Skip to main content

A Highly Sensitive FET-Type Humidity Sensor with Inkjet-Printed Pt-In2O3 Nanoparticles at Room Temperature

Abstract

In this work, Pt-doped In2O3 nanoparticles (Pt-In2O3) were inkjet printed on a FET-type sensor platform that has a floating gate horizontally aligned with a control gate for humidity detection at room temperature. The relative humidity (RH)-sensing behavior of the FET-type sensor was investigated in a range from 3.3 (dry air in the work) to about 18%. A pulsed measurement method was applied to the transient RH-sensing tests of the FET-type sensor to suppress sensor baseline drift. An inkjet-printed Pt-In2O3 resistive-type sensor was also fabricated on the same wafer for comparison, and it showed no response to low RH levels (below 18%). In contrast, the FET-type sensor presented excellent low humidity sensitivity and fast response (32% of response and 58 s of response time for 18% RH) as it is able to detect the work-function changes of the sensing material induced by the physisorption of water molecules. The sensing mechanism of the FET-type sensor and the principle behind the difference in sensing performance between two types of sensors were explained through the analysis on the adsorption processes of water molecules and energy band diagrams. This research is very useful for the in-depth study of the humidity-sensing behaviors of Pt-In2O3, and the proposed FET-type humidity sensor could be a potential candidate in the field of real-time gas detection.

Introduction

Humidity sensors are desired for moisture detection and control in various sectors, such as semiconductor and automotive industries, agriculture, and medical field [1,2,3,4]. They can be classified into capacitive type [5,6,7], resistive type [8,9,10], solid electrolyte type [11], surface acoustic waves (SAW) type [12], quartz crystal microbalance (QCM) [13], etc. depending on their operation mechanisms and sensing approaches. Among them, resistive-type humidity sensors, which detect the variation in resistivity of the sensing materials with the amount of adsorbed water molecules, have interested researchers particularly because of their simple structure, easy fabrication, and convenient operation and application [14, 15]. In order to develop a reliable resistive-type humidity sensor with high sensitivity and short response and recovery times of resistive-type sensors, numerous novel materials have been investigated [14, 15], and nanostructured metal oxides are identified as strong candidates in consideration of their low cost, high operating stability, and good compatibility [15,16,17,18,19].

Recently, In2O3, as typical n-type semiconducting metal oxides, has attracted much attention because of its promising sensing characteristics in the detection of various target gasses [20,21,22]. It was found that the impedance of In2O3 is sensitive to humidity even at room temperature, especially those doped or decorated with noble metals or other oxides [14, 23,24,25]. However, those resistive-type humidity sensors based on In2O3 are mostly evaluated by AC excitation voltage with no DC bias to avoid polarization of the sensors [23]. As a result, the measured current needs to be rehabilitated and rectified to a DC signal for the other scaling or processing [26], which increases the complexity of measurement and limits the application of the sensors. Moreover, most of them present relatively poor resolution and sensitivity for low humidity level detection (lower than 25%) and need further improvement [23, 27].

In this work, a FET sensor platform was fabricated, which has a planner floating gate (FG) facing the control gate (CG) horizontally. Doped In2O3 nanoparticles with Pt (Pt-In2O3) were deposited on the FET substrate to serve as the sensing material with inkjet printing process for relative humidity (RH) detection lower than 18%. The special construction of the FET platform makes the deposition of the sensing material very easy and evades the pollution of the channel of the FET substrate. More importantly, unlike the impedance change mechanism of the resistive-type sensor, the FET sensor platform reflects the work function changes of the sensing material, which effectively improves the humidity performance of In2O3-based sensors. In this article, the RH-sensing performance of the proposed FET-type Pt-In2O3 humidity sensor was detailedly investigated and compared to a Pt-In2O3 resistive-type sensor that fabricated on the same silicon wafer. The experiments indicate that the surface work function of Pt-In2O3 is much more sensitive to the adsorption of water vapor than the resistance change. The mechanism behind the sensing performance of both two sensors and the difference between them were discussed by using energy band diagrams of the sensing material. The adsorption behavior of water vapor on Pt-In2O3 and the reaction procedures were also explained.

Methods

Fabrication of Platforms

To deeply understand the sensing principle of the proposed FET humidity sensor, a resistive-type device with the same Pt-In2O3 sensing material was also investigated in this paper. The resistive-type (Fig. 1a) and the FET-type sensor platforms (Fig. 1b) were fabricated on the same silicon wafer for a fair comparison between them. Figure 1a presents the empty resistor platform, and the inset is its magnified electrodes after forming the transparent Pt-In2O3 layer. Figure 1b shows the FET platform proposed in our previous work [28, 29]. It has four electrodes including CG, drain (D), source (S), and body electrodes. To protect the active region of the FET platform as marked in Fig. 1a, an extended FG was adopted, which aligned with the CG in a horizontal direction. Interdigitated structures of the two gates were used for a good capacitive coupling between them. In addition, an SU-8 passivation was also conducted to only expose the sensing region as marked in Fig. 1b and the electrode contact pads. Figure 1 c and d are the schematic cross-sectional views along and perpendicular to the channel of the FET, which are along line A–A’ and line B–B’ in Fig. 1b, respectively. The channel length and width are 2 μm and 2.4 μm, respectively. The main fabrication steps were described as follows. In this work, pMOSFET platforms were mainly fabricated as they have lower 1/f noise than the nMOSFETs [30]. Firstly, a 550-nm-thick field oxide was grown for the isolation of active regions by local oxidation of silicon (LOCOS) process. A buried channel of the FET was formed by ion implantation, and a 10-nm-thick gate oxide was grown by dry oxidation process at 800 °C. Then, a 350-nm in situ-doped n+ poly-Si layer was deposited and patterned to serve as the FG. The heavily doped p+ source and drain regions were formed by ion implantation process. To prevent the FG and channel from unwanted molecules (for example, H2O) and charge traps, an ONO passivation layer consisting of SiO2 (10 nm)/Si3N4 (20 nm)/SiO2 (10 nm) was formed on the whole wafer. After defining the contact holes, stacked layers of Cr (30 nm)/Au (50 nm) were deposited consecutively and patterned to serve as the CG, D, S, and body electrodes of FET. Note that the electrodes of the resistive-type sensors were also fabricated simultaneously. Finally, an SU-8 passivation layer formed by spin coating was patterned on top of the platforms by a lithography process to expose only the interdigitated FG-CG area of the FET platform (the sensing region in Fig. 1a), the interdigitated electrode area of the resistor platform, and all pads for the electrode contacts.

Fig. 1
figure1

The resistive-type and FET-type gas sensors with inkjet-printed Pt-In2O3 nanoparticles. a SEM image of the resistive-type sensor platform. The inset shows magnified electrodes after forming the Pt-In2O3 sensing layer. b SEM image of the FET-type sensor with a FG aligned with a CG horizontally. c The schematic cross-sectional view along line A–A’ in b. d The schematic cross-sectional view along line B–B’ in b. The channel length and width are 2 μm and 2.4 μm, respectively

Materials

In2O3 nanopowders (≤ 100 nm in diameter), ethanol (99%), 8-Wt% H2PtCl6 (in H2O), and deionized (DI) water were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (USA) for the preparation of the sensing material. All chemicals in this paper were used without further purification.

Deposition of Sensing Material

The Pt-In2O3 sensing material was formed by inkjet printing process. Firstly, In2O3 nanopowders were dissolved in ethanol and stirred thoroughly to obtain a uniform solution. The 8-Wt% H2PtCl6 (in H2O) solution was further diluted by DI water to the desired concentration and then mixed with the In2O3 solution together to serve as the precursor ink. The as-prepared ink was printed on both kinds of platforms using an inkjet printer (Omni Jet 100), followed by a 2-h annealing process at 300 °C in air to fully evaporate the solvent from the printed sensing layer. The Wt% of Pt in the sensing layer was just set to be 10 Wt% to focus principally on the analysis of water vapor adsorption effects.

Measurement Setups

Figure 2 shows the measurement setups used in this work. In Fig. 2, humid gas samples were made by mixing dry air and wet air prepared by injecting dry air through a bubbler, in the mixing chamber. The total flow rate of the humid air sample was fixed at 400 sccm, and the relative humidity was determined by balancing the flow rates of dry and wet air through a multichannel mass flow programmer and calibrated by a humidity calibrator. A reference gas (dry air) with a flow rate of 400 sccm was also used. During the dynamic humidity-sensing test, the reference dry air and the humid air sample were blown to the sensors alternatively. All sensing characteristics of sensors were tested at 25 °C (room temperature). Electrical measurements were carried out by using an Agilent B1500A.

Fig. 2
figure2

Measurement setups. All characteristics of sensors were tested at 25 °C (room temperature)

Results and Discussion

Firstly, the basic I-V characteristics of the Pt-In2O3 resistive-type and FET-type sensors were measured and plotted in Fig. 3 a and b, respectively. Double sweep I-V curve of the resistor shown in Fig. 3a indicates an ohmic contact behavior of the Pt-In2O3 film to the electrodes in both resistive-type and FET-type sensors. In Fig. 3b, double sweep DC I-V and pulsed I-V (PIV) of the FET-type sensor from positive to negative and back were plotted together for comparison. The inset is the pulse scheme used for PIV measurement. In DC I-V results, hysteresis can be observed, which is induced by charge trapping in the sensing material and at the interface between the sensing material and the ONO passivation stacks. Under the traditional working environment of FET type sensors, DC biases are typically applied to the electrodes for tracing the current sensing signal. However, due to the mentioned charge trapping inside the device, the current of the FET sensor can drift significantly over time, which disturbs the current baseline and degrades the accuracy. In contrast, in PIV of the proposed FET humidity sensor, the hysteresis was restrained by using pulsed gate bias. Upon those results, in order to obtain reliable and stable sensing signals when measuring the transient sensing properties of the FET-type sensor, a pulsed measurement method was adopted [29, 31] which is illustrated in Fig. 4a.

Fig. 3
figure3

Basic electrical properties of the resistive-type and FET-type Pt-In2O3 sensors at T = 25 °C. a Double sweep I-V curve of the resistive-type sensor. The results of forward and reverse voltage sweeps overlap with each other. b Double sweep DC and pulsed I-V (PIV) curves of the FET-type sensor. The inset indicates the pulse scheme used for PIV measurement

Fig. 4
figure4

Sensing performance of two types of sensors for 9.4% RH. a Schematic of the FET-type sensor and the pulse scheme used for the measurement of the FET-type sensor in this work. b |ID| of FET-type sensor based on pMOSFET decreased obviously as RH increased from 3.3 to 9.4%. The sensor was blown with humid air for 100 s from about 70 to 170 s. c DC transient measurement of the resistive-type sensor and no response was observed from the resistive-type sensor for 9.4% RH

Figure 4a shows the pulse scheme and the implementation strategy of the pulsed measurement method for the FET-type humidity sensor. The left side of Fig. 4a is the schematic of the FET-type sensor, and pulsed biases were applied to its CG and D electrodes by two waveform generators of Agilent B1500A. The on time (pulse width) ton and off time toff in one pulse period were fixed at 20 μs and 1 s, respectively. During the off time toff, all the CG, D, and S electrodes of the FET were grounded, and no drain current (ID) was read out. During the on time ton, appropriate CG and D read voltages (VrCG and VrDS) were applied synchronously to collect ID samples. Figure 4 b and c show the sensing behaviors of the FET-type and resistive-type sensors, respectively, upon the exposure to 9.4% relative humidity (RH) for 100 s. Note that, for the resistive-type sensor, only constant DC voltages were adopted. The Pt-In2O3 resistive-type sensor, which reflects resistance changes of the sensing material, was not sensitive to the increase of RH from 3.3% (dry air) to 9.4%. However, the absolute drain current |ID| of the pMOSFET sensor decreased markedly with the increase of RH and returned back to the original baseline within about 400 s during the recovery period of the sensor. Given that the sensing mechanism of the FET-type sensor is the change in work function of Pt-In2O3 caused by the adsorption of water molecules, the measurement results indicate that the work function of the sensing material is more sensitive to RH change compared to the resistance. Detailed explanations of this sensing behavior and the reason for the difference in humidity sensitivity between the two platforms were addressed later in this paper.

Next, dynamic response of the FET-type sensor to different RH levels (7.6%, 9.4%, 11.4%, 13.4%, 15.5%, and 17.8%) was measured and is presented in Fig. 5a. The response of the FET-type sensor denoted as SRH was expressed by Eq. (1) [32], where ID_D and ID_H are the original drain current in dry air and the current in a humid environment at a certain RH level, respectively.

$$ {S}_{\mathrm{RH}}=\left[\left(\left|{I}_{\mathrm{D}\_\mathrm{D}}\right|-\left|{I}_{\mathrm{D}\_\mathrm{H}}\right|\right)/\left|{I}_{\mathrm{D}\_\mathrm{D}}\right|\right]\times 100\% $$
(1)
Fig. 5
figure5

Humidity detection using the proposed FET-type sensor. a Transient humidity sensing measurement at T = 25 °C. RH = 3.3%, 7.6%, 9.4%, 11.4%, 13.4%, 15.5%, and 17.8%. b SRH as a parameter of RH in a range from 3.3 to 17.8%. c Variations of tres and trec of the FET-type sensor with RH levels

Figure 5b plots the SRH as a function of RH ranging from 3.3 (dry air) to about 18%. The SRH tends to be proportional to the RH in this range. Note the dynamic response of resistive Pt-In2O3 sensor to RH was also measured, but no resistance change of the sensing material was observed (from 3.3 to 18% RH). The response time tres and recovery time trec are defined as the time required for the current to change to 90% of its final value [33]. Figure 5c presents the variations of tres and trec of the FET-type sensor with RH of 3.3–18%. The tres reduced slightly with the increase of RH, and all tress corresponding to different RH values are less than 60 s. In contrast, the increment in RH has the opposite effect on the trec of the sensor. According to the results, the proposed FET-type humidity sensor has very rapid and high responses to low RH levels at room temperature.

To explain the humidity sensing mechanism of the Pt-In2O3 FET-type sensor investigated in this paper below about 18% RH, the schematic water molecule adsorption and related energy band diagrams near the interface between ONO stake and sensing material were constructed as shown in Fig. 6. Figure 6a illustrates various kinds of adsorptions of water molecules on the surface of Pt-In2O3 particles. With the catalytic action of Pt, water molecules are promoted to react with pre-adsorbed oxygen species (\( {\mathrm{O}}_{\mathrm{ad}}^{-} \)) producing hydroxyl groups (–OH) on the surface of In2O3 as shown in Eq. (2) [34].

$$ {\mathrm{H}}_2\mathrm{O}+2\mathrm{In}+{\mathrm{O}}_{\mathrm{ad}}^{-}\longleftrightarrow 2\left(\mathrm{In}-\mathrm{OH}\right)+{\mathrm{e}}^{-} $$
(2)
Fig. 6
figure6

Schematic water molecule adsorption and related energy band diagrams. a Chemisorption and physisorption layers of water molecules on Pt-In2O3 sensing material. b The energy band diagram near the interface between the ONO stack and sensing layer before RH detection. It was assumed to be at a flat band state. c The energy band diagram after RH detection. Dipoles at the interface decrease the work function of the sensing material

Those hydroxyls leave on the surface of the sensing material and compose the first chemisorption layer because it is difficult to desorb tightly chemisorbed ions at room temperature [35]. Then, during sensing tests, with the increase of RH level, more water molecules start to adsorb on the hydroxyls through double hydrogen bonds and compose the second adsorption layer, which is the first physisorption layer having barely no movable ions inside. When RH level further increases, more layers accumulate after the first physisorption layer filled on the surface of sensing material as shown in Fig. 6a, i.e., the multi-physisorption layers. According to the literatures [23], the impedance of In2O3 begins to decrease until RH reaches higher than about 54%. At low RH levels, only the first physisorption layer is formed, where there are no movable protons contributing to the electrical conduction. After that, multi-physisorption layers are formed through single hydrogen bonding, where movable protons (H+) will be generated by the ionization under an electric field. Those protons hop between the adsorbed water molecules inducing higher conductivity of the sensing material, i.e., the Grotthuss mechanism [27, 36,37,38]. In this paper, no current change of the Pt-In2O3 resistive-type sensor was observed, which demonstrates –OH groups have covered the surface of the sensing material and only physical adsorptions of water molecules occurred when RH was increased during the measurements. Consequently, the Pt-In2O3 resistive-type sensor showed poor sensitivity to RH increments below 18%.

In the case of FET-type sensors, the sensing mechanism is the changes in the work function of sensing material, which is different from resistive-type sensors. According to the results of the resistive-type sensor, under the conditions of RH levels measured in this paper, there is no electron transfer between the sensing material and the water molecules in physisorption layers. However, those adsorbed water molecules can create dipoles at the surface of In2O3 particles pointing away from the sensing material (Fig. 6a). Figure 6 b and c show the energy band diagram of the In2O3 near the interface between the sensing layer and the ONO stack before and after moisture detection, which illustrate the effect of the dipoles. From the perspective of energy bands, the chemisorbed hydroxyls have already existed on the surface of the In2O3 before the test, and we assume that it is at flat band state before moisture detection for convenience (Fig. 6b). The EVAC, EC, EF, and EV in the diagrams denote the energy of vacuum, conduction band, valence band, and Fermi level, respectively. The difference between the EVAC and EF before sensing tests, i.e., the work function, of In2O3 at the interface between the sensing layer and ONO stack, is defined as ΦS1. After the physisorption of water molecules, dipoles formed at the interface reduce the electron affinity and result in the uniform decrease of the work function from ΦS1 to ΦS2. The difference between ΦS1 and ΦS2 is denoted as ΔΦ as shown in Fig. 6c. There is barely no electron transfer from physisorbed water molecules to In2O3. However, the ΔΦ can generate electron accumulation in the body of FET near the interface between gate oxide and body, so the |ID| of pMOSFET decreases. In other words, even though there is no change in the resistance of Pt-In2O3 layer, the dipoles formed by adsorbed water molecules in the physisorption layers can tune the work function of the sensing material and finally induce the drain current changes of the FET-type sensor.

Conclusions

In summary, a FET-type sensor with inkjet-printed Pt-In2O3 nanoparticles was investigated for low RH detection ranging from 3.3 to 18% at room temperature. The Pt-In2O3 resistive-type sensor fabricated on the same silicon wafer was not sensitive to humidity changes at low RH levels. In contrast, the FET-type sensor exhibited fast and excellent humidity response. The principle behind this phenomenon was explained by energy band theory and adsorption behaviors of water molecules on the sensing material. Since only physisorption layers were generated, no electron transfer occurred to contribute to the reduction in resistance of the resistive-type sensor, whereas the physisorbed water molecules formed dipoles that can change the electron affinity and resulted in an increase of work function of the sensing material. Therefore, the proposed FET-type Pt-In2O3 humidity sensor is promising in the applications of low humidity level detections.

Availability of Data and Materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

Pt-In2O3 :

Pt-doped In2O3 nanoparticles

FET:

Field-effect transistor

RH:

Relative humidity

SAW:

Surface acoustic waves

QCM:

Quartz crystal microbalance

AC:

Alternating current

DC:

Direct current

FG:

Floating gate

CG:

Control gate

SU-8:

Sukhoi Su-8

MOSFET:

Metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistor

LOCOS:

Local oxidation of silicon

ONO:

Oxide-nitride-oxide stack

D:

Drain

S:

Source

SEM:

Scanning electron microscope

PIV:

Pulse I-V

References

  1. 1.

    Tripathy A, Pramanik S, Cho J, Santhosh J, Osman NAA (2014) Role of morphological structure, doping, and coating of different materials in the sensing characteristics of humidity sensors. Sensors 14(9):16343–16422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Adnan Zain H, Hafiz Jali M, Rafis Abdul Rahim H, Ashadi Md Johari M, Helmi Mohd Yusof H, Thokchom S, Yasin M, Wadi Harun S (2020) ZnO nanorods coated microfiber loop resonator for relative humidity sensing. Opt Fiber Technol 54:102080

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Zhou N, Wang P, Shi ZX, Gao YX, Yang YX, Wang YP, Xie Y, Cai DW, Guo X, Zhang L, Qiu JR, Tong LM (2019) Au nanorod–coupled microfiber optical humidity sensors. Opt Express 27(6):8180–8185

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Shrestha RG, Kubota Y, Sakamoto Y, Kawakita J (2020) Quick and sensitive detection of water using galvanic-coupled arrays with a submicron gap for the advanced prediction of dew condensation. Sensors 20(11):3314

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Boudaden J, Steinmaßl M, Endres HE, Drost A, Eisele I, Kutter C, Müller-Buschbaum P (2018) Polyimide-based capacitive humidity sensor. Sensors 18(5):1516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Tripathy A, Pramanik S, Manna A, Bhuyan S, Shah NFA, Radzi Z, Osman NAA (2016) Design and development for capacitive humidity sensor applications of lead-free Ca, Mg, Fe, Ti-oxides-based electro-ceramics with improved sensing properties via physisorption. Sensors 16(7):1135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Zhao Y, Yang B, Liu J (2018) Effect of interdigital electrode gap on the performance of SnO2-modified MoS2 capacitive humidity sensor. Sensors Actuators B Chem 271:256–263

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Feng Q, Zeng Y, Xu P, Lin S, Feng C, Li X, Wang J (2019) Tuning the electrical conductivity of amorphous carbon/reduced graphene oxide wrapped-Co3O4 ternary nanofibers for highly sensitive chemical sensors. J Mater Chem A 7(48):27522–27534

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Park KJ, Gong MS (2017) A water durable resistive humidity sensor based on rigid sulfonated polybenzimidazole and their properties. Sensors Actuators B Chem 246:53–60

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Shukla SK, Shukla SK, Govender PP, Agorku ES (2016) A resistive type humidity sensor based on crystalline tin oxide nanoparticles encapsulated in polyaniline matrix. Microchim Acta 183(2):573–580

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Chani MTS, Karimov KS, Meng H, Akhmedov KM, Murtaza I, Asghar U, Abbass SZ, Ali R, Asiri AM, Nawaz N (2019) Humidity sensor based on orange dye and graphene solid electrolyte cells. Russ J Electrochem 55(12):1391–1396

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Le X, Wang X, Pang J, Liu Y, Fang B, Xu Z, Gao C, Xu Y, Xie J (2018) A high performance humidity sensor based on surface acoustic wave and graphene oxide on AlN/Si layered structure. Sensors Actuators B Chem 255:2454–2461

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Yao Y, Zhang H, Sun J, Ma W, Li L, Li W, Du J (2017) Novel QCM humidity sensors using stacked black phosphorus nanosheets as sensing film. Sensors Actuators B Chem 244:259–264

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Garde AS (2014) Humidity sensing properties of WO3 thick film resistor prepared by screen printing technique. J Alloys Compd 617:367–373

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Tsai FS, Wang SJ (2014) Enhanced sensing performance of relative humidity sensors using laterally grown ZnO nanosheets. Sensors Actuators B Chem 193:280–287

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Gupta SP, Pawbake AS, Sathe BR, Late DJ, Walke PS (2019) Superior humidity sensor and photodetector of mesoporous ZnO nanosheets at room temperature. Sensors Actuators B Chem 293:83–92

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Pandey NK, Tiwari K, Roy A, Mishra A, Govindan A (2013) Ag-loaded WO3 ceramic nanomaterials: characterization and moisture sensing studies. Int J Appl Ceram Technol 10(1):150–159

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Qian J, Peng Z, Shen Z, Zhao Z, Zhang G, Fu X (2016) Positive impedance humidity sensors via single-component materials. Sci Rep 6(1):1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Misra SK, Pandey NK (2016) Analysis on activation energy and humidity sensing application of nanostructured SnO2-doped ZnO material. Sensors Actuators A Phys 249:8–14

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Gao L, Cheng Z, Xiang Q, Zhang Y, Xu J (2015) Porous corundum-type In2O3 nanosheets: synthesis and NO2 sensing properties. Sensors Actuators B Chem 208:436–443

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Han D, Song P, Zhang S, Zhang H, Xu Q, Wang Q (2015) Enhanced methanol gas-sensing performance of Ce-doped In2O3 porous nanospheres prepared by hydrothermal method. Sensors Actuators B Chem 216:488–496

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Zhao C, Huang B, Xie E, Zhou J, Zhang Z (2015) Improving gas-sensing properties of electrospun In2O3 nanotubes by Mg acceptor doping. Sensors Actuators B Chem 207:313–320

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Liang Q, Xu H, Zhao J, Gao S (2012) Micro humidity sensors based on ZnO-In2O3 thin films with high performances. Sensors Actuators B Chem 165(1):76–81

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Li B, Tian Q, Su H, Wang X, Wang T, Zhang D (2019) High sensitivity protable capacitive humidity sensor based on In2O3 nanocubes-decorated GO nanosheets and its wearable application in respiration detection. Sensors Actuators B Chem 299:126973

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Du H, Wang J, Sun Y, Yao P, Li X, Yu N (2015) Investigation of gas sensing properties of SnO2/In2O3 composite hetero-nanofibers treated by oxygen plasma. Sensors Actuators B Chem 206:753–763

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Wang L, He Y, Hu J, Qi Q, Zhang T (2011) DC humidity sensing properties of BaTiO3 nanofiber sensors with different electrode materials. Sensors Actuators B Chem 153(2):460–464

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Chen Z, Lu C (2005) Humidity sensors: a review of materials and mechanisms. Sens Lett 3(4):274–295

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Wu M, Shin J, Hong Y, Jang D, Jin X, Kwon HI, Lee JH (2018) An FET-type gas sensor with a sodium ion conducting solid electrolyte for CO2 detection. Sensors Actuators B Chem 259:1058–1065

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Wu M, Hong Y, Jang D, Jin X, Lee JH (2019) An FET-type gas sensor for CO2 detection at room temperature using PEI-coated SWNT. J Semicond Technol Sci 19(2):196–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    O KK, Park N, Yang DJ (2002) 1/f noise of NMOS and PMOS transistors and their implications to design of voltage controlled oscillators. In: IEEE Radio Frequency Integrated Circuits Symposium, RFIC, Digest of Technical Papers

  31. 31.

    Hong S, Shin J, Hong Y, Wu M, Jeong Y, Jang D, Jung G, Bae J-H, Lee J-H (2019) Humidity-sensitive field effect transistor with In2O3 nanoparticles as a sensing layer. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 19(10):6656–6662

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Park SY, Kim YH, Lee SY, Sohn W, Lee JE, Kim DH, Shim YS, Kwon KC, Choi KS, Yoo HJ, Suh JM, Ko M, Lee JH, Lee MJ, Kim SY, Lee MH, Jang HW (2018) Highly selective and sensitive chemoresistive humidity sensors based on rGO/MoS2 van der Waals composites. J Mater Chem A 6(12):5016–5024

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Arunachalam S, Izquierdo R, Nabki F (2019) Low-hysteresis and fast response time humidity sensors using suspended functionalized carbon nanotubes. Sensors 19(3):680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Liu Y, Liu X, Wang Y, Wang R, Zhang T (2019) Metal-organic-framework-derived In2O3 microcolumnar structures embedded with Pt nanoparticles for NO2 detection near room temperature. Ceram Int 45(8):9820–9828

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Fenner R, Zdankiewicz E (2001) Micromachined water vapor sensors: a review of sensing technologies. IEEE Sensors J 1(4):309–317

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Liu X, Wang R, Zhang T, He Y, Tu J, Li X (2010) Synthesis and characterization of mesoporous indium oxide for humidity-sensing applications. Sensors Actuators B Chem 150(1):442–448

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Almar L, Tarancón A, Andreu T, Torrell M, Hu Y, Dezanneau G, Morata A (2015) Mesoporous ceramic oxides as humidity sensors: a case study for gadolinium-doped ceria. Sensors Actuators B Chem 216:41–48

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Morimoto T, Nagao M (1970) The relation between the amounts of chemisorbed and physisorbed water on zinc oxide. Bull Chem Soc Jpn 43(12):3746–3750

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Liaoning Provincial Department of Education 2019 Scientific Research Funding Project (LJGD2019016) and Liaoning Provincial Natural Science Foundation (2020-BS-144).

Funding

Liaoning Provincial Department of Education 2019 Scientific Research Funding Project (LJGD2019016).

Liaoning Provincial Natural Science Foundation (2020-BS-144).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MW carried out the experiments and drafted the manuscript. All the authors contributed to the discussion. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Meile Wu.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wu, M., Wu, Z., Jin, X. et al. A Highly Sensitive FET-Type Humidity Sensor with Inkjet-Printed Pt-In2O3 Nanoparticles at Room Temperature. Nanoscale Res Lett 15, 198 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s11671-020-03426-6

Download citation

Keywords

  • Pt-In2O3
  • Inkjet printing
  • Humidity sensor
  • FET sensor
  • Work function