Skip to content


  • Nano Express
  • Open Access

Improving scattering layer through mixture of nanoporous spheres and nanoparticles in ZnO-based dye-sensitized solar cells

  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 2Email author and
  • 1Email author
Nanoscale Research Letters20149:295

  • Received: 4 March 2014
  • Accepted: 28 May 2014
  • Published:


A scattering layer is utilized by mixing nanoporous spheres and nanoparticles in ZnO-based dye-sensitized solar cells. Hundred-nanometer-sized ZnO spheres consisting of approximately 35-nm-sized nanoparticles provide not only effective light scattering but also a large surface area. Furthermore, ZnO nanoparticles are added to the scattering layer to facilitate charge transport and increase the surface area as filling up large voids. The mixed scattering layer of nanoparticles and nanoporous spheres on top of the nanoparticle-based electrode (bilayer geometry) improves solar cell efficiency by enhancing both the short-circuit current (Jsc) and fill factor (FF), compared to the layer consisting of only nanoparticles or nanoporous spheres.


  • Dye-sensitized solar cell
  • ZnO photoelectrode
  • Light trapping
  • Nanoparticle
  • Nanoporous sphere


Dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs) have shown promising potential as an alternative to Si thin-film solar cells because of low fabrication cost and relatively high efficiency [1, 2]. Efficient utilization of sunlight is greatly important in photovoltaic systems for high efficiency. Therefore, there have been many studies on the scattering layer to fully utilize incident light inside solar cells by using different morphologies and sizes of scatterers in TiO2-based DSSCs [310]. However, few studies for the scattering layer exist in ZnO-based DSSCs [1113], despite the advantages of ZnO such as higher carrier mobility and fabrication easiness for various nanostructures [14, 15].

Among various nanostructures, hundred-nanometer-sized nanoporous spheres provide both effective light scattering and large surface area [16]. X. Tao's group and W. Que's group have reported on the scattering layer consisting of nanoporous spheres [17, 18]. While they have shown improvements on the scattering effect, large voids between spheres leave the possibility of providing more available surface area where dye can be attached, and better charge transport by improved percolation of large-sized spheres should be achieved.

In this paper, we report the improvements of scattering layers using a mixture of nanoparticles and nanoporous spheres. Nanoporous spheres act as effective light scatterers with the large surface area, and nanoparticles favor both efficient charge transport and an additional surface area.


The ZnO nanoporous spheres were synthesized by using zinc acetate dihydrate (0.01 M, Zn(CH3COO)2 · 2H2O, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and diethylene glycol ((HOCH2CH2)2O, Sigma-Aldrich) in an oil bath at 160°C for 6 h [16]. After washing with ethanol, the as-synthesized ZnO nanoporous spheres (NS) and ZnO nanoparticle (NP) (721085, Sigma-Aldrich) were mixed to the weight ratios of NP to NS of 10:0, 7:3, 5:5, 3:7, and 0:10. To fabricate bilayer-structured electrodes, a paste consisting of only ZnO nanoparticles (NP/NS = 10:0) was first spread on a fluorine-doped tin oxide substrate (FTO, TEC 8, Pilkington, St. Helens, UK) covered with a dense TiO2 blocking layer by sputtering. After solvent evaporation, the mixed pastes with various ratios of NS and NP were spread on top of the nanoparticle film by a doctor blade method. The active area was 0.28 cm2, and the as-deposited films were subsequently annealed at 350°C for 1 h.

The films were sensitized with 0.5 mM of N719 dye (RuL2(NCS)2:2TBA, L = 2,2′-bipyridyl-4,4′-dicarboxylic acid, TBA = tetrabutylammonium, Solaronix, Aubonne, Switzerland) for 30 min at RT. The sensitized electrode and platinized counter electrode were sealed with thermoplastic foil (25 μm, DuPont, Wilmington, DE, USA), and the gap between the two electrodes was filled with an iodide-based redox electrolyte (AN-50, Solaronix).

X-ray diffraction (XRD; M18XHF-SRA, Mac Science, Tokyo, Japan) was employed to analyze the crystal structure of the ZnO electrodes, and field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM; SU70, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan) was used to observe the morphology of the bilayer-structured electrodes. The electrochemical properties were analyzed by a solar cell measurement system (K3000, McScience, Suwon, South Korea) under a solar simulator (xenon lamp, air mass (AM) 1.5, 100 mW cm−2). The extinction and diffused reflectance spectra were recorded on a UV/Vis spectrophotometer (Cary 5000, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA), and incident photon-to-current conversion efficiency (IPCE) spectra were measured by an IPCE measurement system (K3100, McScience). Electrochemical impedance spectra (EIS) were taken by using a potentiostat (CHI 608C, CH Instrumental Inc., Austin, TX, USA) to analyze the kinetic parameters in the DSSCs [1921].

Results and discussion

The crystalline structure and grain size of ZnO nanoparticles and nanoporous spheres were analyzed by XRD (Figure 1). The diffraction confirms the crystalline ZnO having hexagonal wurtzite structure (JCPDS #36-1451). From Williamson-Hall plots [2224], the homemade ZnO nanoporous spheres are composed of approximately 35-nm-sized grains, while the grain size of the commercial ZnO nanoparticles is approximately 55 nm.The ZnO bilayer electrodes were sequentially prepared by the bottom layer made by only ZnO nanoparticles and the top scattering layer formed with various mixing ratios of nanoparticles and nanoporous spheres. As shown in Figure 2, the plan-view SEM images of the scattering layers indicate that the nanoparticles and nanoporous spheres are mixed uniformly, not aggregated separately. The range of nanoporous sphere size is approximately 150 to 500 nm, with the average size of approximately 300 nm. As the ratio of nanoporous spheres increases, void spaces in the film get larger. The cross-sectional SEM images show that bilayer structures consisting of the nanoparticle bottom layer and mixed scattering upper layer are composed nicely without any crushes at the interface The average thickness of the bilayer films is approximately 5.5 μm, and the deviation is less than 10%. The poor connectivity among the ZnO nanoporous spheres with the decreased nanoparticle ratio is consistent with the plan-view SEM images.
Figure 1
Figure 1

X-ray diffraction of the ZnO films consisting of only nanoparticles or nanoporous spheres. The peak intensities and positions from the hexagonal ZnO (JCPDS #36-1451) are shown as solid lines.

Figure 2
Figure 2

Plan-view and cross-sectional SEM images of the ZnO bilayer electrodes. The weight ratios of nanoparticle (NP) to nanoporous sphere (NS) for the top layers are (a) 10:0, (b) 7:3, (c) 5:5, (d) 3:7, and (e) 0:10, respectively. Blue labeled boxes are higher magnification for the bilayer interface.

To investigate the optical properties of the mixed scattering layer, the diffused reflectance of the bilayer films (without dye) was measured (Figure 3a) [25, 26]. With the increased nanoporous sphere ratio, the diffused reflectance increases, indicating a better light scattering ability of nanoporous spheres due to the comparable size to the wavelength of visible light [27, 28]. The optical images also confirm the scattering effect by the nanoporous spheres. When the ratio reaches to NP/NS = 0:10, the color changes to totally white.
Figure 3
Figure 3

Diffused reflectance and extinction spectra. (a) Diffused reflectance spectra and optical images of the ZnO bilayer electrodes before dye loading with various mixing ratios. (b) Extinction spectra with dye loading.

Furthermore, after dye adsorption, the NP/NS = 3:7 film shows the highest extinction (Figure 3b). Especially when compared to the NP/NS = 0:10 film, the higher extinction near the dye absorption peak is clear [29]. The results indicate an optimum condition for the surface area between void filling by nanoparticles and primary nanoporous spheres. The notable change in the curve shape for the NP/NS = 0:10 film (Figure 3a,b) means that light scattering plays a role considerably for the adsorbed dye molecules [30].

The solar cell performance of the DSSCs fabricated with the various ZnO bilayer electrodes was investigated (Figure 4a), and the parameters for each cell were summarized in Table 1 The mixed scattering layer improves both the short-circuit current (Jsc) and fill factor (FF), compared to the nanoparticle layer. In particular, the optimum power conversion efficiency (η) of 2.91% is obtained at the ratio of NP/NS = 3:7, and the trend of η is generally consistent with that of Jsc. The open-circuit voltage (Voc) values are not notably changed among the cells except for the NP/NS = 3:7. From the general trend of parameters, we cautiously consider that the value for the open-circuit voltage in NP/NS = 3:7 is out of the tendency. We consider different nanomorphologies of porous spheres synthesized from the limited number of samples. Open-circuit voltage is represented as V oc nkT q · ln J sc J 0 from the general one-diode model [31], and between the two conditions of the NP/NS = 5:5 and 3:7, the difference in Jsc (i.e., ln Jsc) is not enough to impact Voc. Also, the change of Voc may result from the difference of reverse saturation current J0. We have synthesized nanoporous ZnO spheres by hydrothermal method [16], and the nanostructural quality of porous ZnO spheres may vary from batch to batch, thus resulting in the difference of band offset, charge transfer mobilities, porosities, etc. [32, 33].
Figure 4
Figure 4

Photocurrent-voltage curves and IPCE spectra. (a) Photocurrent-voltage curves of the DSSCs with various mixing ratios. (b) Incident photon-to-current conversion efficiency (IPCE) spectra.

Table 1

Characteristics of photocurrent-voltage curves and charge transfer resistances ( R ct ) for ZnO/electrolyte interfaces


Jsc(mA cm−2)






5.98 ± 0.25

0.56 ± 0.01

0.67 ± 0.01

2.25 ± 0.15

30.7 ± 0.3


6.64 ± 0.30

0.55 ± 0.01

0.65 ± 0.02

2.36 ± 0.17

33.1 ± 0.2


7.45 ± 0.13

0.56 ± 0.01

0.68 ± 0.03

2.81 ± 0.14

29.8 ± 0.2


7.47 ± 0.24

0.58 ± 0.01

0.67 ± 0.01

2.91 ± 0.13

31.6 ± 0.2


7.28 ± 0.18

0.56 ± 0.01

0.64 ± 0.02

2.60 ± 0.09

34.5 ± 0.3

If charge collection probabilities are similar among the cells, quantum efficiency depends on the light trapping inside the solar cell [3437]. The NP/NS = 3:7 cell exhibits the highest IPCE values in the whole visible region (Figure 4b), and this IPCE trend is consistent with the extinction data (Figure 3b). Therefore, the enhanced light-harvesting capability (i.e., Jsc) by the mixed scattering layer is attributed to efficient light scattering and increased surface area.

Impedance analyses were performed to understand the electrical properties of the synthesized solar cells [3841]. The Nyquist plots display two semicircles in Figure 5a; the larger semicircles in low frequency range (approximately 100 to 103 Hz) are related to the charge transport/accumulation at dye-attached ZnO/electrolyte interfaces, and the smaller semicircles in high frequency (approximately 103 to 105 Hz) are ascribed to the charge transfer at the interfaces of electrolyte/Pt counter electrode [42]. The impedance parameters were extracted using the equivalent circuit model (inset of Figure 5a), and the fitting lines are shown as solid lines in the Nyquist and Bode plots. From the charge transfer resistances (Rct) in Table 1, we can see that the proper mixing ratio (e.g., 5:5 or 3:7) exhibits lower values implying more efficient charge transfer processes across the ZnO/electrolyte interfaces, while the pure nanoporous sphere layer (0:10) shows the highest Rct. The low resistance favors the transport of the electrons injected within ZnO, thus eventually leading to an effective collection of electrons [11]. The better connectivity achieved by the nanoparticles likely facilitates charge transfer by providing electron transport pathways, thereby resulting in the enhancement of FF with less recombination.
Figure 5
Figure 5

Plots with various mixing ratios of ZnO nanoparticle to nanoporous sphere. (a) Nyquist plot and (b) Bode plot. Solid lines are the fitting results using the equivalent circuit model in the inset.


To improve the utilization of scattering layer in ZnO-based DSSCs, nanoparticles and nanoporous spheres are mixed with various ratios. The nanoporous spheres play an important role in the scattering effect with the large surface area but possess disadvantages of large voids and point contacts between spheres. Nanoparticles clearly advance facile carrier transport with the additional surface area, thereby improving the solar cell efficiency by the enhanced short-circuit current (Jsc) and fill factor (FF).



This research was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF): 2013R1A1A2065793 and 2010–0029065.

Authors’ Affiliations

WCU Hybrid Materials Program, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Research Institute of Advanced Materials, Seoul National University, Seoul, 151-744, South Korea
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Dankook University, Chungnam, Cheonan, 330-714, South Korea


  1. O'Regan B, Grätzel M: A low-cost, high-efficiency solar cell based on dye-sensitized colloidal TiO2 films. Nature 1991, 353: 737–740. 10.1038/353737a0View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Grätzel M: Solar energy conversion by dye-sensitized photovoltaic cells. Inorg Chem 2005, 44: 6841–6851. 10.1021/ic0508371View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Wang ZS, Kawauchi H, Kashima T, Arakawa H: Significant influence of TiO2 photoelectrode morphology on the energy conversion efficiency of N719 dye-sensitized solar cell. Coordin Chem Rev 2004, 248: 13–14.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Chou CS, Guo MG, Liu KH, Chen YS: Preparation of TiO2 particles and their applications in the light scattering layer of a dye-sensitized solar cell. Appl Energ 2012, 92: 224–233.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Sun X, Liu Y, Tai Q, Chen B, Peng T, Huang N, Xu S, Peng T, Zhao XZ: High efficiency dye-sensitized solar cells based on a bi-layered photoanode made of TiO2 nanocrystallites and microspheres with high thermal stability. J Phys Chem C 2012, 116: 11859–11866. 10.1021/jp211838gView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Ke CR, Chen LC, Ting JM: Photoanodes consisting of mesoporous anatase TiO2 beads with various sizes for high-efficiency flexible dye-sensitized solar cells. J Phys Chem C 2012, 116: 2600–2607.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Dadgostar S, Tajabadi F, Taghavinia N: Mesoporous submicrometer TiO2 hollow spheres as scatterers in dye-sensitized solar cells. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2012, 4: 2964–2968. 10.1021/am300329pView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Song J, Yang HB, Wang X, Khoo SY, Wong CC, Liu XW, Li CM: Improved utilization of photogenerated charge using fluorine-doped TiO2 hollow spheres scattering layer in dye-sensitized solar cells. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2012, 4: 3712–3717. 10.1021/am300801fView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Kang SH, Kim JY, Kim HS, Koh HD, Lee JS, Sung YE: Influence of light scattering particles in the TiO2 photoelectrode for solid-state dye-sensitized solar cell. J Photoch Photobio A 2008, 200: 294–300. 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2008.08.010View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Koo HJ, Park J, Yoo B, Yoo K, Kim K, Park NG: Size-dependent scattering efficiency in dye-sensitized solar cell. Inorg Chem 2008, 361: 677–683.Google Scholar
  11. Zheng YZ, Tao X, Wang LX, Xu H, Hou Q, Zhou WL, Chen JF: Novel ZnO-based film with double light-scattering layers as photoelectrodes for enhanced efficiency in dye-sensitized solar cells. Chem Mater 2010, 22: 928–934. 10.1021/cm901780zView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. He S, Zhang S, Lu J, Zhao Y, Ma J, Wei M, Evans DG, Duan X: Enhancement of visible light photocatalysis by grafting ZnO nanoplatelets with exposed (0001) facets onto a hierarchical substrate. Chem Commun 2011, 47: 10797–10799. 10.1039/c1cc14360cView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Zhang J, Que W, Jia Q, Zhong P, Liao Y, Ye X, Ding Y: Novel bilayer structure ZnO based photoanode for enhancing conversion efficiency in dye-sensitized solar cells. J Alloy Compd 2011, 509: 7421–7426. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2011.04.053View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Kaidashev EM, Lorenz M, Wenckstern H, Rahm A, Semmelhack HC, Han KH, Benndorf G, Bundesmann C, Hochmuth H, Grundmann M: High electron mobility of epitaxial ZnO thin films on c-plane sapphire grown by multistep pulsed-laser deposition. Appl Phys Lett 2003, 82: 3901–3903. 10.1063/1.1578694View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Keis K, Vayssieres L, Rensmo H, Lindquist SE, Hagfeldt A: Photoelectrochemical properties of nano- to microstructured ZnO electrodes. J Electrochem Soc 2001, 148: A149-A155. 10.1149/1.1342165View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Zhang Q, Chou TP, Russo B, Jenekhe SA, Cao G: Aggregation of ZnO nanocrystallites for high conversion efficiency in dye-sensitized solar cells. Angew Chem Int Ed 2008, 47: 2402–2406. 10.1002/anie.200704919View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Park YC, Chang YJ, Kum BG, Kong EH, Son JY, Kwon YS, Park T, Jang HM: Size-tunable mesoporous spherical TiO2 as a scattering overlayer in high-performance dye-sensitized solar cells. J Mater Chem 2011, 21: 9582–9586. 10.1039/c1jm11043hView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Yu IG, Kim YJ, Kim HJ, Lee C, Lee WI: Size-dependent light-scattering effects of nanoporous TiO2 spheres in dye-sensitized solar cells. J Mater Chem 2011, 21: 532–538. 10.1039/c0jm02606aView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Nahm C, Choi H, Kim J, Byun S, Kang S, Hwang T, Park HH, Ko J, Park B: A simple template-free ‘sputtering deposition and selective etching’ process for nanoporous thin films and its application to dye-sensitized solar cells. Nanotechnology 2013, 24: 365604. 10.1088/0957-4484/24/36/365604View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Kim J, Choi H, Nahm C, Moon J, Kim C, Nam S, Jung DR, Park B: The effect of a blocking layer on the photovoltaic performance in CdS quantum-dot-sensitized solar cells. J Power Sources 2011, 196: 10526–10531. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.08.052View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Choi H, Nahm C, Kim J, Moon J, Nam S, Kim C, Jung DR, Park B: The effect of TiCl4-treated TiO2 compact layer on the performance of dye-sensitized solar cell. Curr Appl Phys 2012, 12: 737. 10.1016/j.cap.2011.10.011View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Suryanarayana C, Norton MG: X-ray Diffraction: A Practical Approach. New York: Springer; 1998.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Kang J, Nam S, Oh Y, Choi H, Wi S, Lee B, Hwang T, Hong S, Park B: Electronic effect in methanol dehydrogenation on Pt surfaces: potential control during methanol electrooxidation. J Phys Chem Lett 2013, 4: 2931–2936. 10.1021/jz401450vView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Oh Y, Nam S, Wi S, Hong S, Park B: Review paper: nanoscale interface control for high-performance Li-ion batteries. Electron Mater Lett 2012, 8: 91–105. 10.1007/s13391-012-2058-2View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Nahm C, Choi H, Kim J, Jung DR, Kim C, Moon J, Lee B, Park B: The effects of 100 nm-diameter Au nanoparticles on dye-sensitized solar cells. Appl Phys Lett 2011, 99: 253107. 10.1063/1.3671087View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Kim J, Choi H, Nahm C, Park B: Review paper: surface plasmon resonance for photoluminescence and solar-cell applications. Electron Mater Lett 2012, 8: 351–364.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Ferber J, Luther J: Computer simulations of light scattering and absorption in dye-sensitized solar cells. Sol Energ Mat Sol C 1998, 54: 265–275. 10.1016/S0927-0248(98)00078-6View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Ito S, Zakeerudiin SM, Humphry-Baker R, Liska P, Charvet P, Comte P, Nazeeruddin MK, Péchy P, Takata M, Miura H, Uchida S, Grätzel M: High-efficiency organic-dye-sensitized solar cells controlled by nanocrystalline-TiO2 electrode thickness. Adv Mater 2006, 18: 1202–1205. 10.1002/adma.200502540View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Ingle JDJ, Crouch SR: Spectrochemical Analysis. New Jersey: Prentice Hall; 1988.Google Scholar
  30. Gálvez FE, Kemppainen E, Míguez H, Halme J: Effect of diffuse light scattering designs on the efficiency of dye solar cells: an integral optical and electrical description. J Phys Chem C 2012, 116: 11426–11433. 10.1021/jp2092708View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Lee JH, Cho S, Roy A, Jung HT, Heeger AJ: Enhanced diode characteristics of organic solar cells using titanium suboxide electron transport layer. Appl Phys Lett 2010, 96: 163303. 10.1063/1.3409116View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. O'reagan BC, Durrant JR: Kinetic and energetic paradigms for dye-sensitized solar cells: moving from the ideal to the real. Acc Chem Res 2009, 42: 1799–1808. 10.1021/ar900145zView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Park DW, Jeong Y, Lee J, Lee J, Moon SH: Interfacial charge-transfer loss in dye-sensitized solar cells. J Phys Chem C 2013, 117: 2734–2739.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Kim C, Kim J, Choi H, Nahm C, Kang S, Lee S, Lee B, Park B: The effect of TiO2-coating layer on the performance in nanoporous ZnO-based dye-sensitized solar cells. J Power Sources 2013, 232: 159–164.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Choi H, Kim J, Nahm C, Kim C, Nam S, Kang J, Lee B, Hwang T, Kang S, Choi DJ, Kim YH, Park B: The role of ZnO-coating-layer thickness on the recombination in CdS quantum-dot-sensitized solar cells. Nano Energy 2013, 2: 1218–1224. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2013.05.007View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Kim J, Choi H, Nahm C, Kim C, Kim JI, Lee W, Kang S, Lee B, Hwang T, Park HH, Park B: Graded bandgap structure for PbS/CdS/ZnS quantum-dot-sensitized solar cells with a PbxCd1-xS interlayer. Appl Phys Lett 2013, 102: 183901. 10.1063/1.4804149View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Chen Y, Huang F, Chen D, Cao L, Zhang XL, Caruso RA, Cheng YB: Effect of mesoporous TiO2 bead diameter in working electrodes on the efficiency of dye-sensitized solar cells. Chem Sus Chem 2011, 4: 1498–1503. 10.1002/cssc.201100060View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Kim J, Choi H, Nahm C, Kim C, Nam S, Kang S, Jung DR, Kim JI, Kang J, Park B: The role of a TiCl4 treatment on the performance of CdS quantum-dot-sensitized solar cells. J Power Sources 2012, 220: 108–113.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Choi H, Nahm C, Kim J, Kim C, Kang S, Hwang T, Park B: Review paper: toward highly efficient quantu m-dot- and dye-sensitized solar cells. Curr Appl Phys 2013, 13: S2-S13.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Goes MS, Joanni E, Muniz EC, Savu R, Habeck TR, Bueno PR, Fabregat-Santiago F: Impedance spectroscopy analysis of the effect of TiO2 blocking layers on the efficiency of dye sensitized solar cells. J Phys Chem C 2012, 116: 12415–12421.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Fabregat-Santiago F, Garcia-Belmonte JB, Boschloo G, Hagfeldt A: Influence of electrolyte in transport and recombination in dye-sensitized solar cells studied by impedance spectroscopy. Sol Energ Mat Sol C 2005, 87: 117–131. 10.1016/j.solmat.2004.07.017View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Fabregat-Santiago F, Bisquert J, Palomares E, Otero L, Kuang D, Zakeeruddin SM, Grätzel M: Correlation between photovoltaic performance and impedance spectroscopy of dye-sensitized solar cells based on ionic liquids. J Phys Chem C 2007, 111: 6550–6560. 10.1021/jp066178aView ArticleGoogle Scholar


© Kim et al.; licensee Springer. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.