Phase-pure iron pyrite nanocrystals for low-cost photodetectors
© Liu et al.; licensee Springer. 2014
Received: 29 July 2014
Accepted: 25 September 2014
Published: 2 October 2014
Earth-abundant iron pyrite (FeS2) shows great potential as a light absorber for solar cells and photodetectors due to their high absorption coefficient (>105 cm-1). In this paper, high-quality phase-pure and single crystalline pyrite nanocrystals were synthesized via facile, low-cost, and environment friendly hydrothermal method. The molar ratio of sulphur to iron and the reaction time play a crucial role in determining the quality and morphology of FeS2 nanocrystals. X-ray diffraction and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy confirm that phase-pure and single crystalline pyrite nanocrystals can be synthesized with high sulphur to iron molar ratio and sufficient reaction time. For the first time, a crystalline nanogap pyrite photodetector with promising photocurrent and UV-visible photoresponse has been fabricated. This work further demonstrates a facile route to synthesize high-quality FeS2 nanomaterials and their potential in optoelectronic applications.
KeywordsIron pyrite Photodetector Hydrothermal Nanocrystal
Iron pyrite (cubic β-FeS2), commonly known as a non-toxic and earth-abundant compound, has been regarded as one of the most promising semiconductor materials to meet the urgent demand for cost-effective energy solutions [1, 2]. FeS2 has a band gap of 0.95 eV, which matches the solar spectrum, high absorption coefficient (approximately 105 cm-1 for hν > 1.3 eV) [3, 4], excellent electric properties with carrier mobility about 360 cm2 V-1 s-1, and long minority carrier diffusion length (approximately 0.1 to 1.0 μm) [1, 2]. It provides a new alternative way for high-performance photovoltaic cells as well as optoelectronic devices.
Despite these attractive properties, the promises of FeS2 have not been fulfilled. For example, the conversion efficiency of FeS2 solar cells has been limited to only 3% and further improvement remains challenging . The main issues to synthesize high-performance FeS2 devices are phase impurities and surface defects, which could greatly undermine the superior properties of FeS2. Although high quantum efficiency (>90%) and photocurrent (>42 mA cm-2) have been reported for FeS2 solar cells [7–10], the poor crystal quality of bulk FeS2 has led to very low open circuit voltages (<0.2 V) .
The recently realized high-quality FeS2 nanostructures have triggered the new interest for their applications in various types of devices, such as solar cells, photoelectrochemical cells, photodetectors, and battery cathodes [11–14]. To date, various ways to synthesize FeS2 nanostructures have been reported, including metal-organic chemical vapor deposition , thermal sulphidation , magnetron sputtering , hydrothermal synthesis , and hot injection method . Among these methods, hydrothermal method has been favored due to its low temperature process, which can greatly reduce the phase impurities and surface defects .
In this work, we demonstrate a polymer-assisted hydrothermal method without using any expensive precursors or poisonous reagents to synthesize nanostructured FeS2, including FeS2 polygonal nanoparticles, nanocubes, and hierarchical nanostructures. In addition, a nanogap (with a gap as small as 200 nm) FeS2 photodetector has been fabricated. Using such a simple nanogap photoconductor, promising photocurrents and UV-visible (UV-vis) spectral photoresponse have been observed. This facile method to synthesize high-quality FeS2 nanomaterials and their potential applications in high-performance optoelectronics devices demonstrates the growing potential of this earth-abundant material towards low-cost optoelectronic applications.
To obtain high-quality FeS2, the synthesis was carried out using different reaction recipes. All reagents used in our work are of analytical grade from J & K Scientific (Edwardsville, Nova Scotia Canada). Firstly, gelatin of 0.54 g was dissolved in 30 mL hot deionized (DI) water. The gelatin here can be easily adsorbed onto Fe(OH)2, thus providing an encapsulation for FeS2 nanocrystal during the reaction. In this way, it can prevent the diffusion of S2- ions, S and H2S to the surface of Fe(OH)2, and the aggregation of nanoparticles into large microparticles . Therefore, gelatin plays a key role in the size uniformity and stabilization of FeS2 nanocrystals. Secondly, 1.5 mmol FeCl2 · 4H2O was dissolved in 5 mL DI water and then added to the gelatin solution drop by drop at room temperature to avoid the oxidation of Fe2+. By adding NaOH powder, the pH of the solution was then slowly adjusted to about 12. The overdosing OH- at this stage provides an alkaline environment, thus facilitating the reaction processes. NaOH has a significant influence on the reaction between S and water and hence the quality of FeS2 nanocrystals . During this process, the transparent solution changed from light yellow to light green gradually, and then separated out into dark green flocculent precipitates. Lastly, sulphur powder was added to the homogenous solution, which was magnetically stirred for over an hour. The final concentration of gelatin was about 1.5% w/v. The prepared mixture was sealed in a stainless steel autoclave and maintained at 200°C for a certain reaction time before being naturally cooled down to room temperature. The black product was then centrifuged and washed using DI water and alcohol for several times to remove the excess polymer and ions . The phase-pure and crystalline nanocrystals was then acquired and dispersed in ethanol to avoid oxidation.
The experimental parameters used for the hydrothermal synthesis of FeS 2 nanoparticles
Reaction time (hour)
Phase and impurities
FeS2 + Fe x O1 - x + S
FeS2 + Fe x O1 - x + S
FeS2 + Fe x O1 - x
FeS2 + Fe x O1 - x
Nanocubes and polygonal nanoparticles
FeS2 + Fe x O1 - x
Nanocubes and hierarchical particles
Results and discussion
In conclusion, single phase pyrite FeS2 nanocrystals were successfully synthesized using a facile hydrothermal approach. The high-quality crystalline pyrite FeS2 nanocrystals were further confirmed by HRTEM and XRD measurements. The sulphur and iron molar ratio, [S]/[Fe], plays a critical role in nanocrystal quality and morphology. A nanogap pyrite FeS2 nanocrystal photodetector was fabricated using standard photolithography and focused ion beam milling. The nanogap photodetector shows a very high photocurrent in the range of 10-2 to 1 μA for approximately 1 μm2 gap area and spectral response in the UV-vis range. The facile approach for pyrite FeS2 synthesis and the successful demonstration of nanocrystal photodetector suggest a promising way to achieve low-cost optoelectronic devices using pyrite FeS2 nanocrystals.
This work was supported in part by the National Basic Research Program (973) of China through Grant 2013CB933301 and the National Natural Science Foundation of China through Grants NSFC-51272038 and NSFC-61204060.
- Puthussery J, Seefeld S, Berry N, Gibbs M, Law M: Colloidal iron pyrite (FeS2) nanocrystal inks for thin-film photovoltaics. J Am Chem Soc 2011, 133: 716–719. 10.1021/ja1096368View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Caban-Acevedo M, Faber MS, Tan Y, Hamers RJ, Jin S: Synthesis and properties of semiconducting iron pyrite (FeS2) nanowires. Nano Lett 2012, 12: 1977–1982. 10.1021/nl2045364View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ennaoui A, Fiechter S, Goslowsky H, Tributsch H: Photoactive synthetic polycrystalline pyrite (FeS2). J Electrochem Soc 1985, 132: 1579–1582. 10.1149/1.2114168 10.1149/1.2114168 10.1149/1.2114168View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Dash WC, Newman R: Intrinsic optical absorption in single-crystal germanium and silicon at 77 °K and 300 °K. Phys Rev 1955, 99: 1151–1155. 10.1103/PhysRev.99.1151View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Altermatt P, Kiesewetter T, Ellmer K, Tributsch H: Specifying targets of future research in photovoltaic devices containing pyrite (FeS2) by numerical modeling. Solar Energy Mater Solar Cells 2002, 71: 181–195. 10.1016/S0927-0248(01)00053-8View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Macpherson HA, Stoldt CR: Iron pyrite nanocubes: size and shape considerations for photovoltaic application. ACS Nano 2012, 6: 8940–8949. 10.1021/nn3029502View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ennaoui A, Fiechter S, Jaegermann W, Tributsch H: Photoelectrochemistry of highly quantum efficient single-crystalline n-FeS2 (pyrite). J Electrochem Soc 1986, 133: 97–106. 10.1149/1.2108553View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ennaoui A, Fiechter S, Tributsch H, Giersig M, Vogel R, Weller H: Photoelectrochemical energy-conversion obtained with ultrathin organo-metallic-chemical-vapor-deposition layer of FeS2 (pyrite) on TiO2. J Electrochem Soc 1992, 139: 2514–2518. 10.1149/1.2221255View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rezig B, Dahman H, Kenzari M: Iron pyrite FeS2 for flexible solar cells. Renew Energy 1992, 2: 125–128. 10.1016/0960-1481(92)90098-NView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ennaoui A, Fiechter S, Pettenkofer C, Alonsovante N, Buker K, Bronold M, Hopfner C, Tributsch H: Iron disulfide for solar-energy conversion. Solar Energy Mater Solar Cells 1993, 29: 289–370. 10.1016/0927-0248(93)90095-KView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wang Y, Wang D, Jiang Y, Chen H, Chen C, Ho K, Chou H, Chen C: FeS2 nanocrystal ink as a catalytic electrode for dye-sensitized solar cells. Angew Chem Int Ed 2013, 52: 6694–6698. 10.1002/anie.201300401View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wu J, Liu L, Liu S, Yu P, Zheng Z, Shafa M, Zhou Z, Li H, Ji H, Wang ZM: High responsivity photoconductors based on iron pyrite nanowires using sulfurization of anodized iron oxide nanotubes. Nano Lett 2014. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/nl503059t DOI:Google Scholar
- Jiao J, Chen L, Kuang D, Gao W, Feng H, Xia J: Synthesis of FeS2 and Co-doped FeS2 films with the aid of supercritical carbon dioxide and their photoelectrochemical properties. RSC Advances 2011, 1: 255–261. 10.1039/c1ra00066gView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Li L, Cabán-Acevedo M, Girard SN, Jin S: High-purity iron pyrite (FeS2) nanowires as high-capacity nanostructured cathodes for lithium-ion batteries. Nanoscale 2014, 6: 2112–2118. 10.1039/c3nr05851dView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Meester B, Reijnen L, Goossens A, Schoonman J: Synthesis of pyrite (FeS2) thin films by low-pressure MOCVD. Chemical Vapor Deposition 2000, 6: 121–128. 10.1002/(SICI)1521-3862(200006)6:3<121::AID-CVDE121>3.0.CO;2-SView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Morrish R, Silverstein R, Wolden CA: Synthesis of stoichiometric FeS2 through plasma-assisted sulfurization of Fe2O3 nanorods. J Am Chem Soc 2012, 134: 17854–17857. 10.1021/ja307412eView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Willeke G, Dasbach R, Sailer B, Bucher E: Thin pyrite (FeS2) films prepared by magnetron sputtering. Thin Sol Film 1992, 213: 271–276. 10.1016/0040-6090(92)90293-KView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wadia C, Wu Y, Gul S, Volkman SK, Guo J, Alivisatos AP: Surfactant-assisted hydrothermal synthesis of single phase pyrite FeS2 nanocrystals. Chem Mater 2009, 21: 2568–2570. 10.1021/cm901273v 10.1021/cm901273v 10.1021/cm901273vView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Golsheikh AM, Huang N, Lim H, Chia C, Harrison I, Muhamad M: One-pot hydrothermal synthesis and characterization of FeS2(pyrite)/graphene nanocomposite. Chem Eng J 2013, 218: 276–284.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wang D, Wang Q, Wang T: Shape controlled growth of pyrite FeS2 crystallites via a polymer-assisted hydrothermal route. CrystEngComm 2010, 12: 3797–3805. 10.1039/c004266hView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wang D, Wang Q, Wang T: Controlled growth of pyrite FeS2 crystallites by a facile surfactant-assisted solvothermal method. CrystEngComm 2010, 12: 755–761. 10.1039/b917941kView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhu L, Richardson B, Tanumihardja J, Yu Q: Controlling morphology and phase of pyrite FeS2 hierarchical particles via the combination of structure-direction and chelating agents. CrystEngComm 2012, 14: 4188–4195. 10.1039/c2ce25222hView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Alfonso DR: Computational investigation of FeS2 surfaces and prediction of effects of sulfur environment on stabilities. J Phys Chem C 2010, 114: 8971–8980.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bi Y, Yuan Y, Exstrom CL, Darveau SA, Huang J: Air stable, photosensitive, phase pure iron pyrite nanocrystal thin films for photovoltaic application. Nano Lett 2011, 11: 4953–4957. 10.1021/nl202902zView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hung A, Muscat J, Yarovsky I, Russo SP: Density-functional theory studies of pyrite FeS2(100) and (110) surfaces. Surf Sci 2002, 513: 511–524. 10.1016/S0039-6028(02)01849-6View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yan Y, Jones K, Jiang C, Wu X, Noufi R, Al-Jassim M: Understanding the defect physics in polycrystalline photovoltaic materials. Phys B Condens Matter 2007, 401: 25–32.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Murphy R, Strongin DR: Surface reactivity of pyrite and related sulfides. Surf Sci Rep 2009, 64: 1–45. 10.1016/j.surfrep.2008.09.002View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Birkholz M, Fiechter S, Hartmann A, Tributsch H: Sulfur deficiency in iron pyrite (FeS2-x) and its consequences for band-structure models. Phys Rev B 1991, 43: 11926. 10.1103/PhysRevB.43.11926View ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.