Skip to main content

Effect of Nano-SiO2 on Expression and Aberrant Methylation of Imprinted Genes in Lung and Testis


Nanotechnology has been developing rapidly and is now used in many cutting-edge medical therapeutics. However, there is increasing concern that exposure to nanoparticles (NPs) may induce different systemic diseases as epigenetic mechanisms are associated with more and more disease. The role of NP epigenomic modification is important to disease etiology. Our study aimed to determine the epigenetic mechanisms of damage in lung and testis cells by exposing cells to SiO2 NPs. We used male C57BL/6 mice to characterize the damaging effect of SiO2 NPs on lung and testis cells as well as the resulting methylation state at the imprinted Dlk1/Dio3 domain region. The A549 cells exposed to SiO2 NPs had cell apoptosis, and male mice exposed to SiO2 NPs had altered lung and testis tissues. The genes in the imprinted domains Dlk1/Dio3 region changed in both tissues; Dlk1, Rtl1, and Dio3 are upregulated in testis while Dlk1 and Dio3 are also upregulated in lung tissues. Bisulfite sequencing PCR of male adult lung and testis were mostly hypomethylated, with a few hypermethylated CpGs. These findings indicate that nanoparticles play an important role in DNA methylation of imprinted genes.


Silicon dioxide is an oxide of silicon with the chemical formula SiO2, most commonly found in nature as quartz and in various organic environments [1]. Engineered nanoparticles have been widespread in the rapid growth and application of nanotechnology in high-tech industries. This particular nanoparticle is widely used in a range of consumer products including electronics, plastic products, medical, cosmetic, and coating material due to their physical scientific properties such as large specific surface area, abundant reactive sites, high surface energy, unsaturated chemical bonds, strong adsorption capability, and a strong tendency to interact with metals and organic matter, thereby altering contaminants and their transport in the environment [2]. The presence of SiO2 nanoparticles (NPs) in a wide range of consumables increases their likelihood of being released in the environment and comes into contact with the human population.

Previous experimental studies have shown that a single-dose intratracheal instillation or multiple intraperitoneal injections of a metal and metal-oxide nanoparticle species cause toxic effects from cellular to systemic and organismic levels [3]. Treatment of SiO2 NPs represses the growth of breast cancer cell lines by increasing apoptosis and reducing cell motility. Moreover, exposure to SiO2 NPs significantly disturbs the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) [4]. When rat models were treated with three different sizes of TiO2 NPs and compared with controls, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) treatment with large agglomerate (> 100 nm) aerosols induced an acute inflammatory response, while small agglomerate (< 100 nm) aerosols produced significant oxidative stress damage and cytotoxicity [5].

The study of nanoparticle toxicity on reproduction is a growing field. One study has demonstrated that under the same treatment dose, Ni NPs induced higher reproductive toxicity in C. elegans than Ni MPs (microparticles). These reproductive toxicities observed in C. elegans included reduced brood size, fertilized egg, and spermatide activation [6]. There is growing evidence that certain environmental effects can be passed to offspring via paternally pathways without changes in the sperm genome [7, 8]. Paternal information exists not only in the genome, but also in related specific epigenetic markers, mRNA content, and non-coding RNA.

Oxidative stress is an important mechanism in nanoparticle toxicity, which can trigger DNA damage, inflammation, protein denaturation, and lipid peroxidation [9]. These biological effects are influenced by the physiochemical properties of nanoparticles, including their size, surface area, shape, surface chemistry, functionalization, and solubility [10, 11]. There is growing evidence that clearly demonstrate exposure to nanoparticles may trigger epigenetic alterations in tissues and cells even at low, non-cytotoxic doses [12, 13]. Epigenetics is the study of heritable changes in gene function that do not involve changes in the DNA sequence including methylation of DNA, gene imprinting, histone modifications, and regulation by non-coding RNAs [14]. Such epigenetic alterations are associated with the development and progression of numerous pathological states and diseases [15]. Therefore, epigenetic effects are a crucial part of patient risk assessment screening at the cellular level.

The Dlk1/Dio3 imprinted domain contains three known differentially methylated regions (DMRs) that are paternally methylated: intergenic DMR (IG-DMR), maternally expressed 3-DMR (Gtl2-DMR), and Dlk1-DMR [16]. Previous studies suggest that the IG-DMR dictates the allelic methylation status of the Gtl2 promoter DMR, which then controls gene expression across the entire cluster [17]. The mouse genome has a large number of imprinted genes at the Dlk1/Dio3 domain in the distal region of chromosome 12. The IG-DMR located between imprinted gene Dlk1 and Gtl2 is specifically methylated in the male germline and regulates the parental allele-specific expression of the imprinted gene region [18]. The IG-DMR methylation status is established before birth and is thus maintained throughout a male’s lifetime in the male germline during male germ-cell differentiation, meaning IG-DMR methylation is maintained in spermatogonia and spermatocytes of mature testis.

Our aim was to find the changes in male germline gene expression during spermatogenesis prior to transcriptional and translational silencing in order to explain the paternal influence on offspring through the environmental changes. Environmental factors can modify sperm transcriptional modifications, which can lead to alterations in progeny development. To carry out this investigation in our work, we used cell lines and mice as models for screening of the toxic effects of SiO2 NPs. To our knowledge, this is the first study demonstrating the epigenetic mechanisms of the Dlk1/Dio3 imprinted regions that nanoparticles cause damage in both lung and testis tissue.


Experimental Animal

Animal handling was performed in accordance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals under the corresponding animal use protocol at the Nanjing Medical University. Mice were obtained from Beijing Vital River Laboratory Animal Technology Co., Ltd. All animals were housed at 23 °C with a 12-h light cycle. Sterilized water and rodent chow were consumed by the mice at will. Mice activity and behavior were monitored daily. After 2 weeks, mice were injected nano-sized SiO2 12.5 mg/kg.


Nano-sized SiO2 (99.5% trace metal basis, particle size 10–20 nm) were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO, USA). Nanoparticles were suspended in RPMI 1640 Medium to create a stock solution, dispersed by ultrasonic vibration for 20 min, diluted to appropriate concentrations, and dispersed for another 20 min.

Characteristics of SiO2 NPs

The size and zeta potential were recorded using a Malvern Zetasizer Nano ZSP.

RNA Extraction and qRT-PCR

The lung and testis samples were flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen and then stored at 80 °C after about 4 h. We defrosted the samples before we extracted the samples.

The total RNA was isolated from the samples using 1 mL of TRIzol Reagent (Invitrogen Life Technologies Co, USA). The mixture was ultrasonicated at 80% power for 5 min, added 0.2 mL of chloroform, and next was centrifugalized at 12,000g/min at 4 °C for 15 min. Then, three steps of phenol/chloroform purification were added in order to get rid of proteins. Then, we used UV absorbance to measure RNA content and quality of each sample at 260 and 280 nm. The primer sequences of mRNAs are showed in Additional file 1: Table S1 and S2. qRT-PCR was carried out using the manufacturer’s instructions, as described previously [19]. Real-time PCR was carried out using SYBR Green (Vazyme). The PCR cycle was as follows: initial denaturation at 95 °C for 30 s, followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 15 s, annealing at 60 °C for 15 s, and extension at 72 °C for 30 s. The amount of target genes was analyzed using the 2^-ΔCt method following normalization with β-actin.

DNA Extraction, Bisulphite Treatment, and Bisulfite Sequencing PCR

DNA was isolated from testicular and lung tissues using a DNA kit (QIAamp DNA Mini Kit; Qiagen. No.51304; USA) following the manufacturer’s recommendations. Bisulfite conversion of 500 ng of all genomic DNA was achieved using a kit (EpiTect® Bisulfite kit; Qiagen. No. 59104; USA) following the manufacturer’s recommendations. Different CpG methylation oligonucleotides were designed using Methyl Primer Express v1.0 software and the sequences are P1-F 5′-TTGGGTTTTGAGGAGT AGTA-3′, P1-R 5′-ACATCCTATTCCCTAATAAAAATT-3′; P2-F 5′-TATTGGTTTGGTATATATGGATGTA-3′, P2-R 5′-ATAAAACACTTAACTCRTACCRTA-3′; P3-F 5′- TTTGTGTAGTTGTGTTATGGTATATTT-3′, P3-R 5′- ACCCATAACAAACCACAACA-3′; P4-F 5′-TTGTGGTTTGTTATGGGTAAGTT-3′, P4-R 5′-TCAAAACATTCTCCATTAACAAAA-3′.

Each DNA sample was amplified by PCR as follows: 2.5 μl 10 × PCR buffer PCR reaction mix with 500 ng the bisulfite-treated DNA, 0.5 μl each of forward and reverse primers, 0.5 μl dNTP Mix, 0.5 μl rTaq (500 U, dNTP, Mg2+) (Takara Bio, Tokyo, Japan), addition of ddH2O up to a volume of 25 μl. After activation of polymerase at 94 °C for 10 min, it was followed by 40 cycles of the following sequence: 30 s at 94 °C, 30 s at 58 °C, 1 min at 72 °C, and final extension at 72 °C for 10 min.

Cell Culture and Treatment

A549 cells were purchased from ATCC (Manassas, VA, USA) and were cultured in 1640 supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) at 37 °C and 5% CO2 in a humidified incubator. The cells were plated on 96-well plates, incubated with different concentrations of SiO2 NPs: 62.5, 125, 250, 500, 1000, and 2000 μg/ml for 24 h.

Cell Viability Assay

Cellular viability was evaluated by the CCK8 proliferation assay. Cells were plated at a density of 1.5 × 104 per well in a 96-well plate and incubated overnight. After exposure to SiO2 NPs at different concentrations, 100 μl of CCK8 was added to each well, and the cells were incubated for 30 min at 37 °C to allow CCK8 metabolism. At last, absorbance was determined at 450 nm. The cell-inhibiting rates were calculated and transformed into the IC50 using SPSS 15.0.

Statistical Analysis

All computations were performed using the SPSS 15.0 software. Comparisons between groups were made using unrelated t tests and a Pearson chi-square test for BSP. The data are presented as the mean ± SD. In all cases, a value of p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.


Characterization of SiO2 NPs

We characterized SiO2 NPs under experimental conditions. The average hydrodynamic radius and zeta potential of SiO2 NPs in culture medium were 371.77 ± 18.46 nm and 18.83 ± 2.12 mV, respectively (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Characterization of SiO2 NPs in suspension. Particles were suspended in cell culture medium with 10% FBS. a, b Size and zeta potential of SiO2 NPs was assessed by Zetasizer Nano ZSP. c Cell viability was determined by CCK8 assay after exposure to various concentrations of SiO2 NPs for 24 h. Averages ± SD of duplicate experiments, each consisting of three technical replicates. *** p < 0.001

Effect of SiO2 NPs on the A549 Cell Line

To determine the toxicity of SiO2 NPs, we performed a proliferation test with A549 cells, to determine the IC50 of SiO2 NPs on A549 cells. As illustrated in Fig. 1c, SiO2 NPs decrease A549 cell viability in a concentration-dependent manner. The reduction in cell viability is significant at SiO2 NP concentration of higher than 62.5 μg/ml (p < 0.001). The IC50 24 h of a chemical is defined as a concentration that affects 50% of cell after 24 h of exposure. The IC50 24 h determined for SiO2 NPs was 4942 μg/ml.

Effects of SiO2 NPs on Murine Lung and Testis

We determined whether exposure to SiO2 NPs at dose of 12.5 mg/kg body weight would lead to lung membrane damage and even testis damage in our mouse model. As shown in figures, SiO2 NP exposure led to disrupted lamellar body in histological sections of the lung (Fig. 2a, b) and a mitochondrial cristae damage in comparison to the control group in testis (Fig. 2c, d). We then investigated the lung and testis effects of SiO2 NPs on the activation of imprinting on the Dlk1/Dio3 imprinted region.

Fig. 2
figure 2

TEM images of lung and testis tissues of rats exposed to SiO2 NPs. a Morphology was assessed in lung tissues by SEM in controls. b Morphology was assessed in lung tissues by SEM in treated group. c Morphology was assessed in testis tissues by SEM in controls. d Morphology was assessed in testis tissues by SEM in treated group. Scale bars represent 2.0 μm

Expression of the Imprinted Genes on the Murine Lung and Testis

In order to illustrate the changes in lung and testis, we detected the imprinted genes in these tissues. We choose the 24 imprinted genes; they were Dio3, Ddc, Dlk1, Gpr1, Gtl2, H19, Igf2, Igf2as, Igf2r, Inpp5f, Magel2, Magi2, Mest, Mir296, Mir298, Ndn, Nnat, Peg10, Plagl1, Pwcr1, Rasgrf1, Rtl1, Snrpn, and Snurf. Thirteen of these genes are expressed in both lung and testis: Dio3, Dlk1, Gpr1, Gtl2, Igf2r, Igf2, Inpp5f, Peg10, Ndn, Nnat, Rasgrf1, Rtl1, and Snrpn (Fig. 3a, b). The differentially expressed genes of primary focus were on the Dlk1/Dio3 imprinted region, which contains Dlk1, Gtl2, Rtl1, and Dio3.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Expression of imprinted genes in lung and testis. a The expression of imprinted genes in lung. b The expression of imprinted genes in testis. *P < 0.05. **P < 0.01. Student’s t test

Expression of the Dlk1/Dio3 Imprinted Region

The imprinted Dlk1/Dio3 region contains three protein-coding genes (Dlk1, Gtl2, Rtl1, and Dio3) on the inherited allele [20] (Fig. 4c). To elucidate the role of the Dlk1/Dio3 region in lung and testis tissue response to SiO2 NP treatment, we analyzed the methylation pattern of DMR compared with the controls. Different genes are targeted by methylation in the lung and the testis. The expression of the Dlk1 and Dio3 were upregulated in both the lungs and testis, while Rtl1 was upregulated only in testis (Fig. 4a, b).

Fig. 4
figure 4

The expression of Dlk1/Dio3 imprinted region. a The Dlk1/Dio3 region genes expressed in the lung. b The Dlk1/Dio3 region genes expressed in the testis. c Schema of the Dlk1/Dio3 region. *P < 0.05. **P < 0.01. Student’s t test

The Methylation of Dlk1/Dio3 DMR Regions

To further investigate whether the expression of genes changes in response to DNA methylation, we addressed the methylation status of this region in the mouse lung and testis. In DNA methylation analysis, we determined the sequences of the three sections of CpG islands. In the testis, they are hypomethylated; however, in CpG island 1, they are significantly hypermethylated (Fig. 5). In the lung, the whole methylation is the same as in the testis, while the CpG island 2 showed hypermethylation (Fig. 6).

Fig. 5
figure 5

The methylation of Dlk1/Dio3 DMR regions in testis. a The methylation of CpG island 1 in the control and treated tissues. b The methylation of CpG island 2 in the control and treated tissues. c The methylation of CpG island 3 in the control and treated tissues

Fig. 6
figure 6

The methylation of Dlk1/Dio3 DMR regions in lung. a The methylation of CpG island 1 in the control and treated tissues. b The methylation of CpG island 2 in the control and treated tissues. c The methylation of CpG island 3 in the control and treated tissues


The increasing use of nanomaterials has raised concerns about potential impacts on human health and environmental impacts. Previous studies have demonstrated that SiO2 NPs can cause lung and cardiovascular damage, such as lung inflammation and myocardial ischemic damage in old rats [21]. Furthermore, nanoparticles may have an effect on germlines, as such cells appeared to be more sensitive to the toxic effects of Ag NPs and demonstrated adverse effects following exposure to lower doses. Ag NP exposure increased the number of abnormalities observed in rat spermatic cells and reduced the integrity of both the acrosome and plasma membrane in addition to reducing mitochondrial activity [22]. Our investigation is part of a series of studies using an experimental platform to evaluate the potential of nanoparticles to target male organisms and even their unexposed offspring.

In our previous in vitro study, we reported that short-term exposure to some nanoparticles results in cell apoptosis and aberrant expression of imprinted genes in TM-4 Sertoli cells. These findings demonstrate that abnormal expression of imprinted genes may be an underlying mechanism for nanoparticles to induce reproduction toxicity [23]. Furthermore, in our previous in vivo study, some environmental factors, such as endocrine disruptors, also promote a phenotype or disease state not only in the individual exposed but also in successive generations of progeny. Epimutations in the germline that become permanently programmed can allow transmission of epigenetic transgenerational phenotypes [19]. The aim of this study was to investigate changes made to the epigenetic state by SiO2 NP treatment in a murine model in order to lay the mechanistic foundation of male transgenerational effects.

Epigenetic state is a term used to define chemical modifications that occur within a genome without changing the DNA sequence [24]. Epigenetic mechanisms, including DNA methylation, imprinted genes, histone modifications, and non-coding RNA expression, can affect genomic function in an exogenous environment [25]. To our knowledge, our study is the first to investigate SiO2 NPs inducing lung and testis toxicity at the epigenetic level.

We first examined the acute toxicity of the SiO2 NPs in A549 cells, a human lung epithelial cell line. However, our findings in experimental mice revealed injury in laminar lung type II epithelial cells and testicular mitochondrial crest injury after contact with SiO2 NPs at environmental concentrations [26]. In order to better understand the mechanism of the lung and testis pathology, we expressed imprinted genes. Genomic imprinting refers to silencing of one parental allele in zygotes of gametes depending upon the parent of origin; this silencing occurs via epigenetic processes such as DNA methylation and/or histone modification [27]. Previous studies have shown that imprinted gene expression at the Dlk1/Dio3 domain is important for fetal growth [28], the timing of human puberty [29], and susceptibility to metabolic disease [30]. Studies have suggested that the IG-DMR dictates the allelic methylation status of the Gtl2 promoter DMR, which then controls gene expression across the entire Dlk1/Dio3 region [17]. The main function of this imprinted control region is to inherit germ cell-driven DNA methylation as a gametic signal, and later to maintain subsequent allele-specific DNA methylation patterns within somatic cells [31]. Our study demonstrated that SiO2 NPs induce changes to the expression of the Dlk1/Dio3 region both in lung and testis tissues. In the Dlk1/Dio3 region, the paternal expressed genes (Dlk1, Rtl1, and Dio3) are particularly abnormal compared with the controls after NP treatment. Bisulfite sequencing results display different levels of hypomethylation in the lung and testis. The methylation state of IG-DMR is generally lower in treated tissues, and this hypomethylation may represent the mechanism of differential expression of imprinted genes.


In conclusion, our results indicate that SiO2 NP exposure may induce important DNA methylation changes that trigger cellular damage and that these changes are highly important to the expression of the Dlk1/Dio3 imprinted gene cluster. Importantly, the changes in DNA methylation affect both the lung and testis tissues. These results play an important role in our future research examining the epigenomic effects of the nanoparticles inherited by offspring of exposed models and the clarification of the molecular mechanisms that mediate such epigenetic alterations.



Bronchoalveolar lavage fluids


Cell counting kit-8


Differentially methylated regions


Epidermal growth factor receptor


Intergenic DMR






  1. Napierska D, Thomassen LC, Lison D, Martens JA, Hoet PH (2010) The nanosilica hazard: another variable entity. Part Fibre Toxicol 7:39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Contado C (2015) Nanomaterials in consumer products: a challenging analytical problem. Front Chem 3:48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sutunkova MP, Solovyeva SN, Katsnelson BA, Gurvich VB, Privalova LI, Minigalieva IA, Slyshkina TV, Valamina IE, Makeyev OH, Shur VY, Zubarev IV, Kuznetsov DK, Shishkina EV (2017) A paradoxical response of the rat organism to long-term inhalation of silica-containing submicron (predominantly nanoscale) particles of a collected industrial aerosol at realistic exposure levels. Toxicology 384:59–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Jeon D, Kim H, Nam K, Oh S, Son SH, Shin I (2017) Cytotoxic effect of nano-SiO2 in human breast cancer cells via modulation of EGFR signaling cascades. Anticancer Res 37:6189–6197

    Google Scholar 

  5. Noel A, Charbonneau M, Cloutier Y, Tardif R, Truchon G (2013) Rat pulmonary responses to inhaled nano-TiO(2): effect of primary particle size and agglomeration state. Part Fibre Toxicol 10:48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kong L, Gao X, Zhu J, Zhang T, Xue Y, Tang M (2017) Reproductive toxicity induced by nickel nanoparticles in Caenorhabditis elegans. Environ Toxicol 32:1530–1538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Schagdarsurengin U, Steger K (2016) Epigenetics in male reproduction: effect of paternal diet on sperm quality and offspring health. Nat Rev Urol 13:584–595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhang Y, Zhang X, Shi J, Tuorto F, Li X, Liu Y, Liebers R, Zhang L, Qu Y, Qian J, Pahima M, Liu Y, Yan M, Cao Z, Lei X, Cao Y, Peng H, Liu S, Wang Y, Zheng H, Woolsey R, Quilici D, Zhai Q, Li L, Zhou T, Yan W, Lyko F, Zhang Y, Zhou Q, Duan E, Chen Q (2018) Dnmt2 mediates intergenerational transmission of paternally acquired metabolic disorders through sperm small non-coding RNAs. Nat Cell Biol 20:535–540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Manke A, Wang L, Rojanasakul Y (2013) Mechanisms of nanoparticle-induced oxidative stress and toxicity. Biomed Res Int 2013:942916

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Aschberger K, Micheletti C, Sokull-Kluttgen B, Christensen FM (2011) Analysis of currently available data for characterising the risk of engineered nanomaterials to the environment and human health—lessons learned from four case studies. Environ Int 37:1143–1156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Farcal L, Torres Andon F, Di Cristo L, Rotoli BM, Bussolati O, Bergamaschi E, Mech A, Hartmann NB, Rasmussen K, Riego-Sintes J, Ponti J, Kinsner-Ovaskainen A, Rossi F, Oomen A, Bos P, Chen R, Bai R, Chen C, Rocks L, Fulton N, Ross B, Hutchison G, Tran L, Mues S, Ossig R, Schnekenburger J, Campagnolo L, Vecchione L, Pietroiusti A, Fadeel B (2015) Comprehensive in vitro toxicity testing of a panel of representative oxide nanomaterials: first steps towards an intelligent testing strategy. PLoS One 10:e0127174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sierra MI, Rubio L, Bayon GF, Cobo I, Menendez P, Morales P, Mangas C, Urdinguio RG, Lopez V, Valdes A, Vales G, Marcos R, Torrecillas R, Fernandez AF, Fraga MF (2017) DNA methylation changes in human lung epithelia cells exposed to multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Nanotoxicology 11:857–870

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhang XF, Park JH, Choi YJ, Kang MH, Gurunathan S, Kim JH (2015) Silver nanoparticles cause complications in pregnant mice. Int J Nanomedicine 10:7057–7071

    Google Scholar 

  14. Handy DE, Castro R, Loscalzo J (2011) Epigenetic modifications: basic mechanisms and role in cardiovascular disease. Circulation 123:2145–2156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sharma S, Kelly TK, Jones PA (2010) Epigenetics in cancer. Carcinogenesis 31:27–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zeng TB, He HJ, Han ZB, Zhang FW, Huang ZJ, Liu Q, Cui W, Wu Q (2014) DNA methylation dynamics of a maternally methylated DMR in the mouse Dlk1-Dio3 domain. FEBS Lett 588:4665–4671

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kagami M, O'Sullivan MJ, Green AJ, Watabe Y, Arisaka O, Masawa N, Matsuoka K, Fukami M, Matsubara K, Kato F, Ferguson-Smith AC, Ogata T (2010) The IG-DMR and the MEG3-DMR at human chromosome 14q32.2: hierarchical interaction and distinct functional properties as imprinting control centers. PLoS Genet 6:e1000992

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hiura H, Komiyama J, Shirai M, Obata Y, Ogawa H, Kono T (2007) DNA methylation imprints on the IG-DMR of the Dlk1-Gtl2 domain in mouse male germline. FEBS Lett 581:1255–1260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Yuan B, Wu W, Chen M, Gu H, Tang Q, Guo D, Chen T, Chen Y, Lu C, Song L, Xia Y, Chen D, Rehan VK, Sha J, Wang X (2017) From the cover: metabolomics reveals a role of betaine in prenatal DBP exposure-induced epigenetic transgenerational failure of spermatogenesis in rats. Toxicol Sci 158:356–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Irving MD, Buiting K, Kanber D, Donaghue C, Schulz R, Offiah A, Mohammed SN, Oakey RJ (2010) Segmental paternal uniparental disomy (patUPD) of 14q32 with abnormal methylation elicits the characteristic features of complete patUPD14. Am J Med Genet A 152A:1942–1950

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Gong C, Tao G, Yang L, Liu J, Liu Q, Zhuang Z (2010) SiO(2) nanoparticles induce global genomic hypomethylation in HaCaT cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 397:397–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mathias FT, Romano RM, Kizys MM, Kasamatsu T, Giannocco G, Chiamolera MI, Dias-da-Silva MR, Romano MA (2015) Daily exposure to silver nanoparticles during prepubertal development decreases adult sperm and reproductive parameters. Nanotoxicology 9:64–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Yuan B, Gu H, Xu B, Tang Q, Wu W, Ji X, Xia Y, Hu L, Chen D, Wang X (2016) Effects of gold nanorods on imprinted genes expression in TM-4 Sertoli cells. Int J Environ Res Public Health 13(3):271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Sarkar DK (2016) Male germline transmits fetal alcohol epigenetic marks for multiple generations: a review. Addict Biol 21:23–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Chen J, Wu S, Wen S, Shen L, Peng J, Yan C, Cao X, Zhou Y, Long C, Lin T, He D, Hua Y, Wei G (2015) The mechanism of environmental endocrine disruptors (DEHP) induces epigenetic transgenerational inheritance of cryptorchidism. PLoS One 10:e0126403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhu X, Cao W, Chang B, Zhang L, Qiao P, Li X, Si L, Niu Y, Song Y (2016) Polyacrylate/nanosilica causes pleural and pericardial effusion, and pulmonary fibrosis and granuloma in rats similar to those observed in exposed workers. Int J Nanomedicine 11:1593–1605

    Google Scholar 

  27. Diplas AI, Lambertini L, Lee MJ, Sperling R, Lee YL, Wetmur J, Chen J (2009) Differential expression of imprinted genes in normal and IUGR human placentas. Epigenetics 4:235–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Cleaton MA, Dent CL, Howard M, Corish JA, Gutteridge I, Sovio U, Gaccioli F, Takahashi N, Bauer SR, Charnock-Jones DS, Powell TL, Smith GC, Ferguson-Smith AC, Charalambous M (2016) Fetus-derived DLK1 is required for maternal metabolic adaptations to pregnancy and is associated with fetal growth restriction. Nat Genet 48:1473–1480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Dauber A, Cunha-Silva M, Macedo DB, Brito VN, Abreu AP, Roberts SA, Montenegro LR, Andrew M, Kirby A, Weirauch MT, Labilloy G, Bessa DS, Carroll RS, Jacobs DC, Chappell PE, Mendonca BB, Haig D, Kaiser UB, Latronico AC (2017) Paternally inherited DLK1 deletion associated with familial central precocious puberty. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 102:1557–1567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kameswaran V, Bramswig NC, McKenna LB, Penn M, Schug J, Hand NJ, Chen Y, Choi I, Vourekas A, Won KJ, Liu C, Vivek K, Naji A, Friedman JR, Kaestner KH (2014) Epigenetic regulation of the DLK1-MEG3 microRNA cluster in human type 2 diabetic islets. Cell Metab 19:135–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Bartolomei MS (2009) Genomic imprinting: employing and avoiding epigenetic processes. Genes Dev 23:2124–2133

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


This work was funded by the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province of China, grant No. BK20171025. This is a project funded by the Priority Academic Program Development of Jangsu Higher Education Institutions. The authors would like to thank all collaborators and colleagues involved in this project for useful discussions.

Availability of Data and Materials

The datasets used for analysis can be provided on a suitable request, by the corresponding author.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



BLY designed the experiment, carried out the molecular biologic studies, and drafted the manuscript. HZZ carried out the preparation and characterization of nanoparticles and drafted the manuscript. XW conceived of the study and participated in its design and coordination. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Beilei Yuan, Yong Pan or Juncheng Jiang.

Ethics declarations

Authors’ Information

Beilei Yuan and Xuan Wang are lecturers of Nanjing Tech University, and Yong Pan and Juncheng Jiang are professors of Nanjing Tech University.

Huazhong Zhang is a doctor of the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University.

Ethics Approval

All animal experiments were performed in accordance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and approved by the Nanjing Tech University Administration Office of Laboratory Animal.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Additional file

Additional file 1:

Table S1. List of 24 homologous imprinted genes. Table S2. List of primers used to test the expression of the 24 imprinted genes and the reference genes Gapdh and U6. (ZIP 22 kb)

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yuan, B., Zhang, H., Wang, X. et al. Effect of Nano-SiO2 on Expression and Aberrant Methylation of Imprinted Genes in Lung and Testis. Nanoscale Res Lett 13, 266 (2018).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • Nanoparticle
  • Lung
  • Testis
  • Methylation