Open Access

Surfactant-treated graphene covered polyaniline nanowires for supercapacitor electrode

  • Balasubramaniyan Rajagopalan1,
  • Seung Hyun Hur1 and
  • Jin Suk Chung1Email author
Nanoscale Research Letters201510:183

https://doi.org/10.1186/s11671-015-0888-1

Received: 5 February 2015

Accepted: 7 April 2015

Published: 16 April 2015

Abstract

Surfactant-treated graphene/polyaniline (G/PANI) nanocomposites were prepared by the MnO2 template-aided oxidative polymerization of aniline (ANI) on the surfactant-treated graphene sheets. The electrochemical performances of the G/PANI nanocomposites in a three-electrode system using an aqueous sulfuric acid as an electrolyte exhibited a specific capacitance of 436 F g−1 at 1 A g−1, which is much higher than the specific capacitance of pure PANI (367 F g−1). Such a higher specific capacitance of the G/PANI nanocomposite inferred an excellent synergistic effect of respective pseudocapacitance and electrical double-layer capacitance of PANI and graphene.

Keywords

PANI nanowire Graphene Nanocomposites Supercapacitor

Background

To develop an advanced supercapacitor, low cost, eco-benignity, and high efficiency are indispensable. Based on these needs, much interest has been focused on the electrode materials for supercapacitor to improve both the power and energy density [1-3]. Recently, high surface area carbons, metal oxides, and conducting polymers are frequently used as the advanced material in supercapacitor [4]. Two-dimensional (2D) graphene is widely used for energy storage devices owing to its outstanding properties [5]. The preparation of porous graphene with a high surface area by the introduction of pseudocapacitive materials such as metal oxides or conducting polymers to graphene sheets for hybrid materials is one of the efficient approaches for improving the performance of graphene-based supercapacitors [6,7].

Conducting polymers such as polyaniline (PANI), polypyrrole, and polythiophene have been extensively studied for pseudocapacitive materials [8]. Higher energy storage capacitances result owing to the fast faradaic reactions between the electrode materials with unique proton doping and dedoping mechanism of conducting polymers [9]. The drawbacks of these pseudocapacitive materials are the lack of long-term stability and rather slow charge/discharge time because of the swelling and shrinking of polymers [10]. The polymers of definite arrangement and well-conductive path for ion and electron transport are crucial to develop PANI with superior electrochemical performances. The polymer particles between the conducting materials (graphene or CNT) efficiently provide a higher electroactive region and increase the effective access of the electrode in both the double layer and redox mechanism [8,10,11]. The 2D graphene is a good choice for polymer nanocomposites owing to its excellent electrical and mechanical properties and increased electrochemical performances.

The OH, COOH, and epoxy functional groups of graphene oxide (GO) easily interact with polymer backbones to improve the properties of the nanocomposites [4,11-13]. However, the higher electrical resistance of GO or GO with polymer nanocomposites results in poor electrochemical performances in supercapacitor electrode. In contrast, reduced GO is a good choice for double-layer capacitors, as it improves the electrical conductivity of the nanocomposites [14]. The aggregation of graphene nanosheets is an obstacle in the application of the reduced GO in solution, hindering the electrochemical performances [15,16]. The functionalization or surfactants have been used for preventing the aggregation of the graphene sheets [17,18]. A uniform morphology of hybrid material is also essential for the successful electrolyte transport on the electrode-electrolyte boundaries [1,19]. Based on these strategies, this study is focused on the improvement of the energy storage performance of PANI via the intercalation of PANI and surfactant-treated graphene sheets for supercapacitor electrode. Recently, aggregation-free graphene nanocomposites were obtained via the encapsulation of the graphene sheets on the surface of PANI or metal oxides [20,21]. The wrapping of the graphene sheets is helpful for supercapacitor, which significantly increases the charge transport characteristics of the PANI or metal oxide electrodes.

Herein, we describe the preparation of graphene/polyaniline (G/PANI) nanocomposites by inserting MnO2 between the surfactant-treated graphene sheets and followed by oxidative polymerization of aniline (ANI). Sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) used as the surfactant prevents the aggregation of graphene sheets and spacer for accommodating the PANI between the graphene sheets. By varying the ratio of graphene and PANI, the effect of specific capacitance was studied.

Methods

Materials

Expandable graphite (Grade 1721) was obtained from Asbury Carbon (Asbury, NJ, USA). Concentrated sulfuric acid (H2SO4), potassium permanganate (KMnO4), hydrochloric acid (HCl), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), and manganese (II) sulfate monohydrate were received from Samchun Chemical Co., Ltd. (Gyeonggy-do, Korea). Hydrazine monohydrate (N2H4-H2O), potassium dichromate, SLS, and ANI were provided by Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). All the chemicals were used as received without further purification.

Preparation of GO-SLS/PANI nanocomposite

MnO2 was prepared following the literature procedure [22], and GO was prepared according to the modified Hummers method [23]. GO (200 mg) was suspended in DI water for approximately 2 mg/mL. SLS (1.2 g) was added to the GO suspension, while stirring and sonication for 30 min. A predetermined quantity of MnO2 was added, and the stirring was continued for an additional 30 min. The GO-SLS/MnO2 solution was taken in a 500-mL beaker and placed in an ice-cold water. While stirring, ANI dispersed in DI water and HCl (2 M) were added, and the reaction was continued for approximately 3 h. A viscous black-colored solution of GO-SLS/PANI was obtained at the end of the reaction.

Preparation of G/PANI nanocomposites

The viscous solution of GO-SLS/PANI was placed in an oil bath, and the temperature was set to 90 C. Hydrazine hydrate (1:1 with respect to GO) was added to that solution, and the reaction was continued for 1 h. The reduced GO-SLS/PANI was washed with 1 M HCl and ethanol to completely remove SLS from the nanocomposite solution. Finally, the G/PANI nanocomposites were dried at 60 C for 24 h to obtain the nanocomposite powders. The blank graphene sample was also prepared by the reduction of the surfactant-treated GO without using PANI. The G/PANI nanocomposites were labeled as G/PANI (GP) 46 and GP 64 according to the weight percent of graphene in the final product.

Electrode preparation and electrochemical measurements

All the electrochemical measurements were performed in a three-electrode cell assembly equipped with a reference electrode (Ag/AgCl), a platinum wire counter electrode, and a glassy carbon working electrode. The electrode was fabricated by sonication in 85% of active material, 10% super-P carbon black, and 5% polytetrafluoroethylene in 2 mL of ethanol solution. The electrochemical performances were investigated using a 2 M aqueous sulfuric acid as the electrolyte. The mass of active material for the electrochemical measurement was about 1.5 mg. The electrochemical charge/discharge and cyclic voltammetry (CV) were performed in the potential window range of −0.2 to 0.8 V. The electrochemical impedance spectra (EIS) were measured at frequencies between 100 kHz and 0.01 Hz.

Instruments

Morphologies of the G/PANI nanocomposites were characterized via field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM, JSM-6500 F, JEOL Ltd., Akishima-shi, Japan). Thermal properties were characterized using a thermogravimetric analysis (TGA, Q50, TA Instruments, New Castle, DE, USA). Functional group of the nanocomposites was determined using a Nicolet IR 200 FTIR spectrometer (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and the I D and I G values of the graphene were determined using a Raman (DXR; Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The charge/discharge and CV of the G/PANI electrode were performed by using a battery tester (Won A Tech, WBCS 3000, Seoul, Korea). EIS was measured using Bio Logic Science Instruments (Claix, France).

Results and discussion

The template-aided preparation of G/PANI nanocomposites was aimed at reducing the aggregation of the nanocomposites, which improves the electrical conductivity and provides the sufficient electrolyte accessibility to the electrode/electrolyte interface. The layer stacking and non-uniform deposition of the PANI on the G sheets can be greatly avoided. The synthesis scheme for the G/PANI nanocomposite is shown in Figure 1. The intercalation of MnO2 on the surfactant-treated graphene significantly prevents the aggregation of the nanocomposites. The MnO2 obtained by the hydrothermal method produces a nanowire of a needle-like morphology (Figure 2). Figure 2a,b,c,d shows the nanowire structure of MnO2. The sizes of nanowires varied between 2.6 and 3.5 μm, and their lengths and width varied between 121 and 130 nm. Figure 2e,f,g shows the morphology of the G/PANI nanocomposites. The PANI formed by the oxidative polymerization is almost similar in morphology to those of the MnO2 nanowires. Figure 2e,f,g clearly shows the intercalated morphologies of PANI and graphene sheets. Because of the electrostatic interactions between the graphene and PANI, the graphene sheets covered the entire area of the PANI nanowires. The detailed mechanism for the formation of PANI nanowires from the MnO2 template is given below [22]:
Figure 1

Preparation of G/PANI nanocomposites. Systematic representation for the intercalation of PANI nanowires and G.

Figure 2

FE-SEM images of the nanocomposites. FE-SEM images of MnO2 nanowires (a-d), G/PANI nanocomposites (e-g), and EDAX of the G/PANI nanocomposite (h).

$$ \mathrm{A}\mathrm{N}\mathrm{I}+{\mathrm{Mn}\mathrm{O}}_2+4{\mathrm{H}}^{+}+2{\mathrm{e}}^{\hbox{-}}\to {\mathrm{Mn}}^{2+}+2{\mathrm{H}}_2\mathrm{O}+\mathrm{PANI} $$

In the presence of strong acid, ANI polymerization occurred at the surface of the MnO2 nanowires and simultaneously degraded the Mn to soluble Mn2+ ions, then ANI replaced the MnO2, and finally formed PANI nanowires [22]. While oxidative polymerization of ANI, some of ANI monomers were polymerized on the graphene surfaces because of the doping via the π-π interactions of ANI and GO. The coating of PANI on the graphene sheets increases the contact area of the electrode, improving the electrochemical performance of the G/PANI nanocomposites [7]. The absence of Mn peak in the energy dispersive X-ray analysis (EDAX) spectrum of the G/PANI nanocomposites strongly proved the complete removal of Mn as soluble Mn2+ ions in solution (Figure 2h).

As shown in the TGA curve in Figure 3, the initial weight loss of graphene at approximately 100 C occurred because of the thermal decomposition of the residual water. The residual functional groups present in the graphene sheets deintercalated between 200 C and 300 C, and a weight loss of 25 wt.% was observed at 800 C. After the thermal decomposition of functional groups, the final residue of PANI was 47%. However, the thermal stability of PANI considerably increased with the gradual loading of graphene sheets and was attributed to the formation of G/PANI hybrid materials.
Figure 3

TGA of the nanocomposites. TGA of MnO2, G, PANI, GP 46, and GP 64 measured under the nitrogen atmosphere.

The presence of surface functional groups is commonly identified by FTIR spectroscopy. As seen in Figure 4, the absorption peaks of PANI at 1,556 and 1,468 cm−1 were corresponding to the C-C stretching deformation of quinoids and benzene rings, respectively, whereas, the absorption peaks for quinoids and benzene rings of the G/PANI were observed at 1,560 and 1,476 cm−1, respectively. The absorption peaks at 1,296 cm−1 of PANI and 1,293.5 cm−1 of the G/PANI nanocomposites are attributed to the C-N stretching band of an aromatic amine [24]. The presence of a strong band at 3,422 cm−1 is an indication of the N-H stretching band of an aromatic ring of the PANI. Obviously, the intensity of the peak ratio decreased from the pure PANI to the G/PANI nanocomposites, indicating the increasing stability of the nanocomposites [25]. The intense peaks observed at 3,446 and 1,552 cm−1 for graphene accounted for the presence of residual -OH groups and aromatic C = C stretching vibrations, respectively. The sharp peak at 3,446 cm−1 for graphene clearly indicates the residual -OH groups of the graphene sheets. However, the G/PANI nanocomposites showed the absence of peak at 3,446 cm−1, representing an electrochemical reduction of GO during the polymerization of ANI.
Figure 4

FTIR analysis of the nanocomposites. FTIR spectra of G, PANI, and GP 46 nanocomposites.

Raman spectroscopy is a powerful technique for measuring the interracial interactions between the graphene and polymers. As seen in Figure 5, the peaks observed at 1,603 and 1,505 cm−1 for the pure PANI correspond to the C = C stretching vibrations of benzenoid and quinoid rings, respectively, whereas the C-H bending vibrations of benzene and quinoid rings are observed at 1,249 and 1,165 cm−1, respectively. The reduced surfactant-treated GO shows the characteristics of D and G bands at 1,340 and 1,572 cm−1, respectively, corresponding to an I D /I G ratio was 1.3. These results indicate that effective reduction of graphene oxide by hydrazine. No obvious difference was observed between the G/PANI and pure PANI, clearly indicating the formation of hybrid materials.
Figure 5

Raman spectroscopy of the nanocomposites. Raman spectra of G, PANI, GP 46 at a laser wavelength of 633 nm.

The electrochemical performances of an electrode material were investigated by galvanostatic charge/discharge measurements in 2 M sulfuric acid solution. The charge/discharge of the nanocomposites was measured under the potential windows of −0.2 to 0.8 V. The specific capacitance of the G/PANI nanocomposites was investigated at different applied current densities of 0.2 and 1 A g−1. The specific capacitance of the G/PANI nanocomposites was estimated from the discharge cycles according to the following equation:
$$ {C}_{\mathrm{spec}}=\frac{I}{m\left(dv/dt\right)} $$
where I is the current loading (A), dv/dt is the slope of discharge curve, and m is the mass of the active materials (g) [5,26]. The slope of a full discharge curve (except internal resistance (IR) drop) was taken to measure the specific capacitance of the nanocomposites. Figure 6a shows the galvanostatic charge/discharge cycles of graphene, PANI, and G/PANI nanocomposites measured under the current density of 0.2 A g−1 for the first 5 cycles. As shown in Figure 6b, the initial specific capacitance of PANI was found to be 392 F g−1. The higher specific capacitance was attributed to the stronger doping effect of sulfuric acid on the PANI nanowires. The surfactant-treated graphene showed a specific capacitance of 220 F g−1 at 0.2 A g−1. Such a high specific capacitance of graphene can be attributed to the pseudocapacitive effect of the residual oxygen groups of graphene sheets [5]. Owing to the synergistic effect between the graphene and PANI, the first discharge capacitance of GP 64 and GP 46 was found to be 442 and 453 F g−1, respectively at 0.2 A g−1. Interestingly, the IR drop of the nanocomposites decreased with increasing graphene loadings, indicating the decreasing resistance of the nanocomposites electrode.
Figure 6

Galvanostatic charge/discharge cycles of the nanocomposites. Galvanostatic charge/discharge of (a) G, PANI, GP 64, and GP 46 at 0.2 A g−1 for the first five charge/discharge cycles. (b) First charge/discharge cycle of G, PANI, GP 64, and GP 46 at 0.2 A g−1. (c) First charge/discharge cycle of G, PANI, GP 64, and GP 46 at 1 A g−1. (d) Cyclic stability of GP 46 measured for 500 cycles.

Figure 6c shows the charge/discharge characteristics of graphene, PANI, GP 64, and GP 46 at 1 A g−1. The discharge capacitance of GP 46 was 436 F g−1 at 1 A g−1, which is slightly lower than 0.2 A g−1, indicating a good synergistic effect of the PANI and surfactant-treated graphene sheets. As compared to graphene, the discharge curves of the G/PANI show the deviation from the straight line, attributed to the pseudocapacitance contribution over the electrical double-layer capacitor (EDLC) behavior. The detailed investigation of the specific capacitance of graphene, PANI, GP 64, and GP 46 is listed in Table 1. The specific capacitance of GP 46 at 1 A g−1 is larger than those recently reported for G/PANI nanocomposites (Table 2). The results of the higher specific capacitance of PANI and G/PANI nanocomposites at 1 A g−1 inferred an efficient ionic transport of PANI and G/PANI electrode during the electrochemical reactions. Figure 6d shows the electrochemical cyclic stability of GP 46. The capacitance of GP 46 was stable up to 500 cycles, and the initial capacitance retention of 91.7% was achieved at the 500th cycle. The surface loading of graphene sheets enhanced the electrical conductivity and prevented the PANI from shrinking or swelling, thus resulting in a stable cycle life.
Table 1

Specific capacitance of G and G/PANI nanocomposites

Composites

Capacitance (F g −1 ) at 0.2 A g −1

Capacitance (F g −1 ) at 1 A g −1

PANI

392

367

GP 46

453

436

GP 64

442

393

G

220

114

Table 2

Specific capacitance of G/PANI and recently reported G/PANI nanocomposites at 1 A g −1

G/PANI

Capacitance (F g −1 ), 3-electrode

Ref.

G-PANI nanofiber

210

[1]

RGO-PANI

323

[2]

Surfactant stabilized graphene-PANI

321

[18]

G/PANI

436

Present

The CV of the G, PANI, and G/PANI nanocomposites were performed at 10 mV s−1 (Figure 7a). The CV of G shows the complete rectangular curve, representing the characteristics of EDLC behavior [11]. However, those of G/PANI nanocomposites clearly show the rectangular peaks with redox peaks, indicating the contribution of EDLC and pseudocapacitance effect [11,24]. The increases in cyclic areas of the G/PANI nanocomposites in comparison with G and PANI are closely related to the increase of storage capacitance of the electrodes. Further, EIS analyses were conducted in order to prove the capacitance behavior and electrical resistance of the electrodes (Figure 7b). The semicircle and a straight line of the EIS at the corresponding high- and low-frequency regions indicate the charge transfer resistance and EDLC of the electrodes, respectively [1,13]. As shown in Figure 7b, the semicircles of the nanocomposites decreased with G loadings, indicating the decrease of charge transfer resistances of the electrodes. Meanwhile, the straight lines become more vertical for G/PANI nanocomposites, representing the higher EDLC behavior.
Figure 7

CV and EIS analysis. (a) CV of G, PANI, GP 64, and GP 46 nanocomposites. (b) EIS of the G, PANI, GP 64, and GP 46 nanocomposites.

Conclusions

The intercalation of PANI nanowires and surfactant-treated graphene allows the faster electrolyte diffusion and easy accessibility of the electrolyte at higher current densities. The electrochemical characterizations show the superior performances of GP 46 at higher current densities. For example, the specific capacitance of GP 46 at 1 A g−1 was as high as 436 F g−1 and obtained good cycle stability for 500 cycles. The excellent electrochemical performance of GP 46 at higher current density was attributed to the good synergistic effect of the PANI nanowires and graphene sheets.

Abbreviations

ANI: 

aniline

CV: 

cyclic voltammetry

EDAX: 

energy-dispersive X-ray analysis

EDLC: 

electrical double layer capacitor

EIS: 

electrochemical impedance spectroscopy

FE-SEM: 

field emission-scanning electron microscopy

FTIR: 

Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy

G/PANI: 

graphene/polyaniline

GO: 

graphene oxide

GP: 

G/PANI

IR: 

internal resistance

PANI: 

polyaniline

SLS: 

sodium lauryle sulfate

TGA: 

thermogravimetric analysis

Declarations

Acknowledgement

This research was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (2011–0022485).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
School of Chemical Engineering, University of Ulsan

References

  1. Zhang K, Zhang LL, Zhao XS, Wu J. Graphene/polyaniline nanofiber composites as supercapacitor electrodes. Chem Mater. 2010;22:1392–401.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Zhang J, Zhao XS. Conducting polymers directly coated on reduced graphene oxide sheets as high-performance supercapacitor electrodes. J Phys Chem C. 2012;116:5420–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Gómez H, Ram MK, Alvi F, Villalba P, Stefanakos E, Kumar A. Graphene-conducting polymer nanocomposite as novel electrode for supercapacitors. J Power Sources. 2011;196:4102–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Wang H, Hao Q, Yang X, Lu L, Wang X. Effect of graphene oxide on the properties of its composite with polyaniline. App Mater Interfaces. 2010;2:821–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Rajagopalan B, Chung JS. Reduced chemically modified graphene oxide for supercapacitor electrode. Nanoscale Res Lett. 2014;9:535–44.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Wang D, Kou R, Choi D, Yang Z, Nie Z, Li J, et al. Ternary self-assembly of ordered metal oxide graphene nanocomposites for electrochemical energy storage. ACS Nano. 2010;4:1587–95.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Xu G, Wang N, Wei J, Lv L, Zhang J, Chen Z, et al. Preparation of graphene oxide/polyaniline nanocomposite with assistance of supercritical carbon dioxide for supercapacitor electrodes. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2012;51:14390–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Snook GA, Kao P, Best AS. Conducting-polymer-based supercapacitor devices and electrodes. J Power Sources. 2011;196:1–12.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Li H, Wang J, Chu Q, Wang Z, Zhang F, Wang S. Theoretical and experimental specific capacitance of polyaniline in sulfuric acid. J Power Sources. 2009;190:578–86.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Zhang LL, Zhao S, Tian XN, Zhao XS. Layered graphene oxide nanostructures with sandwiched conducting polymers as supercapacitor electrodes. Langmuir. 2010;26:17624–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Yan J, Wei T, Shao B, Fan Z, Qian W, Zhang M, et al. Preparation of a graphene nanosheet/polyaniline composite with high specific capacitance. Carbon. 2010;48:487–93.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Li J, Xie H, Li Y, Liu J, Li Z. Electrochemical properties of graphene nanosheets/polyaniline nanofibers composites as electrode for supercapacitors. J Power Sources. 2011;196:10775–81.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Li Y, Peng H, Li G, Chen K. Synthesis and electrochemical performance of sandwich-like polyaniline/graphene composite nanosheets. Eur Polym J. 2012;48:1406–12.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Wang DW, Li F, Zhao J, Ren W, Chen ZG, Tan J, et al. Fabrication of graphene/polyaniline composite paper via in situ anodic electro polymerization for high-performance flexible electrode. ACS Nano. 2009;3:1745–52.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Yang SY, Chang KH, Tien HW, Lee YF, Li SM, Wang YS, et al. Design and tailoring of a hierarchical graphene-carbon nanotube architecture for supercapacitors. J Mater Chem. 2011;21:2374–80.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Pham VH, Dang TT, Cuong TV, Hur SH, Kong BS, Kim EJ, et al. Synthesis of highly concentrated suspension of chemically converted graphene in organic solvents: effect of temperature on the extent of reduction and dispersibility. Korean J Chem Eng. 2012;29:680–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Zhang K, Mao L, Zhang LL, On Chan HS, Zhao XS, Wu J. Surfactant-intercalated, chemically reduced graphene oxide for high performance supercapacitor electrodes. J Mater Chem. 2011;21:7302–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Mao L, Zhang K, Chan HSO, Wu J. Surfactant-stabilized graphene/polyaniline nanofiber composites for high performance supercapacitor electrode. J Mater Chem. 2012;22:80–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Ashok Kumar N, Choi HJ, Shin YR, Chang DW, Dai L, Baek JB. Polyaniline-grafted reduced graphene oxide for efficient electrochemical supercapacitors. ACS Nano. 2012;6:1715–23.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Luo Y, Kong D, Jia Y, Luo J, Lu Y, Zhang D, et al. Self-assembled graphene@PANI nanoworm composites with enhanced supercapacitor performance. RSC Adv. 2013;3:5851–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Luo Y, Luo J, Zhou W, Qi X, Zhang H, Yu DYW, et al. Controlled synthesis of hierarchical-wrapped TiO2@Co3O4 coaxial nanobelt arrays for high-performance lithium storage. J Mater Chem A. 2013;1:273–81.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Pan L, Pu L, Shi Y, Song S, Xu Z, Zhang R, et al. Synthesis of polyaniline nanotubes with a reactive template of manganese oxide. Adv Mater. 2007;19:461–4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Pham VH, Cuong TV, Hur SH, Oh ES, Kim EJ, Shin EW, et al. Chemical functionalization of graphene sheets by solvothermal reduction of a graphene oxide suspension in N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone. J Mater Chem. 2011;21:3371–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Li X, Song H, Zhang Y, Wang H, Du K, Li H, et al. Enhanced electrochemical capacitance of graphene nanosheets coating with polyaniline for supercapacitors. Int J Electrochem Sci. 2012;7:5163–71.Google Scholar
  25. Kondawar SB, Deshpande MD, Agrawal SP. Transport properties of conductive polyaniline nanocomposites based on carbon nanotubes. Int J Compos Mater. 2012;2:32–6.Google Scholar
  26. Wang H, Hao Q, Yang X, Lu L, Wang X. Graphene oxide doped polyaniline for supercapacitors. Electrochem Commun. 2009;11:1158–61.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Rajagopalan et al.; licensee Springer. 2015

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.