Skip to main content

Dependence of Electronic and Optical Properties of MoS2 Multilayers on the Interlayer Coupling and Van Hove Singularity


In this paper, the structural, electronic, and optical properties of MoS2 multilayers are investigated by employing the first-principles method. Up to six-layers of MoS2 have been comparatively studied. The covalency and ionicity in the MoS2 monolayer are shown to be stronger than those in the bulk. As the layer number is increased to two or above two, band splitting is significant due to the interlayer coupling. We found that long plateaus emerged in the imaginary parts of the dielectric function \( {\varepsilon}_2^{xx}\left(\omega \right) \) and the joint density of states (JDOS) of MoS2 multilayers, due to the Van Hove singularities in a two-dimensional material. One, two and three small steps appear at the thresholds of both the long plateau of \( {\varepsilon}_2^{xx}\left(\omega \right) \) and JDOS, for monolayer, bilayer, and trilayer, respectively. As the number of layers further increased, the number of small steps increases and the width of the small steps decreases accordingly. Due to interlayer coupling, the longest plateau and shortest plateau of JDOS are from the monolayer and bulk, respectively.


Molybdenum disulfide (MoS2) is one of the typical transition metal dichalcogenides and has been widely used as a catalyst [1] and hydrogen storage material [2, 3]. Owing to the strong in-plane interactions and weak van der Waals interactions between MoS2 atomic layers [4, 5], MoS2 crystals have been known as an important solid lubricant for many years [6, 7]. The monolayer MoS2, so-called 1H-MoS2, has been exfoliated from bulk MoS2 by using micromechanical cleavage [8]. The so-called 2H-MoS2 (among 1T, 2H, 3R) is the most stable structure of bulk MoS2 [9, 10] and is a semiconductor with an indirect bandgap of 1.29 eV [4, 11, 12]. The monolayer MoS2 has also drawn great attention due to its two-dimensional nature and graphene-like honeycomb structure. It is interesting that monolayer MoS2 has a direct bandgap of 1.90 eV [4, 13] which can be used as a conductive channel of field-effect transistors [14]. On the other hand, the zero band gap of graphene restricts its applications in optics and transistor application [15,16,17,18]. Moreover, the theoretical and experimental works show that the electronic bandgap decreases as the number of MoS2 layers is increased [19,20,21,22]. Interlayer coupling of multilayer MoS2 is sensitive to layer thickness [21]. Some investigations on the multilayer MoS2 are available [19,20,21,22,23,24,25]; however, the electronic structures and optical properties of multilayer MoS2 are still not well-established, especially for the layer-dependent physical properties related to the interlayer coupling. Van Hove singularity (VHS) plays an important role in optical properties [26, 27] . The only available critical points in two-dimensional materials are those of the P0 (P2) and P1 type, which show as a step and a logarithmic singularity [26, 27]. In this paper, we analyze the electronic and optical properties of MoS2 related to Van Hove singularity, layer by layer and up to six atomic layers.

Nowadays, first-principles calculations have been successfully performed to study the structural, electronic, and optical properties of a wide variety of materials. In this work, we have systematically studied the electronic and optical properties of monolayer, multilayer and bulk MoS2 by using ab initio calculations. Discussions on the optical properties are emphasized. Our results show that, for E||x, the imaginary parts of the dielectric function \( {\varepsilon}_2^{xx}\left(\omega \right) \) possess long plateaus. At these thresholds of these plateaus, \( {\varepsilon}_2^{xx}\left(\omega \right) \) of the monolayer, bilayer, and trilayer exhibit one, two, and three small steps, respectively. The imaginary part of the dielectric function is also analyzed by the joint density of states and the transition matrix elements. JDOS combined with the band structures and the Van Hove singularities are discussed in detail.


The present calculations have been performed by using the Vienna ab initio simulation package (VASP) [28, 29], which is based on the density functional theory, the plane-wave basis and the projector augmented wave (PAW) representation [30]. The exchange-correlation potential is treated within the generalized gradient approximation (GGA) in the form of Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof (PBE) functional [31]. In order to consider the weak interlayer attractions in this layered crystal, PBE-D2 calculations [32] which include the semi-empirical van der Waals correction have been performed. In order to obtain more accurate band gaps, the Heyd-Scuseria-Ernzerhof hybrid functional (HSE06) [33,34,35,36] calculations are also performed in this work. The wave-functions of all the calculated systems are expanded in plane waves, with a kinetic energy cutoff of 500 eV. Brillouin zone (BZ) integrations are calculated by using a special k-point sampling of the Monkhorst-Pack scheme [37], with a 45 × 45 × 1 Γ-centered grid for the monolayer and multilayer MoS2 and 45 × 45 × 11 grid for the bulk MoS2 for PBE-D2 calculations. For HSE06 calculations, a 9 × 9 × 1 Γ-centered grid is used for the monolayer and multilayer MoS2. For the monolayer and multilayer MoS2, all the calculations are modeled by a supercell with a vacuum space of 35 Å in the Z-direction to avoid the interactions between adjacent MoS2 slabs. All the atomic configurations are fully relaxed until the Hellmann-Feynman forces on all the atoms are smaller than 0.01 eV/Å. Our spin-polarized calculations show that the band structures of MoS2 multilayers are rather insensitive to the spin-polarized effect (see Additional file 1: Figure S1); therefore, all the calculation results presented are based on the non-spin-polarization scheme.

Excitonic effects in monolayer MoS2 are found to be significant and have been observed by photoluminescence. We have employed the quasi-particle G0W0 method [38], and the Bethe-Salpeter equation (BSE) [39, 40] to account for the excitonic effects. The band gaps of monolayer MoS2 are calculated to be 2.32 and 2.27 eV for the k-point meshes of 15 × 15 × 1 and 24 × 24 × 1 Γ-centered grid, obtained by the G0W0 with SOC calculations. The imaginary parts of the dielectric function are shown in Fig. 1, calculated from both the G0W0 and the G0W0 + BSE methods. Two exciton peaks at 1.84 and 1.99 eV are found, which agrees well with experimental observations [4, 41]. Although the G0W0+BSE scheme could describe the excitonic effects better, in this paper, we present only the results (without excitonic peaks) under the GGA-PBE functional.

Fig. 1

The imaginary parts of the dielectric function for monolayer MoS2, by using the G0W0 and G0W0+BSE methods, respectively. The experimental absorption spectrum for MoS2 is extracted from Ref. [4]

Results and Discussion

Electronic Structures of MoS2 Multilayers

Crystalline MoS2 occurs naturally and has three crystalline types: 1T, 2H, and 3R, which corresponds to crystals with trigonal, hexagonal, and rhombohedral primitive unit cells, respectively [9]. 2H-MoS2 is known as the most stable structure [10]; therefore, we consider only the 2H type of bulk MoS2 in this work. Bulk 2H-MoS2 has a hexagonal-layered structure consisting of layers of molybdenum atoms surrounded by six sulfur atoms, with S-Mo-S sheets piled up oppositely (showed in Fig. 2). The neighboring sheets in bulk 2H-MoS2 are weakly connected with weak van der Waals interactions. A monolayer MoS2 can then be easily exfoliated from the bulk. The lattice constants of bulk MoS2 are calculated to be a = b = 3.19Å, c = 12.41 Å, which are consistent with the reported values of a = b = 3.18 Å, c = 13.83 Å [18]. The optimized lattice constants for monolayer MoS2 are a = b = 3.19 Å, which are in accord with the bulk MoS2. As shown in Table 1, the calculated lattice constants in the a, b directions are the same for different number of layers of MoS2. It was also reported by Kumar et al. [19] that the lattice constants (a, b) of monolayer MoS2 are nearly identical to the bulk.

Fig. 2

a Top view and b side view of bulk-MoS2. c Side view of monolayer, bilayer, trilayer, as well as four-, five-, and six-layered structures of MoS2. A unit cell is shown in b. Purple and yellow balls represent Mo and S atoms, respectively

Table 1 Geometrical parameters, band gaps and the static dielectric constants for bulk and multilayer MoS2. Eg1, Eg2, Eg3, and Eg4 are the band gaps calculated by our PBE-D2 method, by our HSE06 method, by the GGA-PW91 method, and from the experimental data, respectively

Figure 3 depicts the calculated band structures and electronic density of states (DOS) of different number of layers of MoS2. Results for monolayer, bilayer, trilayer, and four-layer as well as bulk MoS2 are given in Fig. 3, while results for five-layer and six-layer MoS2 are very similar to those of four-layer and bulk. For monolayer MoS2, both the valence band maximum (VBM) and the conduction band minimum (CBM) appear at K-point of the BZ, exhibiting a direct bandgap of 1.64 eV. For bilayer and trilayer MoS2, both the VBM locates at Γ point while both the CBM lies at K point, causing indirect gaps of 1.17 and 1.08 eV, respectively. However, as the number of MoS2 layers increases to four and above four, all the multilayers MoS2 show same characters that the VBM locates at Γ point while the CBM lies between Γ and K points, which is the same as in the bulk. Indirect band gaps are 1.03 eV, 1.01 eV, 0.99 eV, 0.93 eV for four-, five-, six-layer MoS2, and bulk, respectively. Both the PBE-D2 and HSE06 calculations (Table 1) show that the fundamental band gap increases monotonically when the number of MoS2 layers decreases, which is due to a large confinement of electrons in the slab [4, 5, 19, 42]. Moreover, when the bulk MoS2 slab is lessened to a single-layer, it turns into a direct bandgap semiconductor, as mentioned previously, the bulk MoS2 is an indirect gap semiconductor. In Fig. 3a, band structures plot of bulk MoS2 show splitting of bands (as compared to those of monolayer MoS2), mainly around the -point, owing to interlayer coupling [16]. Band structures for two-layers (2L) and more than 2L MoS2 exhibit similar splitting of bands owing again to the interlayer coupling. However, splitting of bands in the bulk is somewhat more significant than those in the multilayers MoS2, indicating a (slightly) stronger interlayer coupling in the bulk than in the multilayers. On the other hand, splitting of bands in the vicinity of point K in BZ is very small. The electronic states at point K for the highest occupied band are mainly composed of dxy and \( {d}_{x^2-{y}^2} \) orbitals of Mo atoms, as well as small parts of (px, py)-orbitals of S atoms (shown in Fig. 4b). The Mo atoms are situated in the middle layer of S-Mo-S sheet, which causes a negligible interlayer coupling at K point (since the nearest atoms between MoS2 layers are S and S). As shown in Fig. 4, stronger interlayer coupling at point Γ can be found when compared with that at point K, since electronic states at point Γ for the highest occupied band are dominated by \( {d}_{z^2} \) orbitals of Mo atoms and pz orbitals of S atoms. Therefore, S-S coupling (interlayer coupling) is clearly stronger at point Γ than that at point K. Our results are consistent with other theoretical work [21]. Generally speaking, the electronic density of states of few-layer MoS2 are similar to those of bulk MoS2 (see Fig. 3), since bulk MoS2 is actually a layered material with weak interactions between the MoS2 layers.

Fig. 3

Calculated band structures and density of states of a monolayer (full lines) and bulk (dash lines), b bilayer, c trilayer, and d four-layer MoS2. In a, the highest occupied bands for bulk and monolayer at point K are set to the same energy. Conduction band minimum of bulk is at point B0

Fig. 4

The charge distributions of the highest occupied band at a point and b point K for bulk MoS2. The isosurface value is set to be 0.004 e/Å3

To deeply explore the bonding nature in the monolayer MoS2, the deformation charge density is shown in Fig. 5a. The deformation charge density is given by Δρ1(r) = ρ(r) − ∑μρatom(r − Rμ) where ρ(r) is the total charge density and ∑μρatom(r − Ru) stands for the superposition of independent atomic charge densities. The results demonstrate that the bonding in the MoS2 monolayer is characterized by clear covalent (solid contours lines in between the Mo-S atoms), as well as strong ionic interactions (represented by alternating areas of dashed and solid contours). To see the bonding strength in the monolayer MoS2 as compared to those in the bulk, the charge density differences between monolayer and bulk MoS2, Δρ2(r), is also presented in Fig. 5b. The charge density difference is defined as Δρ2(r) = ρ1L(r) − ρbulk(r), where ρ1L(r) and ρbulk(r) are the total charge densities of monolayer and bulk MoS2, respectively. Figure 5b indicates a stronger electronic binding in the monolayer case than those in the bulk, which is reflected by the larger charge accumulation (solid contours lines) in between the Mo-S atoms in the monolayer, as well as by stronger ionic bonding in the monolayer MoS2 since the alternating areas of dashed and solid contours in the Fig. 5b are more significant than those in the bulk. Moreover, the charge differences plot (Fig. 5b) indicates that Mo atom of monolayer lost more electrons than Mo atom in the bulk; therefore, the ionicity of monolayer is stronger than bulk. However, it should be pointed out that the order of magnitude of the charge differences in the Fig. 5b are fairly small (the contour interval in the Fig. 5b is only 2.5 × 10−4 e/Å3). Judge from the quantum confinement effect, again, the intra-layer interaction of monolayer should be stronger than bulk. Hence, the bandgap of the monolayer (1.64 eV) is expected to be larger than bulk (0.93 eV). Quantum confinement decreases with the increasing layer number [4, 42], which enhances interlayer coupling and reduce intra-layer interaction. Thus, the band gap of MoS2 decreases with the increase of interlayer coupling. The interlayer charge density redistributions for bilayer MoS2, Δρ3(r), are also presented in Fig. 5c. The Δρ3(r) is given by Δρ3(r) = ρ2L(r) − ρlayer1(r) − ρlayer2(r), where ρ2L(r), ρlayer1(r), ρlayer2(r) are the charge densities of the bilayer MoS2, the first layer of bilayer MoS2 and the second layer of bilayer MoS2, respectively. The charge densities of layer1 and layer2 of bilayer MoS2 are calculated by using the corresponding structure in bilayer MoS2. Charge transfer from MoS2 layers (bilayer) to the intermediate region between the MoS2 layers are clearly seen in Fig. 5c, shown as solid contour lines. The ionic interactions between atomic layers in bilayer MoS2 are also clear, as seen from the alternating areas of dashed and solid contours. Again, the order of magnitude of interlayer charge densities, Δρ3(r), are very small (the contour interval is only 2.5 × 10-4 e/Å3). Generally, the inter-layer charge density redistributions in 2L, 3L, …, bulk MoS2 systems are all very similar.

Fig. 5

a Deformation charge density, Δρ1(r) = ρ(r) − ∑μρatom(r − Rμ), in the monolayer MoS2. b Differences between the charge densities of monolayer and the corresponding layer of bulk. c The interlayer charge density redistribution of bilayer MoS2. Contour interval of a is 2.5 × 10−2 e/Å3, while both those of b and c are 2.5 × 10−4 e/Å3. Solid orange and dashed blue lines correspond to Δρ > 0 and Δρ < 0, respectively

Optical Properties of MoS2 Multilayers

Once the ground state electronic structures of a material are obtained, the optical properties can then be investigated. The imaginary part of the dielectric function \( {\varepsilon}_2^{\alpha \beta}\left(\omega \right) \) is determined by the following equation [43]:

$$ {\displaystyle \begin{array}{c}{\varepsilon}_2^{\alpha \beta}\left(\omega \right)=\frac{4{\pi}^2{e}^2}{\Omega}{\lim}_{q\to 0}\frac{1}{q^2}\underset{c,v,k}{\Sigma}2{w}_k\delta \left({E}_{ck}-{E}_{vk}-\mathrm{\hslash}\omega \right)\\ {}\times \left\langle {u}_{ck+{e}_{\alpha }q}|{u}_{vk}\right\rangle \left\langle {u}_{ck+{e}_{\beta }q}|{u}_{vk}\right\rangle \ast \end{array}} $$

where the indices α and β denote Cartesian directions, c and v refer to conduction and valence bands, Eck and Evk are the energies of conduction bands and valence bands, respectively. The Kramers-Kronig inversion can be applied to acquire the real part of the dielectric function \( {\varepsilon}_1^{\alpha \beta}\left(\omega \right) \) determined by the imaginary part \( {\varepsilon}_2^{\alpha \beta}\left(\omega \right) \):

$$ {\varepsilon}_1^{\alpha \beta}\left(\omega \right)=1+\frac{2}{\pi }P{\int}_0^{\infty}\frac{\varepsilon_2^{\alpha \beta}\left(\omega \hbox{'}\right)\omega \hbox{'}}{\omega {\hbox{'}}^2-{\omega}^2+ i\eta} d\omega \hbox{'} $$

in which P represents the principal value. Since MoS2 has a uniaxial structure, εxx(ω) is then identical to εyy(ω). In this work, we need only discuss the electric vector which is parallel the x-y plane, i.e., E||x is parallel to the MoS2 x-y plane.

For investigating detailed optical spectra of MoS2 system, the absorption coefficient α(ω) and the reflectivity R(ω) were calculated by the real part ε1(ω) and the imaginary part of the dielectric function. Equations of parameters mentioned are presented below:

$$ \alpha \left(\omega \right)=\sqrt{2}\frac{\omega }{c}\sqrt{\sqrt{\varepsilon_1^2\left(\omega \right)+{\varepsilon}_2^2\left(\omega \right)}-{\varepsilon}_1\left(\omega \right)} $$
$$ R\left(\omega \right)={\left|\frac{\sqrt{\varepsilon_1\left(\omega \right)+i{\varepsilon}_2\left(\omega \right)}-1}{\sqrt{\varepsilon_1\left(\omega \right)+i{\varepsilon}_2\left(\omega \right)}+1}\right|}^2 $$

If the matrix element \( \left\langle {u}_{ck+{e}_{\alpha }q}|{u}_{vk}\right\rangle \) varies very slowly as k-vector, the term \( \left\langle {u}_{ck+{e}_{\alpha }q}|{u}_{vk}\right\rangle \left\langle {u}_{ck+{e}_{\beta }q}|{u}_{vk}\right\rangle \ast \) in Eq. (1) can be taken outside the summation. In Eq. (1), most of the dispersion in \( {\varepsilon}_2^{\alpha \beta}\left(\omega \right) \) is due to the summation over the delta function δ(Eck − Evk − ω). This summation can be transformed into an integration over energy by defining a joint density of states (JDOS) [25, 44],

$$ {J}_{cv}\left(\omega \right)=\frac{1}{4{\pi}^3}\int \frac{dS_k}{\nabla_k\left({E}_{ck}-{E}_{vk}\right)} $$

in which ω equals Eck − Evk, Sk represents the constant energy surface denoted by Eck − Evk = ω = const. The joint density of states Jcv(ω) is associated with the transitions from the valence bands to the conduction bands, and the large peaks in Jcv(ω) will originate in the spectrum where k(Eck − Evk) ≈ 0. Points in k-space where k(Eck − Evk) = 0 are called critical points or van Hove singularities (VHS), and Eck − Evk are called critical point energies [26, 27]. The critical points kEck = kEvk = 0 usually occur only at high-symmetry points, while critical points kEck = kEvk ≠ 0 may occur at any general points in the Brillouin zone [27, 45]. In the two-dimensional case, there are three types of critical points, i.e., P0 (minimum point), P1 (saddle point), and P2 (maximum point). At the points P0 or P2, a step function singularity occurred in JDOS, while at the saddle point P1, JDOS was described by a logarithmic singularity [27]. In more detail, the Ec(kx, ky) − Ev(kx, ky) can be expanded in a Taylor series about the critical point. Limiting the expansion to quadratic terms, with the linear term does not occur due to property of the singularity, we then have

$$ {E}_c\left({k}_x,{k}_y\right)-{E}_v\left({k}_x,{k}_y\right)={E}_0+\frac{\mathrm{\hslash}}{2}\left({b}_x\frac{k_x^2}{m_x}+{b}_y\frac{k_y^2}{m_y}\right) $$

Therefore, three types of critical points emerge. For P0, (bx > 0, by > 0), for P1, (bx > 0, by < 0) or (bx < 0, by > 0), and for P2, (bx < 0, by < 0). In this paper, for the case of MoS2 multilayers, only the P0 critical point is involved.

Figure 6a gives the imaginary parts of dielectric function, \( {\varepsilon}_2^{xx}\left(\omega \right) \), of MoS2 multilayers for E||x. We found an interesting phenomenon that the imaginary parts of dielectric function \( {\varepsilon}_2^{xx}\left(\omega \right) \) possess plateaus, and the plateaus of different layers of MoS2 are nearly equal in the range of 1.75 eV~2.19 eV. From the threshold energy up to 1.75 eV, \( {\varepsilon}_2^{xx}\left(\omega \right) \) are quite different for different multilayers of MoS2. The threshold and ending energies of the plateaus in different layers are different, especially, the energy range of \( {\varepsilon}_2^{xx}\left(\omega \right) \) plateau of the monolayer is significantly broader than those of other multilayers. The threshold energy of monolayer MoS2 dielectric function is equal to its direct bandgap of 1.64 eV. However, the threshold energy of bilayer dielectric function is not the indirect bandgap of 1.17 eV but the minimum of direct energy gap of 1.62 eV between the valence and conduction bands. This is because that we study only the transitions between valence and conduction bands with the same electron wave vector, which are classified as direct optical transitions [36, 47]. As the number of MoS2 layers increased to 4, we found that \( {\varepsilon}_2^{xx}\left(\omega \right) \) of multilayer MoS2 systems were almost indistinguishable from bulk. Hence, we discuss here in details only the plateaus of the monolayer, bilayer, and trilayer, as well as bulk MoS2. The \( {\varepsilon}_2^{xx}\left(\omega \right) \) plateaus of monolayer, bilayer, trilayer, and bulk MoS2 ended at 2.57 eV, 2.28 eV, 2.21 eV, and 2.19 eV, respectively. To explain this more precisely, JDOS of monolayer, bilayer, trilayer, and bulk MoS2 are shown in Fig. 7. From Fig. 7, the plateaus are also shown to be in the JDOS. The plateaus of monolayer, bilayer, and trilayer JDOS ended at 2.57 eV, 2.28 eV, 2.21 eV, respectively, which are exactly the same as those in their \( {\varepsilon}_2^{xx}\left(\omega \right) \). For bulk MoS2, the plateau of JDOS ended at 2.09 eV, which is slightly smaller than 2.19 eV in the dielectric function \( {\varepsilon}_2^{xx}\left(\omega \right) \).

Fig. 6

a The imaginary parts of the dielectric function, b the real parts of the dielectric function, c the absorption coefficients, and d the reflectivity spectra, for different number of MoS2 layers. The inset in c also shows the experimental data [46]

Fig. 7

Joint density of states for the monolayer, bilayer, trilayer, and bulk MoS2

To analyze accurately the electronic transitions and for a detailed analysis of the dielectric function \( {\varepsilon}_2^{xx}\left(\omega \right) \), the direct energy gaps, ΔE(NC − NV), between conduction and valence bands of monolayer, bilayer, trilayer, and bulk MoS2 are presented in Fig. 8. The notations NC and NV represent the ordinal numbers of conduction and valence bands. Hence, NC = 1, 2, and 3 signify the lowest, the second lowest, and the third lowest unoccupied band of material. On the other hand, NV = 9, 18, and 27 (which is dependent on the number of electrons in the unit cell) signify the highest occupied band of monolayer, bilayer, and trilayer MoS2, respectively. For monolayer, in the region of 0 ~ 2.57 eV, the electronic transitions are found to be contributed only from the highest occupied band NV = 9 to the lowest unoccupied band NC = 1. From Fig. 8a, a minimum appears at high symmetry point K and the threshold of JDOS (Fig. 7a) appears at 1.64 eV which is actually the direct bandgap of the monolayer MoS2. In the vicinity of high symmetry point K, the curve of ΔE(NC = 1 − NV = 9) is similar to a parabola for monolayer MoS2. Therefore, k(Eck − Evk) = 0 at K point, which means a critical point at high symmetry point K. In a two-dimensional structure, this critical point belongs to P0 type singularity [27], and therefore it leads to a step in the JDOS. Thus, the threshold energy of the JDOS plateau is found at critical point energy 1.64 eV. The ending energy of the JDOS plateau is near 2.57 eV, which is resulted from the appearance of two P0 type singularities at point B1 (k = (0.00, 0.16, 0.00)) and point B2 (k = (− 0.10, 0.20, 0.00)). The slopes of the ΔE(NC = 1 − NV = 9) curve near the two critical points B1 and B2 are very small, which give rise to a rapid increase in JDOS (see Eq.(5)). Main critical points for these long plateaus of JDOS are listed in Table 2, including type, location, transition bands, and the direct energy gap ΔE(NC − NV). Furthermore, we found that kEck = kEvk = 0 happened at high symmetry point K where the slopes of the valence and conduction bands are horizontal. While kEck = kEvk ≠ 0 happened at points B1 and B2, which means that slopes of two bands are parallel. Simultaneously, analysis on the band structures and direct energy gaps (see Fig. 8a) for the monolayer show that, when the direct energy gap ΔE is below 2.65 eV, only the transitions between NV = 9 and NC = 1 contribute to JDOS; when the ΔE is larger than 2.65 eV, the transitions of NV = 9 to NC = 2 also begin to contribute to JDOS; while when the ΔE reaches above 2.86 eV, the NV = 9 to NC = 3 transitions have effect on JDOS. It should be pointed out that for energy larger than 2.65 eV, many bands in Fig. 8a will contribute to JDOS. JDOS of monolayer MoS2 exhibits a plateau in the range of 1.64 ~ 2.57 eV and the variation of the expression |Mvc|2/ω2 is found to be small in this range. According to Eqs. (1) and (5), the imaginary part of the dielectric function \( {\varepsilon}_2^{xx}\left(\omega \right) \) is mainly decided by the JDOS and the transition matrix elements, this gives a similar plateau for the imaginary part of dielectric function \( {\varepsilon}_2^{xx}\left(\omega \right) \) as compared to JDOS.

Fig. 8

Direct energy gaps, ΔE(NC − NV), between conduction and valence bands for the a monolayer, b bilayer, c trilayer, and d bulk MoS2. ad There are three, six, twelve, and six critical points in interband transitions for the monolayer, bilayer, trilayer, and bulk MoS2, respectively

Table 2 Main critical points in interband transitions below 3 eV. For the meaning of the parameters in the table, please refer to Fig. 3 and Fig. 8

For bilayer MoS2, in the region of 0 ~ 2.28 eV (the endpoint of JDOS plateau), the electronic transitions are contributed to NV = 17, 18 to NC = 1, 2. The minimum energy in ΔE(NC − NV) is situated at the K point with a gap of 1.62 eV. In Fig. 8b, similar to monolayer MoS2, bilayer MoS2 holds two parabolic curves going upward (which come from ΔE(NC = 1 − NV = 18) and ΔE(NC = 2 − NV = 18)) at K point. Therefore, there are two P0 type singularities (k(Eck − Evk) = 0) at K point, causing a step in the JDOS. The critical point energies are both 1.62 eV, this is because that the conduction bands (NC = 1 and NC = 2) are degenerate at point K (as shown in Fig. 3b), which results in the same direct energy gap between transitions of NV = 18 to NC = 1 and NV = 18 to NC = 2. From Fig. 8b, as the direct energy gap is increased to 1.69 eV, two new parabolas (which come from ΔE(NC = 1 − NV = 17) and ΔE(NC = 2 − NV = 17)) appear and two new singularities emerge again at K point in the direct energy gap graph, leading to a new step in JDOS for bilayer MoS2 (see Fig. 7b). As a result, the JDOS of the bilayer MoS2 has two steps around the threshold of long plateau (see inset in Fig. 7b). Two parabolas (in Fig. 8b) contribute to the first step and four parabolas contribute to the second step in JDOS. It means that the value of the second step is roughly the double of the first one. As the ΔE reaches to 2.28eV, two new singularities appear at Γ point (where interband transitions come from Γ(NV = 18→NC = 1) and Γ(NV = 18→NC = 2)), which have great contribution to the JDOS and bring the end to the plateau. Our calculations demonstrate that kEck = kEvk = 0 are satisfied not only at high symmetry point K, but also at high symmetry point Γ. Similar to the case of monolayer, we found that the term of |Mvc|2/ω2 is a slowly varying function in the energy range of bilayer JDOS plateau; hence, \( {\varepsilon}_2^{xx}\left(\omega \right) \) of bilayer have a similar plateau in the energy range.

For trilayer MoS2, in the region of 0 ~ 2.21 eV, the JDOS are contributed from electronic transitions of NV = 25, 26, and 27 to NC = 1, 2, and 3. As shown in Fig. 8c, trilayer MoS2 have nine singularities at three different energies (ΔE = 1.61 eV, 1.66 eV, and 1.72 eV, respectively) at the K point. Figure 3c depicts that the conduction bands (NC = 1, 2, 3) are three-hold degenerate at point K; this means that there are three singularities at each critical point energy. According to our previous analysis, the JDOS and \( {\varepsilon}_2^{xx}\left(\omega \right) \) of trilayer MoS2 will show three steps near the thresholds of the long plateaus, the endpoints of the long plateaus of trilayer JDOS, and \( {\varepsilon}_2^{xx}\left(\omega \right) \) are then owing to the appearance of three singularities at Γ point with ΔE = 2.21 eV (see Fig. 7c), which come from the interband transitions of Γ(NV = 27→NC = 1, 2, 3).

For bulk MoS2, the thresholds of \( {\varepsilon}_2^{xx}\left(\omega \right) \) and JDOS are also located at K point, with the smallest ΔE(NC − NV) equals to 1.59 eV. Nevertheless, there is no obvious step appeared in the thresholds of plateaus for both the \( {\varepsilon}_2^{xx}\left(\omega \right) \) and JDOS (see Fig. 6a and Fig. 7d). Based on the previous analysis, the number of steps in the monolayer, bilayer, and trilayer MoS2 are 1, 2, and 3, respectively. As the number of MoS2 layers increases, the number of steps also increases in the vicinity of the threshold energy. Thus, in the bulk MoS2, the JDOS curve is composed of numerous small steps around the threshold energy of the long plateau, and finally the small steps disappear near the threshold energy since the width of the small steps decreases. In the region of 0 ~ 2.09 eV, the electron transitions of bulk MoS2 are contributed to NV = 17, 18 to NC = 1, 2. The 2.09 eV is the endpoint of JDOS plateau of bulk MoS2, which is attributed to two singularities, i.e., the interband transitions of Γ(NV = 18→NC = 1) as well as Γ(NV = 18→NC = 2), as presented in Fig. 8d. However, the plateau endpoint of the imaginary part of dielectric function \( {\varepsilon}_2^{xx}\left(\omega \right) \) is 2.19 eV, which is greater than the counterpart of JDOS (e.g., 2.09 eV). Checked the transition matrix elements, it verified that some transitions are forbidden by the selection rule in the range of 2.09 eV to 2.19 eV. Therefore, the imaginary part of the dielectric function \( {\varepsilon}_2^{xx}\left(\omega \right) \) is nearly invariable in the range of 2.09 ~ 2.19 eV. As a result, the plateau of \( {\varepsilon}_2^{xx}\left(\omega \right) \) of bulk MoS2 is then 1.59 ~ 2.19 eV.

It has been shown that these thresholds of the JDOS plateaus are determined by singularities at the K point for all of the studied materials, see Fig. 8. The endpoint energy of the monolayer JDOS plateau is determined by two critical points at B1 and B2 (Fig. 8a). Nevertheless, the endpoint energies of bilayer, trilayer, and bulk JDOS plateaus are all dependent on the critical points at Γ(Fig. 8b–d). The interlayer coupling near point Γ is significantly larger than the near point K for all the systems of multilayer MoS2. The smallest direct energy gap decreases and the interlayer coupling increases as the number of layers grow. With the layer number increases, a very small decrease of direct energy gap at point K and a more significant decrease of direct energy gap at point Γ can be observed, as a result, a faint red shift in the threshold energy and a bright red shift in the end of both JDOS and \( {\varepsilon}_2^{xx}\left(\omega \right) \) plateaus can also be found. For monolayer MoS2, the smallest ΔE(NC − NV) at point Γ is 2.75 eV which is larger than that at point B1 (or point B2) with a value around 2.57 eV. When it goes to multilayer and bulk MoS2, the strong interlayer coupling near point Γ makes the smallest ΔE(NC − NV) at Γ less than those at point B1 (or point B2). Hence, monolayer owns the longest plateau of JDOS, which is between 1.64 eV and 2.57 eV. The shortest plateau of JDOS (from 1.59 eV to 2.09 eV) is shown in the bulk.

As the energy is increased to the value larger than the endpoint of long platform of the dielectric function, a peak A can be found at the position around 2.8 eV, for almost all the studied materials (Fig. 6a). The width of peak A for monolayer is narrower compared with those of multilayer MoS2; however, the intensity of peak A for monolayer is found to be a little stronger than multilayers. The differences between the imaginary parts of dielectric function for the monolayer and multilayer MoS2 are evident, on the other hand, the differences are small for multilayer MoS2.

In order to explore the detailed optical spectra of MoS2 multilayers, the real parts of the dielectric function ε1(ω), the absorption coefficients α(ω), and the reflectivity spectra R(ω) are presented in Fig. 6b–d. Our calculated data of bulk MoS2 for the real and imaginary parts of the dielectric function, ε1(ω) and ε2(ω), the absorption coefficient α(ω) and the reflectivity R(ω) agree well with the experimental data, except for the excitonic features near the band edge [48,49,50]. The calculated values of , which is called the static dielectric constant, for MoS2 multilayers and bulk can be found in Table 1. From Table 1, the calculated values of \( {\varepsilon}_1^{xx}(0) \) for multilayers and bulk MoS2 are all around 15.5, which is very close to the experimental value of 15.0 for bulk MoS2 [50]. The values of \( {\varepsilon}_1^{xx}(0) \) increase with the increasing number of MoS2 layers. For monolayer MoS2, a clear peak B of \( {\varepsilon}_1^{xx}\left(\omega \right) \) appears about 2.54 eV. Peak B of monolayer is clearly more significant than multilayers, and they are all similar for multilayer MoS2. As the layer number increases, the sharp structures (peak B) also move left slightly. In Fig. 6c, we also observe the emergence of long plateaus in the absorption coefficients, and absorption coefficients are around 1.5 × 105 cm−1 at the long plateaus. There are also small steps around the thresholds for the absorption coefficients, which are consistent to those of the imaginary parts of dielectric function. With the layer number increases, the threshold energy of absorption coefficient decreases, while the number of small steps increases at the starting point of the plateau. For monolayer and multilayer MoS2, strong absorption peaks emerge at visible light range (1.65–3.26 eV), and the monolayer MoS2 own a highest absorption coefficient of 1.3 × 106 cm−1. The theoretical absorption coefficients for different number of MoS2 layers are compared with confocal absorption spectral imaging of MoS2 (the inset) [46], as shown in Fig. 6c. For monolayer and multilayer MoS2, a large peak of α(ω) can be found at the position around 2.8 eV for both the calculation and experiment [46, 51]. Furthermore, a smoothly increase of α(ω) can be found between 2.2 and 2.8 eV for both the theoretical and experimental curves. Therefore, from Fig. 6c, the calculated absorption coefficients of MoS2 multilayers show fairly good agreement with the experimental data [46], except for the excitonic peaks. The reflectivity spectra are given in Fig. 6d. The reflectivity spectra of MoS2 multilayers are all about 0.35–0.36 when energy is zero, which means that MoS2 system can reflect about 35 to 36% of the incident light. In the region of visible light, the maximum reflectivity of monolayer MoS2 is 64%, while the maxima of multilayer and bulk MoS2 are all about 58%. Because of the behaviors discussed, MoS2 monolayer and multilayers are being considered for photovoltaic applications.


In this study, by employing ab initio calculations, the electronic and optical properties of MoS2 multilayers are investigated. Compared to bulk MoS2, the covalency and ionicity of monolayer MoS2 are found to be stronger, which results from larger quantum confinement in the monolayer. With the increase of the layer number, quantum confinement and intra-layer interaction both decrease, meanwhile, the interlayer coupling increases, which result in the decrease of the band gap and the minimum direct energy gap. As the layer number becomes larger than two, the optical and electronic properties of MoS2 multilayers start to exhibit those of bulk. Band structures of multilayers and bulk show splitting of bands mainly around the Γ-point; however, splitting of bands in the vicinity of K point are tiny, owing to the small interlayer coupling at point K.

For optical properties, Van Hove singularities lead to the occurrence of long plateaus in both JDOS and \( {\varepsilon}_2^{xx}\left(\omega \right) \). At the beginnings of these long plateaus, monolayer, bilayer, and trilayer structures appear one, two, and three small steps, respectively. With the layer number increases, the number of small steps increases and the width of the small steps decreases, leading to unobvious steps. A small red shift in the threshold energy and a noticeable red shift in the end of both JDOS and \( {\varepsilon}_2^{xx}\left(\omega \right) \) plateaus are observed, since the increased number of layers leads to small changes in the direct energy gap near point K (weak interlayer coupling) and larger changes near point Γ (stronger interlayer coupling). Thus, the longest plateau and shortest plateau of JDOS are from the monolayer and bulk, respectively. Our results demonstrate that the differences between electronic and optical properties for monolayer and multilayer MoS2 are significant; however, the differences are not obvious between the multilayer MoS2. The present data can help understand the properties of different layers of MoS2, which should be important for developing optoelectronic devices.

Availability of Data and Materials

The datasets supporting the conclusions of this article are included within the article.



The direct energy gap


Monolayer MoS2


Bilayer MoS2


Trilayer MoS2


Four-layer MoS2


Five-layer MoS2


Six-layer MoS2


Bethe-Salpeter equation


Brillouin zone


Conduction band minimum


Generalized gradient approximation


Quasi-particle energy calculation


Joint density of states

MoS2 :

Molybdenum disulfide


The ordinal numbers of conduction band


The ordinal numbers of valence band


Projector augmented wave




Vienna ab initio simulation package


Valence band maximum


Van Hove singularity


  1. 1.

    Srivastava SK, Avasthi BN (1993) Preparation and characterization of molybdenum disulphide catalysts. J Mater Sci 28:5032–5035

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Chen J, Kuriyama N, Yuan H, Takeshita HT, Sakai T (2001) Electrochemical hydrogen storage in MoS2 nanotubes. J Am Chem Soc 123:11813–11814

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Ye L, Wu CZ, Guo W, Xie Y (2006) MoS2 hierarchical hollow cubic cages assembled by bilayers: one-step synthesis and their electrochemical hydrogen storage properties. Chem Commun 45:4738–4740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Mak KF, Lee C, Hone J, Shan J, Heinz TF (2010) Atomically thin MoS2: a new direct-gap semiconductor. Phys Rev Lett 105:136805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Kuc A, Zibouche N, Heine T (2011) Influence of quantum confinement on the electronic structure of the transition metal sulfide TS2. Phys Rev B 83:245213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Fleischauer PD, Lince JR, Bertrand PA, Bauer R (1989) Electronic structure and lubrication properties of MoS2: A Qualitative molecular orbital approach. Langmuir 5:1009–1015

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Martin JM, Donnet C, Le Mogne T, Epicier T (1993) Superlubricity of molybdenum disulphide. Phys Rev B 48:10583–10586

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Novoselov KS, Jiang D, Schedin F, Booth TJ, Khotkevich VV, Morozov SV, Geim AK (2005) Two-dimensional atomic crystals. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102:10451–10453

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Benavente E, Santa Ana MA, Mendizábal F, González G (2002) Intercalation chemistry of molybdenum disulfide. Coordin Chem Rev 224:87–109

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Dungey KE, Curtis MD, Penner-Hahn JE (1998) Structural characterization and thermal stability of MoS2 intercalation compounds. Chem Mater 10:2152–2161

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Kam KK, Parkinson BA (1982) Detailed photocurrent spectroscopy of the semiconducting group VI transition metal dichalcogenides. J Phys Chem 86:463–467

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Reshak AH, Auluck S (2003) Calculated optical properties of 2H-MoS2 intercalated with lithium. Phys Rev B 68:125101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Li XD, Yu S, Wu SQ, Wen YH, Zhou S, Zhu ZZ (2013) Structural and electronic properties of superlattice composed of graphene and monolayer MoS2. J Phys Chem C 117:15347–15353

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Radisavljevic B, Radenovic A, Brivio J, Giacometti V, Kis A (2011) Single-layer MoS2 transistors. Nature Nanotech 6:147–150

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Shkrebtii AI, Heritage E, McNelles P, Cabellos JL, Mendoza BS (2012) Graphene and graphane functionalization with hydrogen: electronic and optical signatures. Phys Status Solidi C 9:1378–1383

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Kumar A, Ahluwalia PK (2012) A first principle comparative study of electronic and optical properties of 1H-MoS2 and 2H-MoS2. Mater Chem Phys 135:755–761

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Hu JQ, Zhang JH, Wu SQ, Zhu ZZ (2015) Hybrid functional studies on the optical and electronic properties of graphane and silicane. Solid State Commun 209-210:59–65

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Johari P, Shenoy VB (2011) Tunable dielectric properties of transition metal dichalcogenides. ACS Nano 5:5903–5908

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Kumar A, Ahluwalia PK (2012) Electronic structure of transition metal dichalcogenides monolayers 1H-MX2 (M = Mo, W; X = S, Se, Te) from ab-initio theory: new direct band gap semiconductors. Eur Phys J B 85:186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Lee HS, Min SW, Chang YG, Park MK, Nam T, Kim H, Kim JH, Ryu S, Im S (2012) MoS2 nanosheet phototransistors with thickness-modulated optical energy gap. Nano Lett 12:3695–3700

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Splendiani A, Sun L, Zhang Y, Li T, Kim J, Chim CY, Galli G, Wang F (2010) Emerging photoluminescence in monolayer MoS2. Nano Lett 10:1271–1275

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Ahmad S, Mukherjee S (2014) A comparative study of electronic properties of bulk MoS2 and its monolayer using DFT technique: application of mechanical strain on MoS2 monolayer. Graphene 3:52–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Wang CY, Guo GY (2015) Nonlinear optical properties of transition-metal dichalcogenide MX2 (M=Mo, W; X=S, Se) monolayers and trilayers from first-principles calculations. J Phys Chem C 119:13268–13276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Britnell L, Ribeiro RM, Eckmann A, Jalil R, Belle BD, Mishchenko A, Kim Y-J, Gorbachev RV, Georgiou T, Morozov SV, Grigorenko AN, Geim AK, Casiraghi C, Castro Neto AH, Novoselov KS (2013) Strong light-matter interactions in heterostructures of atomically thin films. Science 340:1311–1314

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Carvalho A, Ribeiro RM, Castro Neto AH (2013) Band nesting and the optical response of two-dimensional semiconducting transition metal dichalcogenides. Phys Rev B 88:115205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Van Hove L (1953) The occurrence of singularities in the elastic frequency distribution of a crystal. Phys Rev 89:1189–1193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Bassani F, Parravicini GP (1975) Electronic states and optical transitions in solids. Pergamon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Kresse G, Furthmüller J (1996) Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set. Comput Mater Sci 6:15–50

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Kresse G, Furthmüller J (1996) Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys Rev B 54:11169–11186

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Kresse G, Joubert D (1999) From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method. Phys Rev B 59:1758–1775

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Perdew JP, Burke K, Ernzerhof M (1996) Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys Rev Let 77:3865–3868

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Grimme S (2006) Semiempirical GGA-type density functional constructed with a long-range dispersion correction. J Comp Chem 27:1787–1799

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Heyd J, Scuseria GE, Ernzerhof M (2003) Hybrid functionals based on a screened Coulomb potential. J Chem Phys 118:8207–8215

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Heyd J, Scuseria GE, Ernzerhof M (2006) Erratum.Hybrid functionals based on a screened Coulomb potential. J Chem Phys 124:219906

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Paier J, Marsman M, Hummer K, Kresse G, Gerber IC, Ángyán JG (2006) Screened hybrid density functionals applied to solids. J Chem Phys 124:154709

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Krukau AV, Vydrov OA, Izmaylov AF, Scuseria GE (2006) Influence of the exchange screening parameter on the performance of screened hybrid functionals. J Chem Phys 125:224106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Monkhorst HJ, Pack JD (1976) Special points for Brillonin-zone integrations. Phys Rev B 13:5188–5192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Fuchs F, Furthmüller J, Bechstedt F (2007) Quasiparticle band structure based on a generalized Kohn-Sham scheme. Phys Rev B 76:115109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Rohlfing M, Louie SG (1998) Electron-hole excitations in semiconductors and insulators. Phys Rev Lett 81:2312

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Albrecht S, Reining L, del Sole R, Onida G (1998) Ab initio calculation of excitonic effects in the optical spectra of semiconductors. Phys Rev Lett 80:4510

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Ramasubramaniam A (2012) Large excitonic effects in monolayers of molybdenum and tungsten dichalcogenides. Phys Rev B 86:115409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Ye M, Winslow D, Zhang D, Pandey R, Yap YK (2015) Recent advancement on the optical properties of two-dimensional molybdenum disulfide (MoS2) thin films. Photonics 2:288–307

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Gajdoš M, Hummer K, Kresse G, Furthmüller J, Bechstedt F (2006) Linear optical properties in the projector-augmented wave methodology. Phys Rev B 73:045112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Yu PY, Cardona M (2010) Fundamentals of semiconductors: physics and materials properties. Springer-Verlag, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Brust D, Phillips JC, Bassani F (1962) Critical points and ultraviolet reflectivity of semiconductors. Phys Rev Lett 9:94–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Dhakal KP, Duong DL, Lee J, Nam H, Kim M, Kan M, Lee YH, Kim J (2014) Confocal absorption spectral imaging of MoS2: optical transitions depending on the atomic thickness of intrinsic and chemically doped MoS2. Nanoscale 6:13028–13035

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Wooten F (1972) Optical properties of solids. Academic, New York

    Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Zeppenfeld K (1970) Electron energy losses and optical anisotropy of MoS2 single crystals. Opt Commun 1:377–378

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Beal AR, Hughes HP (1979) Kramers-Kronig analysis of the reflectivity spectra of 2H-MoS2, 2H-MoSe2 and 2H-MoTe2. J Phys C 12:881–890

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Bell MG, Liang WY (1976) Electron energy loss studies in solids: the transition metal dichalcogenides. Adv Phys 25:53–86

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Castellanos-Gomez A, Quereda J, van der Meulen HP, Agraït N, Rubio-Bollinger G (2015) Spatially resolved optical absorption spectroscopy of single- and few-layer MoS2 by hyperspectral imaging. Nanotechnology 27:115705

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


This work is supported by the National Key R&D Program of China under grant nos. 2016YFA0202601 and 2016YFB0901502.


This study was funded by the National Key R&D Program of China under grant nos. 2016YFA0202601 and 2016YFB0901502.

Author information




JQH performed the detailed calculations. XHS and SQW discussed on the issues raised during the calculations. KMH and ZZZ designed, discussed, and guided the whole research. Especially, ZZZ co-wrote the paper. All authors read and commented on the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Shun-Qing Wu or Zi-Zhong Zhu.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Additional file

Additional file 1:

Figure S1. The electronic states of MoS2 multilayers are insensitive to the spin-polarized effect, due to the overlaps of spin-up and spin-down band structures for all the cases. (DOC 2814 kb)

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hu, J., Shi, X., Wu, S. et al. Dependence of Electronic and Optical Properties of MoS2 Multilayers on the Interlayer Coupling and Van Hove Singularity. Nanoscale Res Lett 14, 288 (2019).

Download citation


  • MoS2 multilayers
  • Electronic properties
  • Optical properties
  • Van Hove singularities