Open Access

Controllable synthesis porous Ag2CO3 nanorods for efficient photocatalysis

Nanoscale Research Letters201510:193

Received: 29 January 2015

Accepted: 7 April 2015

Published: 21 April 2015


The novel porous Ag2CO3 nanorods were facilely synthesized via a one-pot aqueous solution reaction at room temperature. The crystalline phase and size distribution of the nanorods were determined by X-ray diffraction (XRD) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM), respectively. In addition, the porous feature of nanorods was confirmed by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and nitrogen adsorption-desorption. The morphology and size of the Ag2CO3 crystal can be regulated via the choice of dispersing agents and adding approaches of reactants. Photocatalytic results show that the porous Ag2CO3 nanorods exhibit excellent photodegradation of rhodamine B (RhB) under visible-light irradiation, particularly the photoactivity performance and stability can be further improved in the presence of sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3). It is indicated that NaHCO3 can prevent effectively the photocorrosion and promote the probability of electron-hole separation.


Crystal growth Porous nanorods Silver carbonate Photocatalysis


Semiconductor photocatalysts have attracted intense attention expecting to apply in the fields of pollution removal and fuel production by utilizing abundant sunlight [1-3]. Over the past years, TiO2 as the most universal used photocatalyst has been widely studied owing to its high photocatalytic activity, stability, nontoxicity, and low cost [4-7]. However, TiO2 is a wide bandgap (approximately 3.2 eV) semiconductor and difficult to be activated in visible-light region, only can be utilized under UV light which is a small fraction (about 4%) of the entire solar spectrum. In addition, TiO2 quantum yield of photoactivated processes is frequently lower due to its high recombination of photogenerated electron-hole pairs. Such clear drawback is the main motivation for searching a new, active under visible-light-driven and more efficient photocatalysts [8-10].

Recently, it has been found that silver-containing complex oxide semiconductors show great promise for improving photocatalytic performance owning to their tops of valence band can form a new higher-energy valence band consisting of the hybrid orbital of Ag 4d and O 2p, which make the bandgap narrower [11,12]. As a result, a series of visible-light-responsive novel silver-containing complex oxide semiconductor photocatalysts have been developed, such as AgNbO3 [13,14], AgSbO3 [12,15], Ag2CrO4 [16,17], Ag2SO3 [18], Ag3AsO4 [19], AgMO2 (M = Al,Ga,In) [20], and AgIO4 [21], and their active visible-light-driven photocatalysts for the degradation of organic pollutants have also been explored. More recently, it was reported that Ag2CO3 showed high-efficiency visible-light activity and exhibited universal degradation ability for typically several organic dyes [22-24]. However, the photocorrosion behavior of Ag2CO3 exposed to the light irradiation cannot be ignored. Hence, the addition of light stabilizer in reaction solution is critical to Ag2CO3 photocatalyst for its practical application. Dai et al. [23] prepared Ag2CO3 short rods by a simple precipitation reaction, and it showed that high visible-light photocatalytic activity for the photodegradation of rhodamine B (RhB). The authors stated that the silver nitrate (AgNO3) is beneficial to the stability during the photocatalytic degradation reaction process because it can act as an electron acceptor to avoid photocorrosion of Ag2CO3 photocatalyst. Moreover, it has been reported that the photocatalytic efficiency can be further improved by rational design to achieve porous structures, in that, the porous structures avail the adsorption of reactant molecules and provide multiple accessible passages which reduce the reactant diffusion distance due to their large specific surface area (SSA). Significantly, porous structure can produce more isolated and separated active sites after photoirradiation and provide special channels for charge transport, which results in high efficiency of charge separation and transport in under photoirradiation [25-27].

As far as we know, the synthesis of porous silver-containing complex oxide photocatalysts by one-pot aqueous solution reaction at room temperature has rarely reported. Herein, in the present work, we prepared a novel porous Ag2CO3 nanorod photocatalyst by one-pot aqueous solution reaction using PVP-K90 dispersing agent at room temperature. The as-prepared samples showed efficient photocatalytic activity for the degradation RhB aqueous solution by utilizing sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3) as a light stabilizer under visible-light irradiations. Furthermore, the growth behavior of Ag2CO3 and photocatalysis enhanced mechanism of NaHCO3 were also discussed.



All the chemicals were analytic grade purity and were used without further purification. AgNO3, NaHCO3, polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP-K30, PVP-K90) and RhB were purchased from Shanghai Chemical Regent Factory of China (Shanghai, China).

Synthesis of porous Ag2CO3 nanorods

The porous Ag2CO3 nanorods were synthesized by a typically simple aqueous solution reaction at room temperature. In a typical synthesis, AgNO3 (0.025 M) and PVP-K90 (0.45 M) were dissolved in 40 mL deionized water to form a clear solution by magnetic stirring, then, 40 mL aqueous solution of NaHCO3 (0.05 M) was dropwise added to the obtained solution. The reaction was carried out at room temperature for 2 h under magnetic stirring, and the precipitate was collected by centrifugation, washed three times with deionized water and absolute ethyl alcohol, and dried at 50°C for 12 h. Furthermore, the synthesis of Ag2CO3 thin nanorods was similar to the above description except that PVP-K90 was replaced by PVP-K30. The cube-like Ag2CO3 was achieved by one-time injection of the NaHCO3 solution using PVP-K90 as the dispersing agent. N-doped TiO2, which is good photocatalytic activity under visible-light irradiation, was obtained as a reference to compare with our sample according to the reported literature [28].


Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images were taken using a field-emission scanning electron microscope (JSM-6701 F, JEOL Ltd., Akishima-shi, Japan) and equipped with an energy-dispersive (ED) detector with this field-emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM) operated at 15 kV. Energy-dispersive X-Ray (EDX) analysis was also performed on the JSM-6701 F instrument during SEM. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images were obtained on a JEM-2100 electron microscope (JEOL Ltd., Akishima-shi, Japan) at an accelerating voltage of 200 kV. X-ray diffraction (XRD) data for the finely ground samples were collected at 298 K using a Bruker D8 X-ray diffractometer (Bruker AXS, Inc., Madison, WI, USA) with Cu-Kα radiation source (λ = 1.5406 Å). It was operated at 40 kV in the 2θ range of 10° to 80° in the continuous scan mode with the step size of 0.01°. The changes in the oxidation state of Ag were recorded though an AXIS-ULTRA DLD-600 W photoelectron spectrometer (Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan) (XPS) with Al K1 radiation. Nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherms were collected on an Autosorb-iQ sorption analyzer (Quantachrome Instruments, Boynton Beach, FL, USA) and analyzed followed by the Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) equation. The pore size distribution plots were obtained by using the Barret-Joyner-Halenda (BJH) model.

Photocatalytic performance measurements

The photocatalytic performance of the as-prepared samples was evaluated by measuring the degradation of RhB. In all catalytic activity of experiments, the samples (0.05 g) were put into a solution of RhB dyes (50 mL, 10 mg/L), which was then irradiated with a 300-W Xe arc lamp to provide visible light with λ ≥ 420 nm by an ultraviolet cutoff filter. Before the suspensions were irradiated, they were magnetically stirred for 30 min in the dark to complete the adsorption-desorption equilibrium between dyes and photocatalysts. The degradation of RhB was monitored by UV-vis spectrophotometer (UV-2550, Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan) every 5 min. Before the spectroscopy measurement, these photocatalysts were removed from the photocatalytic reaction systems by centrifugation. The relative concentrations (C/C 0) of the RhB solutions were determined by the absorbance (A/A 0) at 553 nm.

Results and discussion

The porous Ag2CO3 nanorods were successfully synthesized by the precipitation reaction between AgNO3 of aqueous solution in the presence of PVP-K90 and NaHCO3 at room temperature. Figure 1A,B shows typical morphology of samples with different magnifications. From Figure 1A, it can be clearly seen that the products are uniformly dispersed and present nanorod morphology with length of about 3 μm and diameter of 300 nm. Moreover, the high-magnification SEM image in Figure 1B indicates that the surface of the Ag2CO3 nanorods displayed certain roughness, which implies that the nanorods are of porous feature. To get more information about the morphology and interior feature of the Ag2CO3 nanorods, the TEM technique was used to investigate of the Ag2CO3 nanorods. As shown in Figure 1C, a typical TEM image of the as-prepared products and a mass of holes are distributed on Ag2CO3 nanorods and every nanorod is assembled by many Ag2CO3 nanocrystal grains. In addition, energy-dispersive X-Ray spectroscopy (EDS) spectrum (Figure 1D) indicates that the Ag2CO3 samples only contain C, O, and Ag elements except for the elements of Au from the supports, proving that the obtained products are composed of pure Ag2CO3.
Figure 1

SEM, TEM images, and EDS pattern. (A, B) Low- and high-magnified SEM images. (C) TEM images (inset scale bar = 20 nm). (D) EDS pattern of as-prepared Ag2CO3 samples.

To further study the surface area and porous feature of Ag2CO3 samples, N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms were also measured. As shown in Figure 2, the isotherm of samples can be identified as the type IV and H3-type hysteresis loop in the IUPAC classification [29], indicating that the samples are of mesoporous feature. According to the fitting analysis with the BET equation, the surface area is 8.16 m2/g, which is much greater than Ag2CO3 short rods (0.91 m2/g) as reported in other literature [24]. Furthermore, as shown in the inset of Figure 2, the main pore size distribution is about 3.6 nm, which is good consistent with TEM observation. The formation of mesoporous is attributable to the loose aggregation of the originated nanoparticles [30,31].
Figure 2

Nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherm. Nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherms of as-prepared porous Ag2CO3 nanorods. Insets: the pore size distribution of the crystals.

The X-ray diffraction (XRD) was further used to characterize as-prepared Ag2CO3 samples. As shown in Figure 3, the Ag2CO3 nanorods prepared with PVP-K90 as the dispersing agent intense diffraction peaks at 2θ values of 17.6°, 19.3°, 32.8°, 33.8°, 39.2°, 48.5°, 52.7°, 60.4°, and 67.7° correspond to the planes of (101), (110), (211), (300), (220), (222), (410), (330), and (304). All diffraction peaks can be indexed to the typical trigonal structure Ag2CO3 crystal (JCPDS No. 31-1236) and no other diffraction peaks are detected, indicating that the obtained products are pure phase Ag2CO3 and further confirm by means of EDS characterization (Figure 1D).
Figure 3

XRD patterns. XRD patterns of Ag2CO3 products prepared (a) with PVP-K90 as the dispersing agent, (b) with PVP-K30 as the dispersing agent, and (c) by one-time injection of the NaHCO3 solution.

Furthermore, a potential reaction approach explaining the above growth process, as the schematic illustration, is shown in Figure 4A. The synthesis procedure mechanism can be understood as follows. Firstly, Ag+ ions and PVP molecules could form Ag+-PVP complex ions when the dissolution of PVP and AgNO3 in the deionized water under magnetic stirred with an appropriate frequency [32]. The formed Ag+-PVP complex nucleate with CO3 2− and quickly grew into uniform small Ag2CO3 nanocrystal grains with preferential (300) crystal plane, while the grains are difficult to continue growing because of isolation effect results from the surface cladding by PVP. As the reaction process continues, a large number of tiny grains assemble into nanorods via the induced effect of PVP long-chain molecules [33-35]. Due to the isolation effect of PVP dispersing agents and the intercrystallite void of aggregation procedure, there exists pore space among adjacent Ag2CO3 grains and it eventually evolves into the porous nanorod structure. In addition, we investigated the relationship between geometrical morphology of nanorods and the category of dispersing agents. When K30 was used in the reaction system, the Ag2CO3 nanorods obviously transform thinner and shorter (Figure 4B) by comparing with the as-prepared Ag2CO3 nanorods with K90. It is ascribed that K30 has smaller molecular weight, shorter molecular chain length, and lower viscosity than K90, thus result in a weaker adsorption and induced effect in the process of assembly. Furthermore, the adding method of NaHCO3 solution is also an important influence factor for the evolution of Ag2CO3 morphology. When accelerating the drop rate of NaHCO3 solution, the morphology of as-prepared Ag2CO3 becomes small cube-like with the size of about 200 nm; however, it still have a few short nanorods (Figure 4C). These changes may be related to exorbitant instantaneous concentration of CO3 2−, which leads to Ag2CO3 explosive nucleation and rapid growth in short time. Owing to the isolation effect of PVP, the formed crystal particles spontaneously start ordered assembly as the aforementioned. However, the assembly process will terminate once CO3 2− specie completely consumed in the reaction system, and it means that the crystal particles will not continue to assemble following by two end face direction. Naturally, the morphology of Ag2CO3 samples exhibit cubic trait rather than nanorod. As a consequence, we believe that the geometrical morphology of Ag2CO3 can be regulated expediently by the design of experimental conditions.
Figure 4

SEM images and schematic illustration of growth process. (A) The schematic illustration of the possible growth process from Ag2CO3 particles to porous Ag2CO3 nanorods. (B) SEM images of Ag2CO3 products prepared with PVP-K30 as the dispersing agent (inset scale bar = 100 nm). (C) SEM images of Ag2CO3 products prepared by one-time injection of the NaHCO3 solution (inset scale bar = 100 nm).

The photocatalytic activity of as-prepared porous Ag2CO3 nanorods was evaluated by the degradation of typical water pollutants, RhB under visible-light irradiation at room temperature. As is shown in Figure 5A, the self-degradation effect of RhB could be ignored. What is more, by comparing to the photocatalytic performance of as-prepared Ag2CO3 samples and N-doped TiO2 under visible-light irradiation, it indicates that the photocatalytic activity of porous Ag2CO3 nanorods is superior to N-doped TiO2. The degradation rate of porous Ag2CO3 nanorods can reach 94% within 45 min to RhB, while the latter only 45% in the same experimental conditions. Meanwhile, the kinetic process of the photocatalytic degradation reaction was investigated, as shown in Figure 5B. It is observed that the photocatalytic degradation reaction process follows pseudo-first-order kinetic feature with rate constant k of 0.0583 min−1 for porous Ag2CO3 nanorods, which show much higher degradation rate than the N-doped TiO2 and P25 (0.0136 min−1 and 0.0033 min−1, respectively). It benefits from more surface active sites and larger specific surface area for the porous structure and ultimately leads to the increase of contact area between materials and target pollution [25,26].
Figure 5

Photocatalytic degradation and stability. (A) Comparison of visible-light-driven photocatalytic degradation of RhB with the different samples and adsorption in the dark over porous Ag2CO3 nanorods. (B) Plots of ln(C 0/C) vs. irradiation time for the degradation of RhB under visible light. (C) Comparison of photocatalytic stability of the porous Ag2CO3 nanorods and 0.01 M NaHCO3 aqueous solution in four-cycle reactions.

The stability of the Ag2CO3 is another vital consideration except for the photocatalytic activity. It is well known that most silver compounds are light sensitive and appear metallic silver when exposed to light, including Ag2CO3 photocatalyst [22,23,36]. To evaluate the stability of the photocatalyst, the recycle experiments of RhB degradation over porous Ag2CO3 nanorods were conducted, and the result is shown in Figure 5C. It was found that after four-time cycles, the degradation efficiency of Ag2CO3 would decrease from 60% to 3%, indicating that Ag2CO3 was unstable in the absence of imperative stabilizers under visible-light irradiation. Two possible mechanisms are proposed to explain the photocatalytic activity decreased and instability (Figure 6). Ag2CO3 belongs to indirect bandgap semiconductor with a bandgap about 2.30 eV [23,24]; hence, the electrons can be effectively activated from the valence band (VB) to conduction band (CB) under visible light, leaving the holes in the valence band. The holes are capable of decomposing the pollutants in the aqueous solution. The photogenerated electrons in CB can reduce the dissolved O2 in the solution to form H2O2 (Equation 1) and also can reduce Ag+ ions in Ag2CO3 to form Ag particles (Equation 2). The formation of large amounts of Ag particles on the surface can result in instability of the Ag2CO3 under visible light. Meanwhile, they can also bring the decrease of the photocatalytic activity. In addition, Ag2CO3 has a small quantity of dissolution in aqueous solution (Equation 3, Ag+: 2.5 × 10−4 M), and the free Ag+ on the surface may be reduce to Ag0 (Equation 4). This process may further increase the solubility and promote the instability of Ag2CO3 in water.
Figure 6

Schematic of possible photocatalytic mechanism for Ag2CO3.

$$ {\mathrm{O}}_2+2{\mathrm{e}}^{-}+2{\mathrm{H}}^{+}\to {\mathrm{H}}_2{\mathrm{O}}_2 $$
$$ {\mathrm{Ag}}_2{\mathrm{CO}}_3+2{\mathrm{e}}^{-}\to 2{\mathrm{Ag}}^0+{{\mathrm{CO}}_3}^{2-} $$
$$ {\mathrm{Ag}}_2{\mathrm{CO}}_3\rightleftharpoons 2{\mathrm{Ag}}^{+}+{{\mathrm{CO}}_3}^{2-} $$
$$ {\mathrm{Ag}}^{+}+{\mathrm{e}}^{-}\to {\mathrm{Ag}}^0 $$

To avoid the disadvantages of photocorrosion, we employ NaHCO3 as a stabilizer to inhibit the photocorrosion and decrease the solubility of Ag2CO3 in aqueous solution. So, to further evaluate the photostability of Ag2CO3 in the presence of NaHCO3, the recycled experiments for the photodegradation of RhB were performed, and the results are shown in Figure 5C. After four cycles, the Ag2CO3 still gives 70% degradation rate of RhB after 40-min visible-light irradiation and that the Ag2CO3 in the absence of NaHCO3 almost lost their activity. It indicates that the presence of NaHCO3 is helpful to enhance the stability and photocatalytic activity of Ag2CO3. On the basis of experimental results, two possible reasons are proposed to explain the significantly enhanced photocatalytic activity and stability of the presence of NaHCO3. Firstly, the NaHCO3 may effectively prevent the dissolution of the Ag2CO3 in aqueous solution. More importantly, when the presence of NaHCO3, it can facilitate reaction (Equation 2) equilibrium shift to the left and decrease photogenerated electrons reduce Ag+ ions in Ag2CO3. So, it avoids the formation of large amounts of Ag particles, which lead to the photocatalyst inactivate. However, a small amount of Ag particles on the surface of Ag2CO3 can become electron-rich collective. These electrons will participate in the degradation of pollutants. Thus, it promotes effective separation of electron-hole pairs.

To be more convincing of the possible mechanism, XPS measurements were performed to investigate the changes of chemical state of Ag2CO3 before and after photodegradation experiments (Figure 7). The survey XPS spectra are shown in Figure 7A. Carbon, oxygen, and silver were detected in the as-prepared Ag2CO3 samples, and no other impurities were found. Furthermore, Figure 7B shows the high-resolution XPS spectrum of Ag 3d region. As-prepared Ag2CO3 samples of Ag 3d3/2 and Ag 3d5/2 photoelectrons at 374.13 and 368.13 eV could be attributed to Ag+ in Ag2CO3 [37,38]. After four cycles of photodegradation experiments in the absence of NaHCO3, the Ag 3d5/2 peak obvious shifts from 368.13 to 368.33 eV, yet, the Ag 3d5/2 peak only shifts to 368.23 eV once the presence of NaHCO3. It is stated that a strong covalent bond between Ag+ cation and the ligand will result lower binding energy of Ag+ oxidation state than neutral Ag0 [39,40]. In contrast to the XPS spectra of all Ag 3d 5/2 (Figure 7B), from curve (a) to (c), the peak shifts to the higher binding energy, which indicates the decrease of the Ag+ in Ag2CO3 oxidation state while the increase of Ag0. Meanwhile, the variation tendency confirms the restrained effect of Ag2CO3 photocorrosion in the presence of NaHCO3 from the perspective of experiments.
Figure 7

XPS spectra. (A) XPS survey spectra and (B) high-resolution XPS spectra of Ag 3d of Ag2CO3. Curves (a-c) are XPS results of Ag2CO3 before and after photodegradation experiments under visible-light irradiation.

Furthermore, Figure 8A shows the comparison of visible-light photocatalytic activity of porous Ag2CO3 nanorods in the presence of NaHCO3 with different concentrations. When only in the presence of NaHCO3, the RhB solutions almost were not degraded. Further observation shows that the Ag2CO3 exhibits the best photocatalytic activity in 0.01 M NaHCO3. When the concentration of NaHCO3 was reduced to 0.001 M, the degradation rate of RhB was decreased. This is due to low concentrations of NaHCO3 which will not effectively prevent the solubility and photogenerated electrons reduce Ag+ ions in Ag2CO3. However, in 0.1 M NaHCO3, the degradation rate is decrease even further. This may be understood as such, although excess NaHCO3 effectively prevents photogenerated electrons reduce Ag+, at the same time, the photogenerated electrons become difficult to separate from holes. Furthermore, a small amount of Ag particles can be helpful to promote photocatalytic activity. Moreover, the UV-vis absorbance spectral changes of RhB aqueous in porous Ag2CO3 nanorods in the presence of 0.01 M NaHCO3 as a function of irradiation time were investigated (Figure 8B). The maximum absorption wavelengths of RhB solutions are not shifting which indicate that the benzene/heterocyclic rings of the RhB molecule are decomposed [24].
Figure 8

Photocatalytic degradation efficiencies and UV-vis spectral changes. (A) The visible-light photocatalytic activity of porous Ag2CO3 nanorods in the presence of NaHCO3 with different concentrations as follows: 0 M (b), 0.1 M (c), 0.001 M (d), 0.01 M (e), and 0.01 M NaHCO3 in the absence of photocatalysts (a). (B) UV-vis absorbance spectral changes of RhB aqueous in as-prepared of porous Ag2CO3 nanorods with 0.01 M NaHCO3 as a function of irradiation time.


In summary, the novel porous Ag2CO3 nanorods were successfully synthesized by using a facile, simple, effective method. The morphology and size of the as-prepared samples can be controlled by adjusting the dispersing agent category and means of adding to reactant. The obtained porous Ag2CO3 nanorods exhibit the capability to efficiently catalyze the degradation of organic pollutants under visible-light irradiation. Furthermore, adding an appropriate concentration of NaHCO3 solution can effectively improve photoactivity and stability of Ag2CO3. Consequently, our work provides a one-pot aqueous solution reaction at room temperature of strategy which may be useful to extend to the synthesis of porous nanorods of other inorganic materials.



This work was supported by the Yunnan Provincial Science and Technology Innovation Talents scheme -Technological Leading Talent (NO. 2013HA002) and State International Joint Research Center of Advanced Technology for Superhard Materials (NO.2013B01038).

Authors’ Affiliations

State Key Laboratory of Complex Nonferrous Metal Resources Clean Utilization, Kunming University of Science and Technology
National Local Joint Laboratory of Engineering Application of Microwave Energy and Equipment Technology
Key Laboratory of Unconventional Metallurgy, Ministry of Education
Faculty of Metallurgical and Energy Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology


  1. Zhang H, Chen G, Bahnemann DW. Photoelectrocatalytic materials for environmental applications. J Mater Chem. 2009;19:5089–121.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Teoh WY, Scott JA, Amal R. Progress in heterogeneous photocatalysis: from classical radical chemistry to engineering nanomaterials and solar reactors. J Phys Chem Lett. 2012;3:629–39.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Kamat PV, Bisquert J. Solar fuels. Photocatalytic hydrogen generation. J Phys Chem C. 2013;117:14873–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Fujishima A, Rao TN, Tryk DA. Titanium dioxide photocatalysis. J Photoch Photobio C. 2000;1:1–21.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen X, Mao SS. Titanium dioxide nanomaterials: synthesis, properties, modifications, and applications. Chem Rev. 2007;107:2891–959.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Paramasivam I, Jha H, Liu N, Schmuki P. A review of photocatalysis using self-organized TiO2 nanotubes and other ordered oxide nanostructures. Small. 2012;8:3073–103.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Fresno F, Portela R, Suárez S, Coronado JM. Photocatalytic materials: recent achievements and near future trends. J Mater Chem A. 2014;2:2863–84.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Li Y, Zhang L, Wu W, Dai P, Yu X, Wu M, et al. Hydrothermal growth of TiO2 nanowire membranes sensitized with CdS quantum dots for the enhancement of photocatalytic performance. Nanoscale Res Lett. 2014;9:1–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Scuderi V, Impellizzeri G, Romano L, Scuderi M, Nicotra G, Bergum K, et al. TiO2-coated nanostructures for dye photo-degradation in water. Nanoscale Res Lett. 2014;9:1–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Akpan UG, Hameed BH. Development and photocatalytic activities of TiO2 doped with Ca-Ce-W in the degradation of acid red 1 under visible light irradiation. Desalin Water Treat. 2013;52:5639–51.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Ouyang S, Kikugawa N, Chen D, Zou Z, Ye J. A systematical study on photocatalytic properties of AgMO2 (M = Al, Ga, In): effects of chemical compositions, crystal structures, and electronic structures. J Phys Chem C. 2009;113:1560–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Singh J, Uma S. Efficient photocatalytic degradation of organic compounds by ilmenite AgSbO3 under visible and UV light irradiation. J Phys Chem C. 2009;113:12483–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Li G, Yan S, Wang Z, Wang X, Li Z, Ye J, et al. Synthesis and visible light photocatalytic property of polyhedron-shaped AgNbO3. Dalton T. 2009;8519–24.Google Scholar
  14. Wu W, Liang S, Chen Y, Shen L, Yuan R, Wu L. Mechanism and improvement of the visible light photocatalysis of organic pollutants over microcrystalline AgNbO3 prepared by sol–gel method. Mater Res Bull. 2013;48:1618–26.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Liu W, Liu X, Fu Y, You Q, Huang R, Liu P, et al. Nanocrystalline pyrochlore AgSbO3: hydrothermal synthesis, photocatalytic activity and self-stable mechanism study. Appl Catal B Environ. 2012;123:78–83.Google Scholar
  16. Liu Y, Yu H, Cai M, Sun J. Microwave hydrothermal synthesis of Ag2CrO4 photocatalyst for fast degradation of PCP-Na under visible light irradiation. Catal Commun. 2012;26:63–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Xu D, Cao S, Zhang J, Cheng B, Yu J. Effects of the preparation method on the structure and the visible-light photocatalytic activity of Ag2CrO4. Beilstein J Nanotech. 2014;5:658–66.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Dong C, Wu KL, Wei XW, Wang J, Liu L, Hu Y, et al. Preparation of Ag2SO3 sub-microparticles with high visible-light photocatalytic activity. Micro Nano Lett. 2014;9:417–20.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Tang J, Liu Y, Li H, Tan Z, Li D. A novel Ag3AsO4 visible-light-responsive photocatalyst: facile synthesis and exceptional photocatalytic performance. Chem Commun. 2013;49:5498–500.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Dong H, Li Z, Xu X, Ding Z, Wu L, Wang X, et al. Visible light-induced photocatalytic activity of delafossite AgMO2 (M = Al, Ga, In) prepared via a hydrothermal method. Appl Catal B Environ. 2009;89:551–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Tang J, Li D, Feng Z, Tan Z, Ou B. A novel AgIO4 semiconductor with ultrahigh activity in photodegradation of organic dyes: insights into the photosensitization mechanism. RSC Adv. 2014;4:2151–4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Xu C, Liu Y, Huang B, Li H, Qin X, Zhang X, et al. Preparation, characterization, and photocatalytic properties of silver carbonate. Appl Surf Sci. 2011;257:8732–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Dai G, Yu J, Liu G. A new approach for photocorrosion inhibition of Ag2CO3 photocatalyst with highly visible-light-responsive reactivity. J Phys Chem C. 2012;116:15519–24.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Dong H, Chen G, Sun J, Li C, Yu Y, Chen D. A novel high-efficiency visible-light sensitive Ag2CO3 photocatalyst with universal photodegradation performances: Simple synthesis, reaction mechanism and first-principles study. Appl Catal B Environ. 2013;134:46–54.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Pan JH, Dou H, Xiong Z, Xu C, Ma J, Zhao XS. Porous photocatalysts for advanced water purifications. J Mater Chem. 2010;20:4512–28.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Li Y, Fu ZY, Su BL. Hierarchically structured porous materials for energy conversion and storage. Adv Funct Mater. 2012;22:4634–67.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Wang JL, Wang C, Lin W. Metal-organic frameworks for light harvesting and photocatalysis. ACS Catal. 2012;2:2630–40.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Chi B, Zhao L, Jin T. One-step template-free route for synthesis of mesoporous N-doped titania spheres. J Phys Chem C. 2007;111:6189–93.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Dollimore D, Spooner P, Turner A. The BET method of analysis of gas adsorption data and its relevance to the calculation of surface areas. Surf Tech. 1976;4:121–60.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Boissière C, van der Lee A, El Mansouri A, Larbot, A, Prouzet, E. A double step synthesis of mesoporous micrometric spherical MSU-X silica particles. Chem Commun. 1999. 2047–8.Google Scholar
  31. Martines MU, Yeong E, Persin M, Larbot A, Voorhout WF, Kübel C, et al. Hexagonal mesoporous silica nanoparticles with large pores and a hierarchical porosity tested for HPLC. Comptes Rendus Chimie. 2005;8:627–34.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Chen D, Liu M, Chen Q, Ge L, Fan B, Wang H, et al. Large-scale synthesis and enhanced visible-light-driven photocatalytic performance of hierarchical Ag/AgCl nanocrystals derived from freeze-dried PVP–Ag+ hybrid precursors with porosity. Appl Catal B Environ. 2014;144:394–407.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Cao M, Li C, Zhang B, Huang J, Wang L, Shen Y. PVP assisted solvothermal synthesis of uniform Cu2FeSnS4 nanospheres. J Alloy Compd. 2015;622:695–702.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Zeng X, Zhou B, Gao Y, Wang C, Li S, Yeung CY, et al. Structural dependence of silver nanowires on polyvinyl pyrrolidone (PVP) chain length. Nanotechnology. 2014;25:495601.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Wang Y, Huang D, Zhu X, Ma Y, Geng H, Wang Y, et al. Surfactant-free synthesis of Cu2O hollow spheres and their wavelength-dependent visible photocatalytic activities using LED lamps as cold light sources. Nanoscale Res Lett. 2014;9:1–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Yu C, Li G, Kumar S, Yang K, Jin R. Phase transformation synthesis of novel Ag2O/Ag2CO3 heterostructures with high visible light efficiency in photocatalytic degradation of pollutants. Adv Mater. 2014;26:892–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Xu H, Zhu J, Song Y, Zhao W, Xu Y, Song Y, et al. Ion-exchange preparation for visible-light-driven photocatalyst AgBr/Ag2CO3 and its photocatalytic activity. RSC Adv. 2014;4:9139–47.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Xu H, Zhu J, Song Y, Zhu T, Zhao W, Song Y, et al. Fabrication of AgX-loaded Ag2CO3 (X = Cl, I) composites and their efficient visible-light-driven photocatalytic activity. J Alloy Compd. 2015;622:347–57.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. MeeáLee J, KyungáJo Y. A facile exfoliation-crystal growth route to multicomponent Ag2CO3/Ag-Ti5NbO14 nanohybrids with improved visible light photocatalytic activity. Dalton T. 2014;43:10566–73.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Gaarenstroom SW, Winograd N. Initial and final state effects in the ESCA spectra of cadmium and silver oxides. J Chem Phys. 1977;67:3500–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar


© Guo et al.; licensee Springer. 2015

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.