Skip to content


  • Nano Express
  • Open Access

Incorporation of Ln-Doped LaPO4 Nanocrystals as Luminescent Markers in Silica Nanoparticles

  • 1, 2,
  • 2,
  • 2,
  • 1 and
  • 1Email author
Nanoscale Research Letters201611:261

  • Received: 6 April 2016
  • Accepted: 4 May 2016
  • Published:


Lanthanide ions are promising for the labeling of silica nanoparticles with a specific luminescent fingerprint due to their sharp line emission at characteristic wavelengths. With the increasing use of silica nanoparticles in consumer products, it is important to label silica nanoparticles in order to trace the biodistribution, both in the environment and living organisms.

In this work, we synthesized LaPO4 nanocrystals (NCs) with sizes ranging from 4 to 8 nm doped with europium or cerium and terbium. After silica growth using an inverse micelle method, monodisperse silica spheres were obtained with a single LaPO4 NC in the center. We demonstrate that the size of the silica spheres can be tuned in the 25–55 nm range by addition of small volumes of methanol during the silica growth reaction. Both the LaPO4 core and silica nanocrystal showed sharp line emission characteristic for europium and terbium providing unique optical labels in silica nanoparticles of variable sizes.


  • LaPO4
  • Lanthanide
  • Silica
  • Nanocrystals
  • Luminescence


Nanoparticles find application in an increasing number of consumer products. For example, silica nanoparticles are among the most widely applied nanoparticles. Silica particles of 5–500 nm are used as food additive [1, 2], particles of 50–500 nm in rubber [3, 4], ~25 nm particles as paper additive [5], and 10–250 nm particles in cement [68]. Concerns about potential risks of nanoparticles have triggered research on environmental and health issues [1, 912]. More research is required to provide insight in the distribution and toxicity of nanoparticles to aid the development of safe-by-design guidelines for manufacturers [13, 14]. For this reason, model systems are needed to make it possible to monitor and map the distribution of nanoparticles. A promising method to trace the nanoparticles is incorporating a luminescent label into nanoparticles. Various luminescent labelled silica systems have been synthesized in the past decades.

Two main approaches have been used to coat luminescent nanoparticles with silica, namely the Stöber method [15, 16] and the reverse micelle method [1719]. The former method is used for the silica coating of nanoparticles (e.g., 10–200 nm gold and silver particles [20]) in polar media, while the latter method is mainly used for smaller nanoparticles (e.g., 3–10 nm quantum dots [17]) which are suspended in apolar media.

One of the luminescent labels used in silica in the past are quantum dots (QDs) [18]. However, the porous character of the silica limits the stability of the QDs. The surrounding medium can be in contact with the quantum dot which can result in quenching of the luminescence [18]. In addition, the intensity of QD emission decreases after exposure to high temperatures [21]. A second important disadvantage of silica-coated QDs as luminescent labels is the width of the emission bands. Albeit narrower than emission from dye molecules, the 30–40 nm band width limits the number to a few unique luminescent labels that can be created for the QD-labeled silica nanoparticles.

Lanthanide ions incorporated into a nanocrystalline host are a promising alternative since the lanthanide luminescence is known to be unaffected by the surrounding medium, and the chemical and temperature stability of Ln-doped nanocrystals is high [2224]. In addition, the sharp and characteristic emission lines of lanthanide ions can be used to create a large number of unique luminescent labels by changing or combining the lanthanide ions inside the nanocrystal host lattice [25, 26]. For these reasons, lanthanide-doped insulator nanocrystals are promising as luminescent labels for silica. Here, we will investigate the synthesis and optical properties of silica nanoparticles with a luminescent core of LaPO4 doped with luminescent lanthanide ions. Previously, silica coating has been realized for Ln nanostructures with varying size, shape, and type of lanthanide-doped hosts, mostly with the aim to provide a protective silica coating. Examples of these systems are clustered LaPO4:Tb3+ rods of 10 × 95 nm coated with a 15–20 nm silica layer using the Stöber method [27], CePO4:Ln3+ nanoleaves of 20 × 75 nm incorporated into silica sols [28], LaF3 nanocrystals of 5 nm coated with a silica shell of 17 nm [29], and YVO4:Eu3+ nanoparticles and LnPO4:Ce3+/LaPO4 core-shell nanoparticles [30, 31] with a thin (5 nm) silica shell. These silica-coated nanoparticles have a thin silica shell and are not representative of silica nanoparticles used in consumer products. It is the aim of this paper to synthesize silica nanoparticles with a unique and efficiently luminescing core that can serve to trace silica nanoparticles of sizes and shapes that reflect those of commercially applied silica nanoparticles.

We present a new method to incorporate LaPO4 nanocrystals doped with either europium (Eu3+) or cerium and terbium (Ce3+ and Tb3+) into monodisperse silica spheres using the reverse micelle method. The size of the LaPO4 core particles can be varied from 4 to 8 nm by changing the lanthanide precursor to ligand ratio. The size of the silica spheres can be varied between 25 and 55 nm. These sizes are in the same range as for silica nanoparticles that are commonly used in consumer products which make these luminescent-labeled silica nanoparticles relevant for studies of the environmental distribution of silica nanoparticles. In addition, this system may be suitable to perform measurements on luminescent-labeled silica on a single nanoparticle level because of the large number of luminescent lanthanide ions incorporated in a single nanocrystal. This will be useful in in vivo studies of the distribution of silica in living organisms. Finally, these silica particles can also be used as multifunctional biolabels by combining the luminescent core with additional functionalities (e.g., MRI contrast agent, drug delivery) incorporated in the silica shell.



The chemicals used in the various synthesis procedures are LaCl3.6H2O (Strem chemicals, 99.9 %), EuCl3.6H2O (Fisher Scientific, 99.9 %), CeCl3 (Aldrich, 99.99 %), TbCl3.6H2O (Aldrich, 99.9 %), tributyl phosphate (Fluka Analytical, ≥99 %), diphenyl ether (Sigma-Aldrich, 99 %), tributylamine (Sigma-Aldrich, ≥99 %), tridodecylamine (Aldrich, 85 %), phosphoric acid (Aldrich, ≥99.9 %), dihexyl ether (Aldrich, 97 %), dodecylamine (Acros Organics, 98 %), decylamine (Aldrich, 95 %), poly(5)oxyethylene-4-nonylphenyl-ether (Igepal Co 520, Sigma-Aldrich), tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS, Sigma-Aldrich, 99 %), and ammonia 28 % in water stored at 7 °C (Sigma-Aldrich, 99.9 %) were used as received. The solvents used are methanol (Sigma-Aldrich, 99.8 %), cyclohexane (Sigma-Aldrich, anhydrous, 99.5 %), ethanol (Alfa Aeasar, 96 %), and toluene (Sigma-Aldrich, anhydrous, 99.8 %) and were used as received.

Synthesis of LaPO4 Nanocrystals

LaPO4 nanocrystals doped with lanthanide ions were synthesized using a method pioneered in the group of Haase [32]. A clear solution of 10 mmol lanthanide chlorides (La, Eu, or Ce and Tb) in 10 mL methanol was mixed with 40 mmol tributyl phosphate. Subsequently, methanol was removed under vacuum at room temperature in a Schlenk-line. Next, 30 mL of diphenyl ether was added and water released by the hydrated salts was removed under vacuum at 105 °C. The system was purged with nitrogen in a Schlenk-line and the temperature was allowed to drop. At temperatures below 50 °C, 2.5 to 40 mmol tributylamine was added, followed by 7 mL of a 2 M solution of phosphoric acid in dihexyl ether. The reaction mixture was kept overnight (~16 h) under nitrogen at 200 °C to allow for particle growth to the final size (4–8 nm) and annealing of the nanocrystals. After cooling, the nanocrystals were precipitated from the reaction mixture by addition of toluene, washed with methanol and toluene, and dried under vacuum. The nanocrystals could be redispersed in polar media.

Ligand Exchange

We can vary the medium in which the nanocrystals can be suspended from polar to apolar by changing the ligand attached to the surface of the nanocrystal. A ligand exchange reaction was performed in order to change the short tributylamine ligand with the longer dodecylamine ligand. Recapping of the nanocrystals was performed by adding the dry nanocrystals to dodecylamine heated at 200 °C under nitrogen atmosphere. After 10 min, the heating was stopped and the nanocrystals were precipitated from the reaction mixture by adding methanol followed by centrifugation. The nanocrystals were washed several times with toluene and methanol and dried under vacuum. The nanocrystals could be dispersed in apolar solvents after this recapping procedure.

Silica Coating of LaPO4 Nanocrystals

Silica shells were grown around the LaPO4 nanocrystals using the inverse micelle method described by Koole et al. [18]. First, 1.3 mL of Igepal Co 520 (NP-5) was dispersed in 10 mL cyclohexane and stirred at 850 rpm for 15 min. Next, 1–2 nmol tributylamine-capped LaPO4 nanocrystals in 100 μL methanol or 1–2 nmol dodecylamine-capped LaPO4 nanocrystals in 1 mL toluene were injected. In a number of syntheses, 50 to 150 μL methanol was added directly after the addition of the nanocrystals to vary the silica particle size. Subsequently, 80 μL tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS) and 150 μL ammonia were added. The reaction mixture was stirred at 850 rpm for 15 min between every addition and for 1 min after the last addition and stored in a dark room for 1 day. The silica-coated LaPO4 nanocrystals were isolated from the reaction mixture by addition of 3 mL ethanol and centrifugation at 3000 rpm for 10 min. The sediment was redispersed in 10 mL ethanol and centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 20 min. This last step was repeated but centrifuging for 40 min after which the silica-coated LaPO4 nanocrystals were redispersed in 10 mL ethanol.


The purified NCs and silica samples were characterized with transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Samples for analysis were obtained by dissolving 0.5 mg of nanocrystals in 3 mL ethanol and dropcasting the NCs solutions on coated copper TEM grids. The TEM images were obtained with a Tecnai microscope operating at 100 kV equipped with a tungsten filament. Images were recorded with a SIS CCD camera Megaview II in iTEM software.

X-ray diffraction patterns of powder samples were recorded with a PW1729 Philips diffractometer equipped with a Cu Kα X-ray source (λ = 1.5418 Å). Reference diffractograms were taken from the International Center of Diffraction Data (ICDD).

Luminescence Spectroscopy

Photoluminescence measurements were performed using an Edinburgh Instruments FLS920 fluorescence spectrometer. Emission spectra were recorded using a 450 W Xe lamp as excitation source and a Hamamatsu R928 PMT detector. Luminescence decay curves were recorded for pulsed excitation with an optical parametric oscillator (OPO) system (Opotek HE 355 II) pumped by the third harmonic of a Nd:YAG laser. The OPO was set at λ exc = 487 nm to excite in the Tb3+ 7F6 → 5D4 f-f transition (repetition rate 10 Hz, pulse width 10 ns) for the LaPO4:Ce3+,Tb3+ nanocrystals. The LaPO4:Eu3+ nanocrystals were measured with the OPO at λ exc = 465 nm to excite in the Eu3+ 7F0 → 5D2 f-f transition. The decay curves were recorded with a Hamamatsu R928 PMT detector using the multichannel scaling (MCS) option integrated in the FLS 920 fluorescence spectrometer.

Dynamic Light Scattering

The sizes of the micelles formed during silica coating were characterized with dynamic light scattering (DLS). Details can be found in Additional file 1. Four different samples were prepared to analyze the size of the micelles under varying reaction conditions; NP-5 in cyclohexane solutions, ammonia emulsions, and two methanol/ammonia emulsions with different concentrations of methanol. The 306 mM NP-5 in cyclohexane solutions were obtained by dissolving 1.35 g NP-5 in 10 mL cyclohexane under stirring at 850 rpm for 15 min. Ammonia emulsions were prepared by adding 150 μL ammonia (28 wt.% in water) to the NP-5 solutions. The methanol/ammonia solutions were obtained by adding methanol, either 50 or 150 μL, to the NP-5 mixtures, obtaining concentrations of 121 and 359 mM, respectively. After 15 min of stirring at 850 rpm, 150 μL ammonia (28 wt.% in water) was added. All samples were filtered with a Millipore Millex-FG 0.20 μm filter.

Results and Discussion

LaPO4 Cores

The size of both the silica nanoparticles and the luminescent core are important parameters. In this section, we report results on the variation of the LaPO4 core diameter. In a larger core, the number of luminescent lanthanide ions that can be incorporated is higher, which can be important to achieve single nanocrystal luminescence. The LaPO4 nanocrystal size can be tuned by varying the ratio between NC precursors (Ln and phosphate) and the ligand. Hickmann et al. [32] have observed an increase in particle sizes from 4 to 10 nm by changing the lanthanide precursor to ligand ratio from 1:3 to 1:1. In Fig. 1, X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns and transmission electron microscope (TEM) images are shown for LaPO4 NCs synthesized with precursor ratios varying from 4:1 to 1:4 (details can be found in Additional file 1). Figure 1a shows a XRD pattern of particles shown in Fig. 1c. A monazite LaPO4 reference diffractogram is included in the same figure. The X-ray diffractogram shows diffraction peaks that are consistent with the monazite crystal structure for LaPO4. The presence of broad diffraction peaks reflects the formation of nanoparticles with sizes in the nanometer range. A more precise determination of the size can be obtained by analyzing the TEM images. In Fig. 1b–d TEM images are shown for LaPO4 NC synthesized with different precursor-ligand ratios. For the higher ligand concentrations (Fig. 1 b, c), smaller NCs are formed, with diameters ranging from 4 to 6 nm. The variation of the NC size was not always reproducible. The general trend of the present experiments confirm the earlier findings by Hickmann et al. that a lower ligand concentration results in larger LaPO4 NCs. Similar observations are generally made (also for II–VI QDs [3335]) and are explained by the faster growth of NCs that are less well capped/protected by ligands.
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

a XRD of LaPO4 nanocrystals shown in c. The red bars indicate the positions and relative intensities of the XRD pattern of bulk LaPO4 [PDF 00-032-0493]. bd TEM images of LaPO4:Eu3+ nanocrystals synthesized with different amounts of tributylamine capping ligands. b LaPO4 nanocrystals of 4.2 ± 0.9 nm for a LnCl3 to ligand ratio of 1:4. c LaPO4 nanocrystals of 6.1 ± 1.2 nm for a LnCl3 to ligand ratio of 2:1. d LaPO4 nanocrystals of 7.9 ± 1.8 nm for a 4:1 ratio

To investigate the optical properties of the doped LaPO4 NCs, luminescence spectra and luminescence decay curves were recorded for the various types of NCs (different sizes and different types of dopants). Figure 2a shows the emission spectrum (red line) of LaPO4:Eu3+(5 %) nanoparticles of 4 nm. Sharp emission lines are observed around 590, 610, and 700 nm. The sharp emission lines are typical of Eu3+ emission corresponding to intraconfigurational 4f6 transitions. The strongest emission lines can be assigned to the 5D07F1 (590 nm), 5D07F2 (610 nm), and 5D07F4 (700 nm) transitions. The relative intensities of these three emissions are similar. This is in good agreement with reports in the literature for Eu3+-doped LaPO4 NCs [36] and bulk [37]. When Eu3+ ions are incorporated on a site that lacks inversion symmetry (which is the case for the La3+ site in LaPO4), usually the 5D0 → 7F2 emission dominates. However, for Eu3+ in LaPO4, the mixing of opposite parity states into the 4f6 states by the odd parity crystal field components, the mechanism responsible for breaking the parity selection rule for electric dipole transitions is limited, resulting in approximately equal intensities of the 5D0 → 7F1 magnetic dipole transition and 5D0 → 7F2 electric dipole transition [37, 38]. The blue line in Fig. 2a shows the excitation spectrum of the Eu3+ emission. The onset of the excitation at 300 nm is followed by increasing absorption towards shorter wavelengths. The strong UV excitation band originates from the oxygen to europium charge transfer (CT) band [37, 39]. The dip in the excitation band around 270 nm is ascribed to competitive absorption by organic molecules present in the solution, possibly some residual diphenyl ether that was used as solvent and has an absorption maximum around 270 nm or molecules with multiple unsaturated bonds that are formed during the reaction at 200 °C and which typically absorb at these energies [40]. Next to the parity allowed CT transition with high intensity, sharp, and weak excitation peaks are observed between 300 and 400 nm and can be assigned to the intraconfigurational transitions to higher energy 4f6 levels.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

a: Emission spectrum (red line, λ exc = 250 nm) and excitation spectrum (blue line, λ em = 611 nm) of 4 nm LaPO4:Eu3+ NCs in ethanol. b Decay curve (red line) of 611 nm Eu3+ emission for 4 nm LaPO4:Eu3+ NCs in ethanol excited at 465 nm, τ = 3.9 ms, and the radiative decay curve with QY = 1 (blue line), τ = 6.5 ms. c Emission spectrum (green line, λ exc = 280 nm) and excitation spectrum (blue line, λ em = 543 nm) of 4 nm LaPO4:Ce3+, Tb3+ in ethanol. d Decay curve of 543 nm Tb3+ emission for 4 nm LaPO4:Ce3+(1 %),Tb3+(5 %) NCs in ethanol excited at 487, τ = 5.3 ms, and the purely radiative decay curve (blue line), τ = 6.9 ms. See text for details concerning the calculation of the purely radiative decay curves

Figure 2b shows the luminescence decay curve of the Eu3+ emission in 4 nm LaPO4:Eu3+ 5 % NCs, recorded for 611 nm emission. After an initial non-exponential decay, the tail of the decay curve is closer to single exponential. A mono-exponential fit to these data points gives a decay time of 3.9 ms. The initial fast decay can be explained by an additional contribution of non-radiative decay pathways caused by multi-phonon relaxation through nearby N–H and C–H vibrations (phonons) of ligand molecules with energies of ~3400 and 3000 cm−1, respectively. The energy gap between the emitting 5D0 level and the next lower 7F6 level is about 12,000 cm−1 and can be bridged by four N–H or C–H vibrations. Multi-phonon relaxation and radiative decay rates are similar for energy gaps that can be bridged by five phonons [24]. Multi-phonon relaxation becomes faster if the gap can be bridged by a smaller number of phonons and when the distance to the vibrational oscillations decreases. Especially Eu3+ ions close to the surface will show faster decay due to multi-phonon relaxation caused by coupling with the nearby C–H and N–H vibrations. The fast initial decay and influence of the differences in coordination for ions at the surface on the luminescence and decay behavior will be discussed in a next paper.

The radiative decay time of emitters in NCs depends strongly on the refractive index n of the medium surrounding the NC. Calculating the radiative decay time and comparison with the experimentally observed decay curve allows an estimate of the upper limit for the quantum yield (QY) of luminescent NCs [41]. The radiative decay rate can be determined using formula 5 in ref [41]:
$$ {\varGamma}_r(n) = {\varGamma}_0n{\left(\frac{3{n}^2}{2{n}^2+{n}_{\mathrm{NC}}^2}\right)}^2 $$

The calculated Γ r(n) was determined to be 0.16 ms−1 (6.5 ms), using Γ 0 = 0.31 ms−1 (τ = 3.18 ms for bulk LaPO4:Eu3+(2 %) [42]), n NC = 1.79 [43], and n = 1.361 (ethanol). The value of 6.5 ms is longer than the experimentally observed decay time of 3.9 ms in the tail of the decay curve. Consequently, the influence of the non-radiative decay is still present in the tail of the decay curve. An estimate for the upper limit of the QY can be obtained by dividing the area under the measured decay curve by the area under the theoretically determined decay curve obtained by Eq. 1 [41]. This procedure gives a quantum efficiency of 0.48.

The emission spectrum of LaPO4:Ce3+(1 %),Tb3+(5 %) NCs is shown by the green line in Fig. 2c. Emission lines are observed around 490, 540, 585, and 620 nm. The sharp emission lines are attributed to 5D4 to 7FJ transitions and agree with typical Tb3+ emission lines reported in the literature [44]. The green 5D47F5 emission around 545 nm dominates as is usually observed for Tb3+. The blue line in Fig. 2c shows the excitation spectrum of terbium emission. An excitation band starting at 325 nm is observed and assigned to the parity-allowed 4f → 5d transition of Ce3+. The band abruptly drops in intensity at 270 nm, which is similar to the wavelengths where a drop in the excitation spectrum for the CT band of Eu3+ was observed. The drop in intensity is again explained by competing absorption of UV radiation in this wavelength region by organic molecules with a conjugated π-system (multiple alternating double bonds). The observation of the Ce3+ excitation bands while monitoring Tb3+ emission provides evidence that there is energy transfer from Ce3+ to Tb3+ [44].

The luminescence decay curve of the 5D4 emission from Tb3+ in 4 nm LaPO4 NCs doped with Ce3+ and Tb3+ recorded at 543 nm is shown in Fig. 2d. A mono-exponential fit for the tail of the decay curve, starting 5 ms after the excitation pulse, yields a decay time τ of 5.3 ms. Just as for Eu3+, the initial part of the luminescence decay curve is non-exponential but the deviation from exponential decay is less than for Eu3+. This originates from the difference in energy between the 5D07F6 energy gap for Eu3+ (~12000 cm−1) and the 5D47F0 energy gap for Tb3+ (~14500 cm−1). The former can be bridged by four phonons (vide supra), while the latter requires five phonons. As a result, the non-radiative decay process is more pronounced in Eu3+. An upper limit for the quantum yield of 0.74 was obtained for LaPO4:Ce3+(1 %),Tb3+(5 %) NCs using the same procedure as described above, based on Eq. (5) of ref. [41]. The radiative decay rate, Γ r (n), was determined to be 0.145 ms−1 when using the constants Γ 0 = 0.29 ms−1 (τ = 3.4 ms for bulk LaPO4:Tb3+(1 %) [41]), n NC = 1.79, n = 1.363 (ethanol).

Silica-Coated LaPO4 NCs

In order to grow a silica nanoparticle around the luminescent LaPO4:Ln3+ NC cores, an inverse micelle method was used with variations in the reaction conditions. Reaction conditions were varied aiming at growing monodisperse silica NPs of different sizes in the 10–100 nm size range—that is most relevant in view of the current commercial applications of silica nanoparticles. First, the LaPO4:Ln3+ NCs were suspended in apolar media for the silica-coating reaction according to the procedure described by Koole et al. [18]. In the work of Koole et al., quantum dots capped with long apolar ligands were used for the silica coating and suspended in an apolar medium that was injected in the inverse micelle solution. In order to follow this as accurately as possible, the 4 nm LaPO4:Eu3+ and LaPO4:Ce3+,Tb3+ NCs coated with tributylamine were subjected to a ligand exchange reaction with dodecylamine. These NCs could be dispersed into apolar media and were dispersed in toluene for the silica-coating reactions prior to injection in the inverse micelle solution.

The silica growth reaction was stopped after 1 day, and the final size and shape of the particles were studied with TEM. Figure 3a shows a TEM image of the LaPO4 crystals after silica coating. Spherical silica particles with a size of 28.3 ± 3.8 nm are obtained. The LaPO4 NCs are located in the center of the sphere and many silica spheres contain only a single LaPO4 NC. However, silica spheres with no or multiple LaPO4 NCs are observed as well. These empty silica particles have a smaller size than particles containing one or multiple LaPO4 NCs.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3

TEM images of silica nanoparticles with a luminescent LaPO4 core. The medium in which the LaPO4 nanocrystals were dispersed prior to silica growth and the amount of methanol added during the reaction was varied resulting in different SiO2 particle sizes. a Particles of 28.3 ± 3.8 nm are obtained for DDA-capped LaPO4 particles suspended in toluene, no methanol added. b Particles of 33.4 ± 2.3 nm, similar to a with 50 μL methanol added. c Particles of 41.2 ± 3.1 nm, similar to a with 100 μL methanol added. d Particles of 53.5 ± 4.2 nm, similar to a with 150 μL methanol added. e Particles of 36.4 ± 2.8 nm are obtained for tributylamine-capped LaPO4 particles suspended in 100 μL methanol. f Zoom of silica particles shown in d

For investigating biodistribution of silica particles of different sizes, it is desired to be able to tune the size of the silica particles. However, the final silica particle size can only be tuned within a small size range with the method described above. To vary the size of the silica NPs, we added a varying amount of methanol directly after the addition of the LaPO4 NCs to the silica reaction mixture to study the influence on the size of the silica spheres. The added volume of methanol was increased from 50–150 μL in steps of 50 μL. More information about experimental details can be found in Additional file 1. Figure 3b–d shows the NCs after silica coating with increasing methanol concentration going from 3b to 3d. The 4 nm LaPO4 NCs are incorporated in the middle of the silica spheres, and the size of the silica spheres increases from 33.4 ± 2.3 nm to 41.2 ± 3.1 to 53.5 ± 4.2 nm with increasing methanol concentration. This demonstrates that the presence of methanol during the silica reaction increases the silica growth around the LaPO4 NCs.

The variation in size is larger for silica particles synthesized in the presence of a higher volume of methanol. The size of the silica particles is dependent on the number of LaPO4 NCs incorporated, where larger silica particles are formed as more LaPO4 NCs are incorporated. A series of experiments under slightly varying reaction conditions (e.g., source of ammonia) consistently reproduced the effect of the addition of methanol on particle size. Depending on other reaction parameters also larger silica NPs, up to 80 nm, were obtained, see Figure S1 in Additional file 1. In all cases, an addition of small volumes (50–200 μL) of methanol showed similar increases of silica particle sizes.

It is not trivial to explain the role of methanol on the final particle size. In the literature, it has been shown that the addition of alcohol to microemulsions results in coalescence of micelles [45]. In this mechanism, the micelles should enlarge upon addition of alcohol. This is indeed observed for addition of methanol or ethanol to AOT/water/n-decane systems [46]. In our system, another surfactant and oil phase is used and it is not evident that the two systems will behave in the same way. Dynamic light scattering (DLS) measurements can provide information about the size of micelles and is used to study the size of micelles under varying reaction conditions. DLS measurements performed on 306 mM NP-5 in cyclohexane showed the presence of particles with a mean hydrodynamic diameter of 3.5 ± 1.3 nm. The size of the particles increases to 6.3 ± 2.2 nm upon adding ammonia solution (28 wt.% in water) to the system. The increase in size indicates that the ammonia solution is incorporated into the micelles, forming small emulsion droplets.

To investigate the influence of methanol on the micelle system, two different concentrations methanol were added to the mixture of NP-5, ammonia solution and cyclohexane and investigated with DLS (Additional file 1). The hydrodynamic diameter of the emulsion droplets shifted to 7.8 ± 4.0 nm for systems containing 121 mM methanol. In addition, a second size at approximately 1700 nm was observed. However, only a few large structures are present as can be seen from the number distribution. DLS measurements performed on a system containing a higher concentration methanol, 359 mM, did not indicate a significant increase in droplet size. These results indicate that the micelles remain intact and most likely increase significantly in size after the addition of methanol to the system, probably due to the partly incorporation of methanol. In addition, a small number of structures with a large diameter are formed. Table S1 in Additional file 1 lists the data in more detail.

A possible explanation for the formation of larger silica spheres in the presence of methanol is the formation of less silica nuclei in the beginning of the reaction due to the formation of hydrogen bonds between methanol and water. In the literature, it has been shown that an increase in the water concentration leads to the formation of smaller silica particles [47]. This observation is explained by the faster hydrolysis rate of the silicon source, tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS), in the presence of more free water. The fast hydrolysis of TEOS leads to the formation of a larger number of stable silica nuclei. Since all nuclei grow at the same rate, more but smaller silica particles are formed at the end of the reaction, when all TEOS has reacted. It is therefore expected that the presence of less free water leads to the formation of fewer but larger silica particles. Possibly, the amount of free water is reduced by adding methanol to the reaction mixture, since the alcohol can form hydrogen bonds with water. However, it is beyond the scope of this paper to unravel in detail the mechanism responsible for the increase in silica particle size upon addition of small volumes of methanol. The present study clearly demonstrates that this new method can be successfully applied to tune the size of silica NPs over a relevant size range.

Another variation in reaction parameters was made to grow silica around the LaPO4 NCs starting from a suspension of LaPO4 nanocrystals in polar media. For this coating reaction, the as-synthesized LaPO4 NCs coated with tributylamine were suspended in 100 μL methanol and injected into the inverse micelle solution. The reaction was stopped after 1 day and the final particles are shown in Fig. 3e. Spherical particles with a diameter of 36.4 ± 2.8 nm are observed with one or multiple LaPO4 NCs in the middle. The size of the NCs is comparable to the size of the silica NCs shown in Fig. 3c. The total amount of methanol is the same in both reaction mixtures, but in the latter, the LaPO4 NCs were suspended in apolar medium and later methanol was added to the reaction mixture. This indicates similar silica growth mechanisms for both silica-coating reactions. Again, larger silica NCs are formed in reaction mixtures with a higher concentration methanol. The size of the silica spheres can be tuned from 28 to 54 nm by adjusting the amount of methanol between 0 and 150 μL.

For application of the silica NPs in studying biodistribution, it is crucial that the luminescence properties are retained after silica growth. Luminescence spectra were measured for silica NPs with LaPO4:Eu3+ and LaPO4:Ce3+,Tb3+ nanocrystal cores. Luminescence spectra are shown in Fig. 4.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4

a Emission spectrum (red line, λ exc = 250 nm) and excitation spectrum (blue line, λ em = 611 nm) of LaPO4:Eu3+ nanocrystals incorporated into silica spheres dispersed in ethanol. b Decay curve of 611 nm Eu3+ emission for 4 nm LaPO4:Eu3+ NCs incorporated in 28 nm silica spheres dispersed in ethanol excited at 465 nm, τ = 3.8 ms, and the radiative decay curve with QY = 1 (blue line), τ = 6.5 ms. c Emission spectrum (green line, λ exc = 280 nm) and excitation spectrum (blue line, λ em = 543 nm) of LaPO4:Ce3+,Tb3+ NCs incorporated in silica spheres dispersed in ethanol. d Decay curve of LaPO4:Ce3+,Tb3+ NCs incorporated in silica spheres dispersed in ethanol excited at 487 nm, τ = 4.8 ms, and the radiative decay curve with QY = 1 (blue line), τ = 6.9 ms. See text for details concerning the calculation of the purely radiative decay curves

The Eu3+ emission spectrum (red line in Fig. 4a) is identical to that in Fig. 2a which shows that the europium emission is not affected after silica growth. In addition, the ratio between the emission intensities of the 5D0 to 7F1, 7F2, and 7F4 transitions is the same as for the LaPO4:Eu3+ cores. This is expected since the local surrounding of the europium ions is determined by the local coordination in the LaPO4 crystal structure and is not changed after silica growth. The excitation spectrum, blue line in Fig. 4a, shows a broad excitation band with an onset around 300 nm, originating from oxygen to europium charge transfer, and a small peak at 393 nm, assigned to the 7F0 → 5L6 transition. A single broad CT excitation band is observed in the UV without dips around 270 nm which caused the double band structure in the CT band of Eu3+ for the LaPO4 cores (Fig. 2a). This is consistent with the removal of the organic ligands as a result of the replacement by silica at the LaPO4 nanoparticle surface.

The luminescence decay curve of the Eu3+ emission in LaPO4:Eu3+ 5 % NCs incorporated into 28 nm silica spheres, recorded at 611 nm, is shown in Fig. 4b. A mono-exponential fit for the tail of the decay curve, after 5 ms, yields a decay time τ of 3.8 ms. The decay time is similar to the decay time of the LaPO4:Eu3+ cores (3.9 ms).

The upper limit of the quantum yield of the silica-coated LaPO4:Eu3+(5 %) was determined using the same method described above to be 0.45. A theoretical decay rate Γ r (n) of 0.155 ms−1 (6.5 ms) was obtained, using Γ 0 = 0.31 ms−1, n NC = 1.79, and n = 1.361 (ethanol). The quantum yield stayed approximately the same from 0.48 before silica coating to 0.45 after silica coating. Note that the value for n is not exact since the presence of the silica layer around the LaPO4:Eu3+ NC should also be taken into account as the higher refractive index of silica (n = 1.45) will affect the local field correction factor. Calculations using a method describing the local field correction factor for a core-shell system [48] show that this hardly influences the QY calculated from the luminescence decay curves for these particles. More details can be found in Additional file 1.

The green line in Fig. 4c shows the emission spectrum of terbium in LaPO4 NCs incorporated into silica. The blue line shows the excitation spectrum recorded for 543 nm emission. A broad excitation band with an onset at 300 nm is observed and assigned to the parity-allowed 4f → 5d transition of Ce3+. A small dip is observed in the excitation band around 270 nm which can be the result of some residual ligands absorbing in the UV or crystal field splitting of the 5d excited state of Ce3+ which has been observed to give structure in the 250–300 nm f–d absorption band of Ce3+ in LaPO4 [38, 49].

The luminescence decay curve of the 543 nm Tb3+ emission in LaPO4 NCs doped with 1 % Ce3+ and 5 % Tb3+ incorporated into 28 nm silica spheres is shown in Fig. 4d. A mono-exponential fit for the tail of the decay curve, after 5 ms, yields a decay time τ of 5.0 ms and is plotted through the data points. Again, an upper limit for the quantum yield was determined and a value of 0.55 was obtained. The theoretical decay rate, Γ r (n), was determined to be 0.16 ms−1 when using the constants Γ 0 = 0.29 ms−1 (τ = 3.4 ms for bulk LaPO4:Tb3+(1 %) [41]), n NC = 1.79, and n = 1.363 (ethanol). The quantum yield has decreased from 0.74 before silica coating to 0.55 after silica coating.

The drop in quantum yield after the coating of the LaPO4:Ce3+,Tb3+ nanoparticles can be caused by several different mechanisms, such as increase in multiphonon relaxation and the presence of more defects at the surface of the LaPO4 nanocrystal. The decrease in quantum yield can be explained by an increase in the non-radiative decay rate due to faster multiphonon relaxation after silica coating. The N–H and C–H vibrations of ligands with energies of ~3400 and 3000 cm−1, respectively, contribute to multiphonon relaxation before silica coating. After silica coating, the ligands are replaced by silanol groups [50]. The O–H vibrations have energies of ~3500 cm−1. As a result, the 5D47F0 energy gap of Tb3+ (~14500 cm−1) can be bridged by four phonons in the presence of silica instead of five phonons before silica coating, leading to a faster non-radiative decay rate. In addition, the enhanced non-radiative decay rate after silica coating leads to a lower quantum yield. The drop in quantum yield after silica coating is not observed for europium-doped nanoparticles. This is surprising. To explain this observation, we consider the number of phonons (originating from vibrations of ligands) required to bridge the 5D07F6 energy gap (~12000 cm−1) of europium. This number is four, both for the core nanoparticles (N–H and C–H vibrations of ~3400 and 3000 cm−1, respectively) and the silica-coated particles (O–H vibrations of ~3500 cm−1). As a result, the non-radiative decay rate of europium ions is not significantly increased by the silica growth. The similar multiphonon relaxation rates also result in similar quantum yields for europium-doped LaPO4 core NCs and silica-coated nanoparticles.

Next to vibrations of capping materials, vibrations of solvent molecules can also contribute to multiphonon relaxation. The surface of the LaPO4 nanocrystal is less well protected from solvent molecules after silica coating due to the removal of ligands and the porous character of silica. As a result, the OH groups of the solvent molecules (ethanol) can couple more easily with the emission of the lanthanide ions located at the surface of the LaPO4 nanocrystal. Again, the 5D47F0 energy gap of terbium (~14,500 cm−1) can be bridged by five phonons (N–H and C–H vibrations of ~3400 and 3000 cm−1, respectively) before silica coating, while only four phonons are needed after silica coating (O–H vibrations of ~3500 cm−1). The number of phonons required to bridge the 5D07F6 energy gap (~12,000 cm−1) of europium is four, both for the core nanoparticles and the silica-coated particles. As a result, the quantum yield of terbium-doped LaPO4 NCs drops after silica coating, while the quantum yield of europium-doped LaPO4 NCs remains approximately the same after silica coating, as explained before.

The results presented demonstrate the feasibility of making highly luminescent silica nanoparticles of various sizes showing characteristic Eu3+ or Tb3+ emission. An almost unlimited variety of unique luminescent labels can be realized by incorporating other luminescent Ln3+ ions (e.g., Pr3+, Sm3+, Dy3+, Ho3+, Er3+, Tm3+, or Yb3+) in the LaPO4 core or combinations of different Ln3+ ions. It is also interesting to extend the size range by growing additional layers of silica around the nanoparticles.


LaPO4 nanocrystals doped with either europium or cerium and terbium with sizes varying from 4 to 8 nm were synthesized by adjusting the lanthanide precursor to ligand ratio. The LaPO4 NCs showed sharp emission lines characteristic for europium or terbium emission.

In a next step, the LaPO4 nanocrystals were incorporated in silica nanoparticles using a reverse micelle method. Monodisperse silica spheres with a single LaPO4 NC or multiple LaPO4 NCs were obtained. Silica particle sizes could be tuned between 25 and 55 nm by addition of small volumes (0 to 150 μL) of methanol. The luminescence spectra of LaPO4:Ln3+ cores are not affected by silica growth, and the quantum yield remains high after encapsulation in silica nanoparticles. The sizes of the silica nanoparticles studied here is comparable to those of silica nanoparticles applied in consumer products, and the method presented allows for the synthesis of a variety of uniquely labelled silica nanoparticles for biodistribution studies of silica nanoparticles, even down to single nanocrystal experiments using a combination of fluorescence and electron microscopy.



Bonny Kuipers and Bas van Ravensteijn from the Physical and Colloid Chemistry group of the Debye Institute for Nanomaterials Science of Utrecht University are thanked for their help with the DLS measurements. The research leading to these results has received funding from European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme FP7/2007-2013/for project GUIDEnano under grant agreement no. 604387. GAB gratefully acknowledges support by the Marie Curie Action, CIG-294061.

Authors’ Contributions

JJHAVH synthesized the LaPO4 core and LaPO4 core-shell nanoparticles and performed the optical, XRD and TEM measurements. JJHAVH, GAB, HCG, CDMD, and AM analyzed the data. CDMD and AM designed the experiment and JJHAVH and AM wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors’ Affiliations

Condensed Matter and Interfaces, Debye Institute for Nanomaterials Science, Utrecht University, Princetonplein 5, 3584 CC Utrecht, The Netherlands
Molecular Biophysics, Utrecht University, Princetonplein 5, 3584 CC Utrecht, The Netherlands


  1. Peters R, Kramer E, Oomen AG, Herrera Rivera ZE, Oegema G, Tromp PC, Fokkink R, Rietveld A, Marvin HJP, Weigel S, Peijnenburgh AACM, Bouwmeester H (2012) Presence of nanosized silica during in vitro digestion of foods containing silica as a food additive. ASC nano 6:2441–2451View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Contado C, Ravani L, Passarella M (2013) Size characterization by sedimentation field flow fractionation of silica particles used as food additives. Anal Chim Acta 788:183–192View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Peng Z, Kong LX, Li SD, Chen Y, Huang MF (2007) Self-assembled natural rubber/silica nanocomposites: its preparation and characterization. Compos Sci Technol 67:3130–3139View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Arrighi V, McEwen IJ, Qian H, Serrano Prieto MB (2003) The glass transition and interfacial layer in styrene-butadiene rubber containing silica nanofiller. Polymer 44:6259–6266View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Ogihara H, Xie J, Okagaki J, Saji T (2012) Simple method for preparing superhydrophobic paper: spray-desposited hydrophobic silica nanoparticle coatings exhibit high water-repellency and transparency. Langmuir 28:4605–4608View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Singh LP, Agarwal SK, Bhattacharyya SK, Sharma U, Ahalawat S (2011) Preparation of silica nanoparticles and its beneficial role in cementitious materials. Nanomater nanotechnol 1:44–51Google Scholar
  7. Sánchez M, Alonso MC, González R (2014) Preliminary attempt of hardened mortar sealing by colloidal nanosilica migration. Constr Build Mater 66:306–312View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Slane J, Vivanco J, Ebenstein D, Squire M, Ploeg HL (2014) Multiscale characterization of acrylic bone cement modified with functionalized mesoporous silica nanoparticles. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 34:141–152View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Winter M, Beer HD, Hornung V, Krämer U, Schins RPF, Förster I (2011) Activation of the inflammasome by amorphous silica and TiO2 nanoparticles in murine dendritic cells. Nanotoxicology 5:326–340View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Oberdörster G, Stone V, Donaldson K (2007) Toxicology of nanoparticles: a historical perspective. Nanotoxicology 1:2–25View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Som C, Wick P, Krug H, Nowack B (2011) Environmental and health effects of nanomaterials in nanotextiles and façade coatings. Environ Int 37:1131–1142View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Keller A, McFerran S, Lazareva A, Suh S (2013) Global life cycle releases of engineered nanomaterials. J Nanopart Res 15:1692View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Reijnders L (2009) The release of TiO2 and SiO2 nanoparticles from nanocomposites. Polym Degrad Stabil 94:873–876View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Froggett S, Clancy S, Boverhof D, Canady R (2014) A review and perspective of existing research on the release of nanomaterials from solid nanocomposites. Part Fibre Toxicol 11:17View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Stöber W, Fink A (1968) Controlled growth of monodisperse silica spheres in the micron size range. J Colloid Interface Sci 26:62–69View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Nann T, Mulvaney P (2004) Single quantum dots in spherical silica particles. Angew Chem Int Ed 43:5393–5396View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Darbandi R, Thomann R, Nann T (2005) Single quantum dots in silica spheres by microemulsion synthesis. Chem Mater 17:5720–5725View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Koole R, Schooneveld M, Hilhorst J, de Mello Donega C, ’t Hart DC, van Blaaderen A, Vanmaekelbergh D, Meijerink A (2008) On the incorporation mechanism of hydrophobic quantum dots in silica spheres by a reverse microemulsion method. Chem Mater 20:2503–2512View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Osseo-Asare K, Arriagada FJ (1990) Preparation of SiO2 nanoparticles in a non-ionic reverse micellar system. Colloids Surf 50:321–339View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Graf C, Vossen D, Imhof A, van Blaaderen A (2003) A general method to coat colloidal particles with silica. Langmuir 19:6693–6700View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Zhao Y, Riemersma C, Pietra F, Koole R, de Mello Donega C, Meijerink A (2012) High-temperature luminescence quenching of colloidal quantum dots. ASC nano 6:9058–9067View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Haley T (1965) Pharmacology and toxicology of the rare earth elements. J Pharm Sci 54:663–670View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Weber M (1968) Radiative and multiphonon relaxation of rare-earth ions in Y2O3. Phys Rev 171:283–291View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Blasse G, Grabmaier B (1994) Luminescent materials, 1st edn. Springer Verlag, BerlinView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Binnemans K, Görller-Walrand C (1995) On the color of the trivalent lanthanide ions. Chem Phys Lett 235:163–174View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Dieke G, Crosswhite H, Dunn B (1961) Emission spectra of the doubly and triply ionized rare earths. Appl Opt 2:675–686View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Runowski M, Dabrowska K, Grzyb T, Miernikiewicz P, Lis S (2013) Core/shell-type nanorods of Tb3+-doped LaPO4, modified with amine groups, revealing reduced cytotoxicity. J Nanopart Res 15:2068View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Gulnar AK, Sudarsan V, Vatsa RK, Hubli RC, Gautam UK, Vinu A, Tyagi AK (2009) CePO4:Ln (Ln = Tb3+ and Dy3+) nanoleaves incorporated in silica sols. Cryst Growth Des 9:2451–2456View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Sivakumar S, Diamente PR, van Veggel FCJM (2006) Silica-coated Ln3+ doped LaF3 nanoparticles as robust down- and upconverting biolabels. Chem Eur J 12:5878–5884View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Giame D, Buissette V, Lahlil K, Gacoin T, Boilot JP, Casanova D, Beaurepaire E, Sauviat MP, Alexandrou A (2005) Emission properties and applications of nanostructured luminescent oxide nanoparticles. Prog Solid State Chem 33:99–106View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Buissette V, Mourea M, Gacoin T, Boilot JP (2006) Luminescent core/shell nanoparticles with a rhabdophane LnPO4-xH2O structure: stabilization of Ce3+-doped compositions. Adv Funct Mater 16:351–355View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Hickmann K, Kömpe K, Hepp A, Haase M (2008) The role of amines in the growth of terbium(III)-doped cerium phosphate nanoparticles. Small 4:2136–2139View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Yu WW, Wang YA, Peng X (2003) Formation and stability of size-, shape-, and structure-controlled CdTe nanocrystals: ligand effects on monomers and nanocrystals. Chem Mater 15:4300–4308View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Yu WW, Peng X (2002) Formation of high-quality CdS and other II-VI semiconductor nanocrystals in noncoordinating solvents: tunable reactivity of monomers. Angew Chem Int Ed 41:2368–2371View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. de Mello Donega C (2011) Synthesis and properties of colloidal hetereonanocrystals. Chem Soc Rev 40:1512–1546View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Lehmann O, Kömpe K, Haase M (2004) Synthesis of Eu3+-doped core and core/shell nanoparticles and direct spectroscopic identification of dopant sites at the surface and in the inerior of the particles. J Am Chem Soc 126:14935–14942View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Ropp RC (1968) Phosphors based on rare earth phosphates. J Electrochem Soc 115:841–845View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Dorenbos P (2001) 5d-level energies of Ce3+ and the crystalline environment. III Oxides containing ionic complexes. Phys Rev B 64:125117View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. van Schaik W, Lizzo S, Smit W, Blasse G (1993) Influence of impurities on the luminescence quantum efficiency of (La, Ce, Tb)PO4. J Electrochem Soc 140:216–222View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Suzuki H (1967) Electronic absorption spectra and geometry of organic molecules, 1st edn. Academic, New York, pp 1–9Google Scholar
  41. Senden T, Rabouw F, Meijerink A (2015) Photonic effects on the radiative decay rate and luminescence quantum yield of doped nanocrystals. ACS Nano 9:1801–1808View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Dexpert-Ghys J, Mauricot R, Faucher MD (1996) Spectroscopy of Eu3+ ions in monazite type lanthanide orthophosphates LnPO4, Ln = La or Eu. J Lumin 69:203–215View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Weber MJ (2003) Handbook of optical materials. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  44. Rabouw F, den Hartog S, Senden T, Meijerink A (2014) Photonic effects on the Förster resonance energy transfer efficiency. Nat Commun 5:3610View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Wang H, Schaefer K, Moeller M (2008) In situ immobilization of gold nanoparticle dimers in silica nanoshell by microemulsion coalescence. J Phys Chem C 112:3175–3178View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Perez-Casas S, Castillo R, Costas M (2007) Effect of alcohols in AOT reverse micelles. A heat capacity and light scattering study. J Phys Chem B 101:7043–7054View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Arriagada FJ, Osseo-Asare K (1999) Synthesis of nanosize silica in a nonionic water-in-oil microemulsion: effects of the water/surfactant molar ratio and ammonia concentration. J Colloid Interface Sci 211:210–220View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Lavallard P, Rosenbauer M (1996) Influence of surrounding dielectrics on the spontaneous emission of sulforhodamine B molecules. Phys Rev A 54:5450–5453View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Nakazawa E, Shiga F (2003) Lowest 4f-to-5d and charge-transfer transitions of rare-earth ions in LaPO4 and related host-lattices. Jpn J Appl Phys 42:1642–1647View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Scorciapino M, Sanna R, Ardu A, Orru F, Casu M, Musinu A, Cannas C (2013) Core-shell nano-architectures: the incorporation mechanism of hydrophobic nanoparticles into the aqueous core of a microemulsion. J Colloid Interface Sci 407:67–75View ArticleGoogle Scholar


© van Hest et al. 2016