Open Access

Magnetoresistance Versus Oxygen Deficiency in Epi-stabilized SrRu1 − x Fe x O3 − δ Thin Films

  • Umasankar Dash1,
  • Susant Kumar Acharya1,
  • Bo Wha Lee1 and
  • Chang Uk Jung1Email author
Nanoscale Research Letters201712:168

Received: 3 January 2017

Accepted: 22 February 2017

Published: 6 March 2017


Oxygen vacancies have a profound effect on the magnetic, electronic, and transport properties of transition metal oxide materials. Here, we studied the influence of oxygen vacancies on the magnetoresistance (MR) properties of SrRu1 − x Fe x O3 - δ epitaxial thin films (x = 0.10, 0.20, and 0.30). For this purpose, we synthesized highly strained epitaxial SrRu1 − x Fe x O3 − δ thin films with atomically flat surfaces containing different amounts of oxygen vacancies using pulsed laser deposition. Without an applied magnetic field, the films with x = 0.10 and 0.20 showed a metal–insulator transition, while the x = 0.30 thin film showed insulating behavior over the entire temperature range of 2–300 K. Both Fe doping and the concentration of oxygen vacancies had large effects on the negative MR contributions. For the low Fe doping case of x = 0.10, in which both films exhibited metallic behavior, MR was more prominent in the film with fewer oxygen vacancies or equivalently a more metallic film. For semiconducting films, higher MR was observed for more semiconducting films having more oxygen vacancies. A relatively large negative MR (~36.4%) was observed for the x = 0.30 thin film with a high concentration of oxygen vacancies (δ = 0.12). The obtained results were compared with MR studies for a polycrystal of (Sr1 − x La x )(Ru1 − x Fe x )O3. These results highlight the crucial role of oxygen stoichiometry in determining the magneto-transport properties in SrRu1 − x Fe x O3 − δ thin films.


Epitaxial thin film X-ray diffraction Reciprocal space mapping Oxygen vacancy Magnetoresistance Fe-doped SrRuO3


The electronic and magnetic properties of SrRuO3 (SRO) have received a significant amount of attention, not only from a fundamental science point of view but also due to their potential for device applications [13]. In particular, SRO in its thin film form is widely used in oxide electrodes due to its favorably high conductivity, atomically flat surface, and low lattice mismatch with single-crystalline perovskite oxide substrates [4, 5]. SRO is an itinerant ferromagnetic metal that shows a transition from the paramagnetic to ferromagnetic state at the Curie temperature (T C ) = 163 K for polycrystalline samples [1, 6]. The ferromagnetism in SRO originates from a substantial spin polarization of the low-spin-state configuration of the 4d electrons (S = 1; t 4 2g e 0 g ), producing a saturated magnetic moment of 1.6 μ B [7]. Bearing in mind that the itinerant ferromagnetism of SRO originates from a narrow t 2g band, the bandwidth can be dramatically modified by doping 3d metal ions such as Ti4+, Cr3+, Mg2+, Ni2+, and Fe3+, giving rise to exotic magnetic and transport properties [8, 9].

Certain fascinating doping effects have been reported to arise from the substitution of Fe3+ ions at the Ru4+ sites in SRO [10, 11]. For instance, Mamchik et al. observed a “self-spin valve” large negative magnetoresistance (MR) in polycrystalline (Sr1 − x La x )(Ru1 − x Fe x )O3 (SLRFO) samples [12]. In their study, the maximum MR (~45%) was reported for (Sr0.7La0.3)(Ru0.7Fe0.3)O3 samples at T = 10 K and H = 9 T. They proposed that the large negative MR was due to the ferromagnetic interaction between the high-spin state of Fe3+ ions and low-spin state of Ru4+ ions. Co-doping of La3+ at the A sites was critical for stabilization of the single phase in their polycrystalline samples. In contrast, we recently showed that high-quality Fe-doped SRO without A-site co-doping can be stabilized using an epitaxial strain during thin film growth [13, 14]. By preparing highly crystalline epitaxial thin films, we also avoided effects arising from the porosity and grain boundaries of polycrystalline samples. In that work, we fabricated SrRu1 − x Fe x O3 (SRFO) thin films with various Fe doping levels (x = 0.05, 0.10, and 0.20) and observed a maximum negative MR of 14.4% for a 10% Fe-doped SRFO epitaxial thin film at T = 10 K and H = 9 T [13].

However, the maximum MR value of ~14.4% in our previous epitaxial thin film was substantially less than that of co-doped SLRFO polycrystalline samples (45%). Obtaining a large MR is an essential goal for various technological applications, including data storage, non-volatile memory, and sensing applications [15, 16]. Thus, we searched various options to improve the MR values in our epitaxial SRFO thin films. In particular, we noticed that in polycrystalline SLRFO samples, the MR was higher for more semiconducting samples [12]. In contrast, our SRFO thin films with x = 0.00, 0.05, 0.10, and 0.20 with intentionally reduced levels of oxygen vacancies were mostly metallic [13]. Oxygen vacancies, which are intrinsic to perovskite oxides, play a major role in the electronic and magnetic properties of strongly correlated systems. These vacancies effectively act as double electron donors, tuning the valence states of B-site transition metal cations in ABO3 perovskite oxides [17]; as a consequence, the magneto-transport properties of these films are strongly impacted [18]. For instance, in La0.5Sr0.5CoO3 − x perovskite thin films, the negative MR value sharply increased from 1 to 17% when the oxygen partial pressure during the thin film growth changed from 1 to 0.1 mbar [19]. (Even though the oxygen vacancy was not calculated quantitatively, the observed lattice expansion was suggested to be an indicator of an increase in oxygen vacancies.) Similarly, in La0.7Sr0.3MnO3 thin films, the MR increased from 55 to 85% when the thin films were deoxygenated by annealing in a reducing atmosphere [20]. Thus, a semiconducting SRFO thin film with increased oxygen-vacancy content is expected to show higher MR than a metallic SRFO thin film.

In this study, we estimate the oxygen-vacancy content in SrRu1 − x Fe x O3 − δ (x = 0.10, 0.20, and 0.30) thin films deposited at various oxygen partial pressures and examine the impact of oxygen vacancies on MR and transport properties. In addition, we also report a high negative MR of ~36.4% observed in semiconducting SrRu0.7Fe0.3O3 − 0.12 epitaxial thin films. This MR value for thin films of SrRu0.7Fe0.3O3 − 0.12 with a high level of oxygen vacancies is more than two times that of the previously reported highest MR (~14.4%) value for low-oxygen-vacancy thin films of SrRu0.9Fe0.1O3 −0.02 [13].


The current study involved three sets of samples: (1) We reviewed the reported MR and structural analysis for previously reported low-oxygen-vacancy thin films [13], (2) we measured the MR of the high-oxygen-vacancy thin films used in our previous report [14], and (3) we fabricated new SRFO thin films with high concentrations of oxygen vacancies. These SrRu1 − x Fe x O3 − δ (x = 0.10, 0.20, and 0.30) thin films with different oxygen vacancies were grown on SrTiO3 (STO) substrates under different oxygen partial pressures using pulsed laser deposition (PLD). The details of film growth can be found in our previous reports [13, 14, 21, 22]. The laser power and substrate temperature were maintained at 35 mJ and ~750 °C, respectively, at a constant frequency of 4 Hz. During thin film growth, the oxygen partial pressure was set at either 100 or 180 mTorr. Therefore, it is expected that the oxygen content differs among the thin films. The thickness of the films was characterized by a surface profilometer. The quality of the thin films was studied in multiple ways, including the lattice parameter, lattice volume, and surface morphology. The crystal structure was characterized by high-resolution X-ray diffraction (HRXRD). (Two thin films were characterized using the Bruker D8 Discover HRXRD system, while the other three films were characterized with the PANalytical X’Pert PRO HRXRD system.) The surface morphology was examined by atomic force microscopy (AFM). MR was measured by using a cryogen-free cryostat (CMag Vari9, Cryomagnetics Inc.) and a dual-channel source-measure unit (Keithley 2612A Standard Measurement Unit) [13].

Results and Discussion

In our previous two reports, we showed that phase-pure high-quality epitaxial SrRu1 − x Fe x O3 − δ (x = 0.1, 0.2, 0.3) thin films with either high or low oxygen-vacancy content can be grown on STO (001) substrates [13, 14]. In the current study, we selected 10 and 20% Fe-doped SRFO thin films deposited at pressures of 100 and 180 mTorr and grew new 30% Fe-doped SRFO thin films at a pressure of 100 mTorr.

Figure 1 presents the HRXRD patterns of these series of SrRu1 − x Fe x O3 − δ (x = 0.1, 0.2, and 0.3) epitaxial thin films. The figure shows only the local range centered at the (002) reflections of the SRFO thin films. For simplicity, all reflection peaks are indexed in the tetragonal notation for the crystal structure of the SrRu1 − x Fe x O3 − δ films, and the HRXRD intensity is plotted using a log scale [13, 14]. The rocking curve (data not shown) shows excellent c-axis orientation with narrow full width half maxima for all thin films. In terms of the Fe-doping trend on SRFO, it is clear from Fig. 1 that up to x = 0.20, the diffraction peaks of the thin films shift towards a lower 2θ position as the Fe content increases. This trend indicates that the lattice parameters and unit cell volume increase. In contrast, for x = 0.30, the peak of the thin film shifts towards the right relative to the position at x = 0.20, implying that the lattice constants decrease. This change in the lattice parameters of SRFO thin films induced by Fe doping can be explained in terms of possible substitution of Fe3+ ions rather than Fe4+ ions at Ru4+ sites, as discussed previously in detail [13]. From Fig. 1, it is also evident that for both x = 0.10 and 0.20 SRFO thin films, the diffraction peak shifts to a lower angle with decreasing deposition oxygen partial pressure, which implies an increase in the oxygen-vacancy content and an increase in the lattice parameters. An increase of the c-axis lattice parameter is a well-known characteristic of perovskite structures gaining oxygen vacancies [1].
Fig. 1

X-ray diffraction patterns of SrRu1-x Fe x O3-δ (0.10  ≤ x ≤ 0.30) epitaxial thin films. (Note that the 2θ patterns of two films were taken with the Bruker D8 Discover system [13] while those of the other three were taken with the PANalytical X’Pert PRO HRXRD system [14], which resulted in different background signals.)

Reciprocal space mapping (RSM) is a powerful tool to investigate the epitaxial growth of thin films. Figure 2a, b shows the representative RSM of the (103) reflections of SrRu0.8Fe0.2O3.00 − 0.09 and SrRu0.7Fe0.3O3.00 − 0.12 thin films, respectively. (The RSM of other films was reported previously [13, 14].) The substrate and film peak can be easily identified in the RSM results. The diffraction peaks of both films are located right below the substrate peak, implying that the in-plane lattice parameters of both thin films are identical to that of the substrate. Based on the RSM images, it can be deduced that the thin films are compressively strained along the in-plane direction of the STO substrate.
Fig. 2

(Color online) X-ray RSM around the STO (103) planes for a SrRu0.8Fe0.2O3.00 − 0.09/STO (001) and b SrRu0.7Fe0.3O3.00 − 0.12/STO (001). c Surface morphology of SrRu0.9Fe0.1O3.00 − 0.04/STO thin film and d RHEED pattern of SrRu0.9Fe0.1O3.00 − 0.04/STO (001)

The surface morphology of the SrRu0.7Fe0.3O3.00 − 0.12 thin film is shown in Fig. 2c. (The AFM images of other films were reported previously.) The SrRu0.7Fe0.3O3.00 − 0.12 film contains a step-terrace feature with root-mean-square roughness as low as 0.25 nm with atomic smoothness, consistent with the two-dimensional film growth revealed by our previous report [14]. The intensity of the spot was reported to oscillate in our previous report [14]. The image of the reflection of high-energy electron diffraction (RHEED) (Fig. 2d) during the film growth shows one bright spot, corresponding to an atomically flat film surface. In addition, the typical streak-like pattern observed throughout the deposition implies a layer-by-layer growth mode with high-quality crystallinity.

Table 1 summarizes the structural, transport, and magnetic properties of the epitaxial thin films used in the present study. Note that the oxygen-vacancy content listed in the table is estimated from the observed unit cell volume of the thin films, details of which were reported previously [13, 14]. From the unit cell volume of the SrRu1 − x Fe x O3 − δ thin films, we can estimate the relative content of SrFeO2.5 and SrFeO3.0. When calculating the volume ratio (VR) and δ values, we neglect the sophisticated superstructure in SrFeO x with 2.5 < x < 3.0 [23] and simply assume that our films consist of a mixture of three phases, i.e., SrRuO3.0, SrFeO2.5, and SrFeO3.0. Using linear estimation, a rough estimation of the VR (= unit cell volume of SrFeO3/(unit cell volume of SRFeO2.5 + SRFeO3) of SrFeO3.0 and SrFeO2.5 and oxygen-vacancy content (δ value) is performed. The stability of SrFeO3.0, i.e., the oxygen-rich phase, with respect to SrFeO2.5, i.e., the oxygen-poor phase, is the highest for the film with lower Fe doping of x = 0.10 and higher oxygen partial pressure during the growth process. The VR value is less than ~0.2 for SrRu0.7Fe0.3O3 − 0.12 and SrRu0.8Fe0.2O3 − 0.09, and the VR and δ values of SrRu0.7Fe0.3O3 − 0.12 are slightly larger than those of SrRu0.8Fe0.2O3 − 0.09. The XRD peak tends to shift to higher angles when the oxygen-vacancy content decreases and the VR increases. The effects of these two factors nearly cancel each other, resulting in almost the same unit cell volume for SrRu0.7Fe0.3O3 − 0.12 and SrRu0.8Fe0.2O3 − 0.09. The pseudo-cubic unit cell volumes of SrFeO3, SrFeO2.5, and STO substrates are 3.940, 3.850, and 3.905 Å, respectively. Thus, with increasing x, the SrFeO3 phase is promoted over the SrFeO2.5 phase, consequently reducing the VR.
Table 1

Structural, transport, and magnetic properties of SrRu1 − x Fe x O3 − δ (x = 0.1, 0.2, and 0.3) thin films with different concentrations of oxygen vacancies


P (O2) (mTorr)

Oxygen-vacancy content (δ)


ρ (at 5 K) (μΩ cm)

ρ (300 K) (μΩ cm)

T C (K)

SrRu0.9Fe0.1O3 − δ













SrRu0.8Fe0.2O3 − δ













SrRu0.7Fe0.3O3 − δ






Figure 3 shows the magnetic-field dependences of the MR, defined as MR ≡ [ρ(H) − ρ(H = 0)]/ρ(H = 0) × 100%, for x = 0.10 and x = 0.20 thin films with low and high oxygen-vacancy content, where ρ(H) represents the resistivity at an applied magnetic field of H. Among the SrRu1 − x Fe x O3 − δ thin films grown at a higher oxygen pressure (180 mTorr), the MR was higher for the thin film with x = 0.10 as compared with the thin film with x = 0.20 as shown in Fig. 3a, c, respectively [14]. As stated previously, we studied the intrinsic MR properties in Fe-doped SRO by fabricating epitaxial thin films and solving the grain boundary and A-site disorder problems of (Sr,La)(Ru,Fe)O3 polycrystals [12]. We also attempted to minimize the influence of oxygen vacancies on these thin films [13]. However, the obtained maximum MR value in SRFO thin films with low oxygen-vacancy content (max. MR of ~14.4% for x = 0.10) was considerably smaller than that observed in (Sr,La)(Ru,Fe)O3 polycrystals (max. MR of ~45% for x = 0.30) [12]. A notable finding for the MR of (Sr,La)(Ru,Fe)O3 polycrystals was that the MR is highest for the sample in which the zero-field resistivity shows the highest value in the doping range of 0.10 ≤ x ≤ 0.30. Thus, we attempted to confirm this trend in our epitaxial thin films by measuring the MR of SrRu1 − x Fe x O3 − δ (x = 0.10 and 0.20) thin films having more oxygen vacancies, as shown in Fig. 3b, d. In these samples, the MR increases to 16% as the Fe-doping concentration increases from 10 to 20%. Nonetheless, this value is still smaller than that observed in (Sr, La) (Ru,Fe) O3 polycrystals (MR of ~45%).
Fig. 3

MR measurement configuration. MR versus applied magnetic field for all films at temperature T = 10 K. a SrRu0.9Fe0.1O3.00 − 0.02/STO (001) [13], b SrRu0.9Fe0.1O3.00 − 0.04/STO (001), c SrRu0.8Fe0.2O3.00 − 0.07/STO (001) [14], and d SrRu0.8Fe0.2O3.00 − 0.09/STO (001)

Regarding the MR trend of x = 0.10 thin films, the MR value of the thin film with a higher number of oxygen vacancies (SrRu0.9Fe0.1O3 − 0.04) is smaller than the MR of the thin film with a lower oxygen-vacancy content (SrRu0.9Fe0.1O3 − 0.02). Both films show metallic behavior in terms of resistivity, ρ(T), down to 10 K as reported previously, the temperature at which MR measurements were conducted. In contrast, the MR of SrRu0.8Fe0.2O3 − 0.09 is the highest among the four films, as shown in Fig. 3. This film features greater Fe doping and a higher oxygen-vacancy content.

Thus, the value of MR at 10 K seems to increase with an increase in Fe doping and oxygen-vacancy content for semiconducting thin films, while it seems to decrease with increasing oxygen-vacancy content for metallic thin films. In this context, a larger MR is expected for a thin film having more oxygen vacancies and showing more semiconducting behavior. To test this hypothesis, we prepared a thin film of SrRu0.7Fe0.3O3 − 0.12 and compared the MR for a series of SrRu1 − x Fe x O3 − δ films grown at a lower oxygen partial pressure, as presented in Fig. 4a. As predicted, the MR value for the SrRu0.7Fe0.3O3 − 0.12 thin film increases by more than two times relative to the MR value of the SrRu0.8Fe0.2O3 − 0.09 thin film.
Fig. 4

a MR versus applied magnetic field for SrRu1-x Fe x O3.00 − δ /STO thin films at temperature T = 10 K. b Temperature-dependent resistivity, ρ(T), for SrRu1 − x Fe x O3 − δ /STO (001). The dashed and straight lines represent results from our previous reports [13, 14]

The origin of the high MR in our SRFO thin films, especially at lower temperature, is not fully known. The MR, however, is not related to that observed near the paramagnetic–ferromagnetic–semiconductor–metal transition in manganite materials [24], where the MR is sharply peaked around ferromagnetic transition temperature, T C . Herranz et al. explained the difference by the absence of Jahn-Teller effect in Ru4+ ion, whereas Jahn-Teller effect is present in Mn3+ ion [25]. SRO is an itinerant ferromagnet, whose magnetic properties are essentially tied to the electronic band coming from the hybridization of the Ru 4d orbitals and the O 2p orbitals. Since Ru4+ (t 2g 4 e g 0) is not a Jahn-Teller ion, it is not expected to have an enhancement of the MR near T C. High MR is observed in our SRFO thin films at a temperature far below T C . Similar results have been obtained in other reports on SRO thin films and SRO bulk materials [2527]. For example, Herranz et al. studied the temperature dependence of MR of SRO thin films and they observed highest MR at low temperature around 10 K, and then, the MR steadily decreased with increase in temperature [25]. They did not observe any enhancement of MR around T C . They attributed the observation of high MR at low temperature to spin-orbit coupling [25]. In another study, the observation of high MR at low temperature in SRO thin film was attributed to an orbital contribution [26]. The observation of high MR at low temperature in bulk Mn-doped SRO was related to field-induced magnetization [27]. From these discussions, it seems that the observation of high MR in our SRFO thin films may be due to orbital contributions or due to spin-orbit coupling. Further work is clearly required to establish the exact mechanism of MR in SRFO thin films.

The temperature dependence of the zero-field resistivity of the SrRu1 − x Fe x O3 − δ (x = 0.1, 0.2, 0.3) thin films deposited at high and low oxygen partial pressures is shown in Fig. 4b. It might initially seem that the dramatic change in the resistivity of the SrRu1 − x Fe x O3 − δ thin films is due to Fe doping. However, if we consider the resistivity of the SRFO thin films with the same x deposited at higher and lower oxygen partial pressures, we can clearly observe that resistivity changes appreciably due to the increase of oxygen vacancies. Now, let us compare the efficiency of resistivity change by the change in oxygen content and replacement of Ru ion by Fe ion from SrRuO3 to SrRu0.7Fe0.3O3 − 0.12. The oxygen content changes from 3.0 to 2.88 (4% change), while the replacement of Ru ion by Fe ion was 30%. Thus, a 4% change in oxygen contents seems to bring about similar variation to MR as 30% replacement of Ru ion by Fe ion. Thus, oxygen-vacancy content has significantly more impact on MR than replacement of Ru ion by Fe ion on MR. The higher resistivity of the SrRu0.80Fe0.20O3 − 0.09 thin films than of the SrRu0.90Fe0.10O3 − 0.02 thin films can be attributed primarily to the presence of a higher number of oxygen vacancies in the x = 0.20 thin film. From Fig. 4b, it is evident that the metal–insulator transition temperature shifts to a lower temperature range with an increase in both Fe doping and oxygen-vacancy content, implying that both factors have a major influence on the T C of the material. With an increase in Fe doping, the ρ(T) behavior in SRFO thin films changes from the metallic (x = 0.10) regime to the semiconducting (x = 0.30) regime. Furthermore, in the intermediate Fe-doping range (x = 0.20), the thin film exhibits metallic behavior at high temperatures and insulating behavior at low temperatures. Out of all the SRFO thin films, the SrRu0.7Fe0.3O3 − 0.12 thin film shows the most prominent semiconducting behavior and has the highest oxygen-vacancy content, as predicted previously, and thus displays the highest MR value.


In this study, we fabricated high-quality single-phase SrRu1 − x Fe x O3 − δ epitaxial thin films with different oxygen vacancies by PLD. We observed a metal–insulator transition for films with x = 0.20 and x = 0.10. In contrast, the film with x = 0.30 displayed an insulating behavior over the entire temperature range of 2–300 K. Here, the effect of oxygen-vacancy content played a major role in determining the magneto-transport properties of the SRFO epitaxial thin film. With the increase in Fe-doping concentration, the oxygen-vacancy content increased, which in turn increased the negative MR. For the low-doping case of x = 0.10, the MR was higher for the film with fewer oxygen vacancies. The SrRu0.7Fe0.3O3 − 0.12 film with the largest MR (~36.4%) exhibited the largest oxygen-vacancy content (δ = 0.12) and the most prominent semiconducting behavior.



Atomic force microscopy


High-resolution X-ray diffraction




Pulsed laser deposition


Reflection of high-energy electron diffraction


Reciprocal space mapping


(Sr1 − x La x )(Ru1 − x Fe x )O3


SrRu1 − x Fe x O3






Curie temperature


Volume ratio



C. U. Jung was supported by the Hankuk University of Foreign Studies Research Fund of 2016. The others were supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (NRF-2016R1A2B4015911, NRF-2013R1A2A2A01067415, NRF-2014R1A2A1A11051245).

Authors’ Contributions

SKA have interpreted the data and drafted the manuscript under the guidance of CUJ and BWL. USD carried out the experimental studies and helped arranged the figure. CUJ initiated the research and supervised the experimental work and characterization as well as preparation of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ Information

USD is a PhD student in Hankuk University of Foreign Studies. SKA is a postdoctoral research fellow in Hankuk University of Foreign Studies. CUJ and BWL are Professors in Hankuk University of Foreign Studies.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Physics and Oxide Research Centre, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies


  1. Koster G, Klein L, Siemons W, Rijnders G, Dodge JS, Eom CB, Blank DHA, Beasley MR (2012) Structure, physical properties, and applications of SrRuO3 thin films. Rev Mod Phys 84:253–98View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Ishigami K, Yoshimatsu K, Toyota D, Takizawa M, Yoshida T, Shibata G, Harano T, Takahashi Y, Kadono T, Verma VK, Singh VR, Takeda Y, Okane T, Saitoh Y, Yamagami H, Koide T, Oshima M, Kumigashira H, Fujimori A (2015) Thickness-dependent magnetic properties and strain-induced orbital magnetic moment in SrRuO3 thin films. Phys Rev B Condens Matter Mater Phys 92:064402View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Tiano AL, Santulli AC, Koenigsmann C, Feygenson M, Aronson MC, Harrington R, Parise JB, Wong SS (2011) Toward a reliable synthesis of strontium ruthenate: parameter control and property investigation of submicrometer-sized structures. Chem Mater 23:3277–88View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Maiwa H, Ichinose N, Okazaki K (1994) Preparation and properties of Ru and RuO2 thin film electrodes for ferroelectric thin films. Jpn J Appl Phys Part 1 Regul Pap Short Note Rev Pap 33:5223–6View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Acharya SK, Nallagatla RV, Togibasa O, Lee BW, Liu C, Jung CU, Park BH, Park J, Cho Y, Kim D, Jo J, Kwon D, Kim M, Hwang CS, Chae SC (2016) Epitaxial brownmillerite oxide thin films for reliable switching memory. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8:7902–11View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Cao G, McCall S, Shepard M, Crow JE, Guertin RP (1997) Thermal, magnetic, and transport properties of single-crystal Sr1-x Ca x RuO3 (0 = x = 1.0). Phys Rev B Condens Matter Mater Phys 56:321–9View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Yoo YZ, Chmaissem O, Kolesnik S, Brown DE, Dabrowski B, Kimball CW, Kim T-W, Kim M-S, Genis AP, Song J-H (2014) Interrelatedness of Fe composition on structural and magnetic properties in Fe-doped SrRuO3 thin films. Appl Phys A 115:913–7View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Pi L, Maignan A, Retoux R, Raveau B (2002) Substitution at the Ru site in the itinerant ferromagnet SrRuO3. J Phys Condens Matter 14:7391–8View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Williams AJ, Gillies A, Attfield JP, Heymann G, Huppertz H, Martínez-Lope MJ, Alonso JA (2006) Charge transfer and antiferromagnetic insulator phase in SrRu1-x Cr x O3 perovskites: solid solutions between two itinerant electron oxides. Phys Rev B Condens Matter Mater Phys 73:104409View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Bansal C, Kawanaka H, Takahashi R, Nishihara Y (2003) Metal-insulator transition in Fe-substituted SrRuO3 bad metal system. J Alloys Compd 360:47–53View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Fan J, Liao S, Wang W, Zhang L, Tong W, Ling L, Hong B, Shi Y, Zhu Y, Hu D, Pi L, Zhang Y (2011) Suppression of ferromagnetism and metal-like conductivity in lightly Fe-doped SrRuO3. J Appl Phys 110:043907View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Mamchik A, Chen I-W (2003) Large magnetoresistance in magnetically frustrated ruthenates. Appl Phys Lett 82:613View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Toreh KRN, Kim DH, Dash U, Phan T, Lee BW, Jin H, Lee S, Park BH, Park J, Cho MR, Park YD, Acharya SK, Yoo W, Jung M, Jung CU (2016) The “self spin valve” in oxygen stoichiometric SrRu1−x Fe x O3−δ epitaxial thin films. J Alloys Compounds 657:224–30View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Lee BW, Jung CU (2011) Growth and magnetic characterization of epitaxially stabilized Fe-doped SrRuO3 thin films. J Korean Phys Soc 59:322–5View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Li M, Retuerto M, Deng Z, Stephens PW, Croft M, Huang Q, Wu H, Deng X, Kotliar G, Sánchez-Benítez J, Hadermann J, Walker D, Greenblatt M (2015) Giant magnetoresistance in the half-metallic double-perovskite ferrimagnet Mn2FeReO6. Angew Chem 127:12237–41View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Abassi M, Mohamed Z, Dhahri J, Hlil EK (2015) Electrical transport and giant magnetoresistance in La0.62Er0.05Ba0.33FexMn1−x O3 (x = 0.00, and 0.15) manganites. J Alloys Compounds 639:197–202View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Wang L, Dash S, Chang L, You L, Feng Y, He X, Jin K-J, Zhou Y, Ong HG, Ren P, Wang S, Chen L, Wang J (2016) Oxygen vacancy induced room-temperature metal-insulator transition in nickelate films and its potential application in photovoltaics. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8:9769–996View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Trukhanov SV, Troyanchuk IO, Korshunov FP, Sirenko VA, Szymczak H, Baerner K (2001) Effect of oxygen content on magnetization and magnetoresistance properties of CMR manganites. Low Temp Phys 27:283–7View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Liu J-M, Ong CK (1998) The large magnetoresistance property of La0.5Sr0.5CoO3−x thin films prepared by pulsed laser deposition. Appl Phys Lett 73:1047View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Wilson ML, Byers JM, Dorsey PC, Horwitz JS, Chrisey DB, Osofsky MS (1997) Effects of defects on magnetoresistivity in La0.7Sr0.3MnO3. J Appl Phys 81:4971–3View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Lee BW, Jung CU (2010) Modification of magnetic properties through the control of growth orientation and epitaxial strain in SrRuO3 thin films. Appl Phys Lett 96:102507View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Lee B, Kwon O-W, Shin RH, Jo W, Jung CU (2014) Ferromagnetism and ru-ru distance in SrRuO3 thin film grown on SrTiO3 (111) substrate. Nanoscale Res Lett 9:1–9View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Yamada H, Kawasaki M, Tokura Y (2002) Epitaxial growth and valence control of strained perovskite SrFeO3 films. Appl Phys Lett 80:622–4View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Ramirez AP (1997) Colossal magnetoresistance. J Phys Condens Matter 9:8171–99View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Herranz G, Sánchez F, Garcı́a-Cuenca MV, Ferrater C, Varela M, Martı́nez B, Fontcuberta J (2004) Anisotropic magnetoresistance in SrRuO3 ferromagnetic oxide. J Magn Magn Mater 272–276:517–8View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Gausepohl SC, Lee M, Char K, Rao RA, Eom CB (1995) Magnetoresistance properties of thin films of the metallic oxide ferromagnet SrRuO3. Phys Rev B Condens Matter Mater Phys 52:3459–65View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Zhang X-Y, Chen Y, Li Z-Y, Vittoria C, Harris VG (2007) Competition between ferromagnetism and antiferromagnetism: origin of large magnetoresistance in polycrystalline SrRu1-x Mn x O 3 (0 ≤ x ≤ 1). J Phys Condens Matter 19:266211View ArticleGoogle Scholar


© The Author(s). 2017