Skip to main content

Tantalum disulfide quantum dots: preparation, structure, and properties


Tantalum disulfide (TaS2) two-dimensional film material has attracted wide attention due to its unique optical and electrical properties. In this work, we report the preparation of 1 T-TaS2 quantum dots (1 T-TaS2 QDs) by top-down method. Herein, we prepared the TaS2 QDs having a monodisperse grain size of around 3 nm by an effective ultrasonic liquid phase exfoliation method. Optical studies using UV-Vis, PL, and PLE techniques on the as-prepared TaS2 QDs exhibited ultraviolet absorption at 283 nm. Furthermore, we found that dimension reduction of TaS2 has led to a modification of the band gap, namely a transition from indirect to direct band gap, which is explained using first-principle calculations. By using quinine as reference, the fluorescence quantum yield is 45.6%. Therefore, our results suggest TaS2 QDs have unique and extraordinary optical properties. Moreover, the low-cost, facile method of producing high quality TaS2 QDs in this work is ideal for mass production to ensure commercial viability of devices based on this material.

Graphical abstract

TaS2 quantum dots having a monodisperse grain size of around 3 nm have been prepared by an ultrasonic liquid phase exfoliation method, it has been found that the dimension reduction of TaS2 has led to a transition from indirect to direct band gap that results in the unique and extraordinary optical properties (PL QY: 45.6%).


Recently, the family of layered transition metal dichalcogenides (LTMDs) [1] has drawn great attention in many fields, such as electronic devices [2], energy storage [3], catalysis [4], bio-imaging [5, 6], and biosensing [7], due to its many interesting physical and electrical properties. Typically, the structure of LTMDs is formed [1] by covalently bonded monolayer, and each monolayer is linked by Van der Waals forces; hence the LTMDs can be easily cleaved along the layer plane by either chemical or physical methods. According to previous work, the band gaps of LTMDs can be modified from indirect to direct band gap by decreasing the number of layers [8]. In particular, the TaS2 has been studied extensively for various applications, ranging from optical switch [9] to catalysis [10], as they exhibit tunable band gap, controllable size, and strong photoluminescence. Therefore, it is becoming a widely focused functional material.

At present, both top-down and bottom-up methods are adopted to prepare nanomaterials [11, 12]. The bottom-up approach is based on atoms and molecules as building blocks, which are used to form nanoparticle structures according to relevant purposes. This method mainly involves gas-phase and liquid-phase reactions [13, 14]. As for the top-down approach, electrochemical and etching methods [15, 16] have been applied to prepare TaS2 nanomaterials by weakening the Van der Waals interactions and cleaving the bonding force between the layers to obtain TaS2 nanomaterials from its bulk materials. For example, Zeng et al. [17] prepared TaS2 nanosheets through lithium interaction and exfoliation by controlling the cut-off voltage. Zhang et al. [18] prepared monodispersed TaS2 nanodots by a facile top-down method. QDs [19,20,21,22] has attracted wide interest worldwide in recent years, but TaS2 QDs are rarely reported. Therefore, facile methods are still in need to prepare industry applicable TaS2 QDs with narrow size distribution and good dispersion.

In this study, TaS2 QDs with a monodisperse grain size of around 3 nm were prepared by ultrasonic method. In this process, the Van der Waals interactions in between the TaS2 layers were first weakened by intercalation of NMP and then followed by further exfoliation using high power ultrasonic energy. The size of TaS2 QDs can be easily tuned by adjusting centrifugation rate and time; a higher centrifugation rate and a bigger centrifugation time result in a smaller size. This provides an efficient and practical method in the preparation of TaS2 QDs. Its structural, electronic, and optical properties were characterized by experiments, as well as first-principle calculations.


The TaS2 powder was purchased from Aladdin Company (Chengdu China, purity ≥ 99.99%). The chemical reagents were purchased from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co. Ltd and used as received: N-methyl-2-pyrritolidone (NMP) (purity ≥ 99.0%) and ethanol (purity ≥ 99.7%).

Preparation of TaS2 QDs

TaS2 powder 0.5 g was grinded in the mortar for 2 h. Fifty milliliters of NMP solvent was added to the grinded powder sample. The mixture was then ultrasonic treated for 4 h with an ultrasonic power of 210 W. The suspension after ultrasonic treatment was centrifuged at the rate of 7000 rpm for 25 min. The supernatant, which obtains the TaS2 QDs, was collected.

General Characterization

The morphology, elemental composition, and size distribution of TaS2 QDs were studied using transmission electron microscopy (TEM, Tecnai G2 TF30 S-Twin), atomic force microscopy (AFM, Seiko SPA-400), scanning electron microscopy (SEM, SUPRA 55VP), and energy-dispersive spectroscopy (EDS, X-Max20). TaS2 QDs suspension was drop-casted onto an ultrathin carbon-coated holey support film, consisting of 300 mesh copper grids, during TEM characterization. The phase structure of TaS2 QDs was characterized by X-ray photoelectron microscopy (XPS, PHI Versa probe II), X-ray diffractometer (XRD, UItima IV, X-ray source: Cu Kα, λ = 1.54178 Å), Fourier-transform infrared spectrometer (FTIR, Nicolet iS10) using the KBr pellet technique, and Raman spectroscopy (Renishaw in Via) using an argon-ion laser having an excitation wavelength of 514.5 nm. The optical properties of TaS2 QDs were characterized using UV-visible spectrophotometer (UV-Vis, Shimadzu UV-3600) and fluorescence photoluminescence spectrometer (PL and PLE, Hitachi, F-4500).

Results and Discussion

The process of TaS2 QDs formation from its bulk crystal is depicted in Fig. 1a. The preparation process consisted of three steps, namely grinding, ultrasonic, and centrifugation. An enlarged schematic of TaS2 QDs is shown within the dotted red square of Fig. 1a. The tawny solution in the sample bottle was TaS2 QDs solution after centrifugation. Figure 1 b shows the TEM image of the TaS2 QDs, which are spherical in shape with uniform size distribution. As shown in the inset, the size distribution of the TaS2 QDs followed a Gaussian fitted curve with an average diameter of WC = 3.0 nm and full width at half maximum (FWHM) of 1.4 nm. It was reported that the thickness of the TaS2 monolayer ranged from 0.6 to 1.2 nm [23]; hence, the QDs could comprise of 2–5 layers of TaS2. The number of TaS2 layer can be reduced by increasing the centrifugal rate and time (as shown in Additional file 1: Fig. S1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

a Schematic diagram showing the process of TaS2 QDs formation; b TEM image of the TaS2 QDs, inset shows TaS2 QDs particle size distribution. Gaussian fitting curve is shown as yellow line; c FFT pattern (inset) of a selected area (dotted red square); d HR-TEM image of the TaS2 QDs, inset shows the line profile of the diffraction fringes; e SEM image at 70.0 K; f SEM image at 100.0 K; g EDS spectrum of TaS2 QDs

The FFT pattern is shown in the inset of Fig. 1c. It shows a hexagonal crystalline structure, which corresponds to the TaS2 QDs structure in Fig. 1a. As shown in Fig. 1d, the TaS2 QDs line profile exhibits obvious lattice stripe with a spacing of 0.207 nm. The SEM image in Fig. 1e shows a uniform distribution of TaS2 QDs, thus indicating a good dispersibility and uniform size distribution. At higher SEM magnification, it is apparent that the surface consisted of rugged particles as shown in Fig. 1f. This indicates the formation of independent spherical TaS2 QDs during the preparation process. EDS technique was used to characterize the elemental composition as shown in Fig. 1g. A film of TaS2 QDS was deposited on copper sheet during the EDS characterization in order to avoid the overlapping of Ta and Si/SiO2 substrate peaks, which could complicate the analysis. The measured atomic percentage ratio of Ta and S in the material was 33.9/66.1 ≈ 1:1.95, which is close to the theoretical value of 1:2.

Figure 2 a shows AFM images of the TaS2 QDs, labeled as A, B, and C, which were randomly selected and their heights were measured to be 2.30 nm, 2.03 nm, and 2.91 nm, respectively. The average height of 2.41 nm is consistent with the average diameter of 3.01 nm measured using TEM. The FTIR spectra, shown in Fig. 2b, reveal that the Ta-S bond stretching vibration absorption peak was situated at 616 cm−1. Figure 2 c shows Ta 4f, S 2p, C 1s, and O 1s peaks from XPS full-scan spectrum. The C 1s and O 1s peaks were impurity peaks produced by solvent NMP and oxide. Figure 2 d shows the XPS spectrum of S 2p deconvoluted into three components, namely S 2p3/2 (163.4 eV), S 2p1/2 (166.7 eV), and oxidized sulfur (168.2 eV). The XPS spectrum of Ta 4f is shown in Fig. 2e and was deconvoluted into components, such as Ta 4f7/2 (23.2 eV), Ta 4f5/2 (25.6 eV), and Ta 4f7/2 (27.2 eV). The Ta 4f7/2 peak at 27.2 eV is associated with oxidized tantalum [24, 25]; oxidation has also been observed in other QDs [26,27,28]. Figure 2 f shows the Raman vibration mode of TaS2 QDs. The E12g and A1g modes relate to the in-plane and out-of-plane vibration respectively [29]. The A1g and E12g modes of the TaS2 QDs were observed at 301.4 cm−1 and 242.3 cm−1 respectively. The Raman intensity of the E12g vibration mode was much smaller than that of A1g, which could due to the fact that A1g mode is more sensitive to strain than the E12g mode in TaS2 QDs. It shows that the A1g mode dominated during the preparation process of TaS2 QDs. Figure 2 g shows XRD diffraction pattern of the TaS2 QDs. When compared with space group P\( \overline{3} \)m1(164), the pattern indicates trigonal structure of 1 T-TaS2 [30]. According to the standard PDF#04-001-0068 card, the diffraction peak 2θ at 15.0° represented crystal plane (001) with d = 0.590 nm, which corresponds to the C-axis crystal surface spacing. The peak at 30.2° represented crystal plane (002) with d = 0.295 nm. The peak at 33.0° (asterisk peak) was originated from the Si (001) substrate [31]. The grain size can be calculated using the Debye-Scherrer (Eq. (1)) [32].

$$ D=\frac{0.89\lambda }{\beta \cos \theta } $$
Fig. 2
figure 2

a AFM morphology and height analysis results of TaS2 QDs, labeled A, B and C, were randomly selected three points; b TaS2 QDs FTIR spectrum; c the full-scan XPS spectrum of the TaS2 QDs; d XPS spectrum of S 2p; e XPS spectrum of Ta 4f; f The Raman vibration mode of TaS2 QDs and Raman spectra of TaS2 QDs; g XRD diffraction pattern of TaS2 QDs

where D is grain size, β is FWHM of the diffraction peak of the measured sample, θ is diffraction angle, and λ is X-ray wavelength. The calculated grain size of 3.8 nm using the strongest diffraction peak (001) is close to the TEM result of 3.01 nm. Figure 3 a and d show the PL and PLE spectra of the TaS2 QDs respectively, with excitation wavelength (λEx) varied from 320 nm to 460 nm and the emission wavelength (λEm) changed from 400 to 520 nm at 20 nm step. The PL and PLE peaks were red-shifted, as indicated by the dark blue lines in Fig. 3a and d respectively. As shown in Fig. 3b and e, the red-shift of the normalized intensity peaks is more noticeable for the PL (e.g., from 391 to 519 nm) than the PLE (e.g., from 324 to 380 nm) spectra. The wavelength and energy-dependent PL and PLE peaks are shown in greater details in Fig. 3c and f respectively. The peak energies of the red-shifted excitation wavelength ranged from 3.17 to 2.39 eV, while the red-shifted emission energies ranged from 3.83 to 3.26 eV. It can be seen that a higher excitation energy (λEx = 320 nm) led to a larger Stokes shift (71 nm), whereas a lower excitation energy (λEx = 460 nm) resulted in a smaller Stokes shift (59 nm). The difference in Stokes shift is probably due to the size distribution of the prepared QDs, which has also been observed from Se QDs and Te QDs [27, 28]. Comparing the PL and PLE peaks, the PL peaks exhibited a greater red-shift than the PLE peaks, and with the increase of the peak wavelengths, the PL peak has a larger Stokes frequency shift than the PLE peak [33]. The red-shifted intensity peak indicates that the optical properties of TaS2 QDs have an obvious dependence on the wavelength.

Fig. 3
figure 3

a, d The PL & PLE spectra of TaS2 QDs [* interference peak (λEx and λEm) from the instrument], respectively; b, e The PL and PLE normalized spectra of TaS2 QDs under different λEx and λEm, respectively; c, f the relationship of peak and energy for TaS2 QDs

Figure 4a shows the UV-Vis absorption spectra of TaS2 QDs. An absorption peak was observed at 283 nm, which is caused by electron transition upon UV illumination. Based on the study of the reduction in the number of layers, a blue-shifted absorption peak was observed (as shown in Additional file 1: Fig. S2). In addition, the TaS2 QDs solution appeared yellow in color under natural light, peony in color under ultraviolet at 254 nm, and blue in color at 365 nm. Tauc mapping method was used to calculate the TaS2 QDs’ band gap spectrum, according to Eq. (2) [17, 34]:

$$ \alpha \mathrm{hv}=A{\left(\mathrm{hv}-{E}_g\right)}^{1/2} $$
Fig. 4
figure 4

a UV-Vis absorption spectra of TaS2 QDs and TaS2 QDs in natural light, 254 nm and 365 nm UV light illumination; b the direct band gap spectrum of the TaS2 QDs by Tauc method; c energy level diagram of TaS2 QDs

where α is absorption coefficient, A is a constant, hv is light energy, and Eg is band gap energy. The TaS2 QDs has a direct band gap (Eg = 3.69 eV) as shown in Fig. 4b. The results indicate a reduction in the number of layers in TaS2 QDs would lead to a modification of the band gap, including indirect to direct band gap transitions. Based on the above results, TaS2 QDs energy level structure is proposed as shown in Fig. 4c. During electron transition (E1-E2), the energy level of TaS2 QDs is Eg = 4.38 eV. Due to the presence of surface energy level, an emission wavelength of 401 nm is observed and this corresponds to Eg = 3.09 eV. Therefore, the transition energy from E1 to surface state is about 1.3 eV. In order to study the influence of fluorescence effect caused by the increase in band gap, the fluorescence quantum yield (Qs) of TaS2 QDs was calculated using quinine (Qr= 0.54 in 24.9% ethanol) as reference, based on the following equation (Eq. 3) [35, 36]:

$$ {Q}_s={Q}_r\times \frac{I_s}{I_r}\times \frac{A_r}{A_s}\times {\left(\frac{n_s}{n_r}\right)}^2 $$

where the subscript s denotes sample and r indicates reference. Q is PL quantum yield, I is emitting peak area of fluorescence, A is absorbance at a specific excitation wavelength, and n is refractive index. The calculated fluorescenceyield of 45.6% indicates excellent fluorescence properties of the TaS2 QDs. First-principle calculations were performed to further investigate the reasons for the increase in band gap of TaS2 QDs. Figure 5 a and b show the bulk and monolayer structures of TaS2. For the monolayer TaS2, a vacuum of 29.5 Å in the Z direction was added when constructing the unit-cell. The calculations were performed using density functional theory (DFT) as implemented in the Vienna Ab initio simulation package (VASP) [37,38,39]. The electronic exchange-correlation effects were treated using the generalized gradient approximation (GGA) in the Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof (PBE) form [40, 41]. When using Heyd-Scuseria-Ernzerhof (HSE) hybrid functionals [42, 43], 25% Hartree-Fock and 75% PBE-GGA were chosen for short-ranged exchange part in the HSE06 hybrid functionals. The projector augmented wave (PAW) method was utilized to treat the interactions between the ionic cores and the valence electrons [44, 45], where valence electron configuration of S and Ta were set as 3S23p4 and 5d36s2, respectively. The energy cut-off of plane wave basis was set to 520 eV. The Monkhorst-Pack grid mesh [46] of 11 × 11 × 7 and 11 × 11 × 1 were used to sample the Brillouin zone of the bulk and monolayer TaS2, respectively. The convergence in energy was set to 1 × 10−5 eV during electronic structure calculations. The electronic structures of bulk and monolayer TaS2 were calculated by PBE functional, as shown in Fig. 5c and e, respectively.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Structure of TaS2, a bulk TaS2 and b monolayer TaS2. cf Band structure calculations by PBE functional. Partial band structures of bulk and monolayer TaS2 in c and e, respectively. Partial density of states (PDOS) of bulk and monolayer TaS2 in d and f, respectively

The results are in good agreement with previous calculations [47, 48]. Both the bulk and monolayer TaS2 have metallic in-phase states, and the band across the Fermi level is mostly composed of dx2 orbital of Ta atoms. The valence band is mainly composed of p orbitals of S atoms, while the conduction band is mainly from d orbitals of Ta atoms. At Γ point, an indirect gap is transiting to a direct gap from bulk to monolayer structure due to lacking of inter-plane interactions. The band structure was checked using HSE06 hybrid functionals (Fig. 6a, b). The results are similar to PBE except for a larger gap near Γ point for the HSE results, where the conduction band shifted toward lower energy for about 0.5 eV. The absorption spectrum of monolayer TaS2 was also calculated and it contains mainly four peaks at 1.41 eV, 2.00 eV, 6.61 eV, and 7.23 eV. Comparing the absorption spectra and the PDOS, as shown in Fig. 6c and d, the two peaks in the 0~2 eV region are provided by the S 3p→Ta 5d electronic transitions, and the S 3p → Ta 6 s electronic transitions contribute to the peaks in the 6~8 eV region.

Fig. 6
figure 6

a Bulk and b monolayer TaS2 by HSE functionals. c Optical absorption spectra of monolayer TaS2. d PDOS by calculated by HSE. e The monolayer and f the two-layer DOS of QDs calculated by HSE

Next, the TaS2 QDs were modeled as clusters with one and two-layer of Ta-2S unit and compared their spin-polarized DOS. As shown in Fig. 6e and f, due to the dangling bonds of S atoms at the surface, the spin-polarized DOS of the one- and two-layer models show half-metallic nature, where there is a ~ 3 eV gap for the spin-up electrons that is twice the gap at Γ point of the infinite 2D monolayer in Fig. 6b. This demonstrates strong quantum confinement effect. The gap of spin-up electrons of the one-layer model is slightly larger than the two-layer model as a result of lacking inter-plane interactions.


TaS2 QDs having an average size of about 3 nm were prepared by ultrasonic method. The morphology and structural studies performed on the nanomaterials show that they have controllable and hexagonal honeycomb shape. The optical properties of the TaS2 QDs, including absorption and PL, were investigated. A red-shifted effect, compared to the bulk material, was observed and the QDs exhibited multicolor luminescence with strong absorption in near ultraviolet region. The band gap of the TaS2 QDs increased to 3.69 eV from indirect to direct band gap, hence exhibiting extraordinary optical properties. The indirect to direct transition and quantum confinement effect in the electronic structures were confirmed by first-principle calculations of a simple model of the QDs. These results will extend the application of TaS2 QDs in devices, such as photodetectors. Furthermore, the preparation method is also applicable to other layered materials to produce low-cost high-quality QDs from bulk materials.

Availability of Data and Materials

The data supporting the conclusions of this article are included within the article and its additional files.



Atomic force microscopy


Energy-dispersive spectroscopy


Fourier-transform infrared spectrometer


Layered transition metal dichalcogenides



PL and PLE:

Fluorescence photoluminescence spectrometer


Scanning electron microscopy

TaS2 :

Tantalum disulfide


Transmission electron microscopy


UV-visible spectrophotometer


X-ray photoelectron microscopy


X-ray diffraction


  1. Wang H, Yuan H, Sae HS, Li Y, Cui Y (2015) Physical and chemical tuning of two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides. Chem Soc Rev 44:2664–2680

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Desjardins MM, Viennot JJ, Dartiailh MC, Bruhat LE, Delbecq MR, Lee M, Choi M-S, Cottet A, Kontos T (2017) Observation of the frozen charge of a Kondo resonance. Nature 545:71–74

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wei Q, Xiong F, Tan S, Huang L, Lan EH, Dunn B, Mai L (2017) Porous one-dimensional nanomaterials: design, fabrication and applications in electrochemical energy storage. Adv Mater 29:1602300–1602339

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Liu P, Qin R, Fu G, Zheng N (2017) Surface coordination chemistry of metal nanomaterials. J Am Chem Soc 139:2122–2131

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhou K, Zhang Y, Xia Z (2016) As-prepared MoS2 quantum dot as a facile fluorescent probe for long-term tracing of live cells. Nanotechnology 27:275101

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Zebibula A, Alifu N, Xia L, Sun C, Yu X, Xue D, Liu L, Li G, Qian J (2018) Ultrastable an biocompatible NIR-II quantum dots for functional bioimaging. Adv Funct Mater 28:1703451–1703463

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bollella P, Fusco G, Tortolini C, Sanzò G, Favero G, Gorton L, Antiochia R (2017) Beyond graphene: electrochemical sensors and biosensors for biomarkers detection. Biosens Bioelectron 89:152–166

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhao R, Wang Y, Deng D, Luo X, Lu WJ, Sun Y-P, Liu Z-K, Chen L-Q, Robinson J (2017) Tuning phase transitions in TaS2 via the substrate. Nano Lett 17:3471–3477

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Perfetti L, Loukakos PA, Lisowski M (2006) Time evolution of the electronic structure of 1 T-TaS2 through the insulator-metal transition. Phys Rev Lett 97:067402

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Li H, Lu G, Wang Y, Yin Z, Cong C, He Q, Zhang H (2013) Mechanical exfoliation and characterization of single-and few-layer nanosheets of WSe2, TaS2, and TaSe2. Small 9:1974–1981

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhu S, Song Y, Wang J, Wan H, Zhang Y, Ning Y, Yang B (2017) Photoluminescence mechanism in graphene quantum dots: quantum confinement effect and surface/edge state. Nano Today 13:10–14

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gazibegovic S, Car D, Zhang H, Balk SC, Logan JA, de Moor MW, Cassidy MC, Schmits R, Xu D, Wang G, Krogstrup P (2017) Epitaxy of advanced nanowire quantum devices. Nature 548:434–438

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mateo D, Albero J, García H (2017) Photoassisted methanation using Cu2O nanoparticles supported on graphene as a photocatalyst. Energy Environ Sci 10:2392–2400

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bonaccorso F, Colombo L, Yu G, Stoller M, Tozzini V, Ferrari AC, Ruoff RS, Pellegrini V (2015) 2D materials. graphene, related two-dimensional crystals, and hybrid systems for energy conversion and storage. Science 347:1246501–1246511

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Thompson, A. H.: Electrochemical studies of lithium intercalation in titanium and tantalum dichalcogenides. Physica B + C 99, 100-106 (1980). DOI:10.1016/0378-4363(80)90216-8

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wu J, Peng J, Yu Z, Zhou Y, Xie Y (2017) Acid-assisted exfoliation toward metallic sub-nanopore TaS2 monolayer with high volumetric capacitance. J Am Chem Soc 140:493–498

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Zeng Z, Tan C, Huang X, Bao S, Zhang H (2014) Growth of noble metal nanoparticles on single-layer TiS2 and TaS2 nanosheets for hydrogen evolution reaction. Energy Environ Sci 7:797–803

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhang X, Lai Z, Liu Z, Tan C, Huang Y, Li B (2015) A facile and universal top-down method for preparation of monodisperse transition-metal dichalcogenide nanodots. Angew Chem Int Ed 54:5425–5428

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhu J, Yan X, Cheng J (2018) Synthesis of water-soluble antimony sulfide quantum dots and their photoelectric properties. Nanoscale Res Lett 13:19

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Li R, Tang L, Zhao Q, Ly TH, Teng KS, Li Y, Lau SP (2019) In2S3 Quantum dots: preparation, properties and optoelectronic application. Nanoscale Res Lett 14:161

  21. Ramanery FP, Mansur AA, Mansur HS, Carvalho SM, Fonseca MC (2016) Biocompatible fluorescent core-shell nanoconjugates based on chitosan/Bi2S3 quantum dots. Nanoscale Res Lett 11:187

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Kim JI, Kim J, Lee J, Jung DR, Kim H, Choi H, Park B (2012) Photoluminescence enhancement in CdS quantum dots by thermal annealing. Nanoscale Resh Lett 7:482

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Pan J, Guo C, Song C, Lai X, Li H, Zhao W, Zhang H, Mu G, Bu K, Lin T, Xie X, Chen M, Huang F (2017) Enhanced superconductivity in restacked TaS2 nanosheets. J Am Chem Soc 139:4623–4626

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Chang JP, Steigerwald ML, Fleming RM, Opila RL, Alers GB (1999) Thermal stability of Ta2O5 in metal–oxide–metal capacitor structures. Appl Phys Lett 74:3705–3707

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Peters ES, Carmalt CJ, Parkin IP, Tocher DA (2005) Aerosol-assisted chemical vapor deposition of NbS2 and TaS2 thin films from pentakis (dimethylamido) metal complexes and 2-methylpropanethiol. Eur J Inorg Chem 2005:4179–4185

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Li X, Lau SP, Tang L, Ji R, Yang P (2014) Sulphur doping: a facile approach to tune the electronic structure and optical properties of graphene quantum dots. Nanoscale 6:5323–5328

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Qian F, Li X, Tang L, Lai SK, Lu C, Lau SP (2017) Selenium quantum dots: preparation, structure, and properties. Appl Phys Lett 110:053104

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Lu C, Li X, Tang L, Lai SK, Rogée L, Teng KS, Qian F (2017) Zhou. L. & Lau, S. P.: Tellurium quantum dots: preparation and optical properties. Appl Phys Lett 111:063112–063117

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Jeong H, Oh HM, Gokarna A, Kim H, Yun SJ, Han GH, Jeong MS, Lee YH, Lerondel G (2017) Integrated freestanding two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides. Adv Mater 29:1700308–1700317

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Dunnill CW, Edwards HK, Brown PD, Gregory DH (2006) Single-step synthesis and surface-assisted growth of superconducting TaS2 nanowires. Angew Chem Int Edit 45:7060–7063

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. MacIsaac C, Schneider JR, Closser RG, Hellstern TR, Bergsman DS, Park J, Bent SF (2018) Atomic and molecular layer deposition of hybrid Mo–Thiolate thin films with enhanced catalytic activity. Adv Funct Mater 28:1800852

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Holzwarth U, Gibson N (2011) The Scherrer equation versus the ‘Debye-Scherrer equation’. Nat Nanotechnol 6:534

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Zhu X, Su Q, Feng W, Li F (2017) Anti-stokes shift luminescent materials for bio-applications. Chem Soc Rev 46:1025–1039

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Goyal A, Soni PR (2018) Functionally graded nanocrystalline silicon powders by mechanical alloying. Mater Lett 214:111–114

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Qian F, Li X, Tang L, Lai SK, Lu C, Lau SP (2016) Potassium doping: tuning the optical properties of graphene quantum dots. AIP Adv 6:075116–075124

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Antaris AL, Chen H, Diao S, Ma Z, Zhang Z, Zhu S, Wang J, Lozano AX, Fan Q, Chew L, Zhu M, Cheng K, Hong X, Dai H, Cheng Z (2017) A high quantum yield molecule-protein complex fluorophore for near-infrared II imaging. Nat Comm 8:15269–15280

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Kresse G, Furthmüller J (1996) Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set. Comput Mater Sci 6:15–50

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Kresse G, Furthmüller J (1996) Efficient iterative schemes for ab-initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys Rev B: Condens Matter 54:11169–11186

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Kresse G, Hafner J (1993) Ab-initio molecular dynamics for liquid metals. Phys Rev B 47:558–561

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Perdew JP, Burke K, Ernzerhof M (1996) Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys Rev Lett 77:3865–3868

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Payne MC, Teter MP, Allan DC, Arias TA, Joannopoulos JD (1992) Iterative minimization techniques for ab-initio total-energy calculations: molecular dynamics and conjugate gradients. Rev Mod Phys 64:1045–1097

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Heyd J, Scuseria GE, Ernzerhof M (2003) Hybrid functionals based on a screened coulomb potential. J Chem Phys 118:8207–8215

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Heyd J, Scuseria GE (2004) Efficient hybrid density functional calculations in solids: assessment of the Heyd–Scuseria–Ernzerhof screened coulomb hybrid functional. J Chem Phys 121:1187–1192

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Blöchl PE (1994) Projector augmented-wave method. Phys Rev B 50:17953–17979

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Kresse G, Joubert D (1999) From ultrasoft pseudo potentials to the projector augmented-wave method. Phys Rev B 59:1758–1775

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Monkhorst HJ, Pack JD (1976) Special points for brillouin-zone integrations. Phys Rev B 13:5188–5192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Qiao YB, Li YL, Zhong GH, Zeng Z, Qin XY (2007) Anisotropic properties of TaS2. Chin Phys 16:3809–3815

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Sanders CE, Dendzik M, Ngankeu AS, Eich A, Bruix A, Bianchi M, Miwa JA, Hammer B, Khajetoorians AA, Hofmann P (2016) Crystalline and electronic structure of single-layer TaS2. Phys Rev B 94:081404–081408

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references


This work has been supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 51462037 and 61106098), the Key Project of Applied Basic Research of Yunnan Province, China (Grant No. 2012FA003), and Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant No. 2017CX10007).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



XML and LBT designed and supervised the experiments. WG supervised the simulations. LLZ carried out the experiments. CLS carried out the simulations. LL, MZ, FLQ, CYL, and JL carried out the characterizations. KST, YGY, and SPL interpreted the results and improved the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Xueming Li, Libin Tang or Wei Guo.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

Not applicable

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Additional file 1: Fig. S1. (a)

and (c) show the HR-TEM images of the TaS2 QDs after centrifugation at 16000 rpm for 30 minutes. (b) Particle size distribution of TaS2 QDs. (d) The line profile of the TaS2 QDs diffraction fringes. Fig. S2. (a) UV-Vis absorption spectra of TaS2 QDs after centrifugation at 16000 rpm for 30 minutes. (b) UV-Vis absorption spectra of TaS2 QDs compared between 16000 rpm for 30 minutes and 7000 rpm for 25 minutes. (c) and (d) show normalized PL spectra of TaS2 QDs with excitation wavelength (λEx) of 250 nm and 270 nm, respectively.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhou, L., Sun, C., Li, X. et al. Tantalum disulfide quantum dots: preparation, structure, and properties. Nanoscale Res Lett 15, 20 (2020).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • Transition metal dichalcogenides
  • Quantum dots
  • Ultrasonic method
  • First-principle
  • Modulating bandgap