Skip to main content
Account

Table 1 Comparison of the sensing performance between the current work with previously reported results

From: Sensitive Cross-Linked SnO2:NiO Networks for MEMS Compatible Ethanol Gas Sensors

No.

Sensing element

Method of preparation

Ethanol (ppm)

Op.tem. (°C)

Responsea

Ref.

1

Nanocomposite core–shell Ag@SnO2

Chemical solution route followed by calcination

200

25

2.24

[49]

2

1.00 wt.% La2O3 and 99.00 wt.% Sb-doped SnO2 (Sb-SnO2)

Chemical solution route followed by calcination

100

200

16

[23]

3

Pd-doped SnO2 hollow microcubes

Two step Chemical solution route and calcination

200

300

90

[50]

4

Nanorods ZnO backbone and SnO2 branches

One-step hydrothermal method

100

275

18.1

[47]

5

Au–SnO2 nanocomposites

Dip pen nanolithography, deposit on a MEMS platform

1000

375

28

[38]

6

Ni-doped SnO2

One-step hydrothermal method

100

260

28.9

[19]

7

ZnO nanowires grown on a CMOS microhotplate

Hydrothermal method

809

400

2

[51]

8

Horseshoe-shaped SnO2 with annulus like mesoporous

Self-assembly method

100

225

17.3

[52]

9

ZnO tetrapods

Thermal evaporation and controlled oxidation; deposit on a microheater through a PDMS mask

50

400

30

[37]

10

Cross-linked SnO2:NiO network

Magnetic sputtering on etched PS microsphere templates

50

300

9

This work

  1. aResponse = Ra/Rg − 1

Navigation