Open Access

One Way to Design a Valence-Skip Compound

Nanoscale Research Letters201712:127

https://doi.org/10.1186/s11671-017-1897-z

Received: 7 November 2016

Accepted: 3 February 2017

Published: 17 February 2017

Abstract

Valence-skip compound is a good candidate with high T c and low anisotropy because it has a large attractive interaction at the site of valence-skip atom. However, it is not easy to synthesize such compound because of (i) the instability of the skipping valence state, (ii) the competing charge order, and (iii) that formal valence may not be true in some compounds. In the present study, we show several examples of the valence-skip compounds and discuss how we can design them by first principles calculations. Furthermore, we calculated the electronic structure of a promising candidate of valence skipping compound RbTlCl3 from first principles. We confirmed that the charge-density wave (CDW) is formed in this compound, and the Tl atoms in two crystallographic different sites take the valence Tl1+ and Tl3+. Structure optimization study reveals that this CDW is stable at the ambient pressure, while this CDW gap can be collapsed when we apply pressure with several gigapascals. In this metallic phase, we can expect a large charge fluctuation and a large electron–phonon interaction.

Keywords

Valence skip CDW Superconductivity Electronic structure RbTlCl3 BaBiO3

Background

In order to utilize superconducting materials, essentially three properties are highly desirable: high critical temperature (T c), low anisotropy, and good workability. However, the materials satisfying these three conditions are not found at present. For example, cuprates have high T c, but their anisotropy is extremely high, because of their two-dimensional nature and the origin of superconductivity, i.e., strong repulsive Coulomb’s interaction of the conduction electrons. Superconducting gap equation requires that if the sign of the interaction is positive; then, the superconducting gap must have a node, eventually this gap must be anisotropic.

If we can use an attractive interaction as a glue of superconductivity (SC), the appeared SC might be isotropic. Phonon-mediated SC is one of them, while its T c is limited by the Debye temperature. In 1988, Varma proposed a new mechanism of SC, which uses the valence-skip element [1]. For example, Bi takes 3+ or 5+ valence state in a compound and usually does not take 4+ valence state. We call this valence skip because it skips the 4+ valence state. In other words, the electron configuration of the outermost s orbitals forms a closed shell in most compounds, for example, in the case of Bi, s2 (completely filled) for Bi3+ and s0 (empty) for Bi5+. If we force the valence state of Bi as 4+ in a compound or the occupation of the outermost s-electrons as half-filled (s1), it has a large charge fluctuation. This charge fluctuation is attractive one because the effective Coulomb interaction U eff = E(Bi3+) + E(Bi5+)−2E(Bi4+) becomes negative, where E(Bi n+) denotes the energy of Bi n+ state. If this type of compound becomes superconducting (in fact, there are a few examples), it might become a good material for applications.

However, in most cases, this fluctuation is frozen and forms a charge order or so-called charge-density wave (CDW). For example, BaBiO3 shows CDW in the low temperature phase [2]. In this phase, the crystal symmetry lowers due to the displacement of the oxygen atoms. Bi occupies two crystallographic sites, one is Bi3+ and the other is Bi5+. This frozen order can be melt by two methods: First, by raising temperature, since high temperature disfavors the ordered state. This is the thermal effect and rather trivial. Second, by carrier doping in the potassium-doped (Ba,K)BiO3, the charge order is melt and the high-symmetry of the crystal structure is restored. Quite interestingly, (Ba,K)BiO3 shows SC below T c = 39 K [3].

Our goal is to synthesize new superconductors, those are caused by the valence-skip mechanism. The first step to this goal is very simple, just “search s1 compound.” The importance of s1 configuration of the cation is also emphasized by the discoverer of the abovementioned BaBiO3, A. W. Sleight [4]. In fact, we can survey a database such as Pearson’s Crystal Data [5] and find some s1 compounds. However, this is not enough by the following reasons: Firstly, a compound which formally has s1 configuration does not necessary contain one electron in the outermost s orbital of the cation. Secondly, many s1 compounds show CDW, and this CDW is too hard to be melt by doping. First principles calculation can shed light to these problems. Recently, along this strategy, the electronic structure of ATlX3 (A = Rb, Cs; X = F, Cl, Br) was investigated [6]. As expected, the electronic structure of ATlX3 and BaBiO3 quite resemble each other. They both have a charge order of (Tl1+, Tl3+) or (Bi3+, Bi5+), accompanied with the breathing mode of anions. In general, insulators can be metallic by two different ways: One way is the carrier doping, mostly done by substituting a different valence ion. The other way is applying pressure. The latter method has a merit that it does not create randomness, which may degrade or deteriorate the superconductivity. Unfortunately, probably since BaBiO3 is too hard to compress, the pressure-induced superconductivity has not been realized yet. In this paper, we show that RbTlCl3 can be metallic by applying a tractable pressure. Considering that the electronic structure of RbTlCl3 is similar to that of BaBiO3, we can also expect superconductivity in RbTlCl3 under pressure.

This paper is organized as follows: In the “Methods” section, the crystal structures of the compound that we calculated and the method of calculation are described. In the “Results and Discussion” section, we introduce our surveying work for searching for the valence-skip compound. Firstly, we discuss some relationships between the valence, s-p energy difference, and charge fluctuation for some compounds which formally have s1 configuration. Secondly, we report the possibility of pressure-induced valence-skip superconductivity in RbTlCl3. Summary is described in the “Conclusions” section.

Methods

Crystal Structure

It is known that CsTlCl3 has the ordered perovskite structure in the high temperature phase (it is written as elpasolite in the literature) [7]. Although RbTlCl3 is not synthesized yet, it is highly plausible that these compounds have the same structure because they are isovalent and the tolerance factor is around ~1 [6]. In the present work, we ignore the possible small tilting distortion of anions and concentrate on the ordered perovskite phase for simplicity. In this structure, Tl1+ and Tl3+ ions are alternatively order like NaCl and the X atoms move toward Tl3+ because of the larger positive charge and/or smaller ionic radius of Tl3+. This displacement of X atom is the same with the breathing mode of BaBiO3. The crystal structure of BaBiO3 and RbTlCl3 is as follows: Space group Fm-3m (#225), Ba/Rb (1/4,1/4,1/4), Bi1/Tl1 (0,0,0), Bi2/Tl2 (1/2,1/2,1/2), and O/Cl (0,0,z). When z = 0.25, the anion is located at the midpoint of two Bi/Tls and the crystal structure becomes the simple perovskite one. For BaBiO3, we used z = 0.25 since we are interested in the metallic state and for RbTlCl3, we fully relaxed the parameter z by total energy minimization. For both compounds, we ignored the small monoclinic distortion for simplicity.

Method of Calculations

We have calculated the electronic structure of RbTlCl3 from first principles. We have used a full potential augmented plane wave (FLAPW) scheme, and the exchange-correlation potential was constructed within the general gradient approximation [8]. Hereafter, we call this potential as PBE. We used the computer program WIEN2k package [9]. The parameter RK max is chosen as 7.0. The k-point mesh is taken so that the total number of mesh in the first Brillouin zone is ~1000. We have also optimized the crystal structure, with fixing the space group and the lattice parameter. In this structure, the only one free parameter is the position of Cl(=z). The convergence of atomic position is judged by the force working on each atom is less than 1.0 mRy/a.u. As for BaBiO3 and RbTlCl3, we also used KANSAI94 program set in order to compare with the previous results of InTe, SnAs, and PbSb [10]. Here, we used the local density approximation for the exchange-correlation potential [11]. We set the muffin-tin radii of BaBiO3 as r(Ba) = 2.6 a.u., r(Bi) = 2.5 a.u., and r(O) = 1.6 a.u. As for RbTlCl3, we set the muffin-tin radii as r(Rb) = 2.6 a.u., r(Tl) = 2.5 a.u., and r(Cl) = 2.2 a.u. The calculated band structures using WIEN2k and KANSAI94 are almost the same as is expected.

Tight-Binding Analysis and Estimation of Valence State

In order to obtain more insight of the electronic structure of these compounds, we fit the E(k) curve by the following tight-binding (TB) model Hamiltonian:
$$ {\widehat{H}}_0={\displaystyle \sum_i{\varepsilon}_i^{\mu}}{c}_{i\mu}^{\dagger }{c}_{i\mu}+{\displaystyle \sum_{i j}{t}_{i j}^{\mu \nu}}{c}_{i\mu}^{\dagger }{c}_{j\nu} $$
(1)

Here, \( {\varepsilon}_i^{\mu} \) denotes the on-site energy of i-site with μ orbital (μ = s, p) and \( {t}_{ji}^{\mu \nu} \) denotes the transfer matrix element between the μ orbital in i-site and the ν orbital in j-site. We omit the spin indices for simplicity. We only consider the s and p orbitals both for cation and anion and only consider the nearest neighbor hopping. As for the NaCl-type compounds (InTe, SnAs, and PbSb), we already discussed precisely in the previous paper [10]. As for the perovskite compounds (BaBiO3 and RbTlCl3), we assumed z = 0.25 (i.e., no distortion) and adopted the five-parameter model which is used in Ref. [12].

In order to estimate the valence state, we calculate two quantities: One is the number of occupied s-electron in the cation muffin-tin sphere (=N s_mt), and the other is the number of occupied s-electron within a s and p orbitals tight-binding model used in Ref. [10] (=N s_tb). Both quantities have advantages and disadvantages. N s_mt can be directly calculated by this first principles calculation, but it depends on the muffin-tin radius. And since these compounds do not include d or f orbitals in the valence bands, the wave function spreads out to the interstitial region. Thus, the estimation of the valence state of cation is not straightforward. On the other hand, since N s_tb is based on the tight-binding model, it does not directly depend on spread of the wave function. And when we include many-body effect (e.g., negative-U Hubbard model), tight-binding basis is necessary. However, tight-binding fitting to the first principles results causes ambiguity. Therefore, N s_mt and N s_tb are complimentary to each other.

Results and Discussion

s1 Compound or not?

In the preceding paper, we have calculated the band structures of three binary compounds InTe, SnAs, and PbSb with rocksalt structure [10]. In order to obtain the information of the valence of these compounds, we have performed a systematic tight-binding analysis based on ab-initio calculation. Figure 1a shows the N s_mt, N s_tb, and E p aE s c (energy difference between anion p orbital and cation s orbital in the tight-binding model) for five valence-skip candidate compounds. We can see a clear tendency that N s_tb increases when E p a−Es c increases. Moreover, InTe has almost the same value of N s_tb and E p aE s c with BaBiO3, indicating that in InTe the In atom behaves as the Bi atom in BaBiO3. In fact, in the ambient pressure phase, InTe shows CDW, similar to BaBiO3. Therefore, we can say that InTe has s1 configuration, in the sense that BaBiO3 apparently has s1 configuration. RbTlCl3 has almost the same values of N s_tb and E p aE s c, so we conclude that RbTlCl3 also has s1 configuration. We can also claim that PbSb is not a valence skipper because N s_tb is near two. The strength of the valence-skip fluctuation is strong in InTe and BaBiO3 and is weak in PbSb. From these results, we can explain why PbSb does show neither CDW nor SC, and why InTe and BaBiO3 show CDW at ambient pressure and show SC by some perturbation (pressure in InTe and doping in BaBiO3).
Fig. 1

a Characteristic parameters for BaBiO3 and three binary formally s1 compounds. b The difference between the bond valence sum and the formal valence (BVS-FV) compared with N s_mt. Note that we do not find the bond valence sum of PbSb because there is no data of Pb-Sb bond parameter in the literature [16]

We found that N s_mt shows an abnormal behavior in BaBiO3 and RbTlCl3, while in other three binary compounds, N s_mt has the same tendency as N s_tb. The muffin-tin radii of cations are also set as 2.5 a.u. for all these compounds, and we also have checked that the decrease of the cation muffin-tin sphere gives almost the same ratio of N s_mt decrease, i.e., d(N s_mt)/d(rmt) = 0.7~0.9/a.u. At present time, we do not find the clear reason why only BaBiO3 and RbTlCl3 have different tendency, i.e., too much N s_mt compared to N s_tb. We consider that the difference of the crystal structure (perovskite vs. rocksalt) causes this different tendency of N s_mt. In order to see this, we have calculated the bond valence sum and compared with N s_mt in Fig. 1b. Interestingly, the difference between the bond valence sum and the formal valence (=BVS-FV) is well correlated with N s_mt for all these compounds. And we can see that InTe has almost In2+ valence state, and SnAs has a small discrepancy from Sn3+ valence state as we expected. On the contrary, BaBiO3 (RbTlCl3) shows a large discrepancy from Bi4+ (Tl2+) valence state and this behavior looks like that of N s_mt. Considering that the bond valence sum is sensitive to crystal structure, the anomalous behavior of N s_mt in BaBiO3 and RbTlCl3 may come from the difference of the crystal structure.

Pressure-Induced Metallic State in RbTlCl3

In order to determine whether RbTlCl3 shows CDW or not, we performed a structure optimization study by minimizing the total energy. In the ordered perovskite structure, the only two tunable structure parameters are the lattice parameter a (or the volume of the unit cell V) and the parameter z which denotes the position of Cl(0,0,z). At ambient pressure (determined by the energy minimization), a 0 = 11.254 Å and z 0 = 0.2362 are obtained. The obtained lattice parameter a 0 is close to the value of the previous work [6]. If z becomes 0.25, then Cl atom locates at the midpoint of Tl1 and Tl2 atoms, crystal symmetry becomes higher and CDW disappears. Our result z 0 = 0.2362 shows that CDW occurs in RbTlCl3 at ambient pressure. The band gap is opened between the Tl1_s band and the Tl2_s band, similar to the case of SnF3 and BaBiO3 [13]. Therefore, RbTlCl3 is a typical valence skipper. When we choose some a and z, the band gap Δ is determined. In other words, Δ is a function of a and z. Figure 2 shows this Δ as a function of V = (a 3/4). The dotted line shows Δ when z is fixed to z 0 = 0.2362 (z value at ambient pressure). We can see that Δ is rather insensitive to V and one might think it is impossible to collapse the gap by pressure. However, the optimized z is different for each V and we show the V-dependence of Δ with optimizing z in the solid line of Fig. 2. Applying pressure not only decreases V but also change z along V-dependence of z. Therefore, we can control z via changing V and eventually collapse the gap. We can also describe the V dependence of the total energy in the same way, shown in Fig. 2b. These data can be fit by the Murnaghan equation of state curve. Again, the dotted line denotes E(V) when z is fixed to z 0 and the solid line denotes E(V) with optimizing z for each V. The vertical line corresponds to the critical volume V c, defined as Δ(V c) = 0. Since the obtained bulk modulus B is very small (=26 GPa), the corresponding pressure is only ~3 GPa. Considering that density functional calculation usually underestimates the value of the band gap, applying pressure with 4~5 GPa may be enough to collapse the band gap. In order to check this point, we performed a test calculation using so-called mBJ potential functional [14], which can improve the value of the band gap [15]. As for V = V 0 (ambient pressure), the magnitude of the band gap is 1.27 eV using mBJ and 0.74 eV using PBE. On the other hand, at V = 0.85 V 0, the band gap diminishes both for mBJ and PBE. Therefore, we conclude that the metal-insulator transition occurs even we use mBJ potential functional. Since we do not optimize z for mBJ calculation, the critical volume V c and critical pressure may change. The resulting metallic phase should have a large charge fluctuation and a large electron–phonon interaction, which is quite advantageous for isotropic superconductivity.
Fig. 2

a The band gap of RbTlCl3 as a function of volume reduction. ΔV = 0 denotes the volume at ambient pressure. b The total energy and pressure of RbTlCl3 for various unit cell volume. Note that we set the formula unit as Rb2Tl1+Tl3+Cl6, which is twice of that in Ref. [6]. For both panels, the dotted line is for z = z 0 (fixed) and the solid line is for optimized z for each volume

Conclusions

In order to search the valence-skip superconductor, we investigated the electronic structure of several compounds formally having s1 configuration by first principles study. Nevertheless, combined with a tight-binding analysis, we found that some compounds have almost s2 configuration. We also found that RbTlCl3 is a good candidate of the pressure-induced superconductor, with having a large charge fluctuation and electron–phonon interaction.

Abbreviations

CDW: 

Charge-density wave

FLAPW: 

Full-potential augmented plane wave

mBJ: 

Modified Becke-Johnson

PBE: 

Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof

SC: 

Superconductivity

T c

Critical temperature

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank to H. Eisaki and K. Odagiri for the fruitful discussions.

Funding

This work was partially supported by the KAKENHI (Grant No. JP26400379) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS).

Authors’ Contribution

IH is the main contributor. TY performed the part of the calculation and has critically read and revised the manuscript. KK performed the part of the calculation and has critically read and revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

We declare that there are no concerning data of human and animals.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST)
(2)
IMRA Material R&D Co., Ltd.

References

  1. Varma CM (1988) Phys Rev Lett 61:2713View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Sleight AW, Gilson JL, Bierstedt PE (1975) Solid State Commun 17:27View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Mattheiss LF, Gyorgy EM, Johnson DW Jr (1988) Phys Rev B37:3745View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Sleight AW (2015) Physica C514:152View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Pearson’s Handbook Desk Edition, ASM International (1997).Google Scholar
  6. Schoop LM, Müchler L, Felser C, Cava RJ (2013) Inorg Chem 52:5479View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Ackermann R, (2001) Thesis, Universitätsbibliothek Freiburg, BreisgauGoogle Scholar
  8. Perdew JP, Burke K, Ernzerhof M (1996) Phys Rev Lett 77:3865View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Blaha P, Schwarz K, Madsen GKH, Kvasnicka D, Luitz J (2001) WIEN2k, an augmented plane wave + local orbitals program for calculating crystal properties. Vienna University of Technology, WienGoogle Scholar
  10. Hase I, Yasutomi K, Odagiri K, Yanagisawa T, Nishio T (2016) Physica C527:85View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Gunnarson O, Lundqvist BI (1976) Phys Rev B13:4274View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Mattheiss LF, Hamann DR (1983) Phys Rev B28:4227View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Hase I, Yanagisawa T, Kawashima K (2016) Phys C Phys C530:11View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Tran F, Blaha P (2009) Phys Rev Lett 102:226401View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Camargo-Martinez J. A., Baquero R. (2012) Phys. Rev. B86 195106 ; Rev. Mex. Fis. 59 (2013) 453.Google Scholar
  16. Brown ID, Altermatt D (1985) Acta Cryst B41:244, also see http://www.ccp14.ac.uk/ccp/web-mirrors/i_d_brown/, accessed in 01/Nov/2016View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017