Open Access

The role of Si interstitials in the migration and growth of Ge nanocrystallites under thermal annealing in an oxidizing ambient

Nanoscale Research Letters20149:339

Received: 1 May 2014

Accepted: 27 June 2014

Published: 7 July 2014


We report a unique growth and migration behavior of Ge nanocrystallites mediated by the presence of Si interstitials under thermal annealing at 900°C within an H2O ambient. The Ge nanocrystallites were previously generated by the selective oxidation of SiGe nanopillars and appeared to be very sensitive to the presence of Si interstitials that come either from adjacent Si3N4 layers or from within the oxidized nanopillars. A cooperative mechanism is proposed, wherein the Si interstitials aid in both the migration and coarsening of these Ge nanocrystallites through Ostwald ripening, while the Ge nanocrystallites, in turn, appear to enhance the generation of Si interstitials through catalytic decomposition of the Si-bearing layers.


Germanium nanocrystallites Migration Annealing


Silicon-based technology is the prime enabler for high-density integrated microelectronic circuits, optoelectronics, and photovoltaic devices with ubiquitous applications ranging from mobile devices to high-end computing and communications. As Si complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) circuits are relentlessly scaled down to 16 nm or smaller dimensions, knowledge about fundamental nanoscopic processes in Si is becoming crucial for developing a good understanding on the limitations of nanofabrication and the development of future evolutionary directions for the technology as a whole. Many processing reactions including epitaxial growth, doping, oxidation, and silicidation are affected by the native defects in Si such as vacancies, self-interstitials, and their complexes. It is believed that Si interstitials play an important role in these processes, mostly detrimental, for instance causing such effects as undesirable transient-enhanced diffusion of dopants in p/n junctions [1, 2], metal spiking at silicide/Si interfaces [3], interfacial traps along the gate oxide/Si interface [4], and stacking faults/dislocations in the epitaxial layer [1, 5, 6].

In this paper, we report a unique effect, hitherto unreported, that is attributable to Si interstitials present within oxide layers previously generated by the selective oxidation of polycrystalline-SiGe (poly-SiGe) nanopillars leaving behind Ge quantum dots (QDs) or nanocrystallites when the preferential oxidation of Si is complete. In this novel phenomenon, these Ge QDs or nanocrystallites appear to be very sensitive to the presence of Si interstitials, almost acting as detectors for these interstitial species. The mechanism appears to be complex and long range in comparison to the typical diffusion lengths of Si interstitials within oxide layers.


Three different cases were considered for our experimental study. All cases consisted of heterostructures as shown in Figures 1,2,3,4. These samples were prepared using a CMOS-compatible approach by the deposition of poly-Si0.85Ge0.15 layers over buffer layers of Si3N4 or SiO2 on Si substrates using low-pressure chemical vapor deposition. In general, a multilayer deposition of Si3N4/SiO2/Si0.85Ge0.15/SiO2 was carried out sequentially on top of a Si substrate. The topmost, thin SiO2 layer is deposited as a hard mask for subsequent plasma etching for producing SiGe nanopillars. In one case (Figure 2), a thin layer of Si3N4 was deposited immediately prior to the deposition of the SiGe layer. The poly-Si0.85Ge0.15 layers were lithographically patterned to create nanopillar structures of various diameters (50 to 120 nm) over the buffer oxide layers and then subsequently oxidized at 900°C for 10 to 90 min to produce Ge nanocrystallites embedded within the oxide (Figure 2). It takes about 20 min to convert a 60-nm-thick, 120-nm-wide poly-Si0.85Ge0.15 pillar completely into SiO2/Ge nanocrystallites at 900°C by thermal oxidation within an H2O ambient. The entire process has been described together with the mechanism for Ge nanocrystallite formation in previous publications [79]. For yet another sample (Figure 3), the oxidized pillars were subsequently encapsulated via the conformal deposition of a thin capping layer of Si3N4. Details of the thicknesses of the various layers are provided in the schematic diagrams of various structures. It is our contention that Si interstitials are provided both by the Si3N4 layers and by the oxidized SiGe nanopillars themselves, in the latter case, perhaps generated by the incomplete oxidation of the Si within the SiGe.
Figure 1

Formation of Ge nanocrystallite clusters by thermally oxidizing poly-Si 0.85 Ge 0.15 pillars grown over buffer oxide. (a) Schematic diagram of the initially as-formed poly-SiGe pillars, (b) cross-sectional transmission electron microscopy (CTEM) micrograph of a self-assembled cluster of Ge nanocrystallites in the core of the oxidized pillars following 900°C 20 min oxidation in an H2O ambient, and (c) enlarged CTEM micrograph of the Ge nanocrystallites.

Figure 2

Schematic diagrams and CTEM micrographs of Ge nanocrystallites growth and migration into underneath buffer Si 3 N 4 . Ge nanocrystallite clusters migrate into the buffer Si3N4 underneath the original poly-Si0.85Ge0.15 pillar with coarsening and possible coalescence of these nanocrystallites after thermal annealing at 900°C for 30 min in an H2O ambient of the previously oxidized SiGe pillars over (a) 8-nm-thick, (b) 15-nm-thick, and (c) 22-nm-thick buffer Si3N4 layers. (d) Schematic diagram illustrating the mechanism of Si interstitials generated from the Si3N4 layers enhancing the coarsening and coalescence of Ge nanocrystallites when penetrating through thin and thick Si3N4 layers, respectively.

Figure 3

Rapid Ge nanocrystallites coarsening in SiO 2 without migration because of a surrounding Si 3 N 4 capping layer. The Si3N4 capping layer was deposited after the oxidation of the SiGe pillars to create the Ge nanocrystallite clusters and then thermally annealed at 900°C for 90 min in an O2 ambient. (a) Schematic diagram of initially as-formed poly-SiGe pillars. CTEM micrographs of (b) SiGe nanopillars that were thermally oxidized at 900°C for 30 min in an H2O ambient followed by the deposition of Si3N4 capping layer and (c) under further thermal annealing at 900°C for 90 min in an O2 ambient. (d) Schematic diagram showing the vertical and in-plane symmetry of Si interstitial flow that prevents the Ge nanocrystallite clusters from migrating in a preferred direction.

Figure 4

Time evolution of Ge nanocrystallite size and coarsening under postoxidation annealing. (a) CTEM micrographs of coarsening of the Ge nanocrystallite clusters under further thermal annealing at 900°C for various times ranging from 10 to 100 min in an H2O ambient. (b) Ge nanocrystallite size as a function thermal annealing time. The Ostwald ripening process appears to stop around an annealing time of 70 min indicative of the depletion of these residual Si interstitials. (c) Schematic diagram for the very slight coarsening of the Ge nanocrystallite clusters mediated by the presence of small concentrations of residual Si interstitials remaining within the oxidized poly-Si0.85Ge0.15 pillars.

Results and discussion

The experimental procedure for the formation of Ge nanocrystallite cluster within SiO2 is described schematically in Figure 1. The SiO2 capping layer prevents the evaporation of Ge during the final, high-temperature oxidation process for the generation of Ge QDs from the SiGe layer. The bottom Si3N4 layer (in contact with the Si substrate) also acts as an oxidation mask to protect the Si substrate from oxidation during the thermal oxidation of the SiGe nanopillars. Thermal oxidation preferentially converts the Si from the poly-Si0.85Ge0.15 into SiO2, while squeezing the Ge released from solid solution within each poly-SiGe grain into irregularly shaped Ge nanocrystallite clusters that ostensibly assume the crystal orientation and the morphology of the original poly-SiGe grains. Thus, within this newly formed SiO2, a self-assembled cluster of Ge nanocrystallites appears in the core of the oxidized nanopillars (Figure 1) and the Ge nanocrystallites are 5.8 ± 1.2 nm in size with an interspacing of approximately 4.8 nm [7].

The first evidence of a unique growth and migration behavior mediated by the presence of Si interstitials was observed in the sample that contained a thin Si3N4 layer directly below the original SiGe nanopillar (Figure 2) and which was subjected, following oxidation of the poly-Si0.85Ge0.15 layer, to further thermal annealing at 900°C for 30 min in an H2O ambient. The entire cluster of Ge nanocrystallites appears to migrate from its original location within the oxide and ultimately penetrates the Si3N4 layer. We believe that this is because of the Si3N4 layer acting as an initial, local source of Si interstitials via a catalytic decomposition process described elsewhere [9, 10]. In brief, the Ge nanocrystallite clusters/QDs migrate through the underlying Si3N4 layer in a two-step catalytic process, during which the QDs first enhance the local decomposition of the Si3N4 layer, releasing Si that subsequently migrates to the QDs. In the second step, the Si rapidly diffuses and is ultimately oxidized at the distal surface of the QDs, generating the SiO2 layer behind the QDs and thus facilitating the deeper penetration of the QDs in the Si3N4 layer. It is clearly seen in Figure 2 that an increase in the layer thickness of Si3N4 in proximity to the SiGe nanopillars enhances the initial, local source of Si for facilitating the migration of the as-formed Ge nuclei after the SiGe pillar is oxidized. The increased Si content results in a considerable enhancement in the coarsening of the Ge nanocrystallites, as observed when increasing the thickness of buffer Si3N4 from 8 to 15 nm (Figure 2a,b), and also serves to achieve complete coalescence of the nanocrystallites to form a single Ge QD when the buffer Si3N4 is thick enough (22 nm) (Figure 2c). Attendant to the migration process are changes that occur to the crystallographic morphology, crystallinity, and sizes of the Ge nanocrystallites. Thus, the Ge nanocrystallites are undergoing an Ostwald ripening process [11] which also, in addition to the migration, appears to be facilitated by the Si interstitials.

Further evidence of the Si interstitial-mediated Ostwald ripening process was provided by the sample with the Si3N4 capping layer (Figure 3) subjected to thermal annealing at 900°C for 90 min in an H2O ambient. In this case, the Ge nanocrystallite clusters within the pillars experience lateral Si interstitial fluxes in all azimuthal directions because of the surrounding Si3N4. Therefore, the in-plane symmetry of the radial Si interstitial fluxes prevents the Ge nanocrystallite clusters from adopting any one, particular direction for preferential migration as was seen in the previous case (Figure 2). However, the Ostwald ripening proceeds unhindered and results in significant coarsening of the Ge nanocrystallites by as much as 3 to 4 × !

With the profound understanding gained by the above two cases, we can now examine the case of the nanopillar sample itself, without either the underlying Si3N4 layer or the Si3N4 capping layer but also subjected to the same thermal annealing at 900°C for various times within an H2O ambient. In this case, it is observed that the Ostwald ripening process occurs at a much slower rate with a slight change in the average size of the Ge nanocrystallites within the cluster. Starting from an original average size of 5.8 ± 1.2 nm for the as-formed Ge nanocrystallites, Figure 4a shows the time evolution of the Ge nanocrystallite clusters formed after thermal annealing at 900°C under an H2O ambient of 120-nm-diameter pillars of previously oxidized Si0.85Ge0.15 for annealing times of 10, 40, 70, and 100 min, respectively. The average nanocrystallite size changes from approximately 7 nm at 10 min of annealing to 8.7 ± 0.9 nm at 40 min, 10.5 ± 1.8 nm at 70 min, and 11.2 ± 2.5 nm at 100 min of annealing (Figure 4b). Based on the above evidence, we believe that the slight coarsening of the Ge nanocrystallites that is observed with increased annealing times is mediated by the small, residual concentration of Si interstitials left behind after thermal oxidation of the SiGe layer. The Ostwald ripening process essentially stops around 70 min when these interstitials are used up, i.e., converted to oxide.

The above TEM observations clearly reveal that the growth and migration behaviors of Ge nanocrystallites are very sensitive to the presence and the content of Si interstitials that are provided either externally by adjacent Si3N4 layers or by small concentrations of residual Si interstitials remaining within the oxidized poly-SiGe pillars. The role of Si interstitials in the growth of Ge nanocrystallites under thermal annealing in an oxidizing ambient is sketched in Figures 2d, 3d, and 4c. Although a large body of work exists in the literature on the generation and role of Si interstitials, to our knowledge, the above phenomenon has never been reported before. Previous work has attributed the thermal oxidation of Si inducing a drastic lateral expansion of the silicon lattice [12] and the generation of silicon self-interstitials as a means of partially relieving the compressive stress in the growing oxide layer that develops as a result of a 2.25× volume expansion when Si is converted to SiO2. The majority of these Si interstitials generated during Si oxidation diffuse into the growing oxide layer and are also oxidized [13, 14], while a relatively small, but significant, amount of interstitials diffuse into the Si substrate, causing supersaturation of these interstitials and the consequent precipitation as oxidation stacking faults (OSFs) [5, 6] or oxidation-enhanced diffusion (OED) [1, 2] of some dopants. Interestingly, the OED of boron during the thermal oxidation of Si is effectively suppressed through the introduction of a thin layer of Si1 - xGe x or Si1 - xGe x C y over the Si substrate or even completely eliminated when the Ge or C concentration is high [1517]. Moreover, the reduction of the Si interstitials has been shown to be Ge concentration dependent. Again, to our knowledge, we have not found previous work describing a cooperative mechanism, wherein the Si interstitials aid in both the migration of Ge nanocrystallites and in the coarsening of these nanocrystallites through Ostwald ripening as clearly shown above. The additional, interesting aspect of this novel mechanism is that as described by us previously [9, 10], the Ge nanocrystallites also appear to enhance the decomposition of the Si-bearing Si3N4 layers resulting in further generation of Si interstitials.

The quality of the oxide generated by the thermal oxidation of the poly-Si0.85Ge0.15 could also play a significant role in facilitating the new mechanism that we have discovered. Diffusion lengths of Si interstitials in SiO2 calculated at 900°C for diffusion times of 10, 40, 70, 100, and 145 min are 0.72, 1.43, 1,89, 2.26, and 2.72 nm, respectively, based on the equation of D = 1.2 × 10-9exp(-1.9/k B T) [18]. Obviously, these diffusion lengths are too small to explain the Si interstitial-mediated mechanism that we have observed. Hence, we believe that the oxide generated from poly-Si0.85Ge0.15 is possibly not as dense as the conventional, thermally generated oxide from Si substrates and therefore allows the faster diffusion of the Si interstitials through the oxide.


In conclusion, we have observed a unique phenomenon of the migration and growth of Ge nanocrystallite clusters within SiO2 layers that is made possible by the presence of Si interstitials during high-temperature thermal annealing in an oxidizing ambient. The Ge nanocrystallites generated by selective oxidation of SiGe appear to be very sensitive to the presence of Si interstitials that are provided either by adjacent Si3N4 layers or by residual Si interstitials left behind after thermal oxidation of the SiGe. The Si interstitials also facilitate the Ostwald ripening of the Ge nanocrystallites. We have proposed a novel cooperative mechanism for this Si interstitial-mediated growth and migration of Ge nanocrystallites under thermal oxidation. We envisage further scientific exploration of this unique phenomenon and the demonstration of new device geometries with Ge QDs buried within various Si-containing layers.



This work was supported by the National Science Council of the Republic of China (NSC-102-2221-E-008-111-MY3) as well as by the Asian Office of Aerospace Research and Development under contract no. FA 2386-14-1-4008.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Electrical Engineering and the Center for Nano Science and Technology, National Central University
Private Consultant


  1. Hu SM: Formation of stacking faults and enhanced diffusion in the oxidation of silicon. J Appl Phys 1974, 45(4):1567–1573. 10.1063/1.1663459View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Antoniadis DA, Moskowitz I: Diffusion of substitutional impurities in silicon at short oxidation times: an insight into point defect kinetics. J Appl Phys 1982, 53(10):6788–6796. 10.1063/1.330067View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Ronay M, Schad RG: New insight into silicide formation: the creation of silicon self-interstitials. Phys Rev Lett 1990, 64: 2042–2045. Sukegawa T, Tomita H, Fushida A, Goto K, Komiya S and Nakamura T: Transmission Electron Microscopy Observation of CoSix Spikes in Si Substrates during Co-silicidation Process. Jpn J Appl Phys 1997, 36: 6244–6249 10.1103/PhysRevLett.64.2042View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Subramanian C, Hayden J, Taylor W, Orlowski M, McNelly T: Reverse short channel effect and channel length dependence of boron penetration in PMOSFETs. Proceedings of international electron devices meeting. Washington: 1995. 10–13 December: 423–426; Devine RAB, Mathiot D, Warren WL, Fleetwood DM, Aspar B: Point defect generation during high temperature annealing of the Si‒SiO2 interface. Appl Phys Lett 1993, 63(21): 2926–2928.Google Scholar
  5. Leroy B: Kinetics of growth of the oxidation stacking faults. J Appl Phys 1979, 50(12):7996–8005. 10.1063/1.325984View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Tan TY, Goesele U: Growth kinetics of oxidation‒induced stacking faults in silicon: a new concept. Appl Phys Lett 1981, 39(1):86–89. 10.1063/1.92526View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Wang CC, Chen KH, Chen IH, Chang HT, Chen WY, Hsu JC, Lee SW, Hsu TM, Hung MT, Li PW: CMOS-compatible generation of self-organized 3D Ge quantum dot array for photonic and thermoelectric applications. IEEE Trans Nanotechnology 2012, 11(4):657–660.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Wang CC, Liao PH, Kuo MH, George T, Li PW: The curious case of exploding quantum dots: anomalous migration and growth behaviors of Ge under Si oxidation. Nanoscale Research Lett 2013, 8: 192. 10.1186/1556-276X-8-192View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Kuo MH, Wang CC, Lai WT, George T, Li PW: Designer Ge quantum dots on Si: a heterostructure configuration with enhanced optoelectronic performance. Appl Phys Lett 2012, 101: 223107–223108. 10.1063/1.4768292View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Chien CY, Chang YJ, Chen KH, Lai WT, George T, Scherer A, Li PW: Nanoscale, catalytically enhanced local oxidation of silicon-containing layers by ‘burrowing’ Ge quantum dots. Nanotechnology 2011, 22(43):435602–435603. 10.1088/0957-4484/22/43/435602View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Ostwald W: Lehrbuch der allgemeinen chemie. Volume 2. Germany: Leipzig. W. Engelmann; 1896. Ratke L, Voorhees PW: Growth and coarsening: Ostwald ripening in material processing. Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2002: 117–118Google Scholar
  12. Leroy B: Stresses and silicon interstitials during the oxidation of a silicon substrate. Philo Mag B 1987, 55(2):159–199. 10.1080/13642818708211202View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Guillemot N, Tsoukalas D, Tsamis C, Margail J, Papon A, Stoemenos J: Suppression mechanisms for oxidation stacking faults in silicon on insulator. J Appl Phys 1992, 71(4):1713–1720. 10.1063/1.351202View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Tsoukalas D, Tsamis C, Stoemenos J: Investigation of silicon interstitial reactions with insulating films using the silicon wafer bonding technique. Appl Phys Lett 1993, 63(23):3167–3169. 10.1063/1.110212View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. LeGoues FK, Rosenberg R, Meyerson BS: Dopant redistribution during oxidation of SiGe. Appl Phys Lett 1989, 54(8):751–753. 10.1063/1.100882View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Napolitani E, Marino M, Salvador D, Carnera A, Spadafora M, Terrasi A: Silicon interstitial injection during dry oxidation of SiGe/Si layers. J Appl Phys 2005, 97(3):036106. 10.1063/1.1844606View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Carroll MS, Chang CL, Strum JC, Buyuklimnali T: Complete suppression of boron transient-enhanced diffusion and oxidation-enhanced diffusion in silicon using localized substitutional carbon incorporation. Appl Phys Lett 1998, 73(25):3695–3697. 10.1063/1.122866View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Nesbit LA: Annealing characteristics of Si‒rich SiO2 films. Appl Phys Lett 1985, 46(1):38–40. 10.1063/1.95842View ArticleGoogle Scholar


© Chen et al.; licensee Springer. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.