Open Access

Effects of Vacuum Annealing on the Conduction Characteristics of ZnO Nanosheets

Nanoscale Research Letters201510:368

https://doi.org/10.1186/s11671-015-1066-1

Received: 4 June 2015

Accepted: 30 August 2015

Published: 17 September 2015

Abstract

ZnO nanosheets are a relatively new form of nanostructure and have demonstrated potential as gas-sensing devices and dye sensitised solar cells. For integration into other devices, and when used as gas sensors, the nanosheets are often heated. Here we study the effect of vacuum annealing on the electrical transport properties of ZnO nanosheets in order to understand the role of heating in device fabrication. A low cost, mass production method has been used for synthesis and characterisation is achieved using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), photoluminescence (PL), auger electron spectroscopy (AES) and nanoscale two-point probe. Before annealing, the measured nanosheet resistance displayed a non-linear increase with probe separation, attributed to surface contamination. Annealing to 300 °C removed this contamination giving a resistance drop, linear probe spacing dependence, increased grain size and a reduction in the number of n-type defects. Further annealing to 500 °C caused the n-type defect concentration to reduce further with a corresponding increase in nanosheet resistance not compensated by any further sintering. At 700 °C, the nanosheets partially disintegrated and the resistance increased and became less linear with probe separation. These effects need to be taken into account when using ZnO nanosheets in devices that require an annealing stage during fabrication or heating during use.

Keywords

ZnOLBZANanosheetsDefectsResistance

PACS

81.07.-b62.23.Kn73.63.Rt

Background

ZnO nanomaterials have received much attention over the past 15 years due to their novel properties including being a wide band gap (3.37 eV) piezoelectric material with a large exciton binding energy of 60 meV [1, 2]. ZnO nanomaterials have many potential applications including antimicrobial bio-films [3], microelectronics [4], mechanical energy harvesting [5], field emitters [6], ultra violet lasers [7], photovoltaics [8] and other optoelectronic devices [9]. Polycrystalline ZnO nanosheets are a relatively new form of nanostructure and have demonstrated promising potential for practical applications such as gas-sensing devices and dye sensitised solar cells due to their high surface area to volume ratio [10, 11].

In order to study the intrinsic properties of materials, vacuum annealing is commonly used to remove surface contamination [12]. Furthermore, standard semiconductor fabrication techniques often include annealing stages for dopant activation, Ohmic contact formation and implantation repairs [12]. Additionally, devices including gas sensors operate at high temperature which can alter the grain structure of polycrystalline materials [13]. Our earlier work found that grains within the nanosheets start to sinter when annealed at 700 °C in air [14]. Also, photoluminescence (PL) found that the shape and size of the deep level emission (DLE) peak indicated a significant relative increase in p-type defects with annealing temperature, attributed to a decrease in oxygen vacancies. Oxygen vacancies give rise to the inherent n-type nature of ZnO and therefore any changes in these vacancies due to annealing suggest a change in the resistivity of the nanosheets [15]. However, the evolution of transport properties through ZnO nanosheets after annealing has not been studied.

Here, we investigate the effects of vacuum annealing on the chemical composition, morphology, optical and conductive properties of ZnO nanosheets using nanoscale two-point probe, Auger electron spectroscopy (AES), PL and scanning electron microscopy (SEM).

Methods

Layered basic zinc acetate (LBZA) nanosheets were synthesised using our previous method [14]. A 500 ml solution of 0.1 M zinc acetate dihydrate (Zn(CH3COO)2.2H2O) and 0.04 M hexamethylenetetramine (HMTA, (CH2)6N4) from Sigma Aldrich Co. Ltd was heated in an 800 W commercial microwave for 6 min. The solution was centrifuged, the supernatant removed and the residue re-suspended in DI water. The resulting nanosheets were deposited onto silicon with 100 nm of thermal oxide (referred to as Sample 1) and two pieces of n-type (100) silicon from the Institute of Electronic Materials Technology (referred to as Sample 2 and Sample 3), and all three samples were initially annealed in air at 400 °C to thermally decompose the LBZA to ZnO.

Two-point probe measurements were carried out on Sample 1 in ultra-high vacuum (UHV) using an Omicron LT Nanoprobe equipped with a NanoSAM electron analyser, base pressure 1 × 10−10 mbar. Sample 2 was characterised with AES within the Nanoprobe chamber, and Sample 3 with high-resolution SEM using a Hitachi S4800 and PL using a 325-nm wavelength He-Cd laser and an Ocean Optics USB2000+ spectrometer. All characterisation techniques were carried out at room temperature. All samples were annealed to 300, 500 and 700 °C for 1 h in UHV and allowed to cool before being re-characterised. Sample 1 and Sample 2 were not removed from the vacuum between heating stages and analysis. For the PL, three spectra were taken from different areas of the sample and averaged. The AES was performed at 20K magnification using a beam acceleration voltage of 5 kV and 1 nA beam current through a 90 μm beam aperture.

Two-point probe measurements were carried out using tungsten probes, annealed to reduce probe oxide contamination [16, 17]. Two tungsten probes were approached using a method developed to ensure minimal compressive strain at the point of contact providing intrinsic characterisation of the nanosheet [18]. I-V sweeps were performed from −1 to 1 V at five probe separations with two of the positions shown in Fig. 1, each repeated five times. After annealing the nanosheets in vacuum, the probes were repositioned onto the same measurement locations, on the same nanosheet, as shown in the Additional file 1: Figure S1.
Fig. 1

a First position of the tungsten probes on a ZnO nanosheet with an arrow marking a dislocation and b final position of the tungsten probes on the ZnO nanosheet

Results and Discussion

The synthesised nanosheets were of rectangular form with width typically ranging from 3 to 12 μm, lengths typically ranging from 8 to 25 μm and thicknesses typically ranging from 20 to 100 nm. Figure 2 shows SEM images of the grain structure before and after vacuum annealing. Before vacuum annealing the average grain size was 5 ± 1.3 nm, as measured from one representative high-resolution SEM frame. After annealing to 300 °C, the grains sintered to form clusters of around 50–100 nm. The sintered grain size was much larger than that measured following similar annealing in air and is more comparable to annealing at 800 °C in air [14]. This is likely due to the effect of the melting point dependence on pressure, which is well-documented [19, 20]. At 500 °C, the grains sintered further, whilst at 700 °C the nanosheets appear much darker, as shown by the SEM image in Fig. 2d indicating lower conductivity, and show signs of fracturing and partial disintegration.
Fig. 2

SEM images of ZnO nanosheets (a) before vacuum annealing with an arrow marking a void and after vacuum annealing at b 300 °C, c 500 °C and d 700 °C, with insets showing probe positions

In Fig. 3, the mean nanosheet resistance at +1 V measured using the two-point probe is shown against probe separation. One outlier with a standard deviation more than 12 times the average was removed. For homogenous materials, a standard resistivity model would give a linear increase with probe separation. For polycrystalline materials, the resistance primarily increases in a step-like fashion across the grain boundaries [21]. However, since the grain size here is much smaller than the length scale shown, the trend should still be linear. Therefore, perturbations away from linearity in the data in Fig. 3 are not caused by the polycrystalline nature of the nanosheets. Instead, these are likely caused by dislocations and voids in the nanosheet, some examples of which are indicated by the arrows in Figs. 1a and 2a. The same discontinuities are present in the 300 and 500 °C data but are reduced in magnitude as the total resistance reduces. The 300 and 500 °C data is shown magnified in the inset in Fig. 3.
Fig. 3

Mean two-point probe resistance measurements at +1 V with standard deviation, against probe separation for ZnO nanosheets before and after vacuum annealing at 300, 500 and 700 °C, with inset showing 300 and 500 °C. A least squares linear fit is overlaid for all

The regression coefficients are improved after annealing at 300 and 500 °C. Therefore, we attribute the poorer fit of the prior non-annealed case to inconsistent probe-nanosheet contacts due to surface contaminants which are removed during annealing [12]. The regression coefficient at 700 °C decreased due to the partial disintegration of the nanosheet structure as discussed earlier.

PL spectra shown in Fig. 4 are normalised to the near band edge (NBE) peak which remained centred at 378 nm for all annealing stages. Before annealing, the DLE peak maximum is at 640 nm with peak fitting indicating constituent components centred at 595, 635, 690 and 765 nm. These components correspond to transitions from: an oxygen vacancy with a single positive charge to an oxygen interstitial with no charge [2224], an oxygen vacancy with a single positive charge to an oxygen vacancy with no charge [25], an oxygen vacancy with no charge to the valance band [26], the conduction band to an oxygen vacancy with no charge [2628], respectively. These DLE transitions are caused by electron donor defect states indicating that the sheets are n-type [2].
Fig. 4

PL spectra of ZnO nanosheets before and after vacuum annealing at 300, 500 and 700 °C with red arrows marking the peak positions of p-type defects and blue arrows marking the peak positions if n-type defects

After annealing to 300 °C, the intensity of the DLE peak to decrease relative to the NBE with the components remaining centred at the same positions. However, annealing caused components centred at 470, 520 and 543 nm to increase which are attributed to the p-type defect transitions: an interstitial oxygen ion with a single negative charge [29], an oxygen occupying a zinc site [29, 28, 26] and a transition from the conduction band to an oxygen interstitial with no charge [30, 31, 23, 28]. Further annealing to 500 °C caused the intensity of the DLE peak to decrease relative to the NBE with all components reducing. This is the same effect as seen in previous work when annealing ZnO nanosheets in air at 1000 °C, although annealing in UHV causes the effect to occur at a much lower temperature. Annealing to 700 °C caused all components of the DLE peak to increase relative to the NBE peak. However, the SEM images show that there is significant damage to the ZnO nanosheets; therefore, the PL spectrum for the nanosheets annealed to 700 °C is not reliable.

AES was used to assess the chemical composition of the ZnO nanosheets with annealing.

Spectra for the O KLL and Zn LMM transitions were collected from two points on a nanosheet, and two silicon spectra were taken from the substrate at each annealing stage. The average ratio of oxygen and zinc normalised to the average silicon peak intensity is plotted in Fig. 5. This result shows the stoichiometry is retained when annealing up to 500 °C in vacuum. However, annealing at 700 °C caused loss of stoichiometry supporting the SEM image in Fig. 2d that shows the partial disintegrated ZnO nanosheets at the same temperature.
Fig. 5

AES of ZnO nanosheets showing percentage of each element before and after annealing compared to silicon

Earlier, the resistance was shown to decrease after annealing at 300 °C, with the data becoming more linear and the gradient reducing. This is caused both by the removal of surface contaminants and the increase in the average grain size reducing the number of grain boundary edges through which electrons must travel. The resistance decrease could have been caused by an increase in n-type defects giving rise to higher apparent doping, although the PL rules this out, instead showing an increase in p-type defects which would in fact compensate for the n-type carriers.

Annealing to 500 °C causes the number of n-type defects to decrease, further reducing the number of charge carriers and causing the observed increase in resistance. Unlike when annealing at 300 °C, at this higher temperature, the additional surface cleaning and sintering effects do not compensate for the reduction in defect doping.

Conclusions

A low-cost, high throughput microwave method has been used to synthesis ZnO nanosheets using a solution of HMTA and zinc acetate. Vacuum annealing has allowed the study of intrinsic material properties in a controlled environment. Before annealing, the measured resistance against length is less uniform due to surface contamination. At 300 °C, the resistance drops due to surface cleaning and increased grain size, outweighing the reduction in n-type defect doping and the increase in p-type defect doping measured with PL. At 500 °C, the resistance increases as both n-type and p-type defect doping reduces further which is no longer offset by surface cleaning and further grain sintering. Annealing to 700 °C resulted in the partial disintegration of the nanosheet structure, observed both in SEM and by the loss of stoichiometry observed with AES.

Our results are in agreement with previous PL and SEM studies; however, we find that annealing in vacuum causes both the increase in p-type defect formation, and the sintering of the grains, to occur at a significantly lower temperature than observed when annealed in air [14]. Our transport measurements show for the first time that low-temperature annealing of ZnO nanosheets is required prior to contact formation in order to remove surface contaminants and form reliable contacts. Our results also suggest that the operation of any ZnO nanosheet-based device which requires a high-temperature annealing fabrication process step, or is operated at high temperature, will be adversely affected.

Abbreviations

AES: 

Auger Electron Spectroscopy

DLE: 

deep level emission

HMTA: 

hexamethylenetetramine

LBZA: 

layered basic zinc acetate

NBE: 

near band edge

PL: 

photoluminescence

SEM: 

scanning electron microscopy

UHV: 

ultra-high vacuum

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the EPSRC [grant number EP/J5003181/1].

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Multidisciplinary Nanotechnology Centre, College of Engineering, Swansea University
(2)
Department of Physics, College of Science, Swansea University

References

  1. Tarat A, Majithia R, Brown R, Penny M, Meissner K. Synthesis of nanocrystalline ZnO nanobelts via pyrolytic decomposition of zinc acetate nanobelts and their gas sensing behavior. Surf Sci. 2012;606:715–21.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Lord AM, Maffeis TG, Walton AS, Kepaptsoglou DM, Ramasse QM, Ward MB, et al. Factors that determine and limit the resistivity of high-quality individual ZnO nanowires. Nanotechnology. 2013;24(43):435706. doi:10.1088/0957-4484/24/43/435706.
  3. Chen Y, Tse W, Chen L, Zhang J. Ag nanoparticles-decorated ZnO nanorod array on a mechanical flexible substrate with enhanced optical and antimicrobial properties. Nanoscale Res Lett. 2015;10(1):106.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Chang P-C, Fan Z, Chien C-J, Stichtenoth D, Ronning C, Lu JG. High-performance ZnO nanowire field effect transistors. Appl Phys Lett. 2006;89(13):133113. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.2357013.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Qin Y, Wang X, Wang ZL. Microfibre-nanowire hybrid structure for energy scavenging. Nature. 2008;451(7180):809–13. doi:10.1038/nature06601.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Zhu Y, Zhang H, Sun X, Feng S, Xu J, Zhao Q, et al. Efficient field emission from ZnO nanoneedle arrays. Appl Phys Lett. 2003;83(1):144–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Huang MH, Mao S, Feick H, Yan HQ, Wu YY, Kind H, et al. Room-temperature ultraviolet nanowire nanolasers. Science. 2001;292(5523):1897–9. doi:10.1126/science.1060367.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Luo Q, Wu Z, He J, Cao Y, Bhutto W, Wang W, et al. Facile synthesis of composition-tuned ZnO/ZnxCd1-xSe nanowires for photovoltaic applications. Nanoscale Res Lett. 2015;10(1):181.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Willander M. Nano-lasers and nano-LEDs. J Phys Conf Ser. 2014;486(1):012030.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Tarat A, Majithia R, Brown RA, Penny MW, Meissner KE, Maffeis TGG, editors. Nanocrystalline ZnO obtained from pyrolytic decomposition of layered basic zinc acetate: comparison between conventional and microwave oven growth. Nanotechnology (IEEE-NANO), 2012 12th IEEE Conference on; 2012 20–23 Aug. 2012.Google Scholar
  11. Lin C-Y, Lai Y-H, Chen H-W, Chen J-G, Kung C-W, Vittal R, et al. Highly efficient dye-sensitized solar cell with a ZnO nanosheet-based photoanode. Energy & Environmental Science. 2011;4(9):3448–55. doi:10.1039/c0ee00587h.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Maffeis TGG, Penny MW, Castaing A, Guy OJ, Wilks SP. XPS investigation of vacuum annealed vertically aligned ultralong ZnO nanowires. Surf Sci. 2012;606(1–2):99–103. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.susc.2011.09.007.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Malagù C, Carotta MC, Galliera S, Guidi V, Maffeis TGG, Martinelli G, et al. Evidence of bandbending flattening in 10 nm polycrystalline SnO2. Sensors Actuators B Chem. 2004;103(1–2):50–4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2004.04.036.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Tarat A, Nettle C, Bryant DTJ, Jones D, Penny M, Brown R, et al. Microwave-assisted synthesis of layered basic zinc acetate nanosheets and their thermal decomposition into nanocrystalline ZnO. Nanoscale Res Lett. 2014;9(1):11.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Schmidt-Mende L, MacManus-Driscoll JL. ZnO–nanostructures, defects, and devices. Materials Today. 2007;10(5):40–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Cobley RJ, Brown RA, Barnett CJ, Maffeis TGG, Penny MW. Quantitative analysis of annealed scanning probe tips using energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy. Appl Phys Lett. 2013;102(2):023111. doi:10.1063/1.4776705.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Barnett CJ, Kryvchenkova O, Wilson LSJ, Maffeis TGG, Kalna K, Cobley RJ. The role of probe oxide in local surface conductivity measurements. J Appl Phys. 2015;117(17):174306. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4919662.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Smith NA, Lord AM, Evans JE, Barnett CJ, Cobley RJ, Wilks SP. Forming reproducible non-lithographic nanocontacts to assess the effect of contact compressive strain in nanomaterials. Semicond Sci Technol. 2015;30(6):65011–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Boehler R, Ross M. Melting curve of aluminum in a diamond cell to 0.8 Mbar: implications for iron. Earth Planet Sci Lett. 1997;153(3–4):223–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0012-821X(97)00188-X.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Hanstrom A, Lazor P. High pressure melting and equation of state of aluminium. J Alloys Compd. 2000;305(1):209–15. doi:10.1016/s0925-8388(00)00736-2.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Mayadas AF, Shatzkes M. Electrical-resistivity model for polycrystalline films: the case of arbitrary reflection at external surfaces. Phys Rev B. 1970;1(4):1382–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Liao Z-M, Zhang H-Z, Zhou Y-B, Xu J, Zhang J-M, Yu D-P. Surface effects on photoluminescence of single ZnO nanowires. Phys Lett A. 2008;372(24):4505–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2008.04.013.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Lima SAM, Sigoli FA, Jafelicci Jr M, Davolos MR. Luminescent properties and lattice defects correlation on zinc oxide. Int J Inorg Mater. 2001;3(7):749–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1466-6049(01)00055-1.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Heo YW, Norton DP, Pearton SJ. Origin of green luminescence in ZnO thin film grown by molecular-beam epitaxy. J Appl Phys. 2005;98(7):073502. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.2064308.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Janotti A, Van de Walle CG. Oxygen vacancies in ZnO. Appl Phys Lett. 2005;87(12):122102. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.2053360.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Xu PS, Sun YM, Shi CS, Xu FQ, Pan HB. The electronic structure and spectral properties of ZnO and its defects. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms. 2003;199:286–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0168-583X(02)01425-8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Wei XQ, Man BY, Liu M, Xue CS, Zhuang HZ, Yang C. Blue luminescent centers and microstructural evaluation by XPS and Raman in ZnO thin films annealed in vacuum, N2 and O2. Phys B Condens Matter. 2007;388(1–2):145–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physb.2006.05.346.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Lin B, Fu Z, Jia Y. Green luminescent center in undoped zinc oxide films deposited on silicon substrates. Appl Phys Lett. 2001;79(7):943–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.1394173.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Liu J, Lee S, Ahn YH, Park J-Y, Koh KH. Tailoring the visible photoluminescence of mass-produced ZnO nanowires. J Phys D Appl Phys. 2009;42(9):095401.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Xu C, Chun J, Kimb DE. Electrical properties and near band edge emission of Bi-doped ZnO nanowires. Applied Physics Letters. 2007;90(083113):1–3.Google Scholar
  31. Yang Y, Yan H, Fu Z, Yang B, Xia L, Xu Y, et al. Photoluminescence and Raman studies of electrochemically as-grown and annealed ZnO films. Solid State Commun. 2006;138(10–11):521–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssc.2006.04.024.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Barnett et al. 2015

Advertisement