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Singh AK, Sadrzadeh A, Yakobson BI: Probing properties of boron α-tubes by ab initio calculations. Nano Lett 2008, 8: 1314–1317. 10.1021/nl073295o

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Prasad DLVK, Jemmis ED: Stuffing improves the stability of fullerenelike boron clusters. Phys Rev Lett 2008, 100: 165504–165507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Szwacki NG: Boron fullerenes: a first-principles study. Nanoscale Res Lett 2008, 3: 49–54. 10.1007/s11671-007-9113-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lau KC, Orlando R, Pandey R: First-principles study of crystalline bundles of single-walled boron nanotubes with small diameter. J Phys Condens Matter 2008, 20: 1–10. 125202 125202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Yan QB, Zheng QR, Su G: Face-centered-cubic B80 metal: density functional theory calculations. Phys Rev B 2008, 77: 224106–224110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zope RR, Baruah T, Lau KC, Liu AY, Pederdon MR, Dunlap BI: Boron fullerenes: from B80 to hole doped boron sheets. Phys Rev B 2009, 79: 161403R.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Otten CJ, Lourie OR, Yu MF, Cowley JM, Dyer MJ, Ruoff RS, Buhro WE: Crystalline boron nanowires. J Am Chem Soc 2002, 124: 4564–4565. 10.1021/ja017817s

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wang YQ, Duan XF, Cao LM, Wang WK: One-dimensional growth mechanism of amorphous boron nanowires. Chem Phys Lett 2002, 359: 273–277. 10.1016/S0009-2614(02)00732-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang DW, Lu JG, Otten CJ, Buhro WE: Electrical transport in boron nanowires. Appl Phys Lett 2003, 83: 5280–5282. 10.1063/1.1630380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Yun SH, Dibos A, Wu JZ, Kim DK: Effect of quench on crystallinity and alignment of boron nanowires. Appl Phys Lett 2004, 84: 2892–2894. 10.1063/1.1705720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gindulyte A, Lipscomb WN, Massa L: Proposed boron nanotubes. Inorg Chem 1998, 37: 6544–6545. 10.1021/ic980559o

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Boustani I, Quandt A, Hernandez E, Rubio A: New boron based nanostructured materials. J Chem Phys 1999, 110: 3176–3185. 10.1063/1.477976

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kunstmann J, Quandt A: Constricted boron nanotubes. Chem Phys Lett 2005, 402: 21–26. 10.1016/j.cplett.2004.11.130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Liu F, Tian JF, Bao LH, Yang TZ, Shen CM, Lai XY, Xie WG, Deng SZ, Chen J, She JC, Xu NS, Gao HJ: Fabrication of vertically aligned single-crystalline boron nanowire arrays and investigation of their field-emission behavior. Adv Mater 2008, 20: 2609–2615. 10.1002/adma.200800137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Yun SH, Wu JZ, Dibos A, Zou XD, Karlsson UO: Self-assembled boron nanowire Y-junctions. Nano Lett 2006, 6: 385–389. 10.1021/nl052138r

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Cao LM, Zhang Z, Sun LL, Gao CX, He M, Wang YQ, Li YC, Zhang XY, Li G, Zhang J, Wang WK: Well-aligned boron nanowire arrays. Adv Mater 2001, 13: 1701–1704. 10.1002/1521-4095(200111)13:22<1701::AID-ADMA1701>3.0.CO;2-Q

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Sun LL, Matsuoka T, Tamari Y, Tian JF, Tian Y, Zhang CD, Shen CM, Yi W, Gao HJ, Li JQ, Dong XL, Zhao ZX: Pressure-induced superconducting state in crystalline boron nanowires. Phys Rev B 2009, 79: 140505–140508. R.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Li ZZ, Baca J, Wu J: In situ switch of boron nanowire growth mode from vapor–liquid–solid to oxide-assisted growth. Appl Phys Lett 2008, 92: 113104–113106. 10.1063/1.2890165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Yun SH, Wu JZ, Dibos A, Zou XD, Karlsson UO: Growth of inclined boron nanowire bundle arrays in an oxide-assisted vapor–liquid–solid process. Appl Phys Lett 2005, 87: 113109–113111. 10.1063/1.2046728

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Cao LM, Hahn K, Scheu C, Ruhle M, Wang YQ, Zhang Z, Gao CX, Li YC, Zhang XY, He M, Sun LL, Wang WK: Template-catalyst-free growth of highly ordered boron nanowire arrays. Appl Phys Lett 2002, 80: 4226–4428. 10.1063/1.1483131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Setten MJV, Uijttewaal MA, Wijs GAD, Groot RAD: Thermodynamic stability of boron: the role of defects and zero point motion. J Am Chem Soc 2007, 129: 2458–2465. 10.1021/ja0631246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Shang SL, Wang Y, Arroyave R, Liu ZK: Phase stability in α- and β-rhombohedral boron. Phys Rev B 2007, 75: 092101–092104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ordejón P, Artacho E, Soler JM: Self-consistent order-N density-functional calculations for very large systems. Phys Rev B 1996, 53: R10441-R10444. 10.1103/PhysRevB.53.R10441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Sánchez-Portal D, Ordejón P, Artacho E, Soler JM: Density-functional method for very large systems with LCAO basis sets. Int J Quantum Chem 1997, 65: 453–461. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-461X(1997)65:5<453::AID-QUA9>3.0.CO;2-V

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Soler JM, Artacho E, Gale JD, Garcia A, Junquera J, Ordejón P, Sánchez-Portal D: The SIESTA method for ab initio order-N materials simulation. J Phys Condens Matter 2002, 14: 2745–2779. 10.1088/0953-8984/14/11/302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Troullier N, Martins JL: Efficient pseudopotentials for plane-wave calculations. Phys Rev B 1991, 43: 1993–2006. 10.1103/PhysRevB.43.1993

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Bylander DM, Kleinman L: 4f Resonances with norm-conserving pseudopotentials. Phys Rev B 1990, 41: 907–912. 10.1103/PhysRevB.41.907

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Perdew JP, Burke K, Ernzerhof M: Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys Rev Lett 1996, 77: 3865–3868. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Monkhorst HJ, Pack JD: Special points for Brillouin-zone integrations. Phys Rev B 1976, 13: 5188–5192. 10.1103/PhysRevB.13.5188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Zhang A, Zhu ZM, He Y, Ou YG: Structure stabilities and transitions in polyhedral metal nanocrystals: an atomic-bond-relaxation approach. Appl Phys Lett 2012, 100: 1–5. 171912 171912

    Google Scholar 

Download references


This work was supported by NSFC (U0734004 and 11004254), China Postdoc. Sci. Fund (201003387), GDNSF (S2011040004850), and partially by Shanghai Supercomputer Center.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guowei Yang.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

This work was finished through the collaboration of all authors. JLL carried out the calculation, analyzed the calculated data, and drafted the manuscript. TH helped analyze the data and participated in revising the manuscript. GWY supervised the work and finalized the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License ( ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Li, J.L., He, T. & Yang, G. Ferromagnetism and semiconducting of boron nanowires. Nanoscale Res Lett 7, 678 (2012).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • Boron nanowires
  • Ferromagnetism
  • Semiconducting