Molecular beam epitaxy growth of peak wavelength-controlled InGaAs/AlGaAs quantum wells for 4.3-μm mid-wavelength infrared detection
© Shi et al.; licensee Springer. 2013
Received: 29 May 2013
Accepted: 26 June 2013
Published: 3 July 2013
InGaAs/AlGaAs multiple quantum wells used for 4.3 μm mid-wavelength infrared quantum well infrared detectors were grown by molecular beam epitaxy. In composition loss was observed and quantitatively studied by high-resolution X-ray diffraction technology. By this In composition loss effect, the energy band engineering on the photo-response wavelength is not easily achieved. A thin AlGaAs barrier grown at low temperature is used to suppress the In atom desorption, and this growth process was verified to be able to adjust the photo-response wavelength as designed by energy band engineering in the photocurrent spectrum.
Infrared detector technology is one of most important opto-electric devices. It has been developed from bulk material to the quantum well structure [1, 2]. The 3 ~ 5 μm middle-wavelength-infrared (MWIR) region is of particular interest in the fields of scientific research, aerial reconnaissance, and missile tracking. The dominant detector in this wavelength field is still HgCdTe (MCT) due to its high quantum efficiency and lower thermal generation rate. However, due to the high density of defect in the MCT material, it is difficult to reduce the dark current of the MCT device . The quantum well infrared photodetector (QWIP) is fabricated from a GaAs-based material, which is expected to have lower dark current due to the mature process on both the material and device for GaAs [4, 5].
GaAs-based InGaAs/AlGaAs QWIP working in the MWIR region is studied [6–9]. Low dark current of a few pA was measured in MWIR QWIP based on InGaAs/AlGaAs-strained quantum well grown on GaAs substrates . Recently, a 28% quantum efficiency and a detectivity D* = 7 × 1011 Jones at 77 K were reported in a InGaAs/AlGaAs QWIP working below 4.1 μm .
Nevertheless, the huge difference of the growth window for the InGaAs and AlGaAs materials and the easy desorption of the In atom make such multiple quantum well system hard to fabricate . Generally, the typical growth temperature of AlGaAs barrier should be higher than 600°C, and the In atom in the InGaAs quantum well starts the desorption at around 520°C [13–15]. This intrinsic property makes the In composition in the InGaAs quantum well quite unstable when increasing the temperature to grow the followed AlGaAs barrier. Besides, the high mobility of In atoms at the substrate made the surface morphology of InGaAs layer very sensitive to the growth parameters . These problems would make the precise peak wavelength control difficult since the absorption peak wavelength is very sensitive to the structural characteristics of QWIP, such as the In composition and its profiles in the quantum well [17, 18]. It is important to control the In composition profiles in the InGaAs/AlGaAs quantum well structure growth for optimizing the MIRW-QWIP device.
In this work, the In desorption behavior in the molecular-beam-epitaxy (MBE) growth of InGaAs/AlGaAs MWIR QWIP was studied. With low-temperature capping technology of a thin AlGaAs, the In composition can be well controlled.
The samples in this work were grown on a Si-GaAs substrate by a VG-80H MBE system and divided into two groups assigned as groups I and II. The growth rates were firstly determined by reflection high-energy electron diffraction and finely calibrated by X-ray diffraction (XRD) and photoluminescence (PL) measurement.
In order to demonstrate the effect of a low-temperature thin AlGaAs capping layer on suppressing the In desorption, group II including samples D, E, and F were grown. All the three samples were designed to have the same structure with a peak absorption wavelength from the inter-subband transition in InGaAs/AlGaAs quantum wells around 4.3 μm. The layer sequence of the sample structure is 1 μm Si-GaAs bottom contact layer, 20 periods of quantum wells consisting of 50 nm Al0.4Ga0.6As barrier, 0.5 nm GaAs, 2.7 nm In0.3Ga0.7As, and 0.5 nm GaAs. Then, 500 nm Si-GaAs top contact layer was grown to finish the structure. The growing details of samples D and E were displayed in Figure 1c,d, respectively. Finally, we prepared another sample F using the same growth procedure of sample E.
Results and discussions
Considering the obvious growth temperature difference between InGaAs and AlGaAs, it is wise to grow InGaAs quantum well under low temperature, then increase the growth temperature to grow the AlGaAs barrier in order to achieve best crystal quality. It is without a doubt that such growth procedure will decrease the In composition in the InGaAs quantum well. However, if the In atom desorption behavior is predictable and repeatable, it is still possible to grow a determined In composition quantum well through the growth of an InGaAs layer with higher In composition to compensate the In loss during the increase of substrate temperature. So, we firstly design an experiment to study such phenomenon.
Because both the quantum well composition and thickness contribute to the inter-band transition energy, it is impossible to determine the structural characteristics of the quantum well by PL directly. Besides, the InGaAs quantum well is as thin as around 2.7 nm in the 4.3 μm QWIP, it is also very hard to measure the precise composition by XRD technology. In order to quantitatively explore the In composition-losing behavior in the quantum well, samples A and B were grown. For sample A, 2.7-nm-thin InGaAs layer was grown at 500°C, then the substrate temperature was increased to 610°C to simulate the In desorption behavior during the growth of the InGaAs/AlGaAs quantum wells. Afterwards, the growth temperature was quickly lowered to 500°C. Then, the same growth procedure was repeated 20 times to obtain a nominal 54-nm-thick InGaAs layer for the XRD testing. Meanwhile, for sample B, a 54-nm-thick InGaAs layer was directly grown on the GaAs substrate at 500°C.
As can be easily predicted, the In composition of sample A is lower than sample B. The 30% In composition was measured in sample B, but this value dropped to about 15% in sample A. These results show an average In atom loss of around 50% in the InGaAs quantum well during the growth temperature increase. In order to check the reproducibility of such process, another sample assigned as sample C was grown with identical growth parameter to sample A. However, 17% In composition was obtained this time. According to the intra-band energy calculated by the transfer matrix method, a change of ±2% of around 20% In composition would lead to an absorption peak wavelength shift of around 0.3 μm . Considering the relative narrow absorption peak of QWIP comparing with MCT and other inter-band absorption detectors, such error must be a huge block for the application of the InGaAs/AlGaAs MWIR QWIP in some fields where a precise control in the absorption peak position was required such as MWIR laser detection and CO2 monitor.
To further explore the absorption peak control issue of this system serving as middle-wavelength-infrared photodetector, first, sample D was grown using the strategy that the growth temperature was increased to 610°C as soon as the InGaAs well finished for growing the whole AlGaAs barrier. It has already been proven above that such procedure would cause great In composition loss and had no reproducibility. Unlike sample D, another strategy was applied to prepare sample E: after the InGaAs well was grown, a thin 5-nm AlGaAs barrier was pre-deposited at the InGaAs growth temperature (500°C), and then the substrate temperature was quickly risen to 610°C to grow the remaining barrier. At the same time, in order to characterize the reproducibility in peak absorption wavelength of the new strategy, sample F was made a replicate of sample E.
The In composition loss was found to be a serious problem in the fabrication of InGaAs/AlGaAs QWIP devices due to its unavoidability and unrepeatability. In this study, it was demonstrated that using a thin AlGaAs layer grown at low temperature could successfully prevent the In composition from losing. Highly reproducible peak response wavelengths of InGaAs/AlGaAs QWIP demonstrate the well-controlled structural characteristics of InGaAs quantum well.
This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 61106013 and 61275107), the National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (Grant nos. 2009AA033101 and 2013AA031903), and the National Basic Research Program of China (Grant nos. 2010-CB327501 and 2011CB925604).
- Rogalski A: Recent progress in third generation infrared detectors. J Mod Opt 2010, 57(18):1716–1730. 10.1080/09500340.2010.486485View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Shen S: Comparison and competition between MCT and QW structure material for use in IR detectors. Microelectron J 1994, 25(8):713–739. 10.1016/0026-2692(94)90136-8View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hu W, Chen X, Ye Z, Lu W: A hybrid surface passivation on HgCdTe long wave infrared detector with in-situ CdTe deposition and high-density hydrogen plasma modification. Appl Phys Lett 2011, 99(9):091101. 10.1063/1.3633103View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Li N, Xiong DY, Yang XF, Lu W, Xu W-L, Yang C-L, Hou Y, Fu Y: Dark currents of GaAs/AlGaAs quantum-well infrared photodetectors. Applied Physics A 2007, 89(3):701–705. 10.1007/s00339-007-4142-2View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Xiong DY, Li N, Xu WL, Yin F, Lu W: A new resonant tunnelling structure of integrated InGaAs/GaAs very-long-wavelength quantum-well infrared photodetector. Chin Phys Lett 2007, 24(11):3283. 10.1088/0256-307X/24/11/071View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Schneider H, Maier T, Fleissner J, Walther M, Koidl R, Weimann G, Cabanski W, Finck M, Menger P, Rode W, Ziegler J: High-resolution 3–5 μm/8–12 μm dual-band quantum well infrared photodetector array. Electron Lett 2004, 40(13):831–833. 10.1049/el:20040555View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Goldberg AC, Kennerly SW, Little JW, Shafer TA, Mears CL, Schaake HF, Winn M, Taylor M, Uppal PN: Comparison of HgCdTe and quantum-well infrared photodetector dual-band focal plane arrays. Opt Eng 2003, 42(1):30–46. 10.1117/1.1526106View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gunapala SD, Bandara SV, Singh A, Liu JK, Rafol SB, Luong EM, Mumolo JM, Tran NQ, Ting DZY, Vincent JD, Shott CA, Long J, LeVan PD: 640× 486 long-wavelength two-color GaAs/AlGaAs quantum well infrared photodetector (QWIP) focal plane array camera. IEEE Trans Electron Dev 2000, 47(5):963–971. 10.1109/16.841227View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rogalski A: Dual-band infrared detectors. J Infrared Millimet Waves 2000, 19(4):241–258.Google Scholar
- Fiore A, Rosencher E, Bois P, Nagle J, Laurent N: Strained InGaAs/AlGaAs quantum well infrared detectors at 4.5 μm. Appl Phys Lett 1994, 64(4):478–480. 10.1063/1.111135View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nedelcu A, Gueriaux V, Dua L, Marcadet X: A high performance quantum-well infrared photodetector detecting below 4.1 μm. Semicond Sci Technol 2009, 24(4):045006. 10.1088/0268-1242/24/4/045006View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wu J, Wang ZMM, Holmes K, Marega E, Mazur YI, Salamo GJ: Ordered quantum-ring chains grown on a quantum-dot superlattice template. J Nanopart Res 2012, 14(6):919.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Heiblum M, Mendez EE, Osterling L: Growth by molecular beam epitaxy and characterization of high purity GaAs and AlGaAs. J Appl Phys 1983, 54(12):6982–6988. 10.1063/1.332015View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tian HT, Wang L, Shi ZW, Gao HJ, Zhang SH, Wang WX, Chen H: Effect of self-assembled InAs islands on the interfacial roughness of optical-switched resonant tunneling diode. Nanoscale Res Lett 2012, 7: 128. 10.1186/1556-276X-7-128View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Li ZH, Wu J, Wang ZMM, Fan DS, Guo A, Li SB, Yu SQ, Manasreh O, Salamo GJ: InGaAs quantum well grown on high-index surfaces for superluminescent diode applications. Nanoscale Res Lett 2010, 5(6):1079–1084. 10.1007/s11671-010-9605-2View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wu J, Wang ZMM, Holmes K, Marega E, Zhou ZH, Li HD, Mazur YI, Salamo GJ: Laterally aligned quantum rings: from one-dimensional chains to two-dimensional arrays. Appl Phys Lett 2012, 100(20):203117. 10.1063/1.4719519View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Choi KK, Bandara SV, Gunapala SD, Liu WK, Fastenau JM: Detection wavelength of InGaAs/AlGaAs quantum wells and superlattices. J Appl Phys 2002, 91(2):551–564. 10.1063/1.1421216View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Xiong DY, Li N, Li ZF, Zhen HL, Lu W: Detection wavelength of strained InxGa1-x As/GaAs very-long-wavelength quantum well infrared photodetectors. Chin Phys Lett 2007, 24(5):1403. 10.1088/0256-307X/24/5/077View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Vandenberg JM, Hamm RA, Panish MB, Temkin H: High‒resolution X‒ray diffraction studies of InGaAs (P)/InP superlattices grown by gas‒source molecular‒beam epitaxy. J Appl Phys 1987, 62(4):1278–1283. 10.1063/1.339681View ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.