Open Access

The Fabrication and High-Efficiency Electromagnetic Wave Absorption Performance of CoFe/C Core–Shell Structured Nanocomposites

Nanoscale Research Letters201813:68

Received: 22 November 2017

Accepted: 9 February 2018

Published: 1 March 2018


CoFe/C core–shell structured nanocomposites (CoFe@C) have been fabricated through the thermal decomposition of acetylene with CoFe2O4 as precursor. The as-prepared CoFe@C was characterized by X-ray powder diffraction, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, Raman spectroscopy, transmission electron microscopy, and thermogravimetric analysis. The results demonstrate that the carbon shell in CoFe@C has a poor crystallization with a thickness about 5–30 nm and a content approximately 48.5 wt.%. Due to a good combination between intrinsic magnetic properties and high-electrical conductivity, the CoFe@C exhibits not only excellent absorption intensity but also wide frequency bandwidth. The minimum RL value of CoFe@C can reach − 44 dB at a thickness of 4.0 mm, and RL values below − 10 dB is up to 4.3 GHz at a thickness of 2.5 mm. The present CoFe@C may be a potential candidate for microwave absorption application.


Electromagnetic wave absorptionCore–shellCarbonCoFe


Developing novel microwave absorption materials (MAMs) is considered as one of the effective methods to solve the increasingly serious electromagnetic (EM) interference problems since MAMs can absorb unwanted EM energies by converting them into other energy types [15]. Up to now, a variety of MAMs have been exploited in order to meet with the requirements of wide bandwidth, strong absorption, low density, and good stability [69]. Research confirmed that nanostructured core–shell absorbers could combine multiple wave loss mechanisms and achieve high-efficiency wave absorption performance [1014]. For example, Cao et al. reported that 3D Fe3O4 nanocrystals decorating on carbon nanotubes exhibited the minimum RL value of − 52.8 dB at 12.8 GHz [15]. Wang et al. synthesized flower-like ZnO coated by Ni nanoparticles via an atomic layer deposition-assisted strategy [16]. Ni-coated ZnO nanohybrids showed superior EM wave absorbing characteristics compared with pure ZnO. Du et al. reported the synthesis of Fe3O4@C core–shell composites through in situ polymerization of phenolic resin and subsequent high-temperature carbonization [17]. Their results revealed that the microwave absorption properties of the Fe3O4@C were greatly enhanced. Wu et al. fabricated the elliptical Fe3O4/C core–shell nanorings via a one-pot hydrothermal route, and the composites showed an enhanced low-frequency microwave absorption [18].

Metallic magnetic materials are a kind of potential microwave absorbers and have attracted much attention due to their large saturation magnetization and high Snoek limit at high frequencies [19, 20]. For example, the 3D nets constructed by dispersing nickel chains showed excellent microwave absorption capacity even at relatively high temperature of 373 K [21]. Dual dielectric resonance and two strong absorption peaks were achieved by the cobalt nanochains [22]. Nevertheless, single-component metallic magnetic materials usually show an unsatisfactory high-frequency permeability due to eddy-current effect, which hampers their further applications [12, 23, 24]. Recently, much effort has been put to address the problem [2528]. Thereinto, synthesizing metallic magnetic particles in a nano scale and encapsulating them with a thin dielectric layer to isolate from each other could efficiently inhibit eddy-current effect and improve their microwave absorption performance. As a prominent representative of dielectric absorbing material, carbon materials have outstanding properties that make them superior candidates as ideal shell materials, namely, excellent electrical conductivity and good stability [2931]. Zhang et al. synthesized FeCo@C nanoflakes and found that the orientation could decrease the absorber thickness and increase the absorption performance [32]. Zeng et al. reported that CoFe@C core–shell nanocomposites synthesized by a template-engaged approach exhibited microwave absorption performance with an effective absorption bandwidth of 4.3 GHz [33]. However, developing a facile method to fabricate metallic magnetic materials/carbon composites with a well-defined core–shell structure including the high yield and uniformity remains a big challenge.

In this work, we demonstrated a facile and efficient method for the preparation of uniform CoFe/C core–shell structured nanocomposites (CoFe@C) and investigated its microwave absorption properties. The as-prepared CoFe@C shows excellent microwave absorption performance and is very promising as a strong absorption and wide bandwidth microwave absorber.


Synthesis of CoFe2O4

CoFe2O4 samples were synthesized via a facile method. The typical synthesis process of CoFe2O4 is as follows: 2.5 g of CoCl2·6H2O and 5.6 g of FeSO4·7H2O were dissolved in 80 mL of deionized water and then transferred into oil bath heating at 80 °C, under vigorous stirring for 1 h. Subsequently, 30 mL 1 M oxalic acid solution was heated to boiling with magnetic stirring and added into the above solution slowly under constant stirring to form a final black precipitation, and then cooled by ice-water mixture. The black precipitates were collected by centrifugation and further washed several times with water and ethanol, respectively, and then dried at 60 °C under vacuum for 12 h. Subsequently, the precipitates were transferred to a muffle furnace and heated at 600 °C for 1 h. The temperature was raised at a heating rate of 1 °C min− 1.

Synthesis of CoFe@C

The as-obtained CoFe2O4 were loaded into a porcelain boat, transferred to a tube furnace, and put at the center of the furnace. After evacuation, a stream of acetylene (an atmosphere pressure) was introduced. The reaction was performed at 400 °C for 1 h (5 °C min− 1) at atmospheric pressure. After the apparatus was cooled to room temperature, the CoFe@C was obtained.

Morphology, Structure, and Magnetic Properties’ Characterization

Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and high-resolution TEM (HRTEM) images were taken on a JEOL JEM-2100 microscope instrument. The crystal structure was examined using X-ray diffraction (XRD) with Cu Kα radiation on a Bruker D8 Advance diffractometer. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was acquired using an AXIS SUPRA spectrometer with a monochromatic Al Kα (1486.6 eV) source. Thermogravimetric (TG) results were obtained by a thermal analysis system (Q600, TA, USA) using a heating rate of 10 °C min− 1 in air. Raman spectroscopy was performed on a Renishaw inVia Reflex Raman microscope using 532 nm green laser excitation. The magnetic properties were measured using a MicroMag 2900/3900 alternating gradient magnetometer.

Microwave Absorption Properties

The specimens for measuring the microwave absorption properties were prepared by uniformly mixing 50 wt.% of CoFe2O4 or CoFe@C with paraffin and pressing the mixture into a cylindrical shape. Then the cylinder was cut into a toroid of 7.00 mm outer diameter and 3.04 mm inner diameter for measurement. The relative permeability and permittivity values of the mixture were determined and obtained by measuring S11 and S21 parameters at 2–18 GHz with a vector network analyzer (Agilent N5230A) by using the transmission/reflection coaxial line method.

Results and Discussion

We performed XRD analysis to investigate the crystal structure and purity of the samples. Figure 1a displays the XRD patterns of CoFe2O4 and CoFe@C. For CoFe2O4, all characteristic peaks of sample match very well with the inverse spinel structure with the lattice parameters of a = 8.377 Å and c = 8.377 Å, which is consistent with the reported data (JCPDS File No. 03-0864). For CoFe@C, three obvious typical peaks can be indexed as the (110), (200), and (211) reflections of Fe-Co alloy phase (JCPDS no. 44-1483). No obvious characteristic peaks from crystalline graphite are detected, indicating that the coated carbon shell is amorphous [34]. Furthermore, the typical XPS survey spectra of CoFe@C shows the presence of C, O, Fe, and Co (Additional file 1: Figure S1). XPS is a surface analysis tool to investigate the superficial composition and chemical state of elements on the surface of sample. It should be noted that the intensity of Fe 2p and Co 2p peaks for CoFe@C is very weak owing to the thick carbon coating on the surface of CoFe. For C 1s, a characteristic peak at 284.5 eV (Fig. 1b) corresponding to the sp2-hybridisation state of graphite carbon can be observed [35]. XPS results confirm that a uniform carbon layer was successfully coated on the surface of CoFe. CoFe@C core–shell composites would lead to improved dielectric properties due to good electrical conductivity and enhanced interfacial polarizations, which is beneficial to their good wave absorbing properties.
Fig. 1

a XRD patterns of CoFe2O4 and CoFe@C. b C 1s XPS spectrum of CoFe@C

Raman spectroscopy can be used to study the information on the coordination of metal ions. Figure 2a shows the Raman spectrum of CoFe2O4. CoFe2O4 has the cubic inverse spinel structure similar to Fe3O4 attributed to the space group \( {\mathrm{O}}_{\mathrm{h}}^7\left(\mathrm{Fd}\overline{3}\mathrm{m}\right) \) [36]. The low-frequency vibrations (below 600 cm− 1) are assigned to the motion of oxygen around the octahedral lattice site whereas the higher frequencies can be attributed to oxygen around tetrahedral sites [37]. In this work, the mode at 682 cm− 1 is characteristic of the tetrahedral site. The bands at 470 and 300 cm− 1 correspond to Co2+ at octahedral sites [38]. We also investigated the presence of carbon in the CoFe@C samples by Raman spectroscopy. Figure 2b is the Raman spectrum of CoFe@C in the range of 1100–1800 cm− 1. The peak located at 1345 cm− 1 corresponds to the presence of sp3 defects of carbon (D-band). The peak at 1604 cm− 1 represents the characteristic for graphitic sheets (G-band). In this work, the G-band peak of the CoFe@C shifts to a higher wavelength number in comparison with that of well crystalline graphite structures (1575 cm− 1), suggesting that the carbon shell is of highly disorderly [3941].
Fig. 2

Raman spectra of a CoFe2O4 and b CoFe@C

TEM characterization on CoFe2O4 and CoFe@C was performed to investigate the microstructure and morphology. Figure 3a, b exhibits that the CoFe2O4 has a mesoporous structure. All these pores are located among adjacent particles produced from a great quantity of gases release of oxalate precursors during thermal decomposition. The HRTEM image displays the legible lattice fringes of 0.25 nm corresponding to (311) plane of inverse spinel structured CoFe2O4, indicating the highly crystalline nature of the mesoporous particles (Fig. 3c). Through a simple heating process in acetylene, the CoFe@C nanoparticles could be obtained. As shown in Fig. 3d, e, the average size of CoFe nanoparticles is in the range of 40–70 nm in diameter. The carbon shell has a poor crystallization with a disorderly graphitized carbon layer of about 5–30 nm in thickness. The clear crystalline lattice spacing of 0.20 nm from the dark core part can be indexed as (110) crystal planes of CoFe alloy (Fig. 3f). The interplanar distances of the surface carbon layers are around 0.34 nm, which is in agreement with the previous reports.
Fig. 3

a, b TEM and c HRTEM images of CoFe2O4. d, e TEM of CoFe@C and f HRTEM images of CoFe@C

We performed TGA to evaluate the carbon content in CoFe@C. Figure 4 shows the TG curve of CoFe@C. It is found that the weight loss is about 1.27% for CoFe@C from room temperature to 200 °C, which is ascribed to the loss of surface adsorbed water and other adsorbed organic functional groups. From 200 to 380 °C, a weight increase around 1.67% should be from the oxidation weight gain of CoFe. Next, an obvious weight loss is found resulting from the thermal decomposition of carbon. The TG curve keeps stable after 485 °C and the total weight loss is about 48.74%. On the basis of these results, the carbon content in CoFe@C is evaluated to be approximately 48.5 wt.%.
Fig. 4

TG curves of CoFe@C

The magnetic hysteresis loops of CoFe2O4 and CoFe@C were measured at room temperature. As shown in Fig. 5, the values of magnetic saturation (M s ) and the coercivity (Hci) for CoFe2O4 are 61.7 emu g− 1 and 1536.8 Oe, respectively. According to a previous study, the samples with bigger grain sizes possess higher value of M s [42]. In this work, the relatively high M s value for CoFe2O4 compared with several literatures should be attributed to the big crystalline grain size as confirmed from TEM images [4345]. For CoFe@C, the M s value is 42.6 emu g− 1 and the Hci is 729.2 Oe. The coercivity is larger while the value of saturation magnetization is smaller than that of bulk FeCo alloys [46]. However, it is comparable with other reported CoFe or CoFe@C composites [32, 33, 47]. Some slight differences may be ascribed to the Co/Fe proportion, coating of carbon layer and grain size. The good intrinsic magnetic properties for the CoFe@C would contribute to the high magnetic loss, which is favorable for enhancing their microwave absorption performance.
Fig. 5

The hysteresis loops of the CoFe2O4 and CoFe@C at room temperature

The microwave absorption properties of CoFe2O4 and CoFe@C were investigated by mixing 50 wt.% of the samples with paraffin. Figure 6 shows the typical relationship between reflection loss (RL) and frequency at different thickness. It is observed from Fig. 6a that CoFe2O4 exhibits poor wave absorption performance with a minimum RL value of − 7.1 dB at the thickness of 2.5 mm. Moreover, the minimum RL value and absorption peaks show no obvious change with the variation of sample thickness. The microwave absorption properties of CoFe@C involved intensity and bandwidth exhibit significant enhancement (Fig. 6b). To be specific, the minimum RL values of CoFe@C with thicknesses of 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 and 5 mm are − 15.5 dB (at 17.1 GHz), − 17.9 dB (at 13.3 GHz), − 20.8 dB (at 10.9 GHz), − 26.1 dB (at 9.3 GHz), − 44.0 dB (at 7.9 GHz), − 31.8 dB (at 7.0 GHz), and − 24.4 dB (at 6.2 GHz), respectively. The RL values less than − 10 dB for CoFe@C (thickness of 2.5 mm) are in the ranges of 11.6–15.9 GHz corresponding to a bandwidth of 4.3 GHz. In general, materials with RL values below − 10 dB (90% absorption) are regarded as suitable EM wave absorbers. Therefore, the present CoFe@C may be a potential candidate for microwave absorption application.
Fig. 6

Reflection loss curves of a CoFe2O4 and b CoFe@C at different thicknesses

To reveal the possible EM wave absorption mechanism, the complex permittivity (εr = ε′ – ″) and complex permeability (μr = μ′ − ″) of the CoFe2O4 and CoFe@C are given in Fig. 7. It is well known that the real and imaginary parts of complex permittivity and permeability represent electric and magnetic energy storage and dissipation capability, respectively. As shown in Fig. 7a, the ε′ and μ′ values for CoFe2O4 remain nearly unchanged and are in the range of 3.1–3.8 and 1.1–1.4, respectively. Meanwhile, CoFe2O4 has a very small ε″ (0.1–0.5) and μ″ (0–0.11) values. These results indicate that both dielectric and magnetic loss for CoFe2O4 is low, which should be responsible for the poor microwave absorption performance. For CoFe@C, it can be seen in Fig. 7b that the values of complex permittivity are obviously higher than those of the CoFe2O4 in the whole frequency range. With the increasing frequency, the ε′ and ε″ values show a slow decline and are in the range of 5.5–9.1 and 2.0–5.4, respectively. The μ′ values of CoFe@C are in the range of 0.98–1.2, whereas the μ″ values are in the range of 0–0.23, suggesting that CoFe@C has a larger magnetic loss in the microwave frequency range than that of CoFe2O4.
Fig. 7

Frequency dependence of real and imaginary parts of complex permittivity and permeability of a CoFe2O4 and b CoFe@C

In this work, the high ε′ and ε″ values should be ascribed to the good conductivity of CoFe@C composites. According to Cao’s electron-hopping model, the well-conductivity CoFe@C allows electrons to migrate and hop, and thus can greatly consume the electromagnetic energy, leading to enhanced dielectric loss [4851]. Moreover, two peaks at f = ~ 5.2 and ~ 11.1 GHz (Additional file 1: Figure S2) from the Cole-Cole plots indicate the existence of dual relaxation behaviors in CoFe@C samples. These relaxations are probably derived from the surface functions, defects, and interfacial polarizations in CoFe@C composites. In addition, the magnetic loss also contributes to the electromagnetic wave attenuation of CoFe@C composites. Eddy current effects, natural resonance, and exchange resonance are three key wave loss sources in the microwave region. As shown in Additional file 1: Figure S3, the μ″(μ′)−2f− 1 for CoFe@C is not a constant value, suggesting eddy current is not the dominating magnetic loss mechanism. Instead, two peaks at ~ 3 and 12.5 GHz can be found and are indexed to natural resonance and exchange resonance. We also calculated the dielectric loss tangents (tan δE = ε″/ε′) and magnetic loss tangents (tan δM = μ″/μ′) of CoFe@C and CoFe2O4, in which the maximum values of tan δE and tan δM are 0.706 and 1.370, respectively (Additional file 1: Figure S4). The relatively high values of tan δE and tan δM further reveal that CoFe@C possesses intense dielectric and magnetic loss.

Therefore, the excellent microwave absorption performance for CoFe@C should be attributed to the appropriate combination of dielectric–magnetic multiple loss mechanisms. As shown in Fig. 8, the electrons could easily migrate and hop between two well conductive CoFe@C and form micro-current networks, resulting in eminent conduction loss. This is consistent with Cao’s model [52, 53]. The dipole polarization originated from the functional groups, defects, and interface between carbon layers and CoFe nanoparticles is another important loss mechanism. Cao et al. proposed that the capacitor-like structures at the interfaces could also effectively attenuate the power of incident EM waves [54]. Magnetic loss for CoFe@C mainly derives from natural resonance and exchange resonance due to an effective inhibition of eddy-current effect by the uniform carbon layers.
Fig. 8

Schematic illustration for the microwave absorption mechanism of CoFe@C


In summary, we develop a novel method to fabricate the CoFe/C core–shell structured nanocomposites (CoFe@C) for microwave absorption application. The as-prepared CoFe@C manifest remarkable microwave absorption properties including strong absorption and wide bandwidth. The RL values below − 10 dB cover the frequency range of 11.6–15.9 GHz (2.5 mm). The minimum RL value can reach − 44.0 dB when the match thickness is 4.0 mm. The excellent microwave absorption properties are ascribed to the effective combination of dielectric–magnetic multiple loss mechanisms.



CoFe/C core–shell structured nanocomposites




High-resolution TEM


Microwave absorption materials


Transmission electron microscopy




X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy


X-ray diffraction



The authors thank Zhengyi He for providing CoFe2O4 samples. The authors thank the Center of Testing and Analysis for enabling the use of TEM, XRD, and Raman equipment.


This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (11564011, 21706046, 51362010) and the Natural Science Foundation of Hainan Province (514207, 514212).

Availability of Data and Materials

All data are fully available without restriction.

Authors’ Contributions

GPW carried out the overall experiment and wrote the manuscript. YML participated in supervising this study and revising the manuscript. LHW participated in the preparation of the samples. GZW provided the guidance and assistance for the whole work. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ Information

Gengping Wan is a Ph.D. student of Faculty of Environmental Science and Engineering in Kunming University of Science and Technology and an experimental teacher in Hainan University. Yongming Luo is a professor of Faculty of Environmental Science and Engineering in Kunming University of Science and Technology. Lihong Wu is a postgraduate of Key Laboratory of Tropical Biological Resources of Ministry of Education, Hainan University. Guizhen Wang is an associate professor of Key Laboratory of Tropical Biological Resources of Ministry of Education, Hainan University.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors’ Affiliations

Faculty of Environmental Science and Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, China
Key Laboratory of Tropical Biological Resources of Ministry of Education, Hainan University, Haikou, China


  1. Wang G, Gao Z, Wan G, Lin S, Yang P, Qin Y (2014) High densities of magnetic nanoparticles supported on graphene fabricated by atomic layer deposition and their use as efficient synergistic microwave absorbers. Nano Res 7:704–716View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Qiang R, Du Y, Wang Y, Wang N, Tian C, Ma J, Xu P, Han X (2016) Rational design of yolk-shell C@C microspheres for the effective enhancement in microwave absorption. Carbon 98:599–606View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Wen B, Cao M, Lu M, Cao W, Shi H, Liu J, Wang X, Jin H, Fang X, Wang W (2014) Reduced graphene oxides: light-weight and high-efficiency electromagnetic interference shielding at elevated temperatures. Adv Mater 26:3484–3489View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Liu Q, Cao Q, Bi H, Liang C, Yuan K, She W, Yang Y, Che R (2015) CoNi@SiO2@TiO2 and CoNi@air@TiO2 microspheres with strong wide band microwave absorption. Adv Mater 28:486–490View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Zhao B, Guo X, Zhao W, Deng J, Fan B, Shao G, Bai Z (2017) Facile synthesis of yolk-shell Ni@void@SnO2(Ni3Sn2) ternary composites via galvanic replacement/Kirkendall effect and their enhanced microwave absorption properties. Nano Res 10:1–13View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Wang GS, Zhang XJ, Wei YZ, He S, Guo L, Cao MS (2013) Polymer composites with enhanced wave absorption properties based on modified graphite and polyvinylidene fluoride. J Mater Chem A 1:7031–7036View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Pan H, Yin X, Xue J, Cheng L, Zhang L (2016) In-situ synthesis of hierarchically porous and polycrystalline carbon nanowires with excellent microwave absorption performance. Carbon 107:36–45View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Liu C, Xu Q, Tang Y, Wang Z, Ma R, Ma N, Du P (2016) Zr4+ doping-controlled permittivity and permeability of BaFe12−xZrxO19 and the extraordinary EM absorption power in the millimeter wavelength frequency range. J Mater Chem C 4:9532–9543View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Xia T, Zhang C, Oyler NA, Chen X (2013) Hydrogenated TiO2 nanocrystals: a novel microwave absorbing material. Adv Mater 25:6905–6910View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Wang G, Gao Z, Tang S, Chen C, Duan F, Zhao S, Lin S, Feng Y, Zhou L, Qin Y (2012) Microwave absorption properties of carbon nanocoils coated with highly controlled magnetic materials by atomic layer deposition. ACS Nano 6:11009–11017View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Che RC, Peng LM, Duan XF, Chen Q, Liang XL (2004) Microwave absorption enhancement and complex permittivity and permeability of Fe encapsulated within carbon nanotubes. Adv Mater 16:401–405View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Ding D, Xu P, Qiang R, Chu W, Han X, Li X, Wang Y, Du Y (2017) Rational design of core-shell co@C microspheres for high-performance microwave absorption. Carbon 111:722–732View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Liu XG, Geng DY, Meng H, Shang PJ, Zhang ZD (2008) Microwave-absorption properties of ZnO-coated iron nanocapsules. Appl Phys Lett 92:173117View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Lv H, Liang X, Cheng Y, Zhang H, Tang D, Zhang B, Ji G, Du Y (2015) Coin-like α-Fe2O3@CoFe2O4 core-shell composites with excellent electromagnetic absorption performance. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7:4744–4750View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Chen YH, Huang ZH, Lu MM, Cao WQ, Yuan J, Zhang DQ, Cao MS (2015) 3D Fe3O4 nanocrystals decorating on carbon nanotubes to tune electromagnetic properties and enhance microwave absorption capacity. J Mater Chem A 3:12621–12625View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Wang G, Peng X, Yu L, Wan G, Lin S, Qin Y (2015) Enhanced microwave absorption of ZnO coated with Ni nanoparticles produced by atomic layer deposition. J Mater Chem A 3:2734–2740View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Du Y, Liu W, Qiang R, Wang Y, Han X, Ma J, Xu P (2014) Shell thickness-dependent microwave absorption of core-shell Fe3O4@C composites. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6:12997–13006View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Tong W, Yun L, Xiang Z, Cui T, Zhao Y, Li Y, Tong G (2016) Facile hydrothermal synthesis of Fe3O4/C core–shell nanorings for efficient low-frequency microwave absorption. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8:7370–7380View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Feng C, Liu X, Sun YP, Jin C, Lv Y (2014) Enhanced microwave absorption of flower-like FeNi@C nanocomposites by dual dielectric relaxation and multiple magnetic resonance. RSC Adv 4:22710–22715View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Luo JH, Shen P, Yao W, Jiang CF, Xu JG (2016) Synthesis, characterization, and microwave absorption properties of reduced graphene oxide/strontium ferrite/polyaniline nanocomposites. Nanoscale Res Lett 11:141View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Liu J, Cao MS, Luo Q, Shi HL, Wang WZ, Yuan J (2016) Electromagnetic property and tunable microwave absorption of 3D nets from nickel chains at elevated temperature. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8:22615View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Shi XL, Cao MS, Yuan J, Fang XY (2009) Dual nonlinear dielectric resonance and nesting microwave absorption peaks of hollow cobalt Nanochains composites with negative permeability. Appl Phys Lett 95:163108View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Lv H, Liang X, Ji G, Zhang H, Du Y (2015) Porous three-dimensional flower-like co/CoO and its excellent electromagnetic absorption properties. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7:9776–9783View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Zhang X, Rao Y, Guo J, Qin G (2016) Multiple-phase carbon-coated FeSn2/Sn nanocomposites for high-frequency microwave absorption. Carbon 96:972–979View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Ni QQ, Zhu YF, Yu LJ, Fu YQ (2015) One-dimensional carbon nanotube@barium titanate@polyaniline multiheterostructures for microwave absorbing application. Nanoscale Res Lett 10:174View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Lv H, Guo Y, Wu G, Ji G, Yue Z, Xu ZJ (2017) Interface polarization strategy to solve electromagnetic wave interference issue. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 9:5660–5668View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Liu XG, Ou ZQ, Geng DY, Han Z, Jiang JJ, Liu W, Zhang ZD (2010) Influence of a graphite shell on the thermal and electromagnetic characteristics of FeNi nanoparticles. Carbon 48:891–897View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Liu Q, Liu X, Feng H, Shui H, Yu R (2017) Metal organic framework-derived Fe/carbon porous composite with low Fe content for lightweight and highly efficient electromagnetic wave absorber. Chem Eng J 314:320–327View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. You W, Bi H, She W, Zhang Y, Che R (2017) Dipolar-distribution cavity γ-Fe2O3 @C@α-MnO2 nanospindle with broadened microwave absorption bandwidth by chemically etching. Small 13:1602779View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Jian X, Wu B, Wei Y, Dou SX, Wang X, He W, Mahmood N (2016) Facile synthesis of Fe3O4/GCs composites and their enhanced microwave absorption properties. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8:6101–6109View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Cao WQ, Wang XX, Yuan J, Wang WZ, Cao MS (2015) Temperature dependent microwave absorption of ultrathin graphene composites. J Mater Chem C 3:10017–10022View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Zhang YB, Wang P, Wang Y, Qiao L, Wang T, Li FS (2015) Synthesis and excellent electromagnetic wave absorption properties of parallel aligned FeCo@C core–shell nanoflake composites. J Mater Chem C 3:10813–10818View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Zeng XJ, Yang B, Zhu LY, Yang HZ, Yu RH (2016) Structure evolution of Prussian blue analogues to CoFe@C core–shell nanocomposites with good microwave absorbing performances. RSC Adv 6:105644–105652View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Wan G, Wang G, Huang X, Zhao H, Li X, Wang K, Yu L, Peng X, Qin Y (2015) Uniform Fe3O4 coating on flower-like ZnO nanostructures by atomic layer deposition for electromagnetic wave absorption. Dalton Trans 44:18804–18809View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Yu L, Wang GL, Wan GP, Wang GZ, Lin SW, Li XY, Wang K, Bai ZM, Xiang Y (2016) Highly effective synthesis of NiO/CNT nanohybrids by atomic layer deposition for high-rate and long-life supercapacitors. Dalton Trans 45:13779–13786View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Qu Y, Yang H, Yang N, Fan Y, Zhu H, Zou G (2006) The effect of reaction temperature on the particle size, structure and magnetic properties of coprecipitated CoFe2O4 nanoparticles. Mater Lett 60:3548–3552View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Shemer G, Tirosh E, Livneh T, Markovich G (2007) Tuning a colloidal synthesis to control Co2+ doping in ferrite nanocrystals. J Phys Chem C 111:14334–14338View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Gandha K, Elkins K, Poudyal N, Liu JP (2015) Synthesis and characterization of CoFe2O4 nanoparticles with high coercivity. J Appl Phys 117:395View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Wan G, Yu L, Peng X, Wang G, Huang X, Zhao H, Qin Y (2015) Preparation and microwave absorption properties of uniform TiO2@C core–shell nanocrystals. RSC Adv 5:77443–77448View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Wang K, Wan G, Wang G, He Z, Shi S, Wu L, Wang G (2018) The construction of carbon-coated Fe3O4 yolk-shell nanocomposites based on volume shrinkage from the release of oxygen anions for wide-band electromagnetic wave absorption. J Colloid Interface Sci 511:307–317View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Wang G, Ran G, Wan G, Yang P, Gao Z, Lin S, Fu C, Qin Y (2014) Size-selective catalytic growth of nearly 100% pure carbon nanocoils with copper nanoparticles produced by atomic layer deposition. ACS Nano 8:5330–5338View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Eshraghi M, Kameli P (2011) Magnetic properties of CoFe2O4 nanoparticles prepared by thermal treatment of ball-milled precursors. Curr Appl Phys 11:476–481View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Shang T, Lu QS, Chao LM, Qin YL, Yun YH, Yun GH (2018) Effects of ordered mesoporous structure and la-doping on the microwave absorbing properties of CoFe2O4. Appl Surf Sci 434:234–242View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Wang XG, Yan HX, Xue R, Qi SX (2017) A polypyrrole/CoFe2O4/hollow glass microspheres three-layer sandwich structure microwave absorbing material with wide absorbing bandwidth and strong absorbing capacity. J Mater Sci Mater Electron 28:519–525View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Zi ZF, Sun YP, Zhu XB, Yang ZR, Dai JM, Song WH (2009) Synthesis and magnetic properties of CoFe2O4 ferrite nanoparticles. J Magn Magn Mater 321:1251–1255View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Sourmail T (2005) Near equiatomic FeCo alloys: constitution, mechanical and magnetic properties. Prog Mater Sci 50:816–880View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Yang Y, Xu CL, Xia YX, Wang T, Li FS (2010) Synthesis and microwave absorption properties of FeCo nanoplates. J Alloys Compd 493:549–552View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Cao MS, Song WL, Hou ZL, Wen B, Yuan J (2010) The effects of temperature and frequency on the dielectric properties, electromagnetic interference shielding and microwave-absorption of short carbon fiber/silica composites. Carbon 48:788–796View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Wen B, Cao MS, Hou ZL, Song WL, Zhang L, Lu MM, Jin HB, Fang XY, Wang WZ, Yuan J (2013) Temperature dependent microwave attenuation behavior for carbon-nanotube/silica composites. Carbon 65:124–139View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Wang XX, Ma T, Shu JC, Cao MS (2018) Confinedly tailoring Fe3O4 clusters-NG to tune electromagnetic parameters and microwave absorption with broadened bandwidth. Chem Eng J 332:321–330View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Lu MM, Cao WQ, Shi HL, Fang XY, Yang J, Hou ZL, Jin HB, Wang WZ, Yuan J, Cao MS (2014) Multi-wall carbon nanotubes decorated with ZnO nanocrystals: mild solution-process synthesis and highly efficient microwave absorption properties at elevated temperature. J Phys Chem A 2:10540–10547Google Scholar
  52. Lu MM, Cao MS, Chen YH, Cao WQ, Liu J, Shi HL, Zhang DQ, Wang WZ, Yuan J (2015) Multiscale assembly of grape-like ferroferric oxide and carbon-nanotubes: a smart absorber prototype varying temperature to tune intensities. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 34:19408–19415View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Zhang YL, Wang XX, Cao MS Confinedly implanted NiFe2O4-rGO: cluster tailoring and highly tunable electromagnetic properties for selective-frequency microwave absorption. Nano Res.
  54. Cao MS, Yang J, Song WL, Zhang DQ, Wen B, Jin HB, Hou ZL, Yuan J (2012) Ferroferric oxide/multiwalled carbon nanotube vs polyaniline/ferroferric oxide/multiwalled carbon nanotube multiheterostructures for highly effective microwave absorption. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 12:6949–6956View ArticleGoogle Scholar


© The Author(s). 2018