Table 2 Parameter optimization by response surface methodology
No. | Factora | Dependent variablesb | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
X 1 | X 2 | X 3 | MD (nm) | EE (%) | |
1 | 360 | 180 | 50 | 224.7 | 56.26 |
2 | 480 | 120 | 50 | 217.9 | 67.53 |
3 | 480 | 180 | 40 | 239.5 | 63.82 |
4 | 600 | 60 | 50 | 229.3 | 60.24 |
5 | 600 | 180 | 50 | 226.8 | 68.61 |
6 | 480 | 120 | 50 | 220.3 | 70.42 |
7 | 480 | 60 | 60 | 218.6 | 61.47 |
8 | 480 | 120 | 50 | 228.7 | 66.25 |
9 | 360 | 120 | 40 | 233.3 | 58.35 |
10 | 480 | 120 | 50 | 216.4 | 67.52 |
11 | 360 | 120 | 60 | 223.3 | 57.26 |
12 | 480 | 180 | 60 | 215.7 | 67.25 |
13 | 480 | 60 | 40 | 233.2 | 63.86 |
14 | 600 | 120 | 40 | 230.8 | 67.25 |
15 | 360 | 60 | 50 | 218.9 | 57.82 |
16 | 600 | 120 | 60 | 234.6 | 67.74 |
17 | 480 | 120 | 50 | 225.1 | 71.28 |