 Nano Express
 Open Access
 Published:
Coding Anisotropic Metasurface with Integrated Broadband Tunable Radiation and LowScattering Performance
Nanoscale Research Letters volume 14, Article number: 113 (2019)
Abstract
In this paper, we propose a coding electromagnetic metasurface (EMMS) with integrated broadband tunable radiation and lowscattering performance. Anisotropic elements demonstrating opposite phases under x and ypolarized incidence are investigated and coded as “0” and “1” basic elements. These elements are then arranged in an optimized layout using a simulated annealing algorithm to perform the EMMS. By this means, diffusion scattering is realized in a broadband. Meanwhile, when “0” and “1” are fed properly, the coding EMMS displays wideband linearly or circularly polarized radiation with symmetric profiles. Simulated and experimental results verify that our method offers a simple and ingenious way to integrate broadband radiation and low scattering into one singlecoding EMMS.
Background
Electromagnetic (EM) metasurfaces (EMMSs), artificially constructed by periodic or quasiperiodic subwavelength particles, are denoted as a surface version of threedimensional metamaterials [1, 2]. By virtue of compact structures, low profile, good conformal shape, low cost, and easy fabrication, the EMMSs have been extensively investigated and engineered to manipulate EM waves [3,4,5,6,7,8,9], such as polarization, amplitude, and phase.
Especially, anisotropic EMMSs are more ready to achieve a number of interesting characteristics not possible with isotropic ones in some occasions. For polarization engineering, by employing anisotropic particles to construct reflective or transmissive polarization conversion EMMSs, one can almost realize arbitrary polarizations from one specific polarization, such as linear polarization to linear polarization [10,11,12,13], linear polarization to circular polarization [14,15,16], circular polarization to circular polarization [17, 18], and so on. Circularly polarized antennas, polarizationcontrolling devices, and radar cross section reduction (RCSR) can be further accomplished based on polarization manipulation. Absorption is a common fashion for amplitude manipulation. Through changing relative gap orientations or neighboring center offsets of multilayered anisotropic splitring resonators [19,20,21], one can tune the nearfield interactions between them. By this means, low reflection and transmission can be simultaneously obtained to achieve perfect absorption. As for phase manipulation, by delicately designing the geometry of subwavelength particles of the EMMS, phase discontinuities imparted across the reflected or transmitted surface can be achieved. Thus, many fascinating EM devices, such as metasurface lens [22, 23], metasurface holograms [24, 25], invisible cloaking [6], spinorbit manipulation [26, 27], and some other functional interfaces [28,29,30,31], can be then realized.
Recently, coding EMMSs have gained intensive attention as another paradigm for manipulating EM wave propagation [32,33,34,35]. The “coded bits” are represented by constitutive particles with different phase responses. Take 1bit EMMS as an example, coded “0” and “1” elements are mimicked by constitutive structures with 0° and 180° phase shift, respectively. Through a certain spatial mixture of these coded elements, 2bit, 3bit, and multibit EMMSs can be subsequently accomplished [36,37,38]. With multifunction and tunability demands of EM devices, switchable components and fieldprogrammable gate array hardware are included in coding EMMS design. Hence, reconfigurable [39] and programmable [40] EMMSs are then obtained. Based on the aforementioned “coding” concept, 0bit EMMS, consisting of only one kind of anisotropic elements, can be used to achieve polarization conversion [39], while multibit EMMSs coded by optimization algorithms can be used to manipulate diffusion scattering performance, thus achieving RCSR [39].
Obviously, abovementioned EMMS designs mainly devote to investigate scattering performance for incoming EM wave. Actually, if fed appropriately, the EMMSs themselves can act as antennas to radiate EM wave [41,42,43,44,45,46]. Furthermore, to the best of the authors’ knowledge, the “coding” concepts mainly focus on scattering evaluation, but not included in radiation performance. In this paper, the proposed EMMS involves broadband radiation and lowscattering performance simultaneously. The EMMS is composed of anisotropic elements, which possesses opposite phases under x and ypolarized incidence. These anisotropic elements are coded as “0” and “1” and then arranged in a certain sequence optimized by the simulated annealing algorithm (SAA). Based on the antenna array theory [47], appropriate feeding structures are added to coding “0” and “1” elements to realize desired radiation performance. If “0” and “1” elements are fed with the same amplitude and phase, linearly polarized (LP) radiation can be achieved. While if “0” and “1” elements are fed with the same amplitude but with 90° phase difference, left or righthand circular polarization (L/RHCP) radiation can be achieved. Meanwhile, the optimized layout of EMMS results in broadband diffusion scattering performance for incoming EM wave, which is to the advantage of bistatic RCSR. Both simulation and measurement prove that our method offers a simple, flexible, and ingenious strategy for EMMS design with integrated broadband radiation and low scattering performance.
Methods
Figure 1 depicts the detailed geometry of the coding EMMS and the constitutive anisotropic elements. Two FR2 dielectric layers (dielectric constant of 2.65, loss tangent of 0.002) are employed as substrates, denoted as substrate1 and substrate2. The two dielectric layers are tightly and flatly stacked together without any air space between them. The thicknesses of the substrates from top to bottom are 3 mm and 0.5 mm, respectively. 4 × 4 bowtieshaped metallic patches are etched on the top surface of substrate1 measuring 36 × 36 mm^{2} (equal to 0.66λ_{0} × 0.66λ_{0} at 5.5 GHz). The metallic ground plate with a slot as thin as possible (length of 15.5 mm, width of 0.2 mm) is etched on the bottom surface of substrate2 to ensure absolute reflection. Apparently, the EM properties of such anisotropic element lie in its physical arrangement. Based on the “coding” concept, the anisotropic element shown in Fig. 1b is nominated as “1” , while its counterpart (90°rotation around zaxis) is denoted as “0”. The layout of finally proposed EMMS is optimized by SAA, which is a method for local searching. Figure 1d shows the flow chart of the SAA for achieving the optimal coding matrix. It begins with an initial solution which is randomly modified in an iterative process. The main parameters of SAA involve the initial temperature T, the decreasing rate α of each iteration process, the final temperature Tf, the number of iterations I, and the merit function. In our model, we define an initial coding matrix with equal number of “0” and “1”. It is then upgraded by changing positions of an arbitrary pair of “0”and “1”. The parameters T, α, Tf, and I are set as 100, 0.9, 0, and 1000, respectively. For low RCS performance, good diffusion scattering is expected. Thus, our goal is to find the optimal coding matrix (M_{best}) leading to a desired scattering pattern with the smallest maximum value. Thus, the issue is a minmax problem in which the merit function can be expressed as F(M_{best}) = min(AF_{max}), where AF_{max} is the maximum value of AF corresponding to a given coding matrix. The optimal coding matrix corresponds to the minimum AF_{max}, which would lead to a perfect diffusion scattering performance. Generally, the bigger the array size is, the better diffusion scattering we obtain. Here, we choose an array consisting of 4 × 4 elements (M = N = 4). Finally, the optimal coding matrix is shown in Fig. 1a. All simulations in the following analysis unless otherwise stated are carried out with aid of the commercial simulation software Ansoft HFSS v.14.0.
For the radiation case, lumped port excitation and radiation boundary are applied on the anisotropic element. A 50Ω SMA is connected to the extremely thin rectangular patch (length of 13 mm, width of 1.3 mm) through a small hole in substrate2 for impedance matching. The slot in the metallic ground then takes effect by coupling energy to the top anisotropic EMMS to radiate LP EM wave. The reflection coefficient S_{11} and radiation patterns are plotted in Fig. 2. As clearly observed, the bandwidth for − 10 dB impedance matching is achieved from 5 GHz to 6 GHz, implying a relative bandwidth of 18.2%. A stable boresight gain varying from 6.97 dBi to 7.86 dBi is obtained over the impedance bandwidth. Meanwhile, a normal and symmetric radiation profiles are observed in broadside direction for both xoz (E) and yoz (H) planes, as clearly shown in Fig. 2b–d.
To give a physical insight into the working mechanism, the modal surface current of the anisotropic element at 5.35 GHz and 5.75 GHz is plotted in Fig. 3a and b. Note that the simulations performed in this section were carried out by using FEKO 7.0. As clearly shown, the surface current of mode 1 and mode 2 mainly distributes on the middle patches which may result in broadside radiation, while that of unwanted mode 3 and mode 4 mainly distributes on the edge patches, which may result in radiation nulls in the broadside. Furthermore, the surface current of mode 1 and mode 3 flows along the yaxis, while that of mode 2 and mode 4 flows along the xaxis. Besides, the calculated modal significances of the first four characteristic modes of the anisotropic element with and without metasurface are illustrated in Fig. 4a and b. We can tell from Fig. 4b that when the metasurface is applied on the element, mode 1 and mode 2 are resonant at 5.32 GHz and 5.72 GHz in the desired operation band, with either of their modal significances approaching unity. Thus, mode 1 and mode 2 are the fundamental orthogonal mode pairs to generate the wideband and broadside radiation patterns.
For the scattering case, floquet port excitation and master/slave boundaries are implemented on the anisotropic element to exploit the reflection characteristics. As plotted in Fig. 5, only one 0° reflection phase point arises at 9.38 GHz for “1” element, while dual 0° reflection phase points appear at 4.75 GHz and 17.52 GHz for “0” element. Thus, an effective reflection phase difference is created between “0” and “1” elements, as indicated in the dark grey part in Fig. 5a. Meanwhile, the reflection magnitudes shown in Fig. 5b maintain close to 1 in 2~18 GHz for both elements. It is worth noting that a hollow zone for reflection magnitude response is observed around the working band (5~6 GHz) of “0” element. This is attributed that part of the copolarized energy is absorbed by the feeding structure. Still and all, energy cancellation [47] can be well obtained in a broadband. Consequently, broadband RCSR can be expected.
Results and Discussion
In some sense, the scattering process can be understood by transforming EM wave reflection to reradiation process. Therefore, for an M × N EMMS array, the working principle for both radiation and scattering cases can be interpreted by the standard array theory [47]:
where EP is the pattern function of a single element, AF is the array factor, k is the wavenumber, Δx and Δy are the distance between adjacent elements along x and ydirections, respectively, ϕ(m, n) is the phase of the (m, n) element, and θ and φ are the elevation and azimuth angle of an incidence. For simplicity, the subscripts of E_{rtotal} and E_{stotal} in the following analysis indicate cases of radiation and scattering, respectively.
For the radiation case, all anisotropic elements act as radiators when fed appropriately. Naturally, the “0” and “1” elements would produce two orthogonally polarized electric fields, namely EP_{'0'} ⊥ EP_{'1'}. Then, the polarization of radiated EM wave from EMMS depends on the amplitude and phase of the feed sources. Assuming that the input power of each element is equal, one would have EP_{'0'} = EP_{'1'}. ϕ(m, n) would represent the input phase from feed sources. Hence, along the normal direction with (θ, φ) = (0^{∘}, 0^{∘}), Eq. (1) would be simplified as \( {E}_{\mathrm{rtotal}}=8\left({\mathrm{EP}}_{\hbox{'}0\hbox{'}}{e}^{j{\phi}_{\hbox{'}0\hbox{'}}}+{\mathrm{EP}}_{\hbox{'}1\hbox{'}}{e}^{j{\phi}_{\hbox{'}1\hbox{'}}}\right) \) for the proposed EMMS. If ϕ_{'0'} − ϕ_{'1'} = 0^{°}or ± 180^{°}, the total radiation would be LP within the diagonal planes. If ϕ_{'0'} is 90°ahead of ϕ_{'1'}, the total radiated field would be RHCP. Otherwise, if ϕ_{'0'} falls 90°behind ϕ_{'1'}, LHCP radiation would be generated. To summarize, the polarization of radiated field from the EMMS can be adjusted at will by controlling input phases of “0” and “1” elements.
For briefness of the paper, only two representative cases are involved in the following analysis. All “0” and “1” elements are fed with equal power in both cases. On one hand, in terms of ϕ_{'0'} = ϕ_{'1'} = 0^{°}, LP radiation performances are obtained as depicted in Fig. 6. Good impedance matching is achieved from 4.97 GHz to 6.05 GHz (19.6% relative bandwidth), while the gain in normal direction varies from 12.6 dBi to 17.38 dBi in the operation band. Symmetrical radiation patterns are observed in the broadside direction for both E and Hplanes, as clearly shown in Fig. 6b. On the other hand, when ϕ_{'1'} − ϕ_{'0'} = 90^{°}, RHCP radiation is observed as expected. As shown in Fig. 7, the bandwidth for S_{11} < − 10 dB and 3 dB axial ratio bandwidth (ARBW) is 4.97~6 GHz and 5.22~6 GHz, respectively. The common bandwidth for S_{11} < − 10 dB and 3 dB ARBW is from 5.22 GHz to 6 GHz (13.9% relative bandwidth), with boresight gain varying from 13.16 dBi to 15.8 dBi. Likewise, symmetric, broadside, and normal radiation profiles are observed in the 3D radiation patterns at 5.35, 5.5, and 5.75 GHz.
From the aforementioned analysis, it can be verified that the proposed EMMS can perform as a good antenna and radiate in linear polarization and circular polarization modes alternatively by controlling the input magnitudes and phases. Meanwhile, the simulated results indicate that the working bandwidth of proposed EMMS maintains well compared with a single anisotropic element, which verifies the effectiveness of our proposed method. To get an intuitive insight into the working mechanisms of the EMMS for different radiation modes, the electric field distributions at 5.35 GHz with different time variants are investigated. It is clearly shown in Fig. 8a that the resonant Efield distributes evenly across “0” and “1” elements all along as time changes for LP radiation. However, for CP radiation, “1” elements exhibit stronger field density at the phase of 0°, while “0” elements prevail over “1” ones at the phase of 90°. Thus, two orthogonal modes with a 0°or 90° phase difference are excited to perform LP or CP radiation.
For the scattering case, all of “0” and “1” elements act as passive devices. The aperiodic layout of “0” and “1” elements optimized by SAA aims at achieving diffusion scattering performance. Here, for Eq. (1), ϕ(m, n) represents the phase compensation of reflected wave from the (m, n) element. In terms of our proposed design, ϕ(m, n) evaluates 0°and 180°in correspondence to “0” and “1” elements, respectively. In order to give an intuitive demonstration of the lowscattering property of proposed EMMS, the simulated RCS result versus frequency is demonstrated compared with a samesized metallic board. As clearly shown in Fig. 9, obvious reflection suppression is achieved in a broadband ranging from 5 GHz to 18 GHz. A continuous 6dB RCSR is achieved nearly from 5 GHz to 18 GHz (113.04% relative bandwidth). Two RCS hollow dips appear around 5.9 GHz and 10.4 GHz with a maximum RCSR reaching up to 31.8 dB. One can tell from Fig. 9e that the scattering field of the EMMS splits into eight main small beams, which is in adequate agreement with the result obtained by the mathematical calculation in Fig. 9c. Compared with traditional chessboard configuration (four main reflected lobes), more reflected lobes contribute to each beam significantly suppressed based on energy conservation. Fig. 9f reveals the working mechanism of the EMMS. It can be observed that different elements resonate discrepantly, which yields the necessary discontinuous phase shift and finally results in diffusion reflection. The scattering properties of EMMS under oblique incidence were also investigated as shown in Fig. 10. Likewise, instead of strong specular reflection for a samesized metal board, diffusion scattering is consecutively observed for EMMS with different incident angles. Meanwhile, as shown in Fig. 11, the normalized scattering patterns at 6 GHz with incident angles from 0° to 60° are also provided to give an intuitive demonstration of diffusion reflection. To conclude, the proposed EMMS demonstrates diffusion scattering performance in a broadband as expected.
To validate the radiation and scattering performance mentioned above, a 4 × 4 coding EMMS sample was fabricated using standard printed circuit board (PCB) technology. The measurement was conducted in an anechoic chamber to minimize the noise interference. For the radiation case, one RS2W2080S and two RS8W2080S power dividers are connected in sequence to equally distribute the signal into 16 ports, while coaxial cables with different lengths are utilized to provide 90°phase shifting between “0” and “1” elements, as shown in Fig. 12. The measured bandwidths for S_{11} ≤ − 10 dB and 3 dB ARBW shown in Fig. 13a are 4.96~6.02 GHz and 5.22~6.02 GHz, respectively. The common bandwidth is from 5.22 GHz to 6.02 GHz (14.2% relative bandwidth), which is in satisfactory accordance with the simulated results. The normalized radiation patterns at 5.35 GHz and 5.75 GHz are depicted in Fig. 13b and c. Corresponding to the prediction of simulation, symmetric, normaldirected, and RHCP radiation is observed in broadside direction. The measured side lobe levels are at least 10 dB lower than the main lobe levels. In addition, the fields of RHCP are always stronger than that of LHCP by over 18.6 dB in the boresight direction. Thus, it can be concluded that the EMMS achieves good RHCP radiation performance as expected.
For the scattering case, the EMMS sample was placed vertically on the center of a foam platform, while two identical LP pyramidal horn antennas working at 1~18 GHz were placed adjacently as transmitter and receiver, respectively. A piece of absorbing material is set between the two horns to reduce undesired coupling. The centers of the sample and two horns are in the same height, and the distance between them is far enough to satisfy farfield test conditions. Gatereflectline calibration was also employed to further eliminate undesirable signals in the environment. The two horn antennas are connected to the two ports of VNA Agilent N5230C to evaluate reflected power on transmission coefficients. As plotted in Fig. 13d, a considerable 6dB RCSR compared with a samesized metal board is achieved from 5 GHz to 18 GHz (113% relative bandwidth), while over 10dB RCSR is achieved in the band of 5.6~6.5 GHz (14.9% relative bandwidth), 9.2~13.5 GHz (37.9% relative bandwidth) and 15.9~18 GHz (12.4% relative bandwidth). Two RCSR peaks appear around 6.1 GHz and 10.2 GHz valuing 25.9 dB and 30.6 dB, respectively. The measured results agree well with the simulated ones, which verify broadband lowscattering performance of the EMMS.
Comparisons between the proposed design and former metasurfacebased antenna design have been made in Table 1. In particular, [42, 45] demonstrate the performance of antenna array, while others of the single antenna. As clearly shown, the proposed EMMS yields an ultrawideband RCSR involving inband and outofband while achieving broadband tunable radiation simultaneously.
Conclusions
This paper presents a novel coding EMMS with integrated broadband tunable radiation and lowscattering performance. An anisotropic element with intrinsically opposite phases under different polarized incidence is adopted as the constituent element. Appropriate feeding structures enable the anisotropic element to act as radiator. By controlling the input amplitudes and phases based on antenna array theory, LP, LHCP, or RHCP radiation can be achieved at will. In addition, the optimized layout of EMMS contributes to broadband diffusion scattering performance, which results RCSR in a broadband. Thus, broadband radiation and lowscattering performance can be simultaneously achieved in the proposed EMMS, which offers a simple, flexible, and effective strategy to solve the confliction between radiation and scattering. It is worth mentioning that the EMMS could be made up of other alternative anisotropic elements. Some application value can be expected in polarization reconfigurable antennas, target stealth, and so on.
Abbreviations
 ARBW:

Axial ratio bandwidth
 EM:

Electromagnetic
 EMMS:

Electromagnetic metasurfaces
 L/RHCP:

Left or righthand circular polarization
 LP:

Linearly polarized
 PCB:

Printed circuit board
 RCSR:

Radar cross section reduction
 SAA:

Simulated annealing algorithm
References
 1.
Kuester EF, Mohamed MA, PiketMay M, Holloway CL (2003) Averaged transition conditions for electromagnetic fields at a metafilm. IEEE Trans Antenn Propag AP51:2641–2651
 2.
Yu N, Capasso F (2014) Flat optics with designer metasurfaces. Nat Mater 13:139–150
 3.
Chen HT, Padilla WJ, Zide JMO, Gossard AC, Taylor AJ, Averitt RD (2006) Active terahertz metamaterial devices. Nature 444:597–600
 4.
Pendry JB, Schurig D, Smith DR (2006) Controlling electromagnetic fields. Science 312:1780–1782
 5.
Highstrete C, Lee M, Padilla W (2007) Complementary planar terahertz metamaterials. Opt Express 15:1084–1095
 6.
Schurig D, Mock JJ, Justice BJ, Cummer SA, Pendry JB, Starr AF, Smith DR (2006) Metamaterial electromagnetic cloak at microwave frequencies. Science 314:977–980
 7.
Alù A, Salandrino A, Engheta N (2006) Negative effective permeability and lefthanded materials at optical frequencies. Opt Express 14:1557–1567
 8.
He XY, Xiao GN, Liu F, Lin FT, Shi WZ (2019) Flexible properties of THz graphene bowtie metamaterials structures. Opt Mater Express 9:44–55
 9.
He XY, Liu F, Lin FT, Shi WZ (2018) Graphene patterns supported terahertz tunable plasmon induced transparency. Opt Express 26:9931–9944
 10.
Sun HY, Gu CQ, Chen XL, Li Z, Liu LL, Martin F (2017) Ultrawideband and broadangle linear polarization conversion metasurface. J Appl Phys 121:1304–1404
 11.
Gao X, Han X, Cao WP, Li HO, Ma HF, Cui TJ (2015) Ultrawideband and highefficiency linear polarization converter based on double vshaped metasurface. IEEE Trans Antenn Propag 63:3522–3530
 12.
Jia Y, Liu Y, Zhang W, Gong S (2016) Ultrawideband and highefficiency polarization rotator based on metasurface. Appl Phys Lett 109:051901
 13.
Chen HY, Ma H, Wang J, Yuan H, Pang Y, Xu C (2016) Ultrawideband transparent 90° polarization conversion metasurfaces. Appl Phys A 122:463
 14.
Mutlu M, Akosman AE, Serebryannikov AE, Ozbay E (2011) Asymmetric chiral metamaterial circular polarizer based on four Ushaped split ring resonators. Opt Lett 36:1653–1655
 15.
Ma X, Huang C, Pu M, Hu C, Feng Q, Luo X (2012) Multiband circular polarizer using planar spiral metamaterial structure. Opt Express 20:16050–16,058
 16.
Orr R, Goussetis G, Fusco V, Saenz E (2015) Lineartocircular polarization reflector with transmission band. IEEE Trans Antenn Propag 63:1949–1956
 17.
Huang XJ, Yang D, Yang HL (2014) Multipleband reflective polarization converter using Ushaped metamaterial. J Appl Phys 115:103505
 18.
Han JF, Cao XY, Gao J, Wei J, Zhao Y, Li SJ, Zhang Z (2018) Broadband radar cross section reduction using dualcircular polarization diffusion metasurface. IEEE Antennas Wirel Propag Lett 17:969–973
 19.
Ji L, Varadan V (2017) Gap orientation tuning in split ring resonator array for increased energy absorption. J Appl Phys 121:244504
 20.
Powell DA, Lapine M, Gorkunov MV, Shadrivov IV, Kivshar YS (2010) Metamaterial tuning by manipulation of nearfield interaction. Phys Review B 82:155128
 21.
Gu S, Barrett JP, Hand TH, Popa BI, Cummer SA (2010) A broadband lowreflection metamaterial absorber. J Appl Phys 108:064913
 22.
Wei ZY, Cao Y, Su XP, Gong ZJ, Long Y, Li HQ (2013) Highly efficient beam steering with a transparent metasurface. Opt Express 21:10739–10,745
 23.
Ni XJ, Emani NK, Kildishev AV, Boltasseva A, Shalaev VM (2012) Broadband light bending with plasmonic nanoantennas. Science 335:427
 24.
Lin J, Genevet P, Kats MA, Antoniou N, Capasso F (2013) Nanostructured holograms for broadband manipulation of vector beams. Nano Lett 13:4269–4274
 25.
Zheng J, Ye ZC, Sun NL, Zhang R, Sheng ZM, Shieh HPD, Zhang J (2014) Highly anisotropic metasurface: a polarized beam splitter and hologram. Sci Rep 4:6491
 26.
Wang S, Wang XK, Kan Q, Ye JS, Feng SF, Sun WF, Han P, Qu SL, Zhang Y (2015) Spinselected focusing and imaging based on metasurface lens. Opt Express 23:26434–26,441
 27.
Yin XB, Ye ZL, Rho J, Wang Y, Zhang X (2013) Photonic spin hall effect at metasurface. Science 339:1405–1407
 28.
Yang F, Deng RY, Xu SH, Li MK (2018) Design and experiment of a nearzerothickness highgain transmitreflectarray antenna using anisotropic metasurface. IEEE Trans Antenn Propag 66:2853–2861
 29.
Cai T, Wang GM, Fu XL, Liang JG, Zhuang YQ (2018) Highefficiency metasurface with polarizationdependent transmission and reflection properties for both reflectarray and transmitarray. IEEE Trans Antenn Propag 66:3219–3224
 30.
He XY, Liu F, Lin FT, Xiao GN, Shi WZ (2019) Tunable MoS_{2} modified hybrid surface plasmon waveguides. Nanotechnology 30:125201
 31.
Shi CYY, He XY, Peng J, Xiao GN, Zhang H (2019) Tunable terahertz hybrid graphenemetal patterns metamaterials. Optics and Laser Technology 114:28–34
 32.
Giovampaola CD, Engheta N (2014) Digital metamaterials. Nat Mater 13:1115–1121
 33.
Cui TJ, Qi MQ, Wan X, Zhao J, Cheng Q (2014) Coding metamaterials, digital metamaterials and programmable metamaterials. Light: Sci Appl 3:e218
 34.
Liu S, Cheng Q, Xu Q, Wang TQ, Du LL, Luan K, Xu YH, Bao D, Fu XJ, Han JG, Zhang WL, Cui TJ (2016) Freestanding metasurfaces for highefficiency transmitarrays for controlling terahertz waves. Adv Opt Mater 4:384
 35.
Liu S, Cui TJ, Xu Q, Bao D, Du L, Wan X, Tang WX, Ouyang C, Zhou XY, Yuan H, Ma HF, Jiang WX, Han J, Zhang W, Cheng Q (2016) Anisotropic coding metamaterials and their powerful manipulation of differently polarized terahertz waves. Light: Sci. Appl 5:e16076
 36.
Yan X, Liang L, Yang J, Liu W, Ding X, Xu D, Zhang Y, Cui T, Yao J (2015) Broadband, wideangle, low scattering terahertz wave by a flexible 2bit coding metasurface. Opt Express 23:29128–29,137
 37.
Sui S, Ma H, Wang JF, Feng MD, Pang YQ, Xia S, Xu Z, Qu SB (2016) Symmetrybased coding method and synthesis topology optimization design of ultrawideband polarization conversion metasurfaces. Appl Phys Lett 109:014104
 38.
Chen K, Feng Y, Yang Z, Cui L, Zhao J, Zhu B, Jiang T (2016) Geometric phase coded metasurface: from polarization dependent directive electromagnetic wave scattering to diffusionlike scattering. Sci Rep 6:35968
 39.
Zhao Y, Cao X, Gao J, Liu X, Li S (2016) Jigsaw puzzle metasurface for multiple functions: polarization conversion, anomalous reflection and diffusion. Opt Express 24:11208–11,217
 40.
Yang HH, Cao XY, Yang F, Gao J, Xu SH, Li MK, Chen XB, Zhao Y, Zheng YJ, Li SJ (2016) A programmable metasurface with dynamic polarization, scattering and focusing control. Sci Rep 6:35692
 41.
Liu W, Chen ZN, Qing XM, Shi J, Lin FH (2017) Miniaturized wideband metasurface antennas. IEEE Trans Antenn Propag 65:7345–7349
 42.
Son XT, Ikmo P (2017) Compact wideband circularly polarized patch antenna array using metasurface. IEEE Antennas Wirel Propag Lett 16:1932–1936
 43.
Jia YT, Liu Y, Wang H, Li K, Gong SX (2015) Low RCS, highgain and wideband mushroom antenna. IEEE Antennas Wirel Propag Lett 14:277–280
 44.
Kandasamy K, Majumder B, Mukherjee J, Ray KP (2015) LowRCS and polarizationreconfigurable antenna using crossslotbased metasurface. IEEE Antennas Wirel Propag Lett 14:1638–1641
 45.
Zhao Y, Cao XY, Gao J, Xu LM, Liu X, Cong LL (2017) Broadband lowRCS circularpolarized array using metasurfacebased element. IEEE Antennas Wirel Propag Lett 6:1836–1839
 46.
Cong LL, Cao XY, Gao J, Song T (2018) Ultrawideband lowRCS circularlypolarized metasurfacebased array antenna using tightlycoupled anisotropic element. IEEE Access 6:41738–41,744
 47.
Paquay M, Iriate JC, Ederra I, Gonzalo R, de Maagt P (2007) Thin AMC structure for radar crosssection reduction. IEEE Trans Antenn Propag 55:3630–3638
Funding
This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 61671464, 61471389, 61701523, 61801508); Natural Science Foundation of Shannxi Province (Grant No. 2018JM6040).
Availability of Data and Materials
All data are fully available without restriction.
Author Details
^{1}Air Force Engineering University, Xi’an 710077, China
Author information
Author notes
Affiliations
Contributions
LLC and XYC conceived the idea, did the simulations, interpreted the experiments, and wrote the manuscript. HHY and JG suggested the numerical simulations. TS contributed to the sample fabrication and measurement. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Correspondence to Li Li Cong or Xiang Yu Cao.
Ethics declarations
Competing Interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Received
Accepted
Published
DOI
Keywords
 Coding metasurface
 Diffusion
 Radar cross section
 Polarization reconfigurable
 Array antenna