Skip to main content

Nanoscale observation of surface potential and carrier transport in Cu2ZnSn(S,Se)4 thin films grown by sputtering-based two-step process


Stacked precursors of Cu-Zn-Sn-S were grown by radio frequency sputtering and annealed in a furnace with Se metals to form thin-film solar cell materials of Cu2ZnSn(S,Se)4 (CZTSSe). The samples have different absorber layer thickness of 1 to 2 μm and show conversion efficiencies up to 8.06%. Conductive atomic force microscopy and Kelvin probe force microscopy were used to explore the local electrical properties of the surface of CZTSSe thin films. The high-efficiency CZTSSe thin film exhibits significantly positive bending of surface potential around the grain boundaries. Dominant current paths along the grain boundaries are also observed. The surface electrical parameters of potential and current lead to potential solar cell applications using CZTSSe thin films, which may be an alternative choice of Cu(In,Ga)Se2.

PACS number: 08.37.-d; 61.72.Mm; 71.35.-y


Cu2ZnSn(S,Se)4 (CZTSSe) quaternary semiconductors attract a lot of interest for thin-film solar cells[1]. Competition in the solar cell market is nowadays hard-hitting, so it is getting more concern on the cost in the manufacturing of the thin-film solar cells. CZTSSe consists of relatively cheap and earth-abundant elements of Zn and Sn. In contrast, Cu(In,Ga)Se2 (CIGS), which is now mostly promising for commercialization, has expensive and rare elements of In and Ga. CZTSSe shows high absorption coefficient and the band gap of it can be tuned with changing S and Se composition.

So far, the highest conversion efficiency of CZTSSe is reported as 11.1% in non-vacuum process with hydrazine[2] and 9.2% in vacuum process by co-evaporation[3, 4]. Very recently, Solar Frontier announced the conversion efficiency of 10.8% in the CZTSSe solar cell module of 14 cm2[5], which indicates presumably 12 to 13% of the conversion efficiency in the cell level. For large area deposition, sputtering methods have an advantage in production of CZTS-based solar cells[6, 7]. It is likely that compound sources such as ZnS and SnS can improve adhesion between the substrate and the thin film during deposition. Moreover, it is believed that the method can increase grain size, control composition, and improve surface morphology of precursors[8, 9]. In order to put Se into the as-grown CZTS stacked precursors, optimization of annealing conditions of the precursors in Se atmosphere is decisively important. In previous reports, the different stacking orders of precursors determine the crystallinity and grain growth of the CZTSSe thin films[10, 11]. The results showed dense morphology and little voids on surface in case of Cu/SnS/ZnS/Mo/glass[12, 13].

There are some models to exhibit the advantageous properties of grain boundaries (GBs) of polycrystalline CIGS. Jiang et al. proposed that GBs acting as a factor to improve cell performance contrary to single-crystal solar cells by scanning probe characterization. GBs of CIGS drive majority carriers to repel out of the regime, which results in suppression of recombination[14, 15]. Yan et al. suggested that GBs in CIGS electrically benign and not harmful to photovoltaic due to not creating deep levels[16]. On the other hand, valence band maximum at GBs acts as hole barriers, it reduces recombination at GBs[17]. Recently, Abou-Ras et al. identified Se-Se-terminated Σ3{112} twin boundaries, indicating that Cu is depleted and In is enriched in the two atomic planes next to the twin boundary by high-resolution scanning transmission electron microscopy and electron energy-loss spectroscopy[18]. Takahashi group in Japan also reported that downward band bending of the conduction band and broadening of the band gap near GBs are observed by photo-assisted Kelvin probe force microscopy. It accounts for photo-carriers well separate and suppress the recombination at GBs[19]. Therefore, we have to investigate carefully carrier transport at GB in CZTSSe thin films, which is not yet clearly identified for the role of GBs. We already reported positive potential bending of GBs on CZTSe thin films, grown by electron co-evaporation, which showed 2% to 3% of conversion efficiency[20]. In this study, we investigate sputtered CZTSSe thin-film solar cells, which exhibit better device performance than the previous samples. We report local carrier transport and surface potential of CZTSSe thin films using conductive atomic force microscopy (C-AFM) and Kelvin probe force microscopy (KPFM), respectively. For the complete understanding of the behaviors at GBs in CIGS films, recombination at GBs is diminished also due to downward band bending reduced density of deep-level in-gap states (i.e., recombination centers) and expect relatively efficient minority-carrier collection at GBs, as shown by scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) measurements[21, 22]. Future analysis using STM can be addressed for GBs of CZTSSe thin films.


CZTSSe thin films were grown on Mo-coated soda-lime glass substrates. The metal precursor layers were deposited by radio frequency sputtering using Cu, ZnS and SnS targets. The staking order of the precursors in this study was Cu/SnS/ZnS/Mo/glass. Thickness of each stacked layer was changed from 0.4 to 0.7 μm. After the deposition, the precursors were annealed with Se metals in a furnace at 590°C for 20 min. Thickness of the annealed CZTSSe film was 1.8 μm for this study. From X-ray diffraction, the film shows single phase of CZTSSe without any significant second phases. We obtained the final composition is Cu/(Zn + Sn) ~ 0.94 and Zn/Sn ~ 1.65 of CZTSSe thin films by energy dispersive spectrometry (EDS). S/Se ratio is estimated to be approximately 0.1. The grain size indicates 1 to 2 μm of the CZTSSe thin film investigated by field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM) (JSM-700 F).

KPFM and C-AFM measurements were carried out using a commercial AFM (n-Tracer, Nanofocus Inc., Seoul, South Korea). KPFM has been used widely for metals and semiconductors to characterize electrical properties of the surfaces at nanoscale. From KPFM measurement, we obtain contact potential difference (CPD) between a metallic AFM tip and a sample which is denoted as VCPD. VCPD can be defined as Equation (1) and identical as the work function difference between the tip and the sample if there are no defect states on the surface of the sample. If the tip approaches to the sample surface, electrostatic force is getting stronger between the tip and the sample surface. When the tip is close enough to the sample surface, Fermi levels of the tip and the sample will be aligned and become equilibrium state but the vacuum levels are not the same[23]. The external bias DC voltage (VDC) nullifies VCPD as shown in Figure 1a. A Pt/Ir-coated tip was used for C-AFM and KPFM (Nano sensor). The surface potential and topography were determined under a non-contact mode by applying AC voltage with amplitude of 1 V (peak to peak) and frequency of 70 kHz to get clear images and sufficient sensitivity. The AC voltage will lead to an oscillating force to the tip. The feedback loop adjusted the DC potential to nullify the VCPD component by applied DC bias to the tip, so we can obtain the two-dimensional surface potential image. The topography images were obtained by using the noncontact mode at a resonant frequency of the probe of about 73.84 kHz. The scanning rate was with 0.5 Hz to minimize topological signal and samples were not damaged performing these measurements. A lock-in amplifier was operated with a sensitivity of the 100 mV/nA.

Figure 1

Schematic illustration of (a) Kelvin probe force microscopy and (b) conductive atomic force microscopy.

V CPD = φ tip φ sample e

Current maps were obtained at contact mode with applying external constant voltage 0.2 V on the samples in a 5 × 5 μm2 scanning areas shown in Figure 1b. The Mo layer is used for back contact which was connected to a metal-coated conducting probe that is ground. Silver paste was used for the electrical contact for this measurement. A contact force of 1 nN was applied onto a probe for the scanning area and the scanning time was set at 500 ms for each line to acquire a local current map measurement. Local current maps can be measured simultaneously together between sample and tips. The AFM laser has the wavelength of 633 nm (E = 1.95 eV) is above the band gap of CZTSSe films (E = 1.0 to 1.1 eV). Thus, the photon energy is greater than the band gap of the CZTSSe layer, the power of laser is low which does not affect photo-current contribution significantly. Considering local current and surface potential results, we can identify local electrical properties such as GBs of the CZTSSe thin film by comparing the images of the topography with that of the surface potential and current maps.

Results and discussion

A typical device characteristic of the CZTSSe samples that are studied in this paper is summarized in Table 1. The solar cell is fabricated with n-doped CdS layer on the CZTSSe thin films. The CdS layer was formed by chemical bath deposition with 30 nm of thickness. Open circuit voltage (Voc) of the cell is small due to its low band gap and probably interface band-off between CdS and CZTSSe and the fill factor (FF) is relatively small because its carrier path and surface serial resistance are not defined well[24]. To obtain the high-efficiency solar cells, we need to improve Voc and FF.

Table 1 Device performances and composition of CZTSSe thin-film solar cell

Figure 2 shows topography, surface potential, and the line profiles of the CZTSSe thin film. Grains of the CZTSSe films are shown in Figure 2a. The grains seem to possess small particulates. In Figure 2b, yellow region represents positive potential value and blue region indicates negative potential value. The one-dimensional line profiles in Figure 2c project the blue line of Figure 2a,b. In Figure 2c, the CZTSSe thin film reveals high positive surface potential near GBs. CIGS thin films form positively charged GBs which is related to negative band bending. The negative energy bending near GBs improves carrier separation and suppresses recombination of electron–hole pairs at GBs[14, 15] because holes tend to be kept away from the GB region. However, the minority-carrier electrons are moving into the GBs, which might be a trade-off for carrier migration to the electrodes. It is desirable to study carrier transport in the intragrains (IGs) as well as the GBs. Surface potential distribution in the CZTSSe thin film shows similar behaviors to the CIGS thin films. The potential near GBs in the CZTSSe thin film indicates about 300 mV and negative potential about −100 to −200 mV at IGs, which is linked to negative band bending on GBs of the CZTSSe thin film. This is consistent with the fact that some of the minority carriers (electron) transferred to and collected at GBs in the CZTSe thin film[25]. Thus, electron–hole carriers separate effectively on GBs of CZTSSe thin film not acting as recombination center, which is a similar phenomenon occurring in CIGS. In order to clarify the relationship between topography and surface potential, we introduce a topographic parameter Φ = d2H/dX2. H is the height and X is the lateral direction. So the second derivative of H with respect to X means the concave or the convex shapes of the surface topography. Since Φ is an indicative of the surface alterations of the films, we can expect the positive value as GBs and the negative as IGs. From this parameter, we are able to ascertain roughly the region of GBs on the surface. Some groups claim that additional information like electron beam backscattered diffraction (EBSD) is required to confirm the granular nature of the local regions[26]. However, our approach is also widely acceptable for inspection of the surface topography and potential. The experimental results on the relationship between potential and surface are verified, but the implications of the relationship will be further investigated in particular for the regard of conversion efficiency.

Figure 2

Topography (a), corresponding potential images (b), and one-dimensional line profile (c) of the CZTSSe thin film.

Conductive atomic force microscopy

Figure 3 shows topography, current map, and the line profiles of the CZTSSe thin film. Local current flows up to larger than 6 nA on GBs in the CZTSSe thin film. In case of CIGS, magnitude of current showed about 2 nA under the sample external voltage of 0.2 V[27]. The CZTSSe thin film exhibits local current flowing mostly near the GBs as displayed in Figure 3c. Local current routes are formed near the GBs of the CZTSSe thin film. The one-dimensional line profile shows the current flows at the edge of the grains. Similar current distribution was observed in the GBs of the CIGS thin films[28, 29]. Azulay et al. proposed that higher dark current flow through the GBs because of higher hole mobility on the GBs and then inversion of the dominant carrier type at the GBs[29]. Therefore, electrons can become dominant carriers in GBs and drift along GBs of the CIGS thin films[27, 29]. From C-AFM measurement, we can suggest that collected minority carriers form local current route through the near GBs in the case of the CZTSSe thin film, indicating that it is possible that carrier type inversion can also happen in the CZTSSe thin films.

Figure 3

Topography (a), corresponding current-map images (b), and one-dimensional line profile (c) of the CZTSSe thin film.

From the measurement results of KPFM and C-AFM, we found positive potential on the most of GBs and demonstrated downward band bending in the CZTSSe thin film. On the other hand, the negative potential on the GBs is linked to the upward band bending. A model of surface potential and carrier transport is described in Figure 4. The positively charged GBs play a role to be a conduction path and collect minority carriers. However, the defects in the GBs are not well known yet. So, the carriers can be trapped in the defects near the GBs[30], which may be drawbacks for high efficiency of the CZTSSe solar cells. The model of band diagram depends on charged GBs can be affected by film properties such as composition and conversion efficiency[20]. It is indispensible to understand the defect chemistry and transport near GBs of the CZTSSe. If all the understandings are well established and proper processing methods are developed, polycrystalline kesterite thin films are beneficial to device performance for solar cells.

Figure 4

A proposed band bending near the GBs of the CZTSSe thin films. The band diagram also accounts for the minority carrier transport near the GBs.


We measured surface potential and current transport of the CZTSSe thin film with Kelvin probe force microscopy and conductive atomic force microscopy, respectively. For these studies can demonstrate the essential of combining local electrical characterization techniques to investigate the local current and potential properties of kesterite materials. The surface potential near GBs shows negative band bending behaviors with about 300 meV of energy shift. In the current map, the dominant current flow path is observed through GBs, which is governed by minority carriers. Most of the electrical properties of the CZTSSe are very similar to the CIGS, but we will study more the details to explain the physical and chemical properties in the interface of the CZTSSe thin films for high conversion efficiency.



Conductive atomic force microscopy






Electron beam backscattered diffraction


Photo-conversion efficiency


Fill factor


Grain boundaries




Short circuit current


Kelvin probe force microscopy


Open circuit voltage.


  1. 1.

    Chen S, Gong XG, Walsh A, Wei S-H: Electronic structure and stability of quaternary chalcogenide semiconductors derived from cation cross-substitution of II-VI and I-III-VI2 compounds. Phys Rev B 2009, 79: 165211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Todorov TK, Tang J, Bag S, Gunawan O, Gokmen T, Zhu Y, Mitzi DB: Beyond 11% efficiency: characteristics of state-of-the-art Cu2ZnSn(S, Se)4solar cells. Adv Energy Mater 2013, 3: 34–38. 10.1002/aenm.201200348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    W-C H, Repins I, Beall C, DeHart C, To B, Yang W, Yang Y, Noufi R: Growth mechanisms of co-evaporated kesterite: a comparison of Cu-rich and Zn-rich composition paths. Prog Photovolt: Res Appl 2014, 22: 35–43. 10.1002/pip.2296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Repins I, Beall C, Vora N, DeHart C, Kuciauskas D, Dippo P, To B, Mann J, W-C H, Goodrich A, Noufi R: Co-evaporated Cu2ZnSnSe4 films and devices. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 2012, 101: 154–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Hiroi H, Sakai N, Kato T, Sugimoto H: High voltage Cu2ZnSnS4 submodules by hybrid buffer layer. In Proceedings of the IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference 39th: 16–21 June 2013. Tampa, FL;

  6. 6.

    Katagiri H, Jimbo K, Maw WS, Oishi K, Yamazaki M, Araki H, Takeuchi A: Development of CZTS-based thin film solar cells. Thin Solid Films 2009, 517: 2455–2460. 10.1016/j.tsf.2008.11.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Shin SW, Pawar SM, Park CY, Yun JH, Moon J-H, Kim JH, Lee JY: Studies on Cu2ZnSnS4 (CZTS) absorber layer using different stacking orders in precursor thin films. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 2011, 95: 3202–3206. 10.1016/j.solmat.2011.07.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Zoppi G, Forbes I, Miles RW, Dale PJ, Scragg JJ, Peter LM: Cu2ZnSnSe4 thin film solar cells produced by selenization of magnetron sputtered precursors. Prog Photovolt: Res Appl 2009, 17: 315–319. 10.1002/pip.886

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Scragg JJ, Ericson T, Fontané X, Izqierdo-Roca V, Pérez-Rodríguez A, Kubart T, Edoff M, Platze-Björkman C: Rapid annealing of reactively sputtered precursors for Cu2ZnSnS4 solar cells. Prog Photovolt: Res Appl. 2014, 22: 10–17. 10.1002/pip.2265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Momose N, Htay MT, Yudasaka T, Igarashi S, Seki T, Iwano S, Hashimoto Y, Ito K: Cu2ZnSnS4 thin film solar cells utilizing sulfurization of metallic precursor prepared by simultaneous sputtering of metal targets. Jpn J Appl Phys 2011, 50: 01BG09. 10.7567/JJAP.50.01BG09

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Araki H, Kubo Y, Mikaduki A, Jimbo K, Maw WS, Katagiri H, Yamazaki M, Oishi K, Takeuchi A: Preparation of Cu2ZnSnS4 thin films by sulfurizing electroplated precursors. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 2009, 93: 996–999. 10.1016/j.solmat.2008.11.045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Jimbo K, Kimura R, Kamimura T, Yamada S, Maw WS, Araki H, Oishi K, Katagiri H: Cu2ZnSnS4-type thin film solar cells using abundant materials. Thin Solid Films 2007, 515: 5997–5999. 10.1016/j.tsf.2006.12.103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Jackson P, Hariskos D, Lotter E, Paetel S, Wuerz R, Menner R, Wischmann W, Powalla M: New world record efficiency for Cu(In, Ga)Se2 thin-film solar cells beyond 20%. Prog Photovolt: Res Appl 2011, 19: 894–897. 10.1002/pip.1078

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Jiang C-S, Noufi R, AbuShama JA, Ramanathan K, Moutinho HR, Pankow J, Al-Jassim MM: Local built-in potential on grain boundary of Cu(In, Ga)Se2 thin film. Appl Phys Lett 2004, 84: 3477–3479. 10.1063/1.1737796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Jiang C-S, Noufi R, Ramanathan K, AbuShama JA, Moutinho HR, Al-Jassim MM: Does the local built-in potential on grain boundaries of Cu(In, Ga)Se2 thin films benefit photovoltaic performance of the device? Appl Phys Lett 2004, 85: 2625–2627. 10.1063/1.1793346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Yan Y, Jiang C-S, S–H W, Moutinho HR, Al-Jassim MM: Electrically benign behavior of grain boundaries in polycrystalline CuInSe2 Films. Phys Rev Lett 2007, 99: 235504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Persson C, Zunger A: Compositionally induced valence-band offset at the grain boundary of polycrystalline chalcopyrites creates a hole barrier. Appl Phys Lett 2005, 87: 211904. 10.1063/1.2132537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Abou-Ras D, Schaffer B, Schaffer M, Schmidt SS, Caballero R, Unold T: Direct insight into grain boundary reconstruction in polycrystalline Cu(In, Ga)Se2 with atomic resolution. Phys Rev Lett 2012, 108: 075502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Takihara M, Minemoto T, Wakisaka Y, Takahashi T: An investigation of band profile around the grain boundary of Cu(In,Ga)Se2 solar cell material by scanning probe microscopy. Prog Photovolt: Res Appl 2013, 21: 595–599.

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Jeong AR, Jo W, Jung S, Gwak J, Yun JH: Enhanced exciton separation through negative energy band bending at grain boundaries of Cu2ZnSnSe4 thin-films. Appl Phys Lett 2011, 99: 082103. 10.1063/1.3626848

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Mönig H, Smith Y, Caballero R, Kaufmann CA, Lauermann I, Lux-Steiner MC, Sadewasser S: Direct evidence for a reduced density of deep level defects at grain boundaries of Cu(In, Ga)Se2 thin films. Phys Rev Lett 2010, 105: 116802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Azulay D, Balberg I, Millio O: Microscopic evidence for the modification of the electronic structure at grain boundaries of Cu(In1-x, Gax)Se2films. Phys Rev Lett 2012, 108: 076603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Melitz W, Shen J, Kummel AC, Lee S: Kelvin probe force microscopy and its application. Surf Sci Rep 2011, 66: 1–27. 10.1016/j.surfrep.2010.10.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Guo Q, Ford GM, Yang W-C, Walker BC, Stach EA, Hillhouse HW, Agrawal R: Fabrication of 7.2% efficient CZTSSe solar cells using CZTS nanocrystals. J AM CHEM SOC 2010, 132: 17384–17386. 10.1021/ja108427b

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Li JB, Chawla V, Clemens BM: Investigating the role of grain boundaries in CZTS and CZTSSe thin film solar cells with scanning probe microscopy. Adv Mater 2012, 24: 720–723. 10.1002/adma.201103470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Sadewasser S, Abou-Ras D, Azulay D, Baier R, Balberg I, Cahen D, Cohen S, Gartsman K, Ganesan K, Kavalakkatt J, Li W, Millo O, Rissom T, Rosenwaks Y, Schock H-W, Schwarzman A, Unold T: Nanometer-scale electronic and microstructural properties of grain boundaries in Cu(In, Ga)Se2. Thin Solid Films 2011, 519: 7341–7346. 10.1016/j.tsf.2010.12.227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Shin RH, Jo W, Kim D-W, Yun JH, Ahn S: Local current–voltage behaviors of preferentially and randomly textured Cu(In, Ga)Se2 thin films investigated by conductive atomic force microscopy. Appl Phys A 2011, 104: 1189–1194. 10.1007/s00339-011-6408-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Shin RH, Jeong AR, Jo W: Investigation of local electronic transport and surface potential distribution of Cu(In, Ga)Se2 thin-films. Curr Appl Phys 2012, 12: 1313–1318. 10.1016/j.cap.2012.03.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Azulay D, Millo O, Balberg I, Schock HW, Visoly-Fisher I, Cahen D: Current routes in polycrystalline CuInSe2 and Cu(In, Ga)Se2 films. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 2007, 91: 85–90. 10.1016/j.solmat.2006.08.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Li J, Mitzi DB, Shenoy VB: Structure and electronic properties of grain boundaries in earth-abundant photovoltaic absorber Cu2ZnSnSe4. ACS Nano 2011, 5: 8613–8619. 10.1021/nn203230g

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


This work was supported by the New & Renewable Energy of the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) grant funded by the Korea government Ministry of Trade, Industry, and Energy (No. 20123010010130).

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to William Jo.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

GYK, JRK, and WJ measured the electrical properties of the CZTSSe samples with scanning probe microscopy. DHS, DHK, and JKK made the CZTSSe samples by sputtering and subsequent selenization. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kim, G.Y., Kim, J.R., Jo, W. et al. Nanoscale observation of surface potential and carrier transport in Cu2ZnSn(S,Se)4 thin films grown by sputtering-based two-step process. Nanoscale Res Lett 9, 10 (2014).

Download citation


  • Cu2ZnSn(S,Se)4
  • Cu(In,Ga)Se2
  • Kesterite
  • Conductive atomic force microscopy
  • Kelvin probe force microscopy