 Nano Express
 Open Access
 Published:
Photogalvanic Effect in NitrogenDoped Monolayer MoS_{2} from First Principles
Nanoscale Research Letters volume 14, Article number: 380 (2019)
Abstract
We investigate the photogalvanic effect in nitrogendoped monolayer molybdenum disulfide (MoS_{2}) under the perpendicular irradiation, using firstprinciples calculations combined with nonequilibrium Green function formalism. We provide a detailed analysis on the behavior of photoresponse based on the band structure and in particular the joint density of states. We thereby identify different mechanisms leading to the existence of zero points, where the photocurrent vanishes. In particular, while the zero point in the linear photovoltaic effect is due to forbidden transition, their appearance in the circular photovoltaic effect results from the identical intensity splitting of the valance band and the conduction band in the presence of Rashba and Dresslhaus spinorbit coupling. Furthermore, our results reveal a strong circular photogalvanic effect of nitrogendoped monolayer MoS_{2}, which is two orders of magnitude larger than that induced by the linearly polarized light.
Introduction
Searching for novel materials and exploring their exotic properties constitute a major theme in modern physics. At present, there exist significant interests in monolayer molybdenum disulfide (MoS_{2}), which, similar as graphene, can be exfoliated mechanically [1, 2]. In contrast to the bulk MoS_{2} that belongs to an indirectbandgap semiconductor, the monolayer MoS_{2} is a directbandgap semiconductor [3] with a large band gap. The monolayer MoS_{2} possesses excellent optical and electrical properties [4], such as strong photoabsorption [5–8] and high carrier mobility, which promise important applications in transistors [9] and ultra sensitive photodetectors [10]. Further, recent ab initio studies have demonstrated the possibility to tailor the electronic and magnetic properties [11–19] of monolayer MoS_{2} by doping, paving the way for spintronic devices with large latent capacity [20].
The photogalvanic effect (PGE), where electronic current is induced when the material is illuminated by light, can occur in a semiconductor with broken space inversion symmetry. The PGE can be induced by either the circularly or linearly polaried lights, which are coined as, respectively, the circular photogalvanic effect (CPGE) and linear photovoltaic effect (LPGE). Recently, the PGE has been observed in several new materials [21–26]. For example, GaAs/AlGaAs (a kind of twodimensional electron gas) is found to exhibit both the LPGE and CPGE [27]. The CPGE has also been found in topological insulators [28–30], such as HgTe quantum wells and Sb_{2}Te_{3}. Remarkably, the CPGE has been reported in some Weyl semimetals [31–33]. In addition, photoresponse in graphene PN junctions and in Sdoped monolayer black phosphorus [34–36] have been analysed by the team of Guo. Interestingly, both the LPGE and CPGE can exhibit zero points, where the photocurrent vanishes. However, it remains an open question as to the mechanism leading to these zero points.
Doping in monolayer MoS_{2} has been analysed by experiment [37–40] and theory [11, 41, 42], especially for nitrogendoped monolayer MoS_{2} [38, 43]. In this work, we carry out a firstprinciples study of the PGE in nitrogendoped monolayer MoS_{2}. We find the material exhibits both CPGE and LPGE, which are spatially anisotropic and exhibit zero points. With a combined analysis of joint density of states (JDOS) and the band structure, we provide a detailed investigation on the behavior of photocurrent. In particular, we find that the zero points in the LPGE and CPGE arise from different mechanisms: the former is caused by forbidden transition in the former, whereas the latter is due to zero total spin slitting in presence of Rashba and Dresslhaus spinorbit coupling.
Model and Methods
First, the geometry optimum is performed in CASTEP Package [44, 45]. For the unit cell of nitrogendoped monolayer MoS_{2}, the generalized gradient approximation (GGA) and PerdewBurkeErnzerhof (PBE) parametrization were employed for the exchange and correlation potentials. To obtain a structure with high precision, the energy cutoff of plane waves was taken as 500 eV. In the reciprocal space, 6×12×1 kpoints were considered. The total energy is converged to 10^{−6}eV and the residual forces on each atom are less than 0.01 \(eV/\mathop A\limits ^ \circ \).
Next, the quantum transport package Nanodcal [46, 47] was used for a selfconsistent calculation of JDOS and the band structure, which is complemented with GGA_PBE96 for the exchange correlation functional. Here, a double zeta polarized (DZP) atomic orbital basis was used to expand all the physical quantities. Finally, the photocurrent of the device was computed within the Green’s function formalism and the density functional theory (NEGFDFT).
The architecture of the twoprobe device is illustrated in Fig. 1. There, the sulfur atoms are doped with nitrogenatoms, their ratio being 16:1, resulting in broken space reversal symmetry. Figure 1a shows a device exhibiting a mirror symmetry, which contains 39 atoms in the scattering region. Its side view [see Fig. 1b], a relaxed configuration obtained after structure optimization, illustrates the sandwich structure of nitrogendoped monolayer MoS_{2}.
Atoms in the scattering region of nitrogendoped monolayer MoS_{2} were irradiated perpendicularly by light, which polarization vector can be generically described by
Here, θ labels the polarization angle of linearly polarized light, ϕ is the phase angle describing helicity of elliptical polarized light, and e_{α}(α=1,2) denote unit vectors. Note that ϕ=±45^{∘} corresponds to the right/lefthanded circularly polarized light, while ϕ=0 corresponds to the linearly polarized light. Since the space reversal symmetry is broken in the considered sample, PGE can be generated. Denoting the current from one lead to the center region by 〈I〉^{(ph)}, we calculate 〈I〉^{(ph)} using NEGFDFT with the quantum transport package Nanodcal [46, 47]. The corresponding normalized photocurrent is given by
Here, I_{ω} is the number of photons per unit time through per unit area, i.e., the photon flux [see Refs. [34–36, 48]]. In Nanodcal, the photocurrent \(I_{L}^{(ph)}\) of left electrode can be given by [34]
where G^{<(ph)} and G^{>(ph)} is lesser Green’s function and greater Green’s function respectively (with electron −photon interactions). Γ_{L} denotes the coupling of the scattering region with the left electrode. For linearly polarized light, photocurrent can be given by
For circularly polarized light, it can be written as
Both of them, \(G_{1}^{^{> / < \left ({ph} \right)}}\) and \(G_{2}^{^{> / < \left ({ph} \right)}}\) have the same expression as followings
where \(G_{0}^{a}\) and \(G_{0}^{r}\) are the advanced and retarded Green’s functions respectively (without photons). p_{α/β} represents the cartesian component of the electron momentum. e_{1/2β} denotes cartesian component of the unit vector. N is the number of photons. \({C_{0}} = {I_{\omega } }{\left ({e/{m_{0}}} \right)^{2}}\hbar \sqrt {{\mu _{r}}{\varepsilon _{r}}} /2N\omega \varepsilon c\), where c is the speed and ω is the frequency of the light. ε and ε_{r} are dielectric constant and relative dielectric constant respectively. μ_{r} denotes the relative magnetic susceptibility. m_{0} represents the bare electron mass. For linearly polarized light,
For circularly polarized light,
A crucial ingredient in our subsequent analysis of PGE is JDOS, which measures the number of allowed optical transitions between the electronic states in the occupied valence band and unoccupied conduction band [49–53]. The JDOS corresponding to the excitation by photons with frequency ω is given by
where E_{c}(k) and E_{v}(k) denote the energies of electronic states at momentum k in the conduction and valence bands, respectively. For a twodimensional system with nondegenerate bands, JDOS is rewritten as
Results and Discussion
Figure 2 presents the band structure of monolayer MoS_{2} and nitrogendoped monolayer MoS_{2}. In the previous literatures, monolayer MoS_{2} is a directgap semiconductor with a band gap of 1.90 eV [3, 4]. In order to compare the band structure before [see Fig. 2a] and after doping, we select the same paths in the brillouin zone. For nitrogendoped monolayer MoS_{2}, an impurityinduced band crossing the Fermi level is observed, which is close to the top of valence bands[see Fig. 2b]. Hence, nitrogendoped monolayer MoS_{2} is a ptype semiconductor. Importantly, because of the broken space inversion symmetry, the energy bands of the pristine monolayer MoS_{2} further split in presence of doping, even without external voltage. As is known, such splitting of energy band will allow for spinorbit coupling under irradiation by circularly polarized light, providing an important mechanism for the CPGE.
We now study the photoresponse of nitrogendoped monolayer MoS_{2} under perpendicular irradiation by light, obtained via NEGFDFT calculations. Figure 3 shows the photoresponse function of LPGE and CPGE. For LPGE, θ=π/4 and ϕ=0^{∘}. For CPGE, θ=0^{∘} and ϕ=π/4. The photon energy ranges from 0 to 2.3 eV (with an interval of 0.1 eV). In Fig. 3, the photoresponse of CPGE in the nitrogendoped monolayer MoS_{2} is two orders of magnitude stronger than the LPGE. The photoresponse of LPGE stays vanishingly small in the entire regime, which is a direct consequence of the symmetry of device structure. In contrast, CPGE arises after 0.7 eV, which closes to the energy gap between impurity band to conduction band at the high symmetry point Y [see Fig. 2b]. It means that electron transition is direct. Further, CPGE becomes significant when the photon energy is above 1.7 eV. When the photon energy further increases, the photoresponse’s magnitude varies in a nonlinear fashion, while its direction switches from positive to negative.
To gain intuitions into above phenomena, we note that photocurrent is intimately connected with the photo absorption coefficient α defined by
Here, n is the refractive index, c_{0} denotes the speed of light in the vacuum, and m_{e} labels the mass of electron. Further, s donotes the unit vector of the vector potential of electromagnetic wave. The matrix element M_{cv} corresponds to the momentum p and has the form 〈c,kpv,k〉, with v(c),k〉 being the electronic state at quasimomentum k in the valance (conduction) band. Note that occurrence of photocurrent requires α>0. Equation (12) implies that the photocurrent crucially depends on both quantities: the matrix element M_{cv} and the JDOS.
Figure 4 shows the JDOS of the sample. JDOS nearly vanishes for photon energies below 0.5 eV, indicating electrons can hardly be excited. However, when photon energy exceeds 0.5 eV, series of peaks in JDOS arise. In Fig. 4, two peaks arise at photon energies 0.69 eV and 0.76eV (see green dotted lines). This correspond to the minimum energy to excite an electron from the valence band to the impurity band at the high symmetry point Y and Γ [see Fig. 2b], respectively. Furthermore, peaks are also observed when photon energies take the values of 0.94 eV, 1.03 eV, and 1.925 eV. They correspond to optical excitations of electrons from the impurity band to the conduction band at the high symmetry point Y, Γ, and S respectively. In addition, the peaks at 1.65 eV and 1.89 eV (black dotted lines) correspond to the electronic transition from the valence band to the conduction band at high symmetry point Y and Γ respectively. After 1.89 eV, JDOS increases sharply like exponential function, whose trend is in accordance with experiment of optical absorptivity [40]. Besides, our results show that nitrogendoped monolayer MoS_{2} has a strong light absorption in the range of visible light, which is also consistent with the experimental results.
Contrasting Fig. 4 with Fig. 3 indicates an intimate connection between the JDOS and the photoresponse. There, both the JDOS and the photoresponse are nearly zero at photon energies below 0.5 eV, become nonzero—but remain small—in the regime from 0.6 to 1.7 eV, then arise significantly and fluctuate strongly in the regime from 1.7 to 2.3 eV. In particular, when the photon energies is 1.7 eV, photoresponse of CPGE exhibit pronounced peaks. Combined with Fig. 2b, we know that electrons may have two transitions using the impurity band since electrons which are excited for the photon energy of 1.7 eV from valence band to conduction are limited. However, the photoresponse owns the maximum amplitude because that the electrons can transfer from valence band to impurity band and then transfer from impurity band to conduction band.
To further understand the behavior of photocurrent, we next plot the photoresponse of LPGE as a function of polarized angle θ [see Fig. 5a]. One finds the amplitude of photoresponse behaves as ∼ sin(2θ). This is consistent with the phenomenological theory for LPGE of a material with C_{s} symmetry under normal incidence, where \({R_{x}} {\propto } E_{0}^{2}{\chi _{xxy}}\sin \left ({2\theta } \right)\) [21, 26, 54–56] with E_{0} the electric field intensity of the light and χ_{xxy} being a tensor. Interestingly, while the photoresponse function behaves as sin(2θ) when the photon energy is 2.0 eV, it becomes instead − sin(2θ) when the photon energy is 2.1 eV. Therefore, there necessarily exists a point inbetween 2.0 eV and 2.1 eV where the photocurrent vanishes, i.e., the zero point of LPGE. To locate the zero point, we use a method based on dichotomy and plot the variation of photoresponse with respect to the energy of linearly polarized light. As shown in Fig. 5b for θ=π/4 degree, the zero point occurs for a photon energy of 2.0012 eV. As pointed out earlier according to Eq. (12), the photocurrent depends on both the JDOS and the matrix element of momentum. Since the JDOS is always found to be finite in our calculations, the occurrence of zero point can only be attributed to the absence of electronic transition, i.e., the existence of zero point in this case is due to the forbidden transition.
For comparison, the photoresponse of CPGE as a function of the phase angle ϕ is summarized in Fig. 6. One finds R_{x}∼ sin(2ϕ), again in agreement with the phenomenological prediction which gives \({R_{x}} {\propto } E_{0}^{2}{\gamma _{xz}}\sin \left ({2\phi } \right)\) with γ_{xz} being a tensor. Similar to the LPGE, the CPGE also exhibits zero point, which occurs at 2.2560 eV in Fig. 6b. There, the transition matrix is always finite, and therefore, this zero point cannot be explained in terms of the forbidden transition as in the case of LPGE. Instead, we invoke the fact that the CPGE is deeply connected with both Rashba SOC and Dresslhaus SOC, which respectively influence the splitting of the valance band and the conduction band with different intensities. In the particular case where the splittings in the two band are identical, the excited electrons in the conduction band will have opposite momenta at ±k_{x}. As a result, the net electronic current in the conduction band is zero, hence explaining the existence of zero point for CPGE.
Intriguingly, the photoresponse of CPGE in the nitrogendoped monolayer MoS_{2} is two orders of magnitude stronger than the LPGE as shown in Figs. 3, 5, and 6. This can be understood as follows. For the LPGE, the photocurrent is induced by the asymmetric scattering of carriers. In contrast, CPGE arises because electrons in the conduction band exhibit unbalanced occupations under Rashba SOC and Dresslhaus SOC when the material is subjected to irradiation: before the illumination, due to the broken space inverse symmetry in nitrogendoped monolayer MoS_{2}, the degeneracies in the energy band of the pristine sample are lifted with Dresslhaus SOC. Then, when the material is subjected to irradiations by the circularly polarized light, the angular momentum of photons are transferred to the spin angular momentum of electrons with Rashba SOC. As an overall result, electrons fulfilling the opticalselection rule \(\Delta {m_{s}} =0,\begin {array}{*{20}{c}}\end {array} \pm 1\) can be excited to the conduction band. This is different from LPGE, where the spin angular momentum of the electron remains invariant under linearly polaried light, i.e., Δm_{s}=0 for LPGE. Thus, because of Rashba SOC and \(\Delta {m_{s}} \begin {array}{*{20}{c}}\end {array} \pm 1\) for CPGE, the transition probability of electrons will increase dramatically for CPGE, contributing to stronger photoresponse.
Finally, seen from our calculations, photon energy is converted into electricity in our system without external bias, and the absorption of visible light is strong for nitrogendoped monolayer MoS_{2}, especially from 1.6 to 2.3 eV [see Fig. 3], i.e., from red light to green light. Therefore, it is a suitable material for 2D photovoltaic devices [57], rgb 1.00,0.00,0.00lasers [58], and single photon emitters [59]. Besides, photoresponse changes regularly with polarization and phase angles for a given photon energy as R∼ sin(2θ). Therefore, it is useful to control polarization and phase angles to dominate photocurrent. However, LPGE is slight, which prompts our experimentalists to use circularly polarized light in order to gain large photocurrent. Additionally, the analysis of JDOS with band structure gives a reasonable explanation for photocurrent, which provides a theoretical basis for the optoelectronic experimental findings.
Conclusions
In summary, we have presented a firstprinciples study of PGE of in nitrogendoped monolayer MoS_{2} under the perpendicular irradiation based on NEGFDFT. We provide a satisfactory explanation on the behavior of photoresponse, which is achieved using a combination of analysis on the band structure and joint density of states. We find that there exist zero points in the photocurrent for both LPGE and CPGE, but the underlying mechanisms are different. For LPGE, the zero point occurs at the photon energy of 2.0012 eV, where the transition matrix element associated with electronic excitation from the valence band to the conduction band vanishes, i.e., the forbidden transition. For CPGE, on the other hand, the photocurrent is zero at the photon energy of 2.2560 eV, where, while relevant transitions are always allowed, the presence of both Rashba SOC and Dresslhaus SOC result in a net zero current. Further, the photoresponse of CPGE in the nitrogendoped monolayer MoS_{2} is two orders of magnitude stronger than the LPGE. In general, we can change the photon energy, the type of polarized light, and the polarization angle to control the photocurrent in 2D photovoltaic devices effectively. The present theoretical work may shed light on the ongoing explorations of photogalvanic effect of nanomaterials and can open up a new avenue towards optoelectronic and photovoltaic applications involving monolayer MoS_{2}.
Availability of Data and Materials
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included within the article.
Abbreviations
 CPGE:

Circular photogalvanic effect
 LPGE:

Linear photovoltaic effect
 JDOS:

Joint density of states
 GGA:

Generalized gradient approximation
 PBE:

PerdewBurkeErnzerhof
 DZP:

Double zeta polarized
 DFT:

Density functional theory
 NEGF:

Nonequilibrium greens function method
References
 1
Sresht V, Rajan AG, Bordes E, Strano MS, Pádua AAH, Blankschtein D (2017) Quantitative modeling of MoS _{2}–solvent interfaces: predicting contact angles and exfoliation performance using molecular dynamics. J Phys Chem C 121(16):9022–9031.
 2
Eda G, Yamaguchi H, Voiry D, Fujita T, Chen M, Chhowalla M (2011) Photoluminescence from chemically exfoliated MoS _{2}. Nano Lett 11(12):5111–6.
 3
Mak KF, Lee C, Hone J, Shan J, Heinz TF (2010) Atomically thin MoS _{2}: a new directgap semiconductor. Phys Rev Lett 105(13):136805.
 4
Wang QH, KalantarZadeh K, Kis A, Coleman JN, Strano MS (2012) Electronics and optoelectronics of twodimensional transition metal dichalcogenides. Nat Nanotechnol 7(11):699–712.
 5
Zhang H, Lu SB, Zheng J, Du J, Wen SC, Tang DY, Loh KP (2014) Molybdenum disulfide (MoS _{2}) as a broadband saturable absorber for ultrafast photonics. Opt Express 22(6):7249.
 6
Cheng R, Li D, Zhou H, Wang C, Yin A, Jiang S, Liu Y, Chen Y, Huang Y, Duan X (2014) Electroluminescence and photocurrent generation from atomically sharp WSe _{2}/MoS _{2} heterojunction p–n diodes. Nano Lett 14(10):5590–7.
 7
Mak KF, He K, Shan J, Heinz TF (2012) Control of valley polarization in monolayer MoS _{2} by optical helicity. Nat Nanotechnol 7(8):494–8.
 8
Splendiani A, Sun L, Zhang Y, Li T, Kim J, Chim CY, Galli G, Wang F (2010) Emerging photoluminescence in monolayer MoS _{2}. Nano Lett 10(4):1271–5.
 9
Radisavljevic B, Radenovic A, Brivio J, Giacometti V, Kis A (2011) Singlelayer MoS _{2} transistors. Nat Nanotechnol 6(3):147–50.
 10
LopezSanchez O, Lembke D, Kayci M, Radenovic A, Kis A (2013) Ultrasensitive photodetectors based on monolayer MoS _{2}. Nat Nanotechnol 8(7):497–501.
 11
Dolui K, Rungger I, Pemmaraju CD, Sanvito S (2013) Possible doping strategies for MoS _{2} monolayers: an ab initio study. Phys Rev B 88(7):075420.
 12
Yue Q, Chang S, Qin S, Li J (2013) Functionalization of monolayer MoS _{2} by substitutional doping: a firstprinciples study. Phys Lett A 377(1920):1362–7.
 13
Cheng YC, Zhu ZY, Mi WB, Guo ZB, Schwingenschlögl U (2013) Prediction of twodimensional diluted magnetic semiconductors: doped monolayer MoS _{2} systems. Phys Rev B 87(10):100401.
 14
Kadioglu Y, Gökoğlu G, AktÜrk OÜ (2017) Molecular adsorption properties of CO and h _{2}o on Au, Cu, and Au _{x}Cu _{y}doped MoS _{2} monolayer. Appl Surf Sci 425:246–53.
 15
Zhao X, Xia C, Wang T, Dai X (2015) Effect of structural defects on electronic and magnetic properties of pristine and Mndoped MoS _{2} monolayer. Solid State Commun 220:31–35.
 16
Gui Y, Tang C, Zhou Q, Xu L, Zhao Z, Zhang X (2018) The sensing mechanism of ndoped SWCNT _{s} toward SF _{6} decomposition products: a firstprinciple study. Appl Surf Sci 440:846–852.
 17
Wang Y, Gui Y, Ji C, Tang C, Zhou Q, Li J, Zhang X (2018) Adsorption of SF _{6} decomposition components on Pt _{3}TiO _{2} (1 0 1) surface: a dft study. Appl Surf Sci 459:242–8.
 18
Liu D, Gui Y, Ji C, Tang C, Zhou Q, Li J, Zhang X (2019) Adsorption of SF _{6} decomposition components over pd (1 1 1): a density functional theory study. Appl Surf Sci 465:172–9.
 19
Wei H, Gui Y, Kang J, Wang W, Tang C (2018) A DFT study on the adsorption of H _{2}S and SO _{2} on ni doped MoS _{2} monolayer. Nanomaterials 8(9):646.
 20
Fang Q, Zhao X, Huang Y, Xu K, Min T, Chu PK, Ma F (2018) Structural stability and magneticexchange coupling in Mndoped monolayer/bilayer MoS _{2}. Phys Chem Chem Phys 20(1):553–561.
 21
Belinicher VI, Sturman BI (1980) The photogalvanic effect in media lacking a center of symmetry. Uspekhi Fizicheskih Nauk 130(3):415.
 22
Guan H, Tang N, Xu X, Shang LL, Huang W, Fu L, Fang X, Yu J, Zhang C, Zhang X, Dai L, Chen Y, Ge W, Shen B (2017) Photon wavelength dependent valley photocurrent in multilayer MoS _{2}. Phys Rev B 96(24):241304.
 23
Zhao P, Li J, Wei W, Sun Q, Jin H, Huang B, Dai Y (2017) Giant anisotropic photogalvanic effect in a flexible AsSb monolayer with ultrahigh carrier mobility. Phys Chem Chem Phys 19(40):27233–9.
 24
Li J, Yang W, Liu JT, Huang W, Li C, Chen SY (2017) Enhanced circular photogalvanic effect in HgTe quantum wells in the heavily inverted regime. Phys Rev B 95(3):035308.
 25
Ganichev SD, Weiss D, Eroms J (2017) Terahertz electric field driven electric currents and ratchet effects in graphene. Ann Phys 529(11):1600406.
 26
Ganichev SD, Prettl W (2003) Spin photocurrents in quantum wells. J Phys Condens Matter 15(20):935–83.
 27
Zeng XL, Yu JL, Cheng SY, Lai YF, Chen YH, Huang W (2017) Temperature dependence of photogalvanic effect in GaAs/AlGaAs twodimensional electron gas at interband and intersubband excitation. J Appl Phys 121(19):193901.
 28
Kastl C, Karnetzky C, Brenneis A, Langrieger F, Holleitner A (2017) Topological insulators as ultrafast auston switches in onchip THzcircuits. IEEE J Sel Top Quantum Electron 23(4):1–5.
 29
Dantscher KM, Kozlov DA, Scherr MT, Gebert S, Bärenfänger J, Durnev MV, Tarasenko SA, Belkov VV, Mikhailov NN, Dvoretsky SA, Kvon ZD, Ziegler J, Weiss D, Ganichev SD (2017) Photogalvanic probing of helical edge channels in twodimensional HgTe topological insulators. Phys Rev B 95(20):201103.
 30
Kuroda K, Reimann J, Kokh KA, Tereshchenko OE, Kimura A, Güdde J, Höfer U (2017) Ultrafast energy and momentumresolved surface dirac photocurrents in the topological insulator Sb _{2}Te _{3}. Phys Rev B 95(8):081103.
 31
K onig EJ, Xie HY, Pesin DA, Levchenko A (2017) Photogalvanic effect in Weyl semimetals. Phys Rev B 96(7):075123.
 32
de Juan F, Grushin AG, Morimoto T, Moore JE (2017) Quantized circular photogalvanic effect in Weyl semimetals. Nat Commun 8:15995.
 33
Sun K, Sun SS, Wei LL, Guo C, Tian HF, Chen GF, Yang HX, Li JQ (2017) Circular photogalvanic effect in the Weyl semimetal TaAs. Chin Phys Lett 34(11):117203.
 34
Xie Y, Zhang L, Zhu Y, Liu L, Guo H (2015) Photogalvanic effect in monolayer black phosphorus. Nanotechnology 26(45):455202.
 35
Zhang L, Gong K, Chen J, Liu L, Zhu Y, Xiao D, Guo H (2014) Generation and transport of valleypolarized current in transitionmetal dichalcogenides. Phys Rev B 90(19):195428.
 36
Chen J, Hu Y, Guo H (2012) Firstprinciples analysis of photocurrent in graphene PN junctions. Phys Rev B 85(15):155441.
 37
Mouri S, Miyauchi Y, Matsuda K (2013) Tunable photoluminescence of monolayer MoS _{2} via chemical doping. Nano Lett 13(12):5944–8.
 38
Qin S, Lei W, Liu D, Chen Y (2014) Insitu and tunable nitrogendoping of MoS _{2} nanosheets. Sci Rep 4(1):7582.
 39
Li R, Yang L, Xiong T, Wu Y, Cao L, Yuan D, Zhou W (2017) Nitrogen doped MoS _{2} nanosheets synthesized via a lowtemperature process as electrocatalysts with enhanced activity for hydrogen evolution reaction. J Power Sources 356:133–9.
 40
Liu P, Liu Y, Ye W, Ma J, Gao D (2016) Flowerlike ndoped MoS _{2} for photocatalytic degradation of rhb by visible light irradiation. Nanotechnology 27(22):225403.
 41
Azcatl A, Qin X, Prakash A, Zhang C, Cheng L, Wang Q, Lu N, Kim MJ, Kim J, Cho K, Addou R, Hinkle CL, Appenzeller J, Wallace RM (2016) Covalent nitrogen doping and compressive strain in MoS _{2} by remote n _{2} plasma exposure. Nano Lett 16(9):5437–43.
 42
Xu Wb, Huang Bj, Li P, Li F, Zhang Cw, Wang Pj (2014) The electronic structure and optical properties of Mn and B, C, N codoped MoS _{2} monolayers. Nanoscale Res Lett 9(1):554.
 43
Liu Q, Weijun X, Wu Z, Huo J, Liu D, Wang Q, Wang S (2016) The origin of the enhanced performance of nitrogendoped MoS _{2} in lithium ion batteries. Nanotechnology 27(17):175402.
 44
Clark SJ, Segall MD, Pickard CJ, Hasnip PJ, Probert MIJ, Refson K, Payne MC (2005) First principles methods using CASTEP. Z Krist Cryst Mater 220(5/6):567–70.
 45
Segall MD, Lindan PJD, Probert MJ, Pickard CJ, Hasnip PJ, Clark SJ, Payne MC (2002) Firstprinciples simulation: ideas, illustrations and the CASTEP code. J Phys Condens Matter 14(11):2717–44.
 46
Taylor J, Guo H, Wang J (2001) Ab initio modeling of quantum transport properties of molecular electronic devices. Phys Rev B 63(24):245407.
 47
Waldron D, Haney P, Larade B, MacDonald A, Guo H (2006) Nonlinear spin current and magnetoresistance of molecular tunnel junctions. Phys Rev Lett 96(16):166804.
 48
Henrickson LE (2002) Nonequilibrium photocurrent modeling in resonant tunneling photodetectors. J Appl Phys 91(10):6273.
 49
O’Leary SK (2004) An analytical density of states and joint density of states analysis of amorphous semiconductors. J Appl Phys 96(7):3680–6.
 50
Thevaril JJ, O’Leary SK (2010) A dimensionless joint density of states formalism for the quantitative characterization of the optical response of hydrogenated amorphous silicon. J Appl Phys 107(8):083105.
 51
Orapunt F, O’Leary SK (2008) Optical transitions and the mobility edge in amorphous semiconductors: a joint density of states analysis. J Appl Phys 104(7):073513.
 52
Liang WY, Beal AR (1976) A study of the optical joint densityofstates function. J Phys C Solid State Phys 9(14):2823–32.
 53
Cabrera CI, ContrerasSolorio DA, Hernández L (2016) Joint density of states in low dimensional semiconductors. Phys E 76:103–8.
 54
Ivchenko EL, Pikus GE (1978) New photogalvanic effect in gyrotropic crystals. Sov J Exp Theor Phys Lett 27:604.
 55
Ganichev SD, Rössler U, Prettl W, Ivchenko EL, Bel’kov VV, Neumann R, Brunner K, Abstreiter G (2002) Removal of spin degeneracy inpSiGe quantum wells demonstrated by spin photocurrents. Phys Rev B 66(7):075328.
 56
Ganichev SD, Ketterl H, Prettl W, Ivchenko EL, Vorobjev LE (2000) Circular photogalvanic effect induced by monopolar spin orientation in pGaAs/AlGaAs multiplequantum wells. Appl Phys Lett 77(20):3146–8.
 57
Wang L, Huang L, Tan WC, Feng X, Chen L, Huang X, Ang KW (2018) 2d photovoltaic devices: progress and prospects. Small Methods 2(3):1700294.
 58
Zhao L, Shang Q, Gao Y, Shi J, Liu Z, Chen J, Yang M, Yang P, Zhang Z, Du W, Hong M, Liang Y, Xie J, Hu X, Peng B, Leng J, Liu X, Zhao Y, Zhang Y, Zhang Q (2018) Hightemperature continuouswave pumped lasing from largearea monolayer semiconductors grown by chemical vapor deposition. ACS Nano 12(9):9390–6.
 59
He YM, Clark G, Schaibley JR, He Y, Chen MC, Wei YJ, Ding X, Zhang Q, Yao W, Xu X, Lu CY, Pan JW (2015) Single quantum emitters in monolayer semiconductors. Nat Nanotechnol 10(6):497–502.
Acknowledgements
We thank two anonymous reviewers for their helpful advices.
Funding
We gratefully acknowledge support by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11774100), the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (Grant No. 2018A030313322).
Author information
Affiliations
Contributions
Authors’ Contributions
The original idea was conceived by ZGS; the simulation design and data analysis were performed by WML and MY. The manuscript was drafted by ZGS and WML. All authors have approved to the final version of the manuscript.
Authors’ Information
Not applicable.
Corresponding author
Correspondence to ZhiGang Shao.
Ethics declarations
Competing Interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Luo, W., Shao, Z. & Yang, M. Photogalvanic Effect in NitrogenDoped Monolayer MoS_{2} from First Principles. Nanoscale Res Lett 14, 380 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s1167101932225
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Keywords
 Photogalvanic effect
 Ndoped monolayer MoS_{2}
 Asymmetry of spatial inversion
 Joint density of states