Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Nano Express
  • Open Access

Facile fabrication of self-assembled ZnO nanowire network channels and its gate-controlled UV detection

Nanoscale Research Letters201813:413

https://doi.org/10.1186/s11671-018-2774-0

  • Received: 11 May 2018
  • Accepted: 24 October 2018
  • Published:

Abstract

We demonstrate a facile way to fabricate an array of gate-controllable UV sensors based on assembled zinc oxide nanowire (ZnO NW) network field-effect transistor (FET). This was realized by combining both molecular surface programmed patterning and selective NW assembly on the polar regions avoiding the nonpolar regions, followed by heat treatment at 300 °C to ensure stable contact between NWs. The ZnO NW network FET devices showed typical n-type characteristic with an on-off ratio of 105, transconductance around 47 nS, and mobility around 0.175 cm2 V− 1 s− 1. In addition, the devices showed photoresponsive behavior to UV light that can be controlled by the applied gate voltage. The photoresponsivity was found to be linearly proportional to the channel voltage Vds, showing maximum photoresponsivity at Vds = 7 V.

Keywords

  • Zinc oxide nanowires
  • Self-assembly
  • Heat treatment
  • Photodetectors

Background

One-dimensional nanomaterials are well known to have various advantages over other film-type or bulky materials due to their high specific surface area, well-oriented uniform crystal structures, and directed charge transport paths that enable high device performance and easy device fabrication [1, 2]. In particular, due to their unique dimensionality, semiconducting nanowires (NWs) have been utilized in diverse applications such as energy conversion, memory, optical devices, and sensors [39]. Among them, zinc oxide (ZnO) NWs have shown excellent semiconductor characteristics with large direct band gap of 3.37 eV and high exaction binding energy of 60 meV at room temperature [10]. Also, ZnO are known to be environmentally friendly, naturally abundant, and low-cost in production [11]. Hence, ZnO have been applied to a wide variety of fields including light-emitting diodes [12, 13], laser diodes [14], solar cells [1518], photodetectors [1923], transparent field-effect transistors [2426], generators [27, 28], and chemical sensors [29, 30]. Meanwhile, UV sensors based on ZnO NWs have been demonstrated [3133], but the devices were difficult to fabricate. These methods of fabricating ZnO NW network devices generally include electrode-deposited ZnO NW coating films followed by an etching process to define the channel. This method is difficult to control physical dimensions such as the adjustment of the ZnO channel width. To overcome these problems, a method of hydrothermal growth of ZnO NW on pre-patterned layers has been studied, but additional etching and/or hydrothermal growth processes are required. Currently proposed ZnO nanowire patterning methods such as laser-induced selective growth [34, 35] or hydrothermal growth of ZnO NWs with localized heaters [36] involve high-cost and high-temperature processes. There is also a case where a vertically grown ZnO nanowire array network is used to use aligned nanowire array networks with controllability of device properties [37], but this also requires a lot of effort to require vacuum equipment such as CVD and is not suitable for large area and low-cost production. Some low-temperature process with low-cost production based on microcontact printing [38] or inkjet printing was suggested [39], but the control of the NW density and corresponding device properties still remains as a challenge.

In this work, we demonstrate a highly reproducible and facile method to fabricate arrays of gate-controlled UV sensors based on ZnO NW network field-effect transistor (FET) by using self-assembly on molecularly patterned substrates and heat treatment. The ZnO NW network channels have a device yield of 90% with average resistance values of a few hundred kΩ. The post heat treatment is believed to have the effect of removing the residual organic solvents and enhancing the electrical contact between the NWs. The ZnO NW-based FET devices showed n-type properties with an on-off ratio of 105, transconductance around 47 nS, and mobility around 0.175 cm2 V−1 s−1. The physical properties can be controlled by changing the NW assembly conditions like molecular pattern, NW density in solution, pulling speed, and so on. Finally, we successfully realized arrays of ZnO UV sensors with controllable photoresponsivity and response time by the applied gate voltage. The negative gate voltage applied to the n-type FET minimized the initial current due to the depletion of the ZnO NW channel. Indeed, maximum photoresponsivity to UV light was found at gate voltage below − 55 V and the photoresponsivities were found to be proportional to the channel voltage Vds, showing maximum photoresponsivity at Vds = 7 V. In addition, the negative gate voltage facilitated the device recovery after UV light exposure. It should be noted that, although previous reports on ZnO NW network devices have been reported [34, 35], our ZnO NW devices have ZnO NW structures with controllable channel width and thickness without using any chemical or plasma etching process. This mild process combined with heat treatment below the ZnO recrystallization temperature (~ 400 °C) resulted in large-scale facile fabrication of gate-controlled UV sensors with high on-off ratio and photoresponsivity. We expect that our process and device performance will expedite the commercialization process of ZnO NW-based applications.

Methods

ZnO NW network FET fabrication

ZnO NWs of length 2~3 μm and diameter 200 nm were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, Inc., USA. The NWs were dispersed to 1 wt% concentration in dichlorobenzene (DCB) by sonication for 3 s. For preparing the molecularly patterned substrates, photoresist (AZ 5214E) was patterned on SiO2 (300-nm-thick SiO2 on 500-μm-thick p-doped Si wafer) substrate by typical photolithography method. Then, the substrate was dipped into 1:500 v/v octadecyltrichlorosilane (OTS) in hexane about 3 min [40]. During this process, a monolayer of OTS molecules was self-assembled on the surface of the exposed SiO2 region to create a non-polar OTS region. After OTS treatment, the substrate was immersed in acetone for 2 min to remove the region protected by photoresist, exposing the polar SiO2 regions on which the ZnO NWs are to be assembled. The self-assembled OTS monolayers have methyl-termination that makes it a non-polar region. On the other hand, the SiO2 surface works as a polar region from its hydroxyl groups (OH). For ZnO NW assembly, the substrate was dipped into the NW solution and pulled at a controlled pulling speed in the range 0.5~10 mm min−1. The ZnO NW solution was stirred with a magnetic bar during the pulling process at 100 rpm to prevent NW aggregation and precipitation. As the substrate was pulled, evaporation proceeded fastest near the air–suspension–substrate interface resulting in the selective adsorption of ZnO NWs on the polar SiO2 region due to van der Waals force, while avoiding the nonpolar OTS regions. After ZnO NW assembly on the substrate, electrodes (Ti/Al, 10/300 nm) were deposited by thermal deposition, followed by lift-off process.

Heat treatment process

The heat treatment was performed at 1 Torr pressure in Ar ambient inside a furnace. The temperature was raised to 110 °C during 3 min and kept constant for 10 min in order to evaporate any remaining solvents. Then, the temperature was raised to 300 °C during 3 min and kept constant for 10 min to improve the inter-NW interface and reduce the potential barriers and contact resistance between the NWs [41]. Afterwards, the sample was cooled down to room temperature during 1 h and then taken out from the furnace.

Measurement of the electrical and photoresponsive properties of ZnO NW network FETs

The electrical properties such as I–V characteristics and gate properties were measured using a probe station equipped with a semiconductor parameter analyzer (4200A-SCS, Keithley, USA). The source-drain voltage was scanned from 0 V to 7 V. The gate voltage was swept from − 60 V to + 60 V. From the gate-dependent I–V characteristics, we calculated the transconductance and mobility values [42, 43]. To avoid any ambient effects on the resistance of the NW channels, the temperature and relative humidity were kept constant at 23 ± 1 °C and 35 ± 1%, respectively, during the measurements. For UV photoresponse measurement, the source-drain voltage Vds was kept at 7 V. The UV source was a handheld UV lamp (Spectroline ENF-260C/FE, USA) with an excitation wavelength of 365 nm and power density of 350 μW cm−2.

Results and discussion

Figure 1 shows the schematic diagram describing the preparation of percolating ZnO NW network channels and subsequent heat treatment. First, an OTS-patterned substrate was dipped into ZnO NW suspension (1 wt% in dichlorobenzene) and pulled from ZnO NW suspension using a home-made pulling system at different pulling speeds of 0.5 mm min−1 to 10 mm min−1 (Additional file 1: Figure S1). During the pulling process, a liquid meniscus containing ZnO NWs was dragged against the OTS-patterned substrate. The ZnO NWs assembled exclusively on the exposed SiO2 channel regions. As shown in the inset of Fig. 2a, a total of 100 devices were fabricated on 4-in.-wafers using our fabrication method. Figure 2a shows the optical image of a percolating ZnO NW network channel, and the inset shows the FET device array. The average diameter of a ZnO NW was 200 nm, NW length was 2~3 μm, the channel length and width were 6 μm and 20 μm, respectively. After ZnO NW assembly, the source-drain electrodes were made by a conventional photolithography technique, thermal deposition of metal (10 nm Ti, 300 nm Al) and lift-off process.
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Schematic diagram of the fabrication procedure of ZnO NW network FET. Assembly of ZnO NWs on molecularly patterned substrates using pulling process

Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Channel formation and thickness control of ZnO NW network FET devices. a Magnified optical image of a 6 μm length NW network channel and Al electrodes. The inset is optical micrograph of 10 × 10 array devices with micro-patterned channels. b Scanning electron microscope (SEM) images showing the selective assembly of ZnO NWs to line patterns with diverse line widths of 5, 10, and 20 μm. c AFM image of ZnO NWs network. d Average distribution of height vs pulling speed at different pulling speed of 0.5~ 10 mm min−1. The inset shows the AFM height profile for different pulling speeds of 0.5, 2, 10 mm min−1

As shown in Fig. 2b, we were able to obtain ZnO NW patterns with diverse line widths of 5, 10, and 20 μm by changing the SiO2 region pattern size. The surrounding OTS regions are non-polar due to the methyl terminals of the OTS molecules. The NWs are thought to get adsorbed only on the polar SiO2 regions by van der Waals interaction [40]. The selective assembly of ZnO NWs was also confirmed with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) (see Additional file 1: Figure S2). Here, the Zn signals were confined to those regions with ZnO NWs.

The physical properties of percolating ZnO NW network channels such as thickness and density were controlled by modulating the substrate pulling speed from the NW solution during NW assembly. Figure 2c shows the AFM (atomic force microscopy) images of ZnO NW networks assembled at different pulling speeds of 0.5, 2, and 10 mm min−1. The average height profile vs pulling speed is shown in Fig. 2d. The NW density was 1.21 NW μm−2 at pulling speed 0.5 mm min−1, and 0.09 NW μm−2 at 10 mm min−1. The NW channel thickness increased by reducing the pulling speed. The height of the NW channel was usually about 1.5~2 times higher than single NW average diameter of 200 nm at the slowest speed rate 0.5 mm min−1 (Fig. 2d, inset). At pulling speed of 10 mm min−1, the network connection reached the percolation limit, beyond which the network showed no connection. Current methods of fabricating ZnO NW network devices generally involve electrode deposition ZnO NW-coated film, followed with some kind of etching process to define the channels [38, 39]. This method is difficult to control the physical dimensions such as adjustment of the ZnO channel width. To overcome these problems, a method using hydrothermal growth of ZnO NWs on pre-patterned layers has been studied [44, 45], but it requires also additional etching process and/or hydrothermal growing processes that take time and cost. In contrast, our method can easily control the width and length of a channel by previously patterning the channel with OTS molecules and then assembling the NWs through a pulling system.

The electrical properties can be also controlled by modulating the pulling speed. Figure 3 shows the electrical properties before heat treatment. Figure 3a shows the change of I–V characteristics with different pulling speeds. When the pulling speed was decreased from 2 to 0.5 mm min−1, the initial current increased from 5 to 50 nA at 1 V. This is presumably due to the increased network connectivity with increased NW density in the channel. The typical gate-dependent I–V characteristic curves of a ZnO NW FET fabricated at 2 mm min−1 pulling speed are shown in Fig. 3b, c. Figure 3b displays the I–V characteristics at different gate voltage Vg values (from − 60 V to 60 V in 20 V steps). The Ids-Vg gate characteristics in Fig. 3c show typical n-type characteristics with an increased on-off ratio by five orders of magnitude from the off current of 3 pA to 556 nA and decreased off-current when the pulling speed was increased from 0.5 to 2 mm min−1 (see Additional file 1: Figure S3). This increase of on-off ratio with decreased film density can be explained by noting that the channel is more affected by the electrical field from the back gate as we make the NW channel thinner [46]. Also, the pulling speed has an effect on the device yield and two-probe resistance frequency distribution (Additional file 1: Figure S4). The resistance shows the average value of 28.2 ± 4 MΩ and ~ 92% yield at 0.5 mm min−1. However, the distribution shifts to 877 ± 280 MΩ and ~ 78% yield at 2 mm min−1 pulling speed. Here, the yield is defined as the number fraction of devices with measurable resistance values above equipment noise.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3

Connectivity and electrical properties of ZnO NW network by control of pulling speed. a ZnO NWs network FET electrical properties of pulling speed 0.5 and 2 mm min−1. Typical current-voltage characteristics of devices fabricated at different pulling speeds of 0.5 and 2 mm min−1. The network channels showed Schottky contact from − 1 to 1 V. The insets are SEM images of network channel at 0.5 (top left) and 2 (bottom right) mm min−1. The scale bars are 10 μm for both cases. b Current-voltage characteristics of various back-gate voltage. Vg ranged from − 60 V to 60 V in 20 V steps. c Ids vs Vg relations of ZnO NWs network channel fabricated at various Vds. Vds ranged from 0 to 7 V in 1 V steps

Here, the gate characteristic of the FET does not have a clean saturation regime. According to previous reports, the ZnO NW network did not exhibit clean saturation regime, possibly due to the increased carrier scattering by complex NW network path, large surface area, and grain boundaries at NW junctions [47]. Our ZnO NW network forms a number of path between a source and drain. Also, ZnO NW network channel having a thickness up to about 0.4 μm (Fig. 2d). The non-uniform thickness of nanowire cause different distance to the gate for each nanowire, and the degree of modulation is slightly different. Therefore, the FET characteristic does not have a clean saturation regime like a single nanowire FET.

The electrical properties of as-produced devices can be enhanced by subsequent heat treatment process to improve the uniformity in electrical properties and further lower the contact resistance between the NWs [41]. The heat treatment was performed in low-pressure conditions at 300 °C for 10 min while flowing Ar gas at 100 sccm (see Additional file 1: Figure S5). Figure 4 shows the electrical property change of the samples fabricated at 2 mm min−1 pulling speed. After the heat treatment, the current at 1 V bias increased from 600 nA to 6.5 μA (Fig. 4a). The resistance frequency distribution in Fig. 4b shows a drop of the average resistance from 877 ± 280 MΩ to 207 ± 37 kΩ, about 3 order of magnitude. Also, the device yield increased from 78 to 90%, presumably due to the enhanced electrical contact between NWs. We focused on using the advantages of NW connection enhancement through heat treatment. For this reason, the temperature was not raised to more than 400 °C where ZnO recrystallizes. Such recrystallization has been reported to affect the oxygen desorption and adsorption characteristics at the ZnO surface during UV illumination [41]. Therefore, in order to obtain only the improvement of the connection between the NWs through the heat treatment, heat treatment was performed up to 300 °C to improve the interface between the NWs. This resulted in enhancing electrical stability and characteristics. We believe that our heat treatment process might remove the adsorbing molecules such as moisture or hexamethylenetetramine (HMTA), since our process temperature is higher than the melting point of HMTA (290 °C). This resulted in enhancing the NW FET performance because it improves the junction between the NWs and removes other adsorbing molecules that degrade the performance of the NWs such as moisture.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4

ZnO NWs network electrical properties after heat treatment. a Typical current-voltage characteristics before and after annealing of pulling speed 2 mm min−1. The network channels showed Schottky contact behavior. (inset) I–V characteristics before annealing, magnified. b Resistance frequency distribution of ZnO NWs network pulled at speed of 2 mm min−1. Average resistance decreased for about three orders. (c) I–V characteristics at different back-gate voltages. Vg ranged from − 60 V to 60 V in 20 V steps. d Electrical properties of Ids vs Vg after heat treatment. e Comparison of I/Ioff ratio at different Vg values, before and after heat treatment (Vg step = 5 V). f Improved transconductance by heat treatment

The typical Ids-Vds and Ids-Vg characteristic curves of a ZnO NW FET are shown in Fig. 4c, d. Figure 4e shows that Ids-Vg characteristic curves are similar before and after heat treatment, and the maximum Ion/Ioff ratio is ~ 2 × 105. This indicates that the heat treatment only improves the connection between the NWs to lower the resistance and does not cause a change in intrinsic electrical properties. Figure 4f shows the improvement of the transconductance dIds/dVg after heat treatment, which can be attributed to the enhanced electron mobility in the ZnO NW device. The maximum transconductance (gm = dIds/dVg) was extracted from the maximum slope of the Ids-Vg characteristics and the maximum on-off ratio at 7 V of Vds. (Additional file 1: Figure S6). The calculated maximum transconductance was ~ 47 nS at Vg = − 30 V. We used the formula μ = gm·L/(W·Cd·Vds) for the estimated mobility calculation [48]. The mobility was calculated to be 0.175 cm2 V−1 s−1. This is comparable to previously reported values of 0.018 cm2 V−1 s−1 using ZnO NWs device array [49].

Finally, we observed the UV photoresponse of the ZnO network FETs and its dependence on the gate voltage. Figure 5a shows the I–V characteristics with UV illumination at a different gate voltage (from − 60 V to 60 V, in 20 V steps). The Ids-Vg characteristics under UV illumination in Fig. 5b shows a decreased on-off ratio. The UV light had the effect of increasing the off-current of the n-type FET device by creating a photoexcited carrier. Figure 5c shows the difference of measured current for the UV light on and off condition. The UV photoresponsivity (Ilight/Idark: ratio of photocurrent to dark current) varies depending on the applied gate voltage and shows the maximum ratio value of 8.6 × 105 at Vg − 55 V or less. The inset of Fig. 5c shows Ids-Vg characteristics with and without UV illumination when Vds = 7 V (Vds-Ids characteristics show in Additional file 1: Figure S7). Figure 5d shows a linear relationship between the Ilight/Idark and the on-off current ratio (Ion/Ioff). The Ion/Ioff increase leads to the improvement of the UV photoresponsivity. To show the improvement with an increase of the current value Vds, we plot the data of Fig. 5d as an on-off value according to the current (inset). Then, the Vg = − 60 V and Vds = 7 V condition was the optimal condition where the Ilight/Idark ratio was maximum when comparing before and after UV illumination.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5

UV sensing characteristics of ZnO NW FETs. a I–V characteristics under UV illumination at different back-gate voltages. Vg ranged from − 60 V to 60 V in 20 V steps. b Electrical properties of Ids vs Vg under UV illumination. c Ilignt/Idark as a change of gate voltage. Maximum Ilignt/Idark was obtained around Vg ~ − 55 V. Inset, Ids-Vg characteristics under UV illumination and under darkness. d Linear relationship between photo/dark current ratio (Ilignt/Idark) and initial on-off current ratio (Ion/Ioff) of the ZnO NW FET. The inset shows the initial Ion/Ioff ratio for various Vds. The maximum Ion/Ioff ratio was at Vds = 7 V. e Photoresponse of ZnO NW network FET photodetector with and without UV illumination in the air. The inset shows exponential decay characteristics after the UV light off. f Time-resolved photoresponse of the ZnO NW network channel devices recorded by switching on and off the UV light

Ids-Vg characteristics under UV light showed that the transistor changed from a semiconducting state (Fig. 4c) to a conducting (accumulation) state (Fig. 5b). This change can be expected to increase the photoexcited carrier concentration to a degenerate level under UV light [50]. The Ilight/Idark ratios of our devices were about 2 × 104, 10 and 6, at gate voltages of − 60 V, 0 V, and 60 V, respectively (Fig. 5e). This shows that the UV photoresponsivity can be adjusted by the gate voltage. As Vg decreased, the photoresponsivity increased.

We compared the photoresponsivity performance of ZnO NW network-based photodetectors from other studies. For example, CVD grown ZnO nanowire arrays showed UV photoresponsivity (Ilight/Idark) of ~ 104 [33, 51]. In our case, we could achieve a similar photodetector responsivity of 2 × 104 without using any high temperature and/or high vacuum processes. Other studies using methods such as inkjet printing [47] or vertically aligned nanowires [52] showed photoresponsivity levels of 103 to 104, which are the comparable or slightly lower than our study (see Additional file 1: Figure S8). Furthermore, our research shows gate-controllable characteristics, which is advantageous in tuning the device sensitivity according to light conditions.

The UV response of ZnO NWs can be explained by depletion region modulation resulting from oxygen desorption and adsorption [53]. UV light causes desorption of the oxygen ions adsorbed on the ZnO NW surface. The oxygen desorption increases the effective channel thickness, resulting in increased current through the NWs. In addition, reduction of the desorption region due to oxygen desorption by UV light lowers the junction barrier height between the NWs, which makes the current flow drift more efficient [54, 55]. Because our devices exhibited n-type semiconducting behaviors, the dark current was minimized at large negative Vg. Therefore, the photoresponsivity at the large negative gate voltage was maximized (see Additional file 1: Figure S9).

In addition, the gate voltage affects the recovery time to the initial state when the UV light is turned off. The fall (decay) time when Vg = − 60 V and + 60 V are 52 s and 141 s, respectively, showing the difference by three times (inset, Fig. 5e). The time at which the current increases (rise time) or decreases (fall time) from 10% to 90% is defined as the recovery time. The electric field due to the gate bias affects the recombination possibility of electrons and holes in the absorption process of oxygen molecules which was desorbed by UV light [56, 57]. This is involved in the time to return to the initial state of the device. Therefore, the recovery time could be delayed or short depending on the electric field. Figure 5f shows the repetitive photoresponse by applying Vg = − 60 V. This shows the time-resolved photoresponse of the ZnO NW network channel devices recorded by switching on and off the UV light. We confirmed that no degradation of photoresponsivity occurs for repetitive UV responses.

Conclusions

We demonstrated an effective fabrication method of arrays of gate-controlled UV sensors using ZnO NW FETs. Our ZnO NW devices have ZnO NW structures with controllable channel width and thickness without using any chemical or plasma etching process, this mild process combined with heat treatment below the ZnO recrystallization temperature (~ 400 °C) resulted in large-scale facile fabrication of gate-controlled UV sensors with high on-off ratio and photoresponsivity with a device yield of 90%. The fabricated ZnO NWs network UV sensors show n-type gate properties with on-off ratio 105, transconductance around 47 nS, and mobility around 0.175 cm2 V−1 s−1. These electrical properties can be modulated by process parameters in the pulling method such as pulling speed. The electrical properties can be further enhanced with heat treatment method. The devices show high sensitivity to UV light, and the photoresponsivity and response time can be controlled by gate voltage. We expect that our process and device performance will expedite the commercialization process of ZnO NW-based applications.

Abbreviations

AFM: 

Atomic force microscopy

DCB: 

Dichlorobenzene

EDS: 

Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy

FET: 

Field-effect transistor

HMTA: 

Hexamethylenetetramine

NW: 

Nanowire

OTS: 

Octadecyltrichlorosilane

SEM: 

Scanning electron microscope

ZnO: 

Zinc oxide

Declarations

Funding

This project was supported by the Nano-Material Technology Development Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF), funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning (2016M3A7B4909581, 2018R1A1B2006640). JP acknowledges the financial support from the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy (MOTIE) and Korea Institute for Advancement of Technology (KIAT) through the International Cooperative R&D program (grant no. N0001819) and Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning (NRF-2017K1A3A1A19070288).

Availability of data and materials

All data supporting the conclusions of this article are included within the article.

Authors’ contributions

HC and DHL fabricated the sensor devices and performed SEM and EDS characterization. HC and JP performed the sensing experiments. JP performed ZnO NW heat treatment tests. BYL, HC, and HSK finalized the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Korea University, Seoul, 02841, South Korea
(2)
Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute, Daejeon, 34129, South Korea

References

  1. Sun H, Deng J, Qiu L, Fang X, Peng H (2015) Recent progress in solar cells based on one-dimensional nanomaterials. Energy Environ Sci 8:1139–1159View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Ding X, Qin C, Song J, Zhang J, Jiang X, Zhang Z (2017) The influence of hafnium doping on density of states in zinc oxide thin-film transistors deposited via atomic layer deposition. Nanoscale Res Lett 12:63View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Cao L, Fan P, Barnard ES, Brown AM, Brongersma ML (2010) Tuning the color of silicon nanostructures. Nano Lett 10:2649–2654View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Lee S-H, Jung Y, Agarwal R (2007) Highly scalable non-volatile and ultra-low-power phase-change nanowire memory. Nat Nanotechnol 2:626View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Wang X, Zhou J, Song J, Liu J, Xu N, Wang ZL (2006) Piezoelectric field effect transistor and nanoforce sensor based on a single ZnO nanowire. Nano Lett 6:2768–2772View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Zheng G, Patolsky F, Cui Y, Wang WU, Lieber CM (2005) Multiplexed electrical detection of cancer markers with nanowire sensor arrays. Nat Biotechnol 23:1294View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Sinha M, Mahapatra R, Mondal B, Maruyama T, Ghosh R (2016) Ultrafast and reversible gas-sensing properties of ZnO nanowire arrays grown by hydrothermal technique. J Phys Chem C 120:3019–3025View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Fang X, Hu L, Ye C, Zhan L (2010) One-dimensional inorganic semiconductor nanostructures: a new carrier for nanosensors. Pure Appl Chem 82:2185–2198View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Fang X, Hu L, Huo K, Gao B, Zhao L, Liao M, Chu P-K, Bando Y, Golberg D (2011) New ultraviolet photodetector based on individual Nb2O5 nanobelts. Adv Funct Mater 21:3907–3915View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Özgür Ü, Alivov YI, Liu C, Teke A, Reshchikov M, Doğan S, Avrutin V, Cho S-J, Morkoc H (2005) A comprehensive review of ZnO materials and devices. J Appl Phys 98:11View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Tayebee R, Ahmadi SJ, Rezaei Seresht E, Javadi F, Yasemi MA, Hosseinpour M, Maleki B (2012) Commercial zinc oxide: a facile, efficient, and eco-friendly catalyst for the one-pot three-component synthesis of multisubstituted 2-aminothiophenes via the Gewald reaction. Ind Eng Chem Res 51:14577–14582View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Bao J, Zimmler MA, Capasso F, Wang X, Ren Z (2006) Broadband ZnO single-nanowire light-emitting diode. Nano Lett 6:1719–1722View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Sun X, Huang J, Wang J, Xu Z (2008) A ZnO nanorod inorganic/organic heterostructure light-emitting diode emitting at 342 nm. Nano Lett 8:1219–1223View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Zhang XM, Lu MY, Zhang Y, Chen LJ, Wang ZL (2009) Fabrication of a high-brightness blue-light-emitting diode using a ZnO-nanowire array grown on p-GaN thin film. Adv Mater 21:2767–2770View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Huang J, Chu S, Kong J, Zhang L, Schwarz CM, Wang G, Chernyak L, Chen Z, Liu J (2013) ZnO p–n Homojunction random laser diode based on nitrogen-doped p-type nanowires. Adv Opt Mater 1:179–185View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Yin Z, Wu S, Zhou X, Huang X, Zhang Q, Boey F, Zhang H (2010) Electrochemical deposition of ZnO nanorods on transparent reduced graphene oxide electrodes for hybrid solar cells. Small 6:307–312View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Ko SH, Lee D, Kang HW, Nam KH, Yeo JY, Hong SJ, Grigoropoulos CP, Sung HJ (2011) Nanoforest of hydrothermally grown hierarchical ZnO nanowires for a high efficiency dye-sensitized solar cell. Nano Lett 11:666–671View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Bi D, Boschloo G, Schwarzmüller S, Yang L, Johansson EM, Hagfeldt A (2013) Efficient and stable CH 3 NH 3 PbI 3-sensitized ZnO nanorod array solid-state solar cells. Nanoscale 5:11686–11691View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Kind H, Yan H, Messer B, Law M, Yang P (2002) Nanowire ultraviolet photodetectors and optical switches. Adv Mater 14:158View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Liu X, Gu L, Zhang Q, Wu J, Long Y, Fan Z (2014) All-printable band-edge modulated ZnO nanowire photodetectors with ultra-high detectivity. Nat Commun 5:4007View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Zheng Z, Gan L, Li H, Ma Y, Bando Y, Golberg D, Zhai T (2015) A fully transparent and flexible ultraviolet–visible photodetector based on controlled electrospun ZnO-CdO heterojunction nanofiber arrays. Adv Funct Mater 25:5885–5894View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Paulowicz I, Postica V, Lupan O, Wolff N, Shree S, Cojocaru A, Deng M, Mishra Y-K, Tiginyaru I, Kienle L, Adelung R (2018) Zinc oxide nanotetrapods with four different arm morphologies for versatile nanosensors. Sens Actuator B-Chem 262:425–435View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Hu K, Teng F, Zheng L, Yu P, Zhang Z, Chen H, Fang X (2017) Binary response Se/ZnO p-n heterojunction UV photodetector with high on/off ratio and fast speed. Laser & Photon Rev 11:1600257View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Carcia P, McLean R, Reilly M, Nunes G Jr (2003) Transparent ZnO thin-film transistor fabricated by rf magnetron sputtering. Appl Phys Lett 82:1117–1119View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Cheng H-C, Chen C-F, Tsay C-Y (2007) Transparent ZnO thin film transistor fabricated by sol-gel and chemical bath deposition combination method. Appl Phys Lett 90:012113View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Frenzel H, Lajn A, von Wenckstern H, Lorenz M, Schein F, Zhang Z, Grundmann M (2010) Recent progress on ZnO-based metal-semiconductor field-effect transistors and their application in transparent integrated circuits. Adv Mater 22:5332–5349View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Chen C-Y, Huang J-H, Song J, Zhou Y, Lin L, Huang P-C, Zhang Y, Liu C-P, He J-H, Wang ZL (2011) Anisotropic outputs of a nanogenerator from oblique-aligned ZnO nanowire arrays. ACS Nano 5:6707–6713View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Xiao X, Yuan L, Zhong J, Ding T, Liu Y, Cai Z, Rong Y, Han H, Zhou J, Wang ZL (2011) High-strain sensors based on ZnO nanowire/polystyrene hybridized flexible films. Adv Mater 23:5440–5444View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Kang B, Ren F, Heo Y, Tien L, Norton D, Pearton S (2005) pH measurements with single ZnO nanorods integrated with a microchannel. Appl Phys Lett 86:112105View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Alenezi MR, Alzanki T, Almeshal A, Alshammari A, Beliatis M, Henley S, Silva S (2014) Hierarchically designed ZnO nanostructure based high performance gas sensors. RSC Adv 4:49521–49528View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Ning Y, Zhang Z, Teng F, Fang X (2018) Novel transparent and self-powered UV photodetector based on crossed ZnO Nanofiber Array Homojunction. Small 14:1703754View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Ouyang W, Feng T, Fang X (2018) High performance BiOCl nanosheets/TiO2 nanotube arrays heterojunction UV photodetector: the influences of self-induced inner electric fields in the BiOCl nanosheets. Adv Funct Mater 28:1707178View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Li Y, Paulsen A, Yamada I, Koide Y, Delaunay J-J (2010) Bascule nanobridges self-assembled with ZnO nanowires as double Schottky barrier UV switches. Nanotechnology 21:295502View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Yeo J, Hong S, Kim G, Lee H, Suh Y-D, Park I, Grigoropoulos C-P, Ko S-H (2015) Laser-induced hydrothermal growth of heterogeneous metal-oxide nanowire on flexible substrate by laser absorption layer design. ACS Nano 9:6059–6068View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Lee H, Manorotkul W, Lee J, Kwon J, Suh Y-D, Paeng D, Grigoropoulos C-P, Han S, Hong S, Yeo J, Ko S-H (2017) Nanowire-on-nanowire: all-nanowire electronics by on-demand selective integration of hierarchical heterogeneous nanowires. ACS Nano 11:12311–12317View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Lee H, Yeo J, Lee J, Cho H, Kwon J, Han S, Kim S, Hong S, Ko S-H (2017) Selective thermochemical growth of hierarchical ZnO nanowire branches on silver nanowire backbone percolation network heaters. J Phys Chem C 121:22542–22549View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Ko S-H, Park I, Pan H, Misra N, Rogers M-S, Grigoropoulos C-P, Pisano A-P (2008) ZnO nanowire network transistor fabrication on a polymer substrate by low-temperature, all-inorganic nanoparticle solution process. Appl Phys Lett 92:154102View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Kang H-W, Yeo J, Hwang J-O, Hong S, Lee P, Han S-Y, Lee J-H, Rho Y-S, Kim S-O, Ko S-H, Sung H-J (2011) Simple ZnO nanowires patterned growth by microcontact printing for high performance field emission device. J Phys Chem C 115:11435–11441View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Ko S-H, Lee D, Hotz N, Yeo J, Hong S, Nam K-H, Grigoropoulos C-P (2011) Digital selective growth of ZnO nanowire arrays from inkjet-printed nanoparticle seeds on a flexible substrate. Langmuir 28:4787–4792View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Lee D-J, Park J, Kim HS, Lee DH, Park M, Chang H, Jin J-H, Sohn J-R, Heo K, Lee BY (2015) Highly selective ppb-level detection of NH3 and NO2 gas using patterned porous channels of ITO nanoparticles. Sens Actuator B-Chem 216:482–487View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Kim K-P, Chang D, Lim SK, Lee S-K, Lyu H-K, Hwang D-K (2011) Thermal annealing effects on the dynamic photoresponse properties of Al-doped ZnO nanowires network. Curr Appl Phys 11:1311–1314View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Cao Q, Xia M, Kocabas C, Shim M, Rogers JA, Rotkin SV (2007) Gate capacitance coupling of singled-walled carbon nanotube thin-film transistors. Appl Phys Lett 90:023516View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Sangwan VK, Ortiz RP, Alaboson JM, Emery JD, Bedzyk MJ, Lauhon LJ, Marks TJ, Hersam MC (2012) Fundamental performance limits of carbon nanotube thin-film transistors achieved using hybrid molecular dielectrics. ACS Nano 6:7480–7488View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Nam CY, Stein A (2017) Extreme carrier depletion and superlinear photoconductivity in ultrathin parallel-aligned ZnO nanowire array photodetectors fabricated by infiltration synthesis. Adv Opt Mater 5:1700807View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Bao R, Wang C, Peng Z, Ma C, Dong L, Pan C (2017) Light-emission enhancement in a flexible and size-controllable ZnO nanowire/organic light-emitting diode array by the piezotronic effect. ACS Photonics 4:1344–1349View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Oh B-Y, Jeong M-C, Ham M-H, Myoung J-M (2007) Effects of the channel thickness on the structural and electrical characteristics of room-temperature fabricated ZnO thin-film transistors. Semicond Sci Technol 22:608View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Kwon J, Hong S, Lee H, Yeo J, Lee S, Ko S-H (2013) Direct selective growth of ZnO nanowire arrays from inkjet-printed zinc acetate precursor on a heated substrate. Nanoscale Res Lett 8:489View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Yan H, Chen Z, Zheng Y, Newman C, Quinn JR, Dötz F, Kastler M, Facchetti A (2009) A high-mobility electron-transporting polymer for printed transistors. Nature 457:679View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Cadafalch Gazquez G, Lei S, George A, Gullapalli H, Boukamp BA, Ajayan PM, ten Elshof JE (2016) Low-cost, large-area, facile, and rapid fabrication of aligned ZnO nanowire device arrays. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8:13466–13471View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Bergman J, Lundström T, Monemar B, Amano H, Akasaki I (1996) Photoluminescence related to the two-dimensional electron gas at a GaN/AlGaN heterointerface. Appl Phys Lett 69:3456–3458View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. He P, Feng S, Liu S, Li Q, Qi J, Zhan Z, Lia X, Lia Z, Shen J, Lu W (2015) Ultrafast UV response detectors based on multi-channel ZnO nanowire networks. RSC Adv 5:105288–105291View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Bai S, Wu W, Qin Y, Cui N, Bayerl DJ, Wang X (2011) High-performance integrated ZnO nanowire UV sensors on rigid and flexible substrates. Adv Funct Mater 21:4464–4469View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Alenezi MR, Henley SJ, Silva S (2015) On-chip fabrication of high performance nanostructured ZnO UV detectors. Sci Rep 5:8516View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. Liu F, Shimotani H, Shang H, Kanagasekaran T, Zólyomi V, Drummond N, Fal’ko VI, Tanigaki K (2014) High-sensitivity photodetectors based on multilayer GaTe flakes. ACS Nano 8:752–760View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. Campos LC, Guimarães MH, Goncalves A-MB, de Oliveira S, Lacerda RG (2013) ZnO UV photodetector with controllable quality factor and photosensitivity. AIP Adv 3:022104View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  56. Kim W, Chu KS (2009) ZnO nanowire field-effect transistor as a UV photodetector; optimization for maximum sensitivity. Phys Status Solidi A 206:179–182View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  57. Zhou J, Gu Y, Hu Y, Mai W, Yeh P-H, Bao G, Sood AK, Polla DL, Wang ZL (2009) Gigantic enhancement in response and reset time of ZnO UV nanosensor by utilizing Schottky contact and surface functionalization. Appl Phys Lett 94:191103View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2018

Advertisement