Graphene oxide-based SPR biosensor chip for immunoassay applications
© Chiu et al.; licensee Springer. 2014
Received: 30 June 2014
Accepted: 15 August 2014
Published: 28 August 2014
This work develops a highly sensitive immunoassay sensor for use in graphene oxide sheet (GOS)-based surface plasmon resonance (SPR) chips. This sensing film, which is formed by chemically modifying a GOS surface, has covalent bonds that strongly interact with the bovine serum albumin (BSA), explaining why it has a higher sensitivity. This GOS film-based SPR chip has a BSA concentration detection limit that is 100 times higher than that of the conventional Au-film-based sensor. The affinity constants (KA) on the GOS film-based SPR chip and the conventional SPR chip for 100 μg/ml BSA are 80.82 × 106 M-1 and 15.67 × 106 M-1, respectively. Therefore, the affinity constant of the GOS film-based SPR chip is 5.2 times higher than that of the conventional chip. With respect to the protein-protein interaction, the SPR sensor capability to detect angle changes at a low concentration anti-BSA of 75.75 nM on the GOS film-based SPR chip and the conventional SPR chip is 36.1867 and 26.1759 mdeg, respectively. At a high concentration, anti-BSA of 378.78 nM on the GOS film-based SPR chip and the conventional SPR chip reveals two times increases in the SPR angle shift. Above results demonstrate that the GOS film is promising for highly sensitive clinical diagnostic applications.
As a novel class of two-dimensional carbon nanostructures, graphene oxide sheets (GOSs) have received considerable attention in recent years in the fields of plasmonics [1–3] and surface plasmon resonance (SPR) biosensors [4–11], following both experimental and theoretical scientific discoveries. GOSs have remarkable optical [12–19] and biosensing [20–28] properties and are expected to have a wide range of applications. A GOS has a high surface area and sp2 within an sp3 matrix that can confine π-electrons [12–14, 29]. GOSs contain oxygen at their surfaces in the form of epoxy (-O), hydroxyl (-OH), carboxyl (-COOH), and ether functional groups on a carbon framework [30–35]. The direct bandgap behavior of a GOS can be controlled by modification by oxidation that generates photoluminescence (PL) [16–19] and makes available chemically functionalized GOS with biological applications. Surface chemical modifications significantly influence the performance of surface chemistry-derived devices such as optoelectronic devices, luminescent devices, biosensors, and biomaterials. This work develops a novel method for detecting immunological diseases, in which terminal groups (-COOH) are modified and carboxyl groups on GOS surfaces are activated. The carboxyl groups of a GOS film can be converted into amine-reactive groups to increase its surface area sensing. Furthermore, modifying the oxygen-containing functional groups on the surface of GOS can increase its bandgap and its dielectric constant, thereby improving its surface plasmon resonance (SPR) properties.
Designed configuration for sensing
Figure 1a presents a conventional SPR sensing chip and a biomolecule binding mechanism. 8-Mercaptooctanoic acid (MOA; Sigma-Aldrich Co. LLC., St. Louis, MO, USA) is activation of carboxylic acid-terminated thiol self-assembled monolayers (SAMs) on a modified Au surface. MOA binds to the Au surface through their thiol linker (-SH end) resulting monolayers, which are terminated with carboxylic acid (-COOH). The MOA can be further functionalized to immobilize a bovine serum albumin (BSA; Sigma, Chemical Company, St. Louis, MO, USA) protein. Anti-BSA protein interactions are performed as well.
Figure 1b shows a GOS film-based SPR chip with its biomolecule binding mechanism. Two binding mechanisms are functionalized SAMs on amino-modified Au surfaces by solutions of cystamine (Cys; Alfa Aesar Co., Ward Hill, MA, USA) with a concentration of 5 mM and octadecanthiols (ODT, C18H37SH; Sigma-Aldrich Co. LLC.) with a concentration of 10 mM formation of Au-S bonds that immobilize a GOS. Concentration of the GOS diluted in water was 2 mg/ml. The GOS film sensing surface detects BSA protein concentrations in a range of 100 pg/ml to 100 μg/ml and their interaction with anti-BSA. Moreover, analysis is performed of the kinetics of protein-protein interactions at physical contacts that are established between two proteins, owing to biochemical events, protein affinity adsorption forces, and protein binding forces.
Preparation of modified GOS films
Kinetic analysis of bimolecular interactions at surface
where ka and kd are the association and dissociation rate constants for the formation and dissociation of the complex [PT].
where the Langmuir absorption coefficient (Kabs) is defined as Kabs = ka/kd.
where K x is the wave-vector parallel to the surface form which light is reflected, K0 is the wave-vector in a vacuum, and Ksp is the SP wave-vector that is parallel to the interfaces between the metal and the dielectric. θeq is the SPR angle at equilibrium, εp is the refractive index of the prism, and εm and εd are the metal and dielectric constants of the sample, respectively.
Results and discussion
Analysis of sensitivity of interaction between GOS and BSA
Kinetic analysis of interaction between GOS and BSA
Biomolecular interaction analysis using BSA and anti-BSA
In summary, a GOS film was developed for binding with proteins based on SPR analysis for the purpose of immunoassay sensing. The GOS film-based SPR chip herein had a BSA concentration detection limit of as low as 100 pg/ml, which was 1/100th that of the conventional SPR chip. Additionally, in immunoassay detection, the GOS film-based SPR chip was highly sensitive at a low concentration of 75.75 nM, exhibiting an SPR angle shift of 1.4 times that of the conventional chip, and exhibited an SPR angle shift of two times that of the conventional chip at a high concentration of 378.78 nM. Finally, we believe that the fact that the GOS can be chemically modified to increase its SPR sensitivity can be exploited in clinical diagnostic protein-protein interaction applications, especially in cases in which tumor molecular detection is feasible.
The authors would like to thank the Ministry of Science and Technology of the Republic of China, Taiwan, for financially supporting this research under Contract No. MOST 103-2221-E-003 -008, NSC 102-2221-E-003-021, NSC 100-2325-B-182-007, and NSC 99-2218-E-003-002-MY3.
- Yan H, Low T, Zhu W, Wu Y, Freitag M, Li X, Guinea F, Avouris P, Xia F: Damping pathways of mid-infrared plasmons in graphene nanostructures. Nat Photon 2013, 7: 394–399. 10.1038/nphoton.2013.57View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bao Q, Loh KP: Graphene photonics, plasmonics, and broadband optoelectronic devices. ACS Nano 2012, 6: 3677–3694. 10.1021/nn300989gView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jablan M, Soljacic M, Buljan H: Plasmons in graphene: fundamental properties and potential applications. Proc IEEE 2013, 101: 1689.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhang H, Sun Y, Gao S, Zhang J, Zhang H, Song D: A novel graphene oxide-based surface plasmon resonance biosensor for immunoassay. Small 2013, 9: 2537. 10.1002/smll.201202958View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wu T, Liu S, Luo Y, Lu W, Wang L, Sun X: Surface plasmon resonance-induced visible light photocatalytic reduction of graphene oxide: using Ag nanoparticles as a plasmonic photocatalyst. Nanoscale 2011, 3: 2142. 10.1039/c1nr10128eView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ryu Y, Moon S, Oh T, Kim Y, Lee T, Kim DH, Kim D: Effect of coupled graphene oxide on the sensitivity of surface plasmon resonance detection. Appl Opt 2014, 53: 1419. 10.1364/AO.53.001419View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Choi SH, Kim YL, Byun KM: Graphene-on-silver substrates for sensitive surface plasmon resonance imaging biosensors. Opt Express 2011, 19: 458–466. 10.1364/OE.19.000458View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wu L, Chu HS, Koh WS, Li EP: Highly sensitive graphene biosensors based on surface plasmon resonance. Opt Express 2010, 18: 14395–14400. 10.1364/OE.18.014395View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhang J, Sun Y, Xu B, Zhang H, Gao Y, Zhang H, Song D: A novel surface plasmon resonance biosensor based on graphene oxide decorated with gold nanorod–antibody conjugates for determination of transferrin. Biosens Bioelectron 2013, 45: 230–236.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chiu N-F, Huang T-Y: Sensitivity and kinetic analysis of graphene oxide-based surface plasmon resonance biosensors. Sens Actuators B Chem 2014, 197: 35.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Aliofkhazraei M: Advances in Graphene Science. Volume 8. InTech—Open Access Company; 2013. Graphene oxide based surface plasmon resonance biosensors, Croatia Graphene oxide based surface plasmon resonance biosensors, CroatiaView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Johari P, Shenoy VB: Modulating optical properties of graphene oxide: role of prominent functional groups. ACS Nano 2011, 5: 7640–7647. 10.1021/nn202732tView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Loh KP, Bao Q, Eda G, Chhowalla M: Graphene oxide as a chemically tunable platform for optical applications. Nat Chem 2010, 2: 1015. 10.1038/nchem.907View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lim G-K, Chen Z-L, Clark J, Goh RGS, Ng W-H, Tan H-W, Friend RH, Ho PK, Chua L-K: Giant broadband nonlinear optical absorption response in dispersed graphene single sheets. Nat Photon 2011, 5: 554–560. 10.1038/nphoton.2011.177View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Eda G, Chhowalla M: Chemically derived graphene oxide: towards large-area thin-film electronics and optoelectronics. Adv Mater 2010, 22: 2392–2415. 10.1002/adma.200903689View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Shukla S, Saxena S: Spectroscopic investigation of confinement effects on optical properties of graphene oxide. Appl Phys Lett 2011, 98: 073104. 10.1063/1.3555438View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Luo Z, Vora PM, Mele EJ, Johnson ATC, Kikkawa JM: Photoluminescence and band gap modulation in graphene oxide. Appl Phys Lett 2009, 94: 111909. 10.1063/1.3098358View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chien C-T, Li S-S, Lai W-J, Yeh Y-C, Chen H-A, Chen I-S, Chen L-C, Chen K-H, Nemoto T, Isoda S, Chen M, Fujita T, Eda G, Yamaguchi H, Chhowalla M, Chen C-W: Tunable photoluminescence from graphene oxide. Angew Chem Int Ed 2012, 54: 6662.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Shang J, Ma L, Li J, Ai W, Yu T, Gurzadyan GG: The origin of fluorescence from graphene oxide. Sci Rep 2012, 2: 1.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lee W-C, Kuo C-C, Chiu N-F: Simple fabrication of glucose biosensor based on Graphene-Nafion composite by amperometric detections. Proc IEEE Sensors 2012. doi: 10.1109/ICSENS.2012.6411155 doi: 10.1109/ICSENS.2012.6411155Google Scholar
- Liu F, Choi JY, Seo TS: Graphene oxide arrays for detecting specific DNA hybridization by fluorescence resonance energy transfer. Biosens Bioelectron 2010, 25: 2361–2365. 10.1016/j.bios.2010.02.022View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hu Y, Li F, Bai X, Li D, Hua S, Wang K, Niu L: Label-free electrochemical impedance sensing of DNA hybridization based on functionalized graphene sheets. Chem Commun 2011, 47: 1743–1745. 10.1039/c0cc04514dView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wang Z, Zhou X, Zhang J, Boey F, Zhang H: Direct electrochemical reduction of single-layer graphene oxide and subsequent functionalization with glucose oxidase. J Phys Chem C 2009, 113: 14071–14075. 10.1021/jp906348xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Salihoglu O, Balci S, Kocabas C: Plasmon-polaritons on graphene-metal surface and their use in biosensors. Appl Phys Lett 2012, 100: 213110. 10.1063/1.4721453View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jung JH, Cheon DS, Liu F, Lee KB, Seo TS: A graphene oxide based immuno-biosensor for pathogen detection. Angew Chem Int Ed 2010, 49: 5708–5711. 10.1002/anie.201001428View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Liu J, Fu S, Yuan B, Li Y, Deng Z: Toward a universal “adhesive nanosheet” for the assembly of multiple nanoparticles based on a protein-induced reduction/decoration of graphene oxide. J Am Chem Soc 2010, 132: 7279–7281. 10.1021/ja100938rView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Guo S, Dong S: Graphene and its derivative-based sensing materials for analytical devices. J Mater Chem 2011, 21: 18503–18516. 10.1039/c1jm13228hView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mohanty N, Berry V: Graphene-based single-bacterium resolution biodevice and DNA transistor: interfacing graphene derivatives with nanoscale and microscale biocomponents. Nano Lett 2008, 8: 4469–4476. 10.1021/nl802412nView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Shin SY, Kim ND, Kim JG, Kim KS, Noh DY, Kim KS, Chung JW: Control of the π plasmon in a single layer graphene by charge doping. Appl Phys Lett 2011, 99: 082110–082111. 10.1063/1.3630230View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Dreyer DR, Park S, Bielawski CW, Ruoff RS: The chemistry of graphene oxide. Chem Soc Rev 2010, 39: 228–240. 10.1039/b917103gView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cao Y, Lai Z, Feng J, Wu P: Graphene oxide sheets covalently functionalized with block copolymers via click chemistry as reinforcing fillers. J Mater Chem 2011, 21: 9271–9278. 10.1039/c1jm10420aView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Liu X-W, Yao Z-J, Wang Y-F, Wei X-W: Graphene oxide sheet-prussian blue nanocomposites: green synthesis and their extraordinary electrochemical properties. Colloids Surf B: Biointerfaces 2010, 81: 508–512. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2010.07.049View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Georgakilas V, Otyepka M, Bourlinos AB, Chandra V, Kim N, Kemp KC, Hobza P, Zboril R, Kim KS: Functionalization of graphene: covalent and non-covalent approaches, derivatives and applications. Chem Rev 2012, 112: 6156–6214. 10.1021/cr3000412View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chen D, Feng H, Li J: Graphene oxide: preparation, functionalization, and electrochemical applications. Chem Rev 2012, 112: 6027–6053. 10.1021/cr300115gView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bai H, Li C, Shi G: Functional composite materials based on chemically converted graphene. Adv Mater 2011, 23: 1089–1115. 10.1002/adma.201003753View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tu Q, Pang L, Chen Y, Zhang Y, Zhang R, Lu B, Wang J: Effects of surface charges of graphene oxide on neuronal outgrowth and branching. Analyst 2014, 139: 105–115. 10.1039/c3an01796fView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Katz EY: A chemically modified electrode capable of a spontaneous immobilization of amino compounds due to its functionalization with succinimidyl groups. J Electroanal Chem 1990, 291: 257–260. 10.1016/0022-0728(90)87193-NView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lin S, Lee AS-Y, Lin C-C, Lee C-K: Determination of binding constant and stoichiometry for antibody-antigen interaction with surface plasmon resonance. Curr Proteomics 2006, 3: 271–282. 10.2174/157016406780655586View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Myszka DG: Kinetic analysis of macromolecular interactions using surface plasmon resonance biosensors. Curr Opin Biotechnol 1997, 8: 50–57. 10.1016/S0958-1669(97)80157-7View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Oshannessy DJ, Brighamburke M, Soneson KK, Hensley P, Brooks I: Determination of rate and equilibrium binding constants for macromolecular interactions using surface plasmon resonance: use of nonlinear least squares analysis methods. Anal Biochem 1993, 212: 457–468. 10.1006/abio.1993.1355View ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.