Table 2 Comparison of sensing performance of ethanol with previously reported modified electrodes
Modified electrode | Linear range (mM) | LOD (mM) | Sensitivity (μAmM−1 cm−2) | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|---|
SnO2–ZnO | 0.195–25 | 0.137 | 62.56 | [62] |
Polypropylene carbonate/silica | 0.17–850 | 0.021 | 0.5698 | [65] |
Mesoporous Pd–ZnO | 0.05–0.8 | 0.0192 | 33.08 | [66] |
Gd2O3 nanostructures | 0.17–850 | 0.052 | 0.266 | [69] |
ZnO–CeO2 | 0.17–1700 | 0.16 | 0.8331 | [70] |
CuO nanosheets | 0.17–1700 | 0.143 | 0.9722 | [71] |
Ni-doped SnO2 | 10−6–1 | 0.6 × 10− 6 | 2.3148 | [72] |
Mg(OH)2 nanodisks | 10−4–10 | 73 × 10− 6 | 6.89 | [73] |
poly(1–naphthylamine) | 0.78–50 | – | 1.66 | [74] |
Mg(OH)2 nanosheets | 0.01–1000 | 0.005 | 3.991 | [75] |
Mesoporous Ag/α–Fe2O3 | 0.05–0.8 | 0.0154 | 41.27 | This work |
0.8–15 | 2.93 | This work |