Skip to content


  • Nano Express
  • Open Access

Giant Catalytic DNA Particles for Simple and Intuitive Detection of Pb2+

Nanoscale Research Letters201611:244

  • Received: 18 February 2016
  • Accepted: 3 May 2016
  • Published:

The Erratum to this article has been published in Nanoscale Research Letters 2016 11:450


DNAzymes have been extensively studied as biosensors because of their unique functionality of cleaving substrate in the presence of metal ion cofactors. However, there are only a few reports on visual detection using gold nanoparticles. Here, we synthesized the DNAzyme microparticle (DzMP) (~1 μm) via rolling circle amplification for detection of Pb2+ without the help of other materials. Then, the substrate strands were labeled with two different fluorophores (6-carboxyfluorescein and Cy5) to visualize the DzMPs and to monitor the separation of substrate strands. Because of their large size, the decline in the number of fluorescent particles in the presence of Pb2+ could be successfully demonstrated by a fluorescence microscopy, presenting a new platform for heavy metal detection.


  • DNAzyme
  • Heavy metal detection
  • Biosensor


Nucleic acids have attracted a great attention due to their versatile properties. Especially, various DNA enzymes (termed DNAzyme) have recently been developed by the systematic evolution of ligands by exponential enrichment (SELEX) since Breaker and Joyce presented the in vitro selection of catalytic DNA in 1994 [1]. These DNAzymes have unique properties that are capable of catalyzing bioorganic chemical reactions. For example, DNAzymes catalyzing RNA cleavage [13], ligation [4, 5], or modification of nucleic acids [6, 7] have been reported. They have been applied in various fields such as biochemistry, medicine, and analytical chemistry.

Particularly, DNAzymes cleaving DNA or RNA substrates in the presence of specific metal cofactor such as Pb2+, Mg2+, Cu2+, and UO2 2+ have been widely studied [1, 810]. Also, Na+ [11, 12] or lanthanide [13, 14] -dependent DNAzymes have been recently reported. Because the toxicity of heavy metals is well known, these DNAzymes have often been used as a sensor to detect heavy metals. To be specific, fluorescent techniques [15, 16], polymerase chain reaction [17], electrochemical approaches [18], and surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) [19, 20] have been applied for DNAzyme-based sensors. Also, the colorimetric sensors using gold nanoparticles were introduced [21]. However, there have been few studies on visual detection techniques and most of the conventional colorimetric detection methods need the immobilization of DNAzyme on gold nanoparticles [2123].

Previously, the synthesis of DNA hydrogel via ligase-mediated reaction or rolling circle amplification (RCA) has been reported [24, 25]. Based on these enzymatic approaches, here we synthesized the giant catalytic DNA particles (~1 μm) without other inorganic core particles and successfully visualized the detection of Pb2+ utilizing a fluorescence microscope as illustrated schematically in Fig. 1. First, the DNAzyme microparticles (DzMPs) comprised of 17E DNAzyme for sensitive Pb2+ detection were produced by rolling circle amplification (RCA). Then, the fluorescently labeled 17DS substrate strands were hybridized with the generated particles. In the absence of Pb2+, the 17DS/E DzMPs emit bright fluorescence. However, in the presence of Pb2+, the particles turn off their light since the cleaved substrates are falling apart from the 17E DzMPs. This giant DNAzyme particle-based strategy enables detection of Pb2+ by fluorescence microscopy. In addition, DzMPs have numerous catalytic sites, and their sequences can be flexibly changed to have diverse functionalities. Therefore, this DzMP-based approach offers a simple detection method as well as a promise of a potent therapeutic tool for clinical applications.
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Schematic illustration of the construction of the 17DS/E DNAzyme microparticles and their catalytic activity. The DNA microparticles containing a large amount of 17E DNAzyme sites were synthesized via rolling circle amplification (RCA) (step 1). The 17DS substrate strands containing a cleavage site were added to the particle solution and then hybridized particles could be formed by denaturation and annealing. The substrate strands are cleaved when Pb2+ is added and the cleaved strands are separated from the particles (step 2)


Preparation of Circular DNA

All the oligonucleotides used in the study were purchased from the Integrated DNA Technologies (IDT, USA) (Table 1). To prepare the circular DNA, phosphorylated linear single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) that has complementary sequence to the 17E DNAzyme was designed and the primer ssDNA was designed to contain two complementary regions to each end of the linear ssDNA. For hybridization, equal concentration (3 μM) of the linear ssDNA and primer ssDNA were mixed in nuclease-free water. Next, the mixed solution was heated to 95 °C for 2 min and cooled gradually to 25 °C for 1 h. To connect the nick in the circular DNA, the solution was incubated overnight at room temperature with T4 DNA ligase (0.03 U/μL, Promega, USA) and ligase buffer (300 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.8), 100 mM MgCl2, 100 mM dithiothreitol, and 10 mM adenosine triphosphate).
Table 1

DNA sequences for the fabrication of DNAzyme microparticles

Linear DNA



Primer DNA



Dual-labeled 17DS substrate DNA


rA represents the ribonucleotide adenosine

Cy3-labeled 17DS substrate DNA

5′- /Cy3/ACT CAC TAT rA* GGA AGA GAT G - 3′

rA represents the ribonucleotide adenosine

*rA represents the ribonucleotide adenosine

Synthesis of 17E DNAzyme Microparticles

To synthesize the 17E DNAzyme microparticle (17E DzMP), the prepared circular DNA was mixed with Φ29 DNA polymerase (1 U/μL, Lucigen, USA), deoxyribonucleotide triphosphate (2 mM), and reaction buffer (40 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 50 mM KCl, 10 mM MgCl2, 5 mM (NH4)2SO4, and 4 mM dithiothreitol). For the RCA process, the mixed solution was incubated at 30 °C for 20 h. After brief sonication and washing several times using nuclease-free water, the 17E DzMP could be collected. Scanning electron microscopy (Hitachi, Japan, S-4200) was utilized to analyze the morphology of the DzMPs.

Hybridization of 17DS Substrate with 17E DNAzyme Microparticles

To facilitate the confirmation of the hybridization of the 17E DzMP and 17DS substrate strands, the substrate was modified with the Cy3 fluorophore at the end of 5′ (Cy3-17DS). To determine the optimum ratio between 17E DzMP and Cy3-17DS, the different concentrations (200 nM, 1 μM, 5 μM each) of Cy3-labeled substrate strands was added into the 17E DzMP solutions. The denaturation and annealing processes were performed to produce Cy3-labeled 17DS/17E DNAzyme microparticles (Cy3-17DS/E DzMPs). The solution was heated to 95 °C for 2 min and cooled gradually to 25 °C for 1 h. The substrate residues were removed by washing several times. The fluorescence intensity of the 17DS/E DzMPs were measured using Nucleo Counter (Chemometec, Denmark, NC-3000). The fluorescent images of the particles were obtained by fluorescence microscopy (Nikon, Japan, Eclipse Ti).

Gel Electrophoresis

To confirm the cleavage reaction, the various concentrations of Pb2+ solution (100 nM to 1 mM) was added to Cy3-17DS/E DzMP solutions. Then, to avoid the settling of DzMPs, the mixed solution was incubated using rotating oven at room temperature for 1 h. The catalytic activity of the DNAzyme was confirmed using DNA polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (DNA-PAGE). Gel electrophoresis was carried out on a 10 % DNA-PAGE gel at 95 V at room temperature in Tris-borate-EDTA (TBE) buffer (0.89 M Tris-borate and 0.02 M EDTA, pH 8.3) for 40 min. First, the gel electrophoresis result was analyzed without DNA-specific dyes to monitor the Cy3-17DS substrate strands. Then, the resulting DNAzyme particles were analyzed after staining with GelRed (10−4 dilution of the stock solution, Biotium, USA).

Detection of Pb2+ Using a Fluorescence Microscope

To observe DzMPs using a fluorescence microscope, dual-labeled substrate was used. The substrate strand which was labeled with a FAM fluorophore (6-carboxyfluorescein) at the 5′-end and a Cy5 at the 3′-end (6FAM/Cy5-17DS). To verify the optimal condition, different concentrations of 6FAM/Cy5-17DS (10 nM, 100 nM, 1 μM each) were mixed with 17E DzMPs and the same denaturation and annealing processes as above were performed. The fluorescence intensity of the 6FAM/Cy5-17DS/E DzMP was measured using Nucleo Counter (Chemometec). For the detection test, various concentrations of Pb2+ solution (100 nM to 1 mM) was added to the DzMP solution, and the mixed solution was incubated at room temperature using a rotating oven for 1 h. After cleavage reaction, the separation of the 6FAM/Cy5-17DS was monitored by utilizing fluorescence microscopy (Nikon).

Results and Discussion

Formation of Catalytic DNA Microparticles

As illustrated in Fig. 1, the catalytic DNA particles were prepared from the designed circular template to generate 17E DNAzyme by RCA process. To observe the morphology and structure of the particles, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was utilized. As seen in Fig. 2a, SEM image showed that the enzymatic particles have flower-like globular shape with uniform size (~1 μm). Because of the large surface area of the porous structure, numerous catalytic sites of the particles could participate in the enzymatic reaction. In addition, Cy3-labeled 17DS substrate strands (Cy3-17DS) were added to prepare 17E DzMPs to produce Cy3-17DS/E DzMPs. To determine the optimal ratio between substrates and DzMPs, three different concentrations (200 nM, 1 μM, and 5 μM each) of substrate solutions were tested. The hybridization between Cy3-17DS and 17E DzMPs was verified by utilizing image cytometry. As shown in Fig. 2b, fluorescence intensities of the particles increased as the concentration increased from 200 nM to 5 μM. Especially, there was a significant increase in intensity when the 5 μM of Cy3-17DS was used, compared to that of control 17E DzMPs. In addition, further study was performed using fluorescence microscopy, and the 17E particles which were mixed with 5 μM of Cy3-17DS showed bright fluorescence (Fig. 2c). These results indicated that the 17DS substrate strands were hybridized enough with the 17E particles which could catalyze the cleavage reaction. Also, the DzMPs still maintain their structure after hybridization with the 17DS substrate (see Additional file 1: Figure S1).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

a SEM images of 17E DzMPs. b Histogram showing the fluorescence intensity of the Cy3-17DS/E DzMPs for various concentrations of the Cy3-17DSs. c Fluorescence microscopy image of the 17E-17DS particles which are hybridized with the 5 μM of Cy3-17DS

Confirmation of Catalytic Activity of DzMPs

To confirm the catalytic activities and determine the sensitivity, various concentrations of Pb2+ (100 nM to 1 mM) were incubated with the Cy3-17DS/E DzMPs at room temperature for 1 h. After incubation, the solutions were analyzed by gel electrophoresis without purification to monitor the separated strands. Because of the presence of Cy3 fluorophore, the substrate strands could be analyzed without further staining with DNA-specific dyes. As seen in Fig. 3a, some 17DS substrates were detected at untreated control (lane 2). There are no significant changes at concentrations up to 100 μM. However, the substrate band was disappeared meaning cleavage of the substrate strands when the particles were treated with 1 mM Pb2+ (lane 7) and the cleaved substrate band was also observed (see Additional file 1: Figure S2). In addition, the previous gel was stained with GelRed to confirm the particles. Since the DzMPs have a size larger than the pore size, the particles were found within the wells (Fig. 3b). The intensities of the bands from lane 2 to lane 6 reveal little difference. On the other hand, in lane 7, the intensity of the band significantly decreased. This is probably due to the fact that the bulk of cleaved substrate strands were separated from the 17E DzMPs because of the catalytic activity of DNAzyme in the presence of Pb2+. For a quantitative study, the normalized intensities have shown in Fig. 3c. Under the concentration of 1 μM Pb2+, the differences between the intensities of untreated and Pb2+-treated samples were not substantial. However, the intensities were reduced up to about 25 % in the case of the concentration of 10 and 100 μM. In addition, the 1 mM treated particles showed an appreciable decrease of 64 % in the gel electrophoresis band intensity. Also, a gradual decrease in intensity of the DzMPs was demonstrated by additional experiment between 20 and 200 μM Pb2+ (see Additional file 1: Figure S3, Tables S1 and S2). These results suggest that the detection of Pb2+ was successfully achieved in the presence of Pb2+.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3

Gel electrophoresis results of the substrate strand (lane 1) and the 17DS/E DzMPs incubated with 100 nM (lane 3), 1 μM (lane 4), 10 μM (lane 5), 100 μM (lane 6), and 1 mM Pb2+ (lane 7) or untreated particles (lane 2). a The image that obtained without staining with the DNA-specific dyes. b The image that obtained after staining with the GelRed. c High magnification image of the highlighted area in b and the normalized fluorescence intensity of the particles

Simple Detection of Pb2+ Using a Fluorescence Microscope

In order to develop a more convenient detection system, we designed the dual-labeled 17DS substrate. The substrate strand was labeled with a 6-carboxyfluorescein fluorophore (6-FAM) at the 5′-end and a Cy5 at the 3′-end (6FAM/Cy5-17DS). Therefore, more precise observations are available since the particles emit two different colors at once. To determine the proper concentration, different concentrations (10 nM, 100 nM, 1 μM) of 6FAM/Cy5-17DS were hybridized with the 17E DzMPs. The fluorescence intensities of the 6FAM/Cy5-17DS/E DzMPs were also measured by image cytometry. The results show that the number of the particles in the right upper quadrant was gradually increased as the concentration of 6FAM/Cy5-17DS increased (Fig. 4a). Especially, the scatterplot of 1 μM of substrate showed a clear linear form, and thus the DzMPs hybridized with 1 μM of 6FAM/Cy5-17DS (6FAM/Cy5-17DS/E DzMPs) were selected for the detection experiment. For the detection using a fluorescence microscope, 1 μM and 1 mM Pb2+ solution were investigated. As shown in Fig. 4b, it is confirmed that the untreated 6FAM/Cy5-17DS/E DzMPs emit both green and red fluorescence. There was not a particular change in the case of 1 μM Pb2+; however, when the 1 mM Pb2+ ions were treated, the number of fluorescent particles remarkably decreased. This means that the 6FAM/Cy5-17DS substrates were cleaved in the presence of Pb2+ and the cleaved substrates were separated from the DzMPs, leading to the reduction in fluorescence intensity. In addition, there were several fluorescent particles which have larger size than untreated control. It was probably caused by aggregation of particles with high concentration of positive charge ion. From these changes, a simple detection of lead ions could be achieved by the DzMP-based detection system.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4

a Image acquisition cytometry plots of the 17E-17DS particles for the different concentrations of the 6FAM/Cy5-17DS substrates. b Fluorescence microscopy images of the 6FAM/Cy5-17DS/E DzMPs in the presence of different concentrations of Pb2+. The particles which are hybridized with the 1 μM of 6FAM/Cy5-17DS were incubated with lead ions at room temperature for 1 h


In conclusion, the DNAzyme microparticle having numerous DNAzyme sites was successfully synthesized. DNAzyme activity of the particles was confirmed by gel electrophoresis and quantification analysis and as low as 20 μM Pb2+ could be detected. Furthermore, dual-labeled substrate was designed for the simple detection platform. By utilizing the DNAzyme microparticles, the detection of lead ions was demonstrated based on the Pb2+-dependent DNAzyme chemistry. This strategy offers a simple and intuitive detection method with a detection limit of 1 mM Pb2+ and it could be applied in environmental applications [26, 27]. Although the sensitivity of this platform should be improved, the DNAzyme microparticles have a lot of advantages such as a large surface area, a high density of catalytic sites, and stability against nuclease [28]. Moreover, the functionality of DzMPs can be modified to contain diverse DNAzymes against a target in cancer cells by controlling sequences. Therefore, this catalytic DNA microparticles may well be useful not only as a detector but as a therapeutic medicine.




This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning (NRF-2015R1A1A1A05001174).

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Seoul, 163 Seoulsiripdaero, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, 130-743, South Korea


  1. Breaker RR, Joyce GF (1994) A DNA enzyme that cleaves RNA. Chem Biol 1(4):223–229View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Schubert S, GuÈl DC, Grunert HP, Zeichhardt H, Erdmann VA, Kurreck J (2003) RNA cleaving ‘10-23’ DNAzymes with enhanced stability and activity. Nucleic Acids Res 31(20):5982–5992View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Silverman SK (2005) In vitro selection, characterization, and application of deoxyribozymes that cleave RNA. Nucleic Acids Res 33(19):6151–6163View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Cuenoud B, Szostak JW (1995) A DNA metalloenzyme with DNA ligase activity. Nature 375(6532):611–614View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Flynn-Charlebois A, Wang Y, Prior TK, Rashid I, Hoadley KA, Coppins RL et al (2003) Deoxyribozymes with 2′-5′ RNA ligase activity. J Am Chem Soc 125(9):2444–2454View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Li Y, Breaker RR (1999) Phosphorylating DNA with DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci 96(6):2746–2751View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Sheppard TL, Ordoukhanian P, Joyce GF (2000) A DNA enzyme with N-glycosylase activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci 97(14):7802–7807View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Breaker RR, Joyce GF (1995) A DNA enzyme with Mg2+-dependent RNA phosphoesterase activity. Chem Biol 2(10):655–660View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Carmi N, Breaker RR (2001) Characterization of a DNA-cleaving deoxyribozyme. Bioorgan Med Chem 9(10):2589–2600View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Moshe M, Elbaz J, Willner I (2009) Sensing of UO2 2+ and design of logic gates by the application of supramolecular constructs of ion-dependent DNAzymes. Nano Lett 9(3):1196–1200View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Torabi S-F, Wu P, McGhee CE, Chen L, Hwang K, Zheng N et al (2015) In vitro selection of a sodium-specific DNAzyme and its application in intracellular sensing. Proc Natl Acad Sci 112(19):5903–5908View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Zhou W, Saran R, Chen Q, Ding J, Liu J (2016) A new Na+-dependent RNA-cleaving DNAzyme with over 1000-fold rate acceleration by ethanol. ChemBioChem 17(2):159–163View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Huang P-JJ, Lin J, Cao J, Vazin M, Liu J (2014) Ultrasensitive DNAzyme beacon for lanthanides and metal speciation. Anal Chem 86(3):1816–1821View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Huang P-JJ, Vazin M, Matuszek Ż, Liu J (2014) A new heavy lanthanide-dependent DNAzyme displaying strong metal cooperativity and unrescuable phosphorothioate effect. Nucleic Acids Res. doi:10.1093/nar/gku1296 Google Scholar
  15. Zhang X-B, Wang Z, Xing H, Xiang Y, Lu Y (2010) Catalytic and molecular beacons for amplified detection of metal ions and organic molecules with high sensitivity. Anal Chem 82(12):5005–5011View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Wu P, Hwang K, Lan T, Lu Y (2013) A DNAzyme-gold nanoparticle probe for uranyl ion in living cells. J Am Chem Soc 135(14):5254–5257View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Wang F, Wu Z, Lu Y, Wang J, Jiang J-H, Yu R-Q (2010) A label-free DNAzyme sensor for lead (II) detection by quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Anal Biochem 405(2):168–173View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Shen L, Chen Z, Li Y, He S, Xie S, Xu X et al (2008) Electrochemical DNAzyme sensor for lead based on amplification of DNA—Au Bio-Bar codes. Anal Chem 80(16):6323–6328View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Wang Y, Irudayaraj J (2011) A SERS DNAzyme biosensor for lead ion detection. Chem Commun 47(15):4394–4396View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Ye S, Guo Y, Xiao J, Zhang S (2013) A sensitive SERS assay of L-histidine via a DNAzyme-activated target recycling cascade amplification strategy. Chem Commun 49(35):3643–3645View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Liu J, Lu Y (2004) Accelerated color change of gold nanoparticles assembled by DNAzymes for simple and fast colorimetric Pb2+ detection. J Am Chem Soc 126(39):12298–12305View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Liu J, Lu Y (2004) Colorimetric biosensors based on DNAzyme-assembled gold nanoparticles. J Fluoresc 14(4):343–354View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Zhang H, Lin L, Zeng X, Ruan Y, Wu Y, Lin M et al (2016) Magnetic beads-based DNAzyme recognition and AuNPs-based enzymatic catalysis amplification for visual detection of trace uranyl ion in aqueous environment. Biosens Bioelectron 78:73–79View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Um SH, Lee JB, Park N, Kwon SY, Umbach CC, Luo D (2006) Enzyme-catalysed assembly of DNA hydrogel. Nat Mater 5(10):797–801View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Lee JB, Peng S, Yang D, Roh YH, Funabashi H, Park N et al (2012) A mechanical metamaterial made from a DNA hydrogel. Nat Nanotechnol 7(12):816–820View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Gichner T, Žnidar I, Száková J (2008) Evaluation of DNA damage and mutagenicity induced by lead in tobacco plants. Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen 652(2):186–190View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Prasad M, Strzalka K (2002) Physiology and biochemistry of metal toxicity and tolerance in plants. 1st ed. Dordrecht: Kluwer AcademicGoogle Scholar
  28. Zhu G, Hu R, Zhao Z, Chen Z, Zhang X, Tan W (2013) Noncanonical self-assembly of multifunctional DNA nanoflowers for biomedical applications. J Am Chem Soc 135(44):16438–16445View ArticleGoogle Scholar


© Kim and Lee. 2016