Investigation of Bulk Traps by Conductance Method in the Deep Depletion Region of the Al2O3/GaN MOS Device
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 22 February 2017
Accepted: 26 April 2017
Published: 10 May 2017
Conductance method was employed to study the physics of traps (e.g., interface and bulk traps) in the Al2O3/GaN MOS devices. By featuring only one single peak in the parallel conductance (G p/ω) characteristics in the deep depletion region, one single-level bulk trap (E C-0.53 eV) uniformly distributed in GaN buffer was identified. While in the subthreshold region, the interface traps with continuous energy of E C-0.4~0.57 eV and density of 0.6~1.6 × 1012 cm−2 were extracted from the commonly observed multiple G p/ω peaks. This methodology can be used to investigate the traps in GaN buffer and facilitates making the distinction between bulk and interface traps.
KeywordsAl2O3/GaN MOS channel device Conductance method Buffer traps Interface traps
Owing to the superior properties of high electron mobility, high breakdown voltage, high-power density, low on-resistance, and high temperature operation capability, GaN heterojunction field-effect transistors (HFETs) have been considered as a promising solution for next-generation energy-efficient power electronics and attracted tremendous attention in the last two decades . For power switching applications, the enhancement-mode (E-mode) transistors are highly preferred rather than the depletion-mode (D-mode) devices for the inherent fail-safe operation and simple gate driver circuitry. Despite the various technologies proposed to realize E-mode, GaN HFETs such as p-cap gate [2, 3], fluorine plasma ion implantation , and cascode technology , the MOSFET with partially or fully recessed gate is considered as a promising candidate because of its high-threshold voltage (V TH), large gate swing for improved fail-safe capability [6, 7], and low on-resistance . Moreover, the MOS-gate is compatible with the mainstream gate driver ICs. However, the traps (e.g., interface and bulk traps) tarnish the advantages of GaN HFETs due to the stability and reliability issues such as V TH instability , drain lag or gate lag , and power slump. Besides the surface/interface traps, the GaN power HFETs’ performance such as the breakdown voltage and dynamic on-resistance could be substantially affected by the bulk traps in GaN buffer layer in high-voltage-switching applications [11, 12] since the high electric-field is prone to trigger the buffer traps for dynamic charging/discharging. Hence, it is of great significance to characterize the buffer traps of GaN MOS devices.
Bulk traps in GaN MOS devices have been studied by deep-level transient spectroscopy (DLTS)  and pulse measurement . However, though the dynamic charge/discharge process of both bulk and interface trap-induced transient behavior may simultaneously appear in the same spectrum, extra effort is required to differentiate between the bulk and interface traps when using DLTS-like techniques and pulse measurement [15, 16]. On the other hand, the conductance method has been widely used to evaluate the interface traps in AlGaN/GaN MIS structures as well as GaN-based MIS structures [17–19]. Moreover, it is possible to discriminate the bulk and interface traps in the conductance method by studying its bias dependence because the conductance loss is sensitive to the traps within a few kT/q around the Fermi level. In this letter, the conventional conductance method normally used to characterize the interface traps is employed to study the bulk traps (BT) in GaN buffer for the first time. Two trap-dominated regions were found in the Al2O3/GaN MOS structure with full barrier recess. In the deep depletion region, only one single Gp/ω peak is captured at the measured bias voltage ranging from −1 to 0 V, revealing the bulk traps with a single level in GaN buffer. The energy of the bulk trap was determined to be E C-0.53 eV. While in the subthreshold region, the interface traps with continuous energy levels that result in multiple Gp/ω peaks were observed within the measured bias range of 1.6~2.6 V. The energy levels were extracted to be in the range of 0.4 to 0.57 eV below GaN conduction band (CB).
Results and Discussion
where the capture cross section of the trap σ n = 4 × 10−13 cm−2, the electron thermal velocity v th =2.6 × 107 cm/s, the density of states at GaN CB N C = 2.2 × 1018 cm−3, the Boltzmann constant k B = 1.38 × 10−23J/K, and temperature T = 300 K were used . The interface trap levels are in the range of 0.4 to 0.57 eV below GaN CB with D IT decreased from 1.6 × 1012 to 0.6 × 1012cm−2.
In conclusion, for the first time, the conventional conductance method was used to study the buffer traps in the Al2O3/GaN MOS device with full barrier removal. The bulk traps with a single energy level and uniformly distributed in GaN buffer that leads to a single Gp/ω peak were detected by f-dependent conductance measurements in the deep depletion region. On the other hand, the interface traps with wide energies were measured in the subthreshold region, which corresponds to the multiple Gp/ω peaks observed in the f-dependent conductance measurements. Due to the different f-dependent conductance response originating from the different energy and spatial distributions, the demonstrated approach is much easier to be used to investigate the physics of the bulk traps in GaN buffer.
This work was supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Project Nos. 61234006 and 61674024, and in part by the National Science and Technology Major Project 02 under Project No. 2013ZX02308-005, in part by the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province, China, under project Grant No. 2015A030311016, in part by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities under project ZYGX2016J211 and in part by the opening project of State Key Laboratory of Electronic Thin Films and Integrated Devices under Grant KFJJ201609.
YYS jointly conceived the study with ZJL. YYS, ABZ, LYZ, and YS performed the experiments. YYS and ZJL performed all the data analyses and wrote the original draft of the manuscript. QZ, WJC, and BZ reviewed and edited the manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
- Ikeda N, Niiyama Y, Kambayashi H, Sato Y, Nomura T, Kato S, Yoshida S (2010) GaN power transistors on Si substrates for switching applications. Proc IEEE 98:1151–1161View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hu X, Simin G, Yang J, Asif Khan M, Gaska R, Shur MS (2000) Enhancement mode AIGaN/GaN HFET with selectively grown pn junction gate. Electron Lett 36:753–754View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Uemoto Y, Hikita M, Ueno H, Matsuo H, Ishida H, Yanagihara M, Ueda T, Tanaka T, Ueda D (2006) A normally-off AlGaN/GaN transistor with RonA=2.6mΩcm2 and BVds=640V using conductivity modulation, in proc. Int. Electron Device Meeting (IEDM), San Francisco, CA., pp 1–4Google Scholar
- Cai Y, Zhou Y, Chen KJ, Lau KM (2005) High-performance enhancement -mode AlGaN/GaN HEMTs using fluoride-based plasma treatment. Electron Device Lett IEEE 26:435–437View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Huang X, Liu Z, Li Q, Lee FC (2014) Evaluation and application of 600 V GaN HEMT in cascode structure. Trans Power Electron, IEEE 29:2453–2461View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhou Q, Chen B, Jin Y, Huang S, Wei K, Liu X, Bao X, Mou J, Zhang B (2015) High-performance enhancement-mode Al2O3/AlGaN/GaN-on-Si MISFETs with 626 MW/cm2 figure of merit. Trans Electron Devices, IEEE 62:776–781View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhou Q, Liu L, Zhang A, Chen B, Jin Y, Shi Y, Wang Z, Chen W, Zhang B (2016) 7.6 V threshold voltage high-performance normally-Off Al2O3/GaN MOSFET achieved by interface charge engineering. Electron Device Letters, IEEE 37:165–168View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wei J, Liu S, Li B, Tang X, Lu Y, Liu C, Hua M, Zhang Z, Tang G, Chen KJ (2015) Low on-resistance normally-off GaN double-channel metal–oxide–semiconductor high-electron-mobility transistor. Electron Device Lett IEEE 36:1287–1290View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wang Y, Liang YC, Samudra GS, Huang H, Huang B, Huang S, Chang T, Huang C, Kuo W, Lo G (2015) 6.5 V high threshold voltage AlGaN/GaN power metal-insulator-semiconductor high electron mobility transistor using multilayer fluorinated gate stack. Electron Device Lett IEEE 36:381–383View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Binari SC, Klein PB, Kazior TE (2012) Trapping effects in GaN and SiC microwave FETs. Proc IEEE 90:1048–1058View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhou C, Jiang Q, Huang S, Chen KJ (2012) Vertical leakage/breakdown mechanisms in AlGaN/GaN-on-Si devices. Electron Device Lett IEEE 33:1132–1134View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Liao W, Chen Y, Chen Z, Chyi J, Hsin Y (2014) Gate leakage current induced trapping in AlGaN/GaN Schottky-gate HFETs and MISHFETs. Nanoscale Res Lett 9:474View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Marso M, Wolter M, Javorka P, Kordos P, Lüth H (2003) Investigation of buffer traps in an AlGaN/GaN/Si high electron mobility transistor by backgating current deep level transient spectroscopy. Appl Phys Lett 82:633–635View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bisi D, Meneghini M, Santi C, Chini A, Dammann M, Brückner P, Mikulla M, Meneghesso G, Zanoni E (2013) Deep-level characterization in GaN HEMTs-part I: advantages and limitations of drain current transient measurements. Trans Electron Devices, IEEE 60:3166–3175View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- M.Ťapajna, J. L. Jimenez, and M. Kuball (2012) On the discrimination between bulk and surface traps in AlGaN/GaN HEMTs from trapping characteristics, Phys. Status Solidi A 209 :386–389Google Scholar
- Verzellesi G, Faqir M, Chini A, Fantini F, Meneghesso G, Zanoni E, Danesin F, Zanon F, Rampazzo F, Marino FA, Cavallini A, Castaldini A (2009) False surface-trap signatures induced by buffer traps in AlGaN-GaN HEMTs, in proc. IEEE Int. Rel. Phys. Symp., pp 732–735Google Scholar
- Kordoš P, Stoklas R, Gregušová D, Novák J (2009) Characterization of AlGaN/GaN metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistors by frequency dependent conductance analysis. Appl Phys Lett 94:223512View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lu X, Yu K, Jiang H, Zhang A, Lau KM (2017) Study of interface traps in AlGaN/GaN MISHEMTs using LPCVD SiNx as gate dielectric. Trans Electron Devices, IEEE 64:824–831View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- M. Hua, Z. Zhang, J. Wei,J.Lei, G.Tang, K. Fu, Y. Cai, B.Zhang and K. J. Chen, (2016) Integration of LPCVD-SiNx gate dielectric with recessed-gate E-mode GaN MIS-FETs: toward high performance, high stability and long TDDB lifetime,, in Proc. Int. Electron Device Meeting (IEDM), San Francisco, CA, pp. 260–263Google Scholar
- Cardon F, Gomes WP (1978) On the determination of the flat-band potential of a semiconductor in contact with a metal or an electrolyte from the Mott-Schottky plot. J Phys D Appl Phys 11:L63–L67View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Donnelly JP, Milnes AG (1967) The capacitance of p-n heterojunctions including the effects of interface states. IEEE Trans Electron Devices 14:63–68View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Promros N, Yamashita K, Li C, Kawai K, Shaban M, Okajima T, Yoshitake T (2012) n-type nanocrystalline FeSi2/intrinsic Si/p-type Si heterojunction photodiodes fabricated by facing-target direct-current sputtering, Japanese. J of Appl Phys 51:021301Google Scholar
- Lehovec K (1966) Frequency dependence of the impedance of distributed surface states in MOS structures. Appl Phys Lett 8:48–50View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nicollian EH, Brews JR (1982) MOS physics and technology. John Wiley & Sons, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Lehmann J, Leroux C, Charles M, Torres A, Morvan E, Blachier D, Ghibaudo G, Bano E, Reimbold G (2013) Sheet resistance measurement on AlGaN/GaN wafers and dispersion study. Microelectron Eng 109:334–337View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Puzyrev YS, Schrimpf RD, Fleetwood DM, Pantelides ST (2015) Role of Fe impurity complexes in the degradation of GaN/AlGaN high-electron mobility transistors. Appl Phys Lett 106:053505View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wickramaratne D, Shen J, Dreyer CE, Engel M, Marsman M, Kresse G, Marcinkevicˇius S, Alkauskas A, Walle CGV (2016) Iron as a source of efficient Shockley-Read-Hall recombination in GaN. Appl Phys Lett 109:162107View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Marco S, Uren MJ, Kuball M (2013) Iron-induced deep-level acceptor center in GaN/AlGaN high electron mobility transistors: energy level and cross section. Appl Phys Lett 102:073501View ArticleGoogle Scholar