Open Access

Improvement of amperometric transducer selectivity using nanosized phenylenediamine films

  • O. V. Soldatkina1,
  • I. S. Kucherenko2,
  • V. M. Pyeshkova1, 2Email author,
  • S. A. Alekseev1,
  • O. O. Soldatkin1, 2 and
  • S. V. Dzyadevych1, 2
Nanoscale Research Letters201712:594

Received: 29 December 2016

Accepted: 25 October 2017

Published: 14 November 2017


In this work, we studied the conditions of deposition of a semipermeable polyphenylenediamine (PPD)-based membrane on amperometric disk platinum electrodes. Restricting an access of interfering substances to the electrode surface, the membrane prevents their impact on the sensor operation. Two methods of membrane deposition by electropolymerization were compared—at varying potential (cyclic voltammetry) and at constant potential. The cyclic voltammetry was shown to be easier in performing and providing better properties of the membrane. The dependence of PPD membrane effectiveness on the number of cyclic voltammograms and phenylenediamine concentration was analyzed. It was shown that the impact of interfering substances (ascorbic acid, dopamine, cysteine, uric acid) on sensor operation could be completely avoided using three cyclic voltammograms in 30 mM phenylenediamine. On the other hand, when working with diluted samples, i.e., at lower concentrations of electroactive substances, it is reasonable to decrease the phenylenediamine concentration to 5 mM, which would result in a higher sensitivity of transducers to hydrogen peroxide due to a thinner PPD layer. The PPD membrane was tested during continuous operation and at 8-day storage and turned out to be efficient in sensor and biosensors.


Amperometric sensorPermselective membranePhenylenediamineElectroactive substanceAscorbic acidBiosensor


Biosensors are novel analytical devices; the usage of which is an alternative to chromatography, spectroscopy, and colorimetry. Biosensors are much cheaper and easier to use than these traditional methods, however, often inferior to them by the analytical characteristics. At present, the research in the field of biosensorics is in active progress [1].

According to the classical definition of the International association of researchers in fundamental and applied chemistry, a biosensor is an integrated device based on receptor and transducer, which is able to provide quantitative or semi-quantitative analysis using biological recognition element [2]. By the type of transducer, biosensors are classified into several groups (electrochemical, optical, piezoelectric, etc.), among which electrochemical biosensors are one of the largest groups and in turn are divided into amperometric, potentiometric, conductometric, and impedimetric [3].

One of important analytical characteristics of biosensors is their selectivity, i.e., an ability to identify the target compound only. The biosensor selectivity is determined by selectivity of biological material and selectivity of transducer. Basically, enzymes and antibodies used in electrochemical biosensors as biomaterial are very selective, whereas electrodes, which serve as transducers, are rather nonselective. The biosensor selectivity is of particular importance when working with real biological fluids or other complex samples; therefore, its investigation is a necessary stage in the development of biosensors.

In blood serum, urine, cerebrospinal fluid, etc., there are interfering substances that can undergo chemical reactions on the surface of transducers, thus causing false results in biosensor measurement of the target substance. The main interferents in biological samples are ascorbic acid, cysteine, homocysteine, uric acid, dopamine, glutathione, etc. Their concentrations in human blood serum are shown in Table 1.
Table 1

Concentration of electroactive substances in human blood serum


Concentration in serum


Ascorbic acid

0.4–2.0 mg/dL = 23–114 μM


1.8–17.9 mg/L = 10.2–101 μM



255.9–317.3 μM


Total homocysteine

6.8–17.0 μM


Uric acid

120–450 μM

[19, 20]

208–428 μM (males)

155–357 μM (females)



0.01–1 μM


1 nM (healthy people)

0.9–6 μM (patients with Parkinson’s disease treated with l-dopa)


Total glutathione

5.8 ± 0.9 μM


Reduced glutathione

1.6 ± 0.3 μM


There are two main approaches to prevent oxidation of interfering substances on the electrode surface—a decrease of working potential by introduction of additional substances into the bioselective membrane or deposition of additional semipermeable membranes, which allows selective access of the target substance to the electrode surface [4]. The deposition of semipermeable membranes is methodologically simpler and slightly affects the biosensor functioning.

In biosensors, hydrogen peroxide oxidizes or reduces on the electrode and thus the biosensor signal is generated. Therefore, an actual issue is the development of nanoporous films, which are permeable for hydrogen peroxide and prevent the penetration of other substances. Among these membranes, the polymer films based on phenylenediamine (PD) attract considerable attention [5]. Polyphenylenediamine (PPD)-based membrane has nanopores; their size is sufficient for penetrating low molecular weight compounds, including hydrogen peroxide, through membrane to the electrode surface. On the other hand, the membrane does not allow passing through or oxidation of larger substances like ascorbic acid or dopamine. Thus, the membrane improves selectivity to hydrogen peroxide, which, in turn, increases the biosensor accuracy. In several works, different PD isomers and methods for PD polymerization were studied. Particularly, PPD membranes were formed on ruthenium-coated carbon fiber microelectrodes by electrodeposition at a constant potential (+ 0.7 V) when creating biosensors based on glucose oxidase, lactate oxidase, and glutamate oxidase [6]. Three PD isomers were tested; the results with meta-isomer were the best. Because some sensitivity to ascorbic acid still remained, ascorbate oxidase was added to eliminate it completely. In [7], the authors studied PPD membranes deposited onto Pt–Ir cylinders by CV or constant potential amperometry. Sensitivity to ascorbic acid notably decreased with the membranes based on meta- and ortho-isomers oxidized at a constant potential whereas sensitivity to hydrogen peroxide decreased by 10% only. The results obtained with PPD membranes deposited onto palladium disk electrodes were quite different [8]. Electrodeposition of m-PD by CV caused the formation of films with threefold higher hydrogen peroxide permeability compared with m-PD oxidation at a constant potential. Thus, m-PD was shown to be preferable among all isomers. The recently reported hydrogen peroxide sensor using CV-deposited o-PD film with Au nanoparticles [9] demonstrated good avoidance of interfering effects. Generally, it can be concluded that m-PD is superior to others for all electrodes, whereas the procedure of PD polymerization should be optimized in each particular case. Additionally, PD-based membranes can be also used in sensors without the biological element. As was recently shown, bovine serum albumin could be detected by a sensor based on conjugated copolymers of PD and other aromatic compounds (quenching of the protein fluorescence after binding with the copolymer was observed) [10].

Thus, the aim of the present work was to compare different methods of m-phenylenediamine deposition and select an optimal procedure of PPD formation on the platinum disk electrodes.



Ascorbic acid, cysteine, uric acid, dopamine, hydrogen peroxide, m-phenylenediamine, and HEPES were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Chemie (USA). All other chemicals were of p.a. grade.

The samples of human blood serum were obtained from Kyiv Municipal Scientific and Practical Center of Nephrology and Hemodialysis (Ukraine).

Design of Amperometric Transducers

In this work, self-made platinum disk electrodes served as amperometric transducers. Platinum wire 0.4 mm in diameter and 3 mm long was sealed at one end of a glass capillary with an outer diameter of 3.5 mm. An open end of the wire was the working surface of transducer. An inner end of the platinum wire was soldered by Wood’s alloy to one end of a silver wire inside the capillary; its another end was connected to a potentiostat. The electrodes were used repeatedly; before usage, their working surface was treated with HCl for 30 s, washed with ethanol, and grinded by abrasive paper P1500 PS 8A.

Methods of Measurement

The UV-vis absorption spectra of the samples were measured on Thermo Evolution 600 spectrometer in the 200–900-nm wavelengths range in diffuse-reflectance mode using an integration sphere. The Spectralon diffuse reflectance standard and platinum disk were used as blank samples for m-phenylenediamine powder and PPD layer on the surface of Pt electrode respectively.

For electrochemical measurements, working electrodes were placed in a classical electrochemical cell with an auxiliary (platinum wire) and a reference (Ag/AgCl in saturated KCl) electrodes connected to the PalmSens potentiostat (Palm Instruments BV, Netherlands). Usage of the eight-channel multiplexer (from the same producer), connected to the potentiostat, allowed simultaneous monitoring of signals from eight electrodes; however, in our work, we usually used three electrodes because of small size of the working cell.

The chronoamperometric measurements (“amperometric detection” technique) were carried out at room temperature in an open 3-mL glass cell with permanent stirring by a magnetic stirrer and at constant potential of 0.6 V versus Ag/AgCl reference electrode. Ten millimolars of HEPES, pH 7.4, was used as a working buffer in all experiments. The substrate concentrations in the working cell were obtained by addition of aliquots of stock solutions (50 mM hydrogen peroxide, 20 mM ascorbic acid, 3 mM cysteine, 4.5 mM uric acid, 2.1 mM dopamine). New solutions were prepared just before the experiment. All electroactive substances except uric acid were dissolved in the working buffer; uric acid due to its small solubility was dissolved in distilled water with 5 mM NaBrO3. Phenylenediamine was dissolved in 40 mM phosphate buffer, pH 7.4.

Cyclic voltammetry was carried out in the same measuring cell without stirring. Start potential was 0 V, final potential +0.9 V, scan rate (rate of potential change) 20 mV/s, and step of potential change 5 mV.

All experiments were carried out in three repetitions. Data in the tables and figures represent a mean value of experiments ± standard deviation, computated by OriginLab OriginPro 8.5 program.

Results and Discussion

To confirm the reasons of deposition of additional membrane on amperometric transducer for improvement of its selectivity to hydrogen peroxide, it was necessary to verify sensitivity and selectivity of this transducer regarding possible interferents.

Biosensors can be employed for measurements in both undiluted and diluted samples. The option of dilution depends on the concentration of substance to be analyzed and the biosensor sensitivity: if the biosensor can identify the target substance in concentrations, which are dozens of times lower than those actual in the samples, the latter should be diluted to decrease the content of interferents and thus improve the array accuracy. Additionally, it allows dozens-fold decrease of the substrate volume required for measurements.

Sometimes the concentration of analyzed substance is too low, or dilution is undesirable for technical reasons. For better understanding of the function of amperometric transducer, electroactive materials of three concentrations were used: (1) relevant for blood serum, (2) 20-fold lower than (1), i.e. 20-fold dilution, and (3) 100-fold dilution. The biosensor responses to electroactive substances of three concentrations were received using the bare transducer before the PPD film deposition, and transducer sensitivity was calculated (Table 2). As seen, the sensitivity to dopamine and ascorbic acid was the highest, to cysteine —the lowest. However, ascorbic and uric acids can be considered as main interferents due to their essentially higher concentrations in biological samples. The transducer responses to these substances are an order of magnitude larger than the response to the target substance, hydrogen peroxide. Therefore, the bare transducer is unsuitable for measurements in biological samples due to the pronounced impact of interferents. On the other hand, after 100-fold dilution, the responses to cysteine and dopamine became negligible, and response to all interferents in total was only about 20% of the response to hydrogen peroxide, which means that in some cases, the sensor can be used even without additional modifications.
Table 2

Responses and sensitivity of platinum disk transducer to electroactive materials. Responses are received in 10 mM HEPES buffer, pH 7.4

Analyzed substance

Undiluted sample

20-fold dilution of the sample

100-fold dilution of the sample

Mean sensitivity of transducer, nA/mM

Transducer response, nA

Substance concentration in working cell, μM

Transducer response, nA

Substance concentration in working cell, μM

Transducer response, nA


4.5 ± 1.5


4.6 ± 1.4


4.2 ± 1.6

90 ± 30

Ascorbic acid

52.5 ± 25.1


2.7 ± 1.1


0.4 ± 0.2

438 ± 209


9.0 ± 5.7


0.5 ± 0.3


0.1 ± 0.1

30 ± 19

Uric acid

62.4 ± 31.2


3.0 ± 1.4


0.6 ± 0.2

139 ± 70


2.7 ± 0.5


0.1 ± 0.1



450 ± 83

Currently, there is only fragmented information regarding the methods of PPD membrane deposition on transducers. Therefore, at the next stage of work, it was evaluated which method of two most common and promising is more feasible.

In the first method, PPD membranes were deposited on the surface of platinum disk electrode via electropolymerization of molecules of monomer phenylenediamine using varying potential (cyclic voltammetry). The transducers with reference and auxiliary electrodes were placed in a working cell with phenylenediamine solution, and a number of cyclic voltammograms were obtained [7]. An example of the experiment is shown in Fig. 1. During the first cyclic voltammogram (CVA), a significant increase in the current was observed at the potential ranging from 0.5 to 0.9 V because of phenylenediamine oxidation. During the second and subsequent CVAs, the current significantly decreased, indicating a lower speed of electropolymerization. However, as the following experiments showed, the formation of PPD membrane lasted over all CV.
Fig. 1

Cyclic voltammograms obtained at phenylenediamine electropolymerization on transducer surface

The second method of PPD membrane deposition consists in phenylenediamine oxidation at a constant potential of + 0.7 V over fixed time (40 min) [11]. Comparison of transducer responses when using both methods of deposition is shown in Table 3. Hereafter, the responses to the electroactive substances without the PPD membrane were taken as 100%. The membranes, deposited by both methods, impeded interferents quite effectively—only a weak sensitivity to cysteine was observed. On the other hand, the transducer sensitivity to hydrogen peroxide after voltammetry increased by 2.6 times. This can be explained by the platinum electro-activation during voltammetry, but not by the effect of PPD membrane. Such increase in sensitivity to hydrogen peroxide was observed also after obtaining cyclic voltammograms in phosphate buffer without phenylenediamine. After the membrane deposition at a constant potential, no electro-activation was revealed and the responses to hydrogen peroxide did not change. Thus, the use of cyclic voltammetry was revealed to be preferable for three reasons—less time for one deposition (20 vs. 40 min), more efficient hindering of cysteine, and increasing responses to hydrogen peroxide.
Table 3

Comparison of standard methods of deposition of PPD membrane

Analyzed substance and its concentration

10 CVAs in 5 mM phenylenediamine

40 min at a constant potential of 0.7 V in 100 mM phenylenediamine

Response, nA

% of response without membrane

Response, nA

% of response without membrane

H2O2, 50 μM

12.0 ± 1.4

267.3 ± 26.0

4.5 ± 1.3

99.3 ± 29.7

Ascorbic acid, 120 μM

< 0.1


< 0.1


Cysteine, 300 μM

0.2 ± 0.2

1.9 ± 1.9

0.6 ± 0.4

6.3 ± 3.8

Uric acid, 450 μM

< 0.1


< 0.1


Dopamine, 6 μM

< 0.1


< 0.1


However, cyclic voltammetry has one disadvantage—voltammograms may be simultaneously obtained on one electrode only (even using multiplexer), whereas membrane deposition at a constant potential allows simultaneous connection of 8–16 working electrodes (depending on the multiplexer type). Therefore, further work should be focused on optimization of the conditions of cyclic voltammograms to decrease the time of transducer pretreatment.

PD electropolymerization by CV and constant potential amperometry is supposed to occur by different pathways through quite complicated mechanism [12]. Thus, CV involves high applied potential, which leads to the generation of less conjugated oligomers of PD. For this reason, it is supposed that at PD polymerization by CV, the pores are larger, and the PPD layer permeability is higher if compared to the polymerization at a constant potential [8, 13]. However, as noted in the “Background” section, different authors came to contradictory conclusions about the preferential method of PD deposition, and in many cases, CV gave good results. In our opinion, both CV and constant potential amperometry can provide the generation of PPD membranes with good permselective properties, and optimization is necessary for each particular case.

The PPD membrane was clearly visible on the electrode surface as a uniform transparent golden-brown film. To confirm that it is PPD indeed, the PD polymerization was additionally confirmed by spectroscopy. The UV-vis diffuse reflectance spectrum of the film (Fig. 2) demonstrates intense absorbance bands at 222 and 315 nm, similar to the bands of the monomer and related to the electron transitions in the aromatic rings [14], whereas the featureless absorbance at 400–800 nm, constantly decreasing with the wavelength relates to π − π* electron transitions in highly conjugated aromatic system of conductive PPD polymer.
Fig. 2

UV-vis diffuse reflectance spectra of m-phenylenediamine and PPD membrane, formed on the Pt electrode

For better interpretation of the obtained results, it would be useful to estimate the size of pores in the PPD membranes produced by different methods. However, direct determination of the pore size in PPD membrane is almost impossible, since the membrane consists of multiple layers of PD and pores in bottom layers can have different size. Killoran and O’Neill determined that the thickness of effective membrane from m-PD was 15 nm, and cross-sectional area of one oligomeric polymer strand estimated by del Valle et al. was 1 nm [7, 15]. Thus, the PPD membrane contains roughly 15 layers of polymer. Since the PPD membrane has hydrophobic and isolating properties, the membrane should have perforating nanopores that stretch to the electrode surface and allow by-pass of hydrogen peroxide molecules, otherwise H2O2 cannot be oxidized and generate amperometric signal. The pores are definitely not uniform and the minimal diameter of pores should be less than 1 nm in order to reject electroactive molecules, and thus it is quite difficult to analyze the pores even with electron or atomic force microscopes. For these technical reasons, it is much easier to estimate effectiveness of the PPD membrane by evaluating the membrane permeability for different molecules. Such indirect approach is widespread and allows comparison of practical characteristics of different membranes.

The effectiveness of PPD membranes deposited using various number of cyclic voltammograms was tested (Fig. 3).
Fig. 3

Efficiency of PPD membranes deposited using different number of CVAs

PPD membrane deposited by one CVA was obviously insufficient to eliminate the influence of interferents. However, here, the effect of platinum electroactivation was the strongest. At further increase of the voltammograms number, the responses to interferents decreased, but at the same time, the transducer sensitivity to hydrogen peroxide also decreased, probably because of too thick PPD layer, which impedes the substance diffusion. Three CVAs were enough for complete disappearance of responses to dopamine and uric acid, and significant decrease in responses to ascorbic acid and cysteine. Therefore, three CVAs were taken for optimal, and phenylenediamine concentration was increased up to complete elimination of the interferent impact (Fig. 4).
Fig. 4

Efficiency of PPD membranes deposited at different phenylenediamine concentrations

Notably, the use of 5 mM phenylenediamine was sufficient to eliminate the responses to interferents of small concentrations remaining after sample dilution, but deficient to work with undiluted samples. An increase of phenylenediamine concentration to 20 mM and three CVAs turned out to be sufficient for complete elimination of the cysteine impact and a decrease of responses to ascorbic acid to the lowest level (0.1% of the response to ascorbic acid without PPD membrane). The use of higher (up to 100 mM) phenylenediamine concentration resulted in twofold decrease of the transducer sensitivity to hydrogen peroxide, probably, because of too thick PPD layer. Thus, the deposition of PPD membrane using three CVAs in 30 mM phenylenediamine is an optimal procedure. As one voltammogram lasted about 2 min, the membrane deposition on one sensor took 6 min.

Next, stability of the PPD membrane was studied. After deposition of the PPD membranes, the sensors were placed in the working buffer for 2 h, and responses to hydrogen peroxide, ascorbic acid, and cysteine were measured to evaluate the changes in membrane permselectivity (Fig. 5). It was found that the responses to hydrogen peroxide slightly increased during the work, whereas small responses to interferents became even smaller. Probably, it happened because ascorbic acid and cysteine gradually clogged few large pores in the PPD layer. This experiment demonstrated that the PPD membrane can be used with no significant loss in its selectivity to hydrogen peroxide during at least 2 h.
Fig. 5

Stability of the PPD membrane during 2 hours. The responses to three substances were normalized to the initial response to the corresponding substance after PPD deposition

Storage stability of the PPD membrane was investigated. The sensors with deposited PPD membranes were stored dry during 8 days at − 18 °C; periodically, the sensors were unfrozen and responses to hydrogen peroxide, ascorbic acid, and cysteine were measured (Fig. 6). Over this period, the sensitivity of sensors to hydrogen peroxide increased by 2.5 times; the sensitivity to ascorbic acid and cysteine did not change. This effect can be explained by slow swelling of the PPD membrane that led to an improvement of hydrogen peroxide diffusion through the PPD layer.
Fig. 6

Storage stability of the PPD membrane. The responses were normalized to response to H2O2 at the first day

Finally, the PPD membrane effectiveness was validated at analysis of real biological samples. The transducers with no membranes demonstrated weak signals after addition of blood serum to the working cell due to the presence of electroactive compounds. However, after deposition of the membrane, no responses were obtained. Similar results were obtained with the lysate of neurons. These experiments demonstrate that the developed method of PPD deposition on platinum disk electrodes is effective and the modified transducers can be used for work with complex biological samples.

It is useful to compare the method for PPD deposition developed in this work with the methods reported earlier (Table 4).
Table 4

Comparison of the developed method of deposition of PPD membrane with previously reported methods

Optimal method of PD polymerization

Type of electrode

Optimal isomer of PD

Duration of the electrode preparation

Effectiveness of blocking properties

Storage stability

Biosensor application


CV (from − 0.3 V to +0.9 V vs. Ag/AgCl)

Pd disk


48 min

Full blocking of AA, cys, acetaminophen.

Small interference from UA




Constant potential (+0.7 V vs. Ag/AgCl)

Ru-covered carbon fiber ME


45 min

Full blocking of UA, cys, acetaminophen, DA.

Small interference from AA—addition of ascorbate oxidase to remove it

> 2 days

Glucose, lactate and glutamate biosensors, in vivo analysis in rat brain


Constant potential (+0.7 V vs. SCE)

Pt–Ir cylinders ME


15 min

Full blocking of AA

> 7 days




(from −0.25 V to +0.9 V vs. SCE)

Glassy carbon electrode


15 min

Full blocking of AA, UA and DA

> 15 days

N/A, H2O2 detection in human serum samples


Constant potential (+0.7 V vs. Ag/AgCl)

Pt cylinders ME


15 min

Full blocking of AA





(from 0 V to +0.9 V vs. Ag/AgCl)

Pt disk


6 min

Full blocking of AA, cys, UA, DA

> 8 days

Human serum samples and cell lysate

This work

ME microelectrode, AA ascorbic acid, cys cysteine, DA dopamine, UA uric acid, N/A not applicable

As seen, the presented method is the quickest one and blocking properties of the obtained membrane are better or at least not worse than those of other PPD membranes.


We investigated the conditions of deposition of a semipermeable polyphenylenediamine-based membrane aimed at decreasing an impact of interfering substances on the biosensor operation. It was shown that phenylenediamine electropolymerization by cyclic voltammetry was easier and provided better properties of the membrane if compared to electropolymerization at constant potential. The dependence of PPD membrane effectiveness on the number of cyclic voltammograms and phenylenediamine concentration was investigated. It was shown that the impact of interfering substances on the sensor operation can be completely eliminated by using three cyclic voltammograms in 30 mM phenylenediamine. On the other hand, when working with diluted samples, i.e., lower concentrations of electroactive substances, it is reasonable to decrease the phenylenediamine concentration to 5 mM, which would result in higher transducer sensitivity to hydrogen peroxide due to a thinner PPD layer. The PPD membrane can be used with no significant loss in its selectivity to hydrogen peroxide during at least 2 h of continuous operation and can be stored at least 8 days. It was shown that the transducer with the PPD membrane is not sensitive to the electroactive substances present in biological samples and can be used for the biosensor creation.



This study was supported by the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine in the frame of Scientific and Technical Government Program “Sensor systems for medico-ecological and industrial-technological requirement: metrological support and experimental operation”.

Authors’ Contributions

OVS performed all experiments. ISK helped OVS with experiments and wrote the manuscript. VMP and OOS planned and supervised the experiments. SAA performed experiments with UV-vis spectroscopy. SVD is the supervisor of the whole work, the results of which are presented in this article. All the authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors’ Affiliations

Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv
Laboratory of Biomolecular Electronics, Institute of Molecular Biology and Genetics, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine


  1. Turner APF (2013) Biosensors: sense and sensibility. Chem Soc Rev 42:3184–3196Google Scholar
  2. Thévenot DR, Toth K, Durst RA, Wilson GS (2001) Electrochemical biosensors: recommended definitions and classification. Biosens Bioelectron 16:121–131View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Grieshaber D, MacKenzie R, Vörös J, Reimhult E (2008) Electrochemical biosensors—sensor principles and architectures. Sensors 8:1400–1458View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Cosnier S, Holzinger M (2011) Electrosynthesized polymers for biosensing. Chem Soc Rev 40:2146–2156View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Stejskal J. Polymers of phenylenediamines. Prog Polym Sci 2015;41;1-31Google Scholar
  6. Schuvailo OM, Soldatkin OO, Lefebvre A, Cespuglio R, Soldatkin AP (2006) Highly selective microbiosensors for in vivo measurement of glucose, lactate and glutamate. Anal Chim Acta 573–574:110–116View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Killoran SJ, O’Neill RD (2008) Characterization of permselective coatings electrosynthesized on Pt–Ir from the three phenylenediamine isomers for biosensor applications. Electrochim Acta 53:7303–7312View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Dai YQ, Zhou DM, Shiu KK (2006) Permeability and permselectivity of polyphenylenediamine films synthesized at a palladium disk electrode. Electrochim Acta 52:297–303View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Shamsipur M, Karimi Z, Amouzadeh TM (2015) A highly sensitive hydrogen peroxide sensor based on (Ag-Au NPs)/poly[o-phenylenediamine] modified glassy carbon electrode. Mater Sci Eng C 56:426–431View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Riaz U, Ashraf SM, Aleem S, Budhiraja V, Jadoun S (2016) Microwave-assisted green synthesis of some nanoconjugated copolymers: characterisation and fluorescence quenching studies with bovine serum albumin. New J Chem 40:4643–4653View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Soldatkin OO, Schuvailo OM, Marinesco S, Cespuglio R, Soldatkin AP (2009) Microbiosensor based on glucose oxidase and hexokinase co-immobilised on platinum microelectrode for selective ATP detection. Talanta 78:1023–1028View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Jang D-H, Yoo Y-S, Oh SM (1995) Electropolymerization mechanism for poly(o-phenylenediamine) (PPD) and its electrocatalytic behavior for O2 reduction. Bull Kor Chem Soc 16:392–397Google Scholar
  13. Craig JD, O’Neill RD (2003) Comparison of simple aromatic amines for electrosynthesis of permselective polymers in biosensor fabrication. Analyst 128:905–911View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Hosny NM, Samir G, Zoromba MS, Alghool S (2017) Doped poly(m-phenylenediamine) (PmPDA): a new precursor for Cr2O3 nanoparticles. Polym Sci, Ser B 59:91–96View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. del Valle MA, Díaz FR, Bodini ME, Alfonso G, Soto GM, Borrego ED (2005) Electrosynthesis and characterization of o-phenylenediamine oligomers. Polym Int 54:526–532View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Mayo Medical Laboratories (USA) official web-site. Accessed 31 October 2017
  17. Patriarca M, Menditto A, Morisi G (1991) Determination of ascorbic acid in blood plasma or serum and in seminal plasma using a simplified sample preparation and high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with Uv detection. J of Liquid Chromat 14:297–312View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Salemi G, Gueli MC, D’Amelio M, Saia V, Mangiapane P, Aridon P, Ragonese P, Lupo I (2009) Blood levels of homocysteine, cysteine, glutathione, folic acid, and vitamin B12 in the acute phase of atherothrombotic stroke. Neurol Sci 30:361–364View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Noroozifar M, Khorasani-Motlagh M, Nadiki HH, Hadavi MS, Foroughi MM (2014) Modified fluorine-doped tin oxide electrode with inorganic ruthenium red dye-multiwalled carbon nanotubes for simultaneous determination of a dopamine, uric acid, and tryptophan. Sens Actuat B 204:333–341View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Lupu S, Mucci A, Pigani L, Seeber R, Zanardi C (2002) Polythiophene derivative conducting polymer modified electrodes and microelectrodes for determination of ascorbic acid. Effect of Possible Interferents Electroanalysis 14:519–525Google Scholar
  21. Burtis CA, Ashwood ER, Bruns WS (2006) Tietz textbook of clinical chemistry, 4th edn. WB Saunders Company, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  22. Herrasti Z, Martínez F, Baldrich E (2014) Electrochemical detection of dopamine using streptavidin-coated magnetic particles and carbon nanotube wiring. Sens Actuat B 203:891–898View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Álvarez-Martos I, Ferapontova EE (2016) Electrochemical label-free aptasensor for specific analysis of dopamine in serum in the presence of structurally related neurotransmitters. Anal Chem 88:3608–3616View ArticleGoogle Scholar


© The Author(s). 2017