Skip to main content

Manipulation of the Magnetic Properties of Janus WSSe Monolayer by the Adsorption of Transition Metal Atoms

Abstract

Two-dimensional Janus materials have great potential for the applications in spintronic devices due to their particular structures and novel characteristics. However, they are usually non-magnetic in nature. Here, different transition metals (TMs: Co, Fe, Mn, Cr, and V) adsorbed WSSe frameworks are constructed, and their structures and magnetic properties are comprehensively investigated by first-principles calculations. The results show that the top of W atom is the most stable absorption site for all the TM atoms, and all the systems exhibit magnetism. Moreover, their magnetic properties significantly depend on the adsorbed elements and the adsorbent chalcogens. A maximal total magnetic moment of 6 μB is obtained in the Cr-adsorbed system. The induced magnetism from S-surface-adsorption is always stronger than that for the Se-surface-adsorption due to its larger electrostatic potential. Interestingly, the easy magnetization axis in the Fe-adsorbed system switches from the in-plane to the out-of-plane when the adsorption surface changes from Se to S surface. The mechanism is analyzed in detail by Fe-3d orbital-decomposed density of states. This work provides a guidance for the modification of magnetism in low-dimensional systems.

Introduction

Spintronics is an emerging technology exploiting the spin degree of freedom and holds great promise for next-generational devices with high speed and low power consumption [1,2,3,4]. Since the discovery of mechanically exfoliated graphene in 2004, there sets off a research boom on spin-electronic devices based on two-dimensional (2D) materials, especially on 2D graphene owing to its long spin diffusion length and coherent time [5,6,7]. However, graphene possesses zero band gap, limiting its development in optoelectronic devices [5]. Recently, transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDCs) are considered as promising candidates for optoelectronic applications due to the rich variety of materials and the tunable bandgap [8,9,10,11]. They generally exhibit a sandwich structure with the form of X–M–X (MX2, where M and X represent transition metal and chalcogen element, respectively), such as WS2 and WSe2, whose upper and lower layers have the same element. Interestingly, a new type of TMDCs, namely Janus structure of X–M–Y (X and Y represent different chalcogen elements, respectively) [12,13,14], shows many new features owing to the particular structures, such as strong Rashba spin–orbit coupling (SOC) effect [15, 16], large valley splitting [17, 18], strong piezoelectric effect [19], and so on. For example, Yao et al. reported that the Rashba coefficient of single-layer WSeTe is up to 0.92 eVÅ [15], which is even higher than that in traditional semiconductor heterojunctions of InGaAs/InAlAs [20] and LaAlO3/SrTiO3 [21]. Zhou et al. predicted that a large valley splitting of about 410 meV could be produced in Janus WSSe monolayer by the coupling with a MnO substrate [17].

Despite of the above-mentioned excellent properties, Janus TMDCs are intrinsically non-magnetic, which hinders its further application in spin-electronic devices. Up to now, the design and manipulation of low-dimensional magnetic materials is a major challenge. The previous research has introduced magnetism in conventional TMDCs through various approaches including the adsorption or doping of transition metal (TM) atom [22,23,24,25], the introduction of defects, chirality and edge structure [26,27,28,29], etc. Although it is predicted that the substitution of 3d-TM atoms can induce magnetism and modify the band structures in Janus MoSSe monolayer [30], such method is experimentally difficult to implement. In comparison, the surface atom adsorption is an effective and convenient way to tailor the physical properties of 2D materials. However, how the adsorbed atoms modify the electronic structure and physical properties of Janus TMDCs is rarely reported. The mechanism of magnetic regulation in Janus TMDCs remains unclear.

In this work, we construct different TMs (Co, Fe, Mn, Cr, and V) adsorbed WSSe frameworks, and comprehensively study their structures and magnetic properties by using first-principles calculations, especially their magnetic anisotropy energies (MAEs) at different adsorption surfaces. Their stable structures are identified by the calculated total energies, and their magnetic properties are analyzed by the total density of states (DOS) and differential charge densities. It is found that the magnetic moment and easy magnetization axis significantly depend on the adsorbed elements and the adsorbent chalcogens. In the case of Fe adsorption, the easy magnetization axis of the system can be switched from in-plane (Se side) to out-of-plane direction (S side). The physical mechanism of magnetic anisotropy is further analyzed by Fe-3d orbital-decomposed DOS.

Computational Methods

All calculations are performed by density functional theory based on periodic boundary conditions with spin-polarized, as implemented in Vienna ab initio simulation package (VASP) code [31]. The generalized gradient approximation (GGA) with the Perdew–Burke–Emzerhof (PBE) description is adopted for the exchange–correlation potential [32, 33]. In order to rule out the interaction between TM atoms, a 4 × 4 × 1 supercell is selected. A 15 Å vacuum layer is used to eliminate the interlayer interaction and the periodic image. The interlayer vdW interaction is described by using the DFT-D2 method [34]. All structures are fully relaxed until the force and the total energy reach the convergence criterion, where the convergence values are set to 10–6 eV and 0.01 eV, respectively. The Brillouin zone is sampled with 7 × 7 × 1 and 11 × 11 × 1 dense mesh by using Gamma-centered Monkhorst–Pack grid in structural optimization and self-consistent calculation, respectively. The cutoff energy of the plane wave expansion is optimized to 500 eV, which ensures the convergence of the system. The MAE is calculated by taking the difference between the total energies as the magnetization oriented along the in-plane [100] and out-of-plane [001] directions: MAE = EinEout, SOC is considered in the calculations [35, 36].

Results and Discussion

To simulate the adsorption of TM atoms on Janus WSSe monolayer, we first construct a monolayer WSSe supercell consisting of 48 atoms, as shown in Fig. 1a. Pristine Janus WSSe monolayer possesses a spatial C3v symmetry and exhibits the sandwich structure with one layer of S atoms, one layer of W atoms, and one layer of Se atoms. The monolayer thickness is calculated to be 3.35 Å. The planar projection shows an ideal hexagonal honeycomb structure with a lattice constant of 3.24 Å. The bond lengths of W-S (dW-S) and W-Se (dW-Se) are 2.42 Å and 2.54 Å, respectively, and the bond angle θS-W-Se is 81.76°, which are consistent with the previous reports [37]. Figure 1b shows the planar average electrostatic potential energy of the monolayer WSSe, where Z0 is the thickness of the unit cell, Z is a coordinate variable, and Z/Z0 means the relative position in the unit cell. As expected, the broken mirror symmetry along the Z direction results in the different potential energies on the S and Se surfaces, and the S surface has the larger electrostatic potential. Meanwhile, we also calculated the spin-resolved DOS of Janus WSSe monolayer. As shown in Fig. 1c, the DOS for the spin-up and spin-down channels are symmetrically distributed, indicating that the ground state is non-magnetic. It can also be seen that the band gap of Janus WSSe monolayer is about 1.7 eV, which is between that of WS2 [38] and WSe2 [39].

Fig. 1
figure1

a Top view and side views of Janus WSSe monolayer. b The average in-plane electrostatic potential distribution of WSSe monolayer. c Total DOS of primitive Janus WSSe monolayer

To induce magnetism in Janus WSSe, five different kinds of 3d-TM atoms (Co, Fe, Mn, Cr, and V) were adopted to adsorb on the surface of monolayer WSSe. On account of the structural symmetry, three possible adsorption sites are considered for atom adsorption on either the S or Se layer. As shown in Fig. 2, the three cases are on the top of W atom (labeled as TWS or TWSe), on the hollow of hexagonal ring (labeled as HS or HSe), and on the top of S (Se) atom (labeled as TS or TSe). The total energies for these configurations are calculated to determine the most stable adsorption site. The results are shown in Table 1. It is clearly seen that when the TM atom is located on TWS or TWSe, the system has the lowest energy, indicating that the top of W atom is the most stable adsorption site. Hence, all the following calculations of electronic structures and magnetic properties are based on this configuration. Table 2 lists the calculated results including the bond length (dW-S, dW-Se, and dTM-S(Se)), the height difference (∆h) between the upper layer S(Se) atom and the TM atom, the total magnetic moment MT, the local magnetic moment ML of TM atom, and MAE. Obviously, the structure parameters of dW-S and dW-Se are different from that of the primitive Janus WSSe. For the case that the TM atoms are adsorbed on the S-side of WSSe, the dW-S is elongated by comparing with that in primitive Janus WSSe (2.41 Å), whereas the dW-Se is almost kept same (2.54 Å). Similarly, this behavior occurs in the case that TM atoms are adsorbed on the Se-side, where the dW-Se is also expanded. This is because that the covalent interaction between the TM atoms and the neighboring S(Se) atoms weakens the coupling between W and S(Se) and then leads to the extension of the W-S(Se) bond. In addition, the dTM-S(Se) and the ∆h for the different adsorption surface are distinct. They exhibit the smaller value for the S adsorbing surface, which is owing to the stronger electronegativity for the S atom, as revealed in Fig. 1b.

Fig. 2
figure2

Top view and side views of different configurations. a, d TM atom locates on the top of W atom; b, e TM atom locates on the hollow site; c, f TM atom locates on the top of S(Se) atom

Table 1 The total energy for different configurations
Table 2 The calculated results including the bond length (dW-S, dW-Se, and dTM-S(Se)), the height difference (∆h), the total magnetic moment MT, the local magnetic moment ML of TM adatom, and MAE

In the following, we focus on the magnetic behavior of Janus WSSe after the adsorption of TM atoms. As shown in Table 2, the distinguished magnetism for the different configurations is observed. A maximal MT of 6 μB is obtained in Cr-adsorbed system. Interestingly, different adsorption surfaces do not cause an obvious difference in the MT, albeit there is a relatively big difference in the ML. The calculated ML are 0.92, 1.83, 2.73, 4.80, and 2.90 μB on the S surface, and 0.93, 1.88, 2.78, 4.86, and 2.98 μB on the Se surface for Co, Fe, Mn, Cr, and V adatoms, respectively. Notably, the ML on the S surface is always smaller than that on the Se surface for each kind of TM adatom, indicating the stronger-induced magnetism in Janus WSSe for the case of S adsorbing surface.

To gain insight into the magnetic properties of the different systems, the spin-resolved total DOS is calculated with the results shown in Fig. 3. The positive and negative values denote the majority and minority spin channels, respectively, and the Fermi level is set to be zero. The majority and minority spin states in all the systems exhibit asymmetric characterization, confirming the existence of the magnetism. Compared with the DOS of pure Janus WSSe shown in Fig. 1c, some new impurity states appear in the bandgap in all the systems. These impurity states are mainly attributed to the TM-3d states, a small amount of hybridization of the first nearest S-3p or Se-3p states, and the second nearest W-5d states [22]. Due to the localization of TM-3d orbitals, the impurity states show a narrow energy range. Notably, in the case of Co, Fe, and Mn adsorptions, the induced impurity states around Fermi level only distribute in the minority spin channel, demonstrating a 100% spin polarization. Whereas for the other two cases, there are only the majority spin states in the band gap. In addition, due to the influence of the internal electrostatic potential for the different adsorption surfaces, the energy level and intensity of impurity states are slightly different. These results suggest that the magnetic properties strongly depend on the adsorbed element and the adsorbent chalcogen layer.

Fig. 3
figure3

Spin-polarized total DOS of the different TM atom-adsorbed WSSe monolayer. a, b Co; c, d Fe; e, f Mn; g, h Cr; i, j V

To further reveal the origin of magnetism in different systems, the differential charge densities are calculated. As shown in Fig. 4, there are strong negative differential charge densities around TM atoms and the nearest neighboring chalcogen atoms. While in the middle of the TM-S(Se) bond, significant charge accumulations are observed. This means that the TM atoms and the chalcogen atoms are combined by covalent bonds. It is worth noting that the charge accumulation between TM-S bonds is more evident than that between TM-Se bonds, which indicates the stronger covalent interaction and the shorter bond length. Meanwhile, a small number of charges are accumulated between the TM atom and the lower W atom due to the internal electric field along the z direction. The charge accumulations in the case of Cr and V adsorption are smaller than that in the other cases, which is consistent with the relatively long bond length shown in Table 2. The transfer of charges between the TM atoms and the WSSe layer leads to the decrease of the unpaired electrons in TM atoms, which reduces the magnetic moment of the TM atom on the one hand, and induces the magnetism of the WSSe on the other hand.

Fig. 4
figure4

Differential charge densities of different TM atom-adsorbed systems. a Co; b Fe; c Mn; d Cr; e V

The magnetic anisotropy for different systems is investigated as well. The calculated results are shown in Table 2. Positive and negative MAE indicate the vertical and parallel easy magnetization axis of the system, respectively. The Cr- and V-adsorbed systems have the negative MAE, while the Mn- and Co-adsorbed systems show positive MAE, demonstrating that their easy magnetization axis are in-plane and out-of-plane, respectively. Different adsorption surfaces cause slight changes in MAE, but do not give rise to the changes in their easy magnetization axis. Interestingly, the characteristics in the Fe-adsorbed system are completely different. Its easy magnetization axis switches from the in-plane (MAE: −0.95 meV) to the out-of-plane (MAE: 2.66 meV) when the adsorbing surface changes from Se to S.

To better understand the mechanism of the changed MAE in Fe-absorbed system, we calculated the Fe-3d orbital-decomposed DOS with the results shown in Fig. 5. According to the second-order perturbation theory [23, 40,41,42], the MAE arising from the SOC can be approximately formulated as:

$$MAE = E_{||} - E_{ \bot } \approx \xi^{2} \mathop \sum \limits_{\mu ,\sigma } \frac{{\mu^{ \downarrow \left( \uparrow \right)} \left| {L_{z} } \right|\sigma^{ \downarrow \left( \uparrow \right)} - \mu^{ \downarrow \left( \uparrow \right)} \left| {L_{x} } \right|\sigma^{ \downarrow \left( \uparrow \right)} }}{{E_{\mu } - E_{\sigma } }}$$
(1)
Fig. 5
figure5

DOS of Fe-adsorbed system with different adsorption surface, a on the S adsorption surface; b on the Se adsorption surface. cg The 3d-orbital decomposed DOS of Fe atom adsorbed on the S surface. hl The 3d-orbital decomposed DOS of Fe atom adsorbed on the Se surface

where σ↓(↑), μ↓(↑) and , denote the eigenstates and eigenvalues of the occupied (unoccupied) states with spin state (↓or↑), respectively; \(\xi\) represents the strength of SOC; Lz and Lx stand for the angular momenta operators. The SOC is regarded as the perturbative term in the Hamiltonian, and the MAE is expressed as the energy difference between the occupied states and the unoccupied states through the coupling of angular momenta Lz and Lx. In general, MAE is determined by non-zero elements in Lz and Lx matrices near the Fermi level. As for the same spin states (↓↓or ↑↑), when the occupied and unoccupied states have the same magnetic quantum number m, they make a positive contribution to the MAE under the action of the operator Lz; whereas when they have different m, a negative contribution to the MAE is made through the action of the operator Lx. As for the different spin states (↓↑ or ↑↓), the contribution is just the opposite. The non-zero matrix elements include < xz | Lz | yz >  = 1, < xy | LZ | x2-y2 >  = 2, < z2| Lx | xz, yz >  = \(\sqrt 3\), < xy | Lx | xz, yz >  = 1, < x2- y2 | Lx | xz, yz >  = 1. In our case, as shown in Fig. 5a, b, only the minority spin states appear near the Fermi level, so it determines the MAE. Ligand-field theory is combination of crystal field theory and molecular orbital theory, which can be used to explain the bonding of coordination compounds and analyze changes in central atomic orbitals [43]. According to ligand-field theory, the C3v symmetry makes the degenerated Fe-3d orbitals split into three kinds of states: single state a (dz2, |m|= 0), degenerated states e1 (dyz, dxz, |m|= 1) ,and e2 (dxy, dx2−y2, |m|= 2). As shown in Fig. 5c–g, when Fe is adsorbed on the S surface, the DOS mainly includes the dxz, dyz, dxy, and dx2-y2 minority spin states, and a significant positive contribution to MAE comes from the spin-conservation term < xz | Lz | yz >  = 1 and < xy | Lz | x2-y2 >  = 2, whereas the relatively weak negative contribution is from the spin-conservation term < xy | Lx | xz, yz >  = 1, < x2- y2 | Lx | xz, yz >  = 1. As a result, a positive MAE of 2.66 meV is achieved. As for the case of Fe adsorbed on Se surface, the dxz and dyz minority spin states dramatically reduces, and as the result, the MAE reduces to -0.95 meV owing to the significant decrease of the positive contribution term < xz | Lz | yz >.

Since the electronic and magnetic properties of the system depend on different adsorbed elements and different adsorbed surfaces, achieving an accurate detection of TM atoms deposition in experiments is essentially critical and could be a challenge for MAE engineering. In view of this, a spin-polarized scanning tunneling microscope (STM) equipped with a magnetic tip can be engaged to gain insight on the spin states near the adsorption sites and X-ray magnetic circular dichroism (XMCD) measurements can also be carried out to investigate the magnetic moment information and MAE of TM atoms on Janus material [44].

Conclusions

In this work, we systematically studied the structures and the magnetic properties of different TM atom-adsorbed WSSe frameworks by the first-principles calculations. The pristine Janus WSSe monolayer shows the different potential energies on S and Se surfaces due to the broken mirror symmetry along the Z direction. Meanwhile, it is non-magnetic in nature. The adsorbed configurations have the lowest energy when TM atom adsorbs on TWS or TWSe, indicating the most stable adsorption site. All the adsorbed systems exhibit magnetism. Their magnetism strongly depends on the adsorbed elements and the adsorbent chalcogens. The maximal MT of 6 μB is obtained in the Cr-adsorbed system. Different adsorption surfaces do not cause an obvious difference in MT; however, there was a relatively big difference in ML. The ML for the S surface adsorption is always smaller than that for the Se surface adsorption due to the stronger electrostatic potential, revealing the stronger-induced magnetism. The differential charge densities reveal that the magnetism of the system is attributed to the covalent interaction and the charge transfer between TM atoms and WSSe. In addition, different adsorption surfaces do not result in the changes of the easy magnetization axis in Cr-, V-, Mn-, and Co-adsorbed systems. However, as for the Fe-adsorbed system, the easy magnetization axis switches from the in-plane to the out-of-plane when the adsorption surface changes from Se to S surface. It is found that the strong coupling between the minority states dxy, dx2 − y2 and dxz, dyz on the S surface contribute to the positive MAE, while the dramatically reduced dxz and dyz minority spin states on the Se surface leads to the negative MAE. Since adsorbed atoms is an effective method to induce magnetism in two-dimensional systems, it offers insightful guidance to the preparation of magnetic Janus TMDC and design the novel 2D spintronic devices.

Availability of data and materials

All data are fully available without restriction.

Abbreviations

TM:

Transition metal

TMDCs:

Transition metal dichalcogenides

SOC:

Spin–orbit coupling

DOS:

Density of states

MAE:

Magnetic anisotropy energy

STM:

Scanning tunneling microscope

XMCD:

X-ray magnetic circular dichroism

References

  1. 1.

    Das R, Kalappattil V, Phan M-H, Srikanth H (2021) Magnetic anomalies associated with domain wall freezing and coupled electron hopping in magnetite nanorods. J Magn Magn Mater 522: 167564

  2. 2.

    Datta S, Das B (1990) Electronic analog of the electro-optic modulator. Appl Phys Lett 56(7):665–667

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Manzeli S, Ovchinnikov D, Pasquier D, Yazyev OV, Kis A (2017) 2D transition metal dichalcogenides. Nat Rev Mater 2(8):17033

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Xu R, Zou X, Liu B, Cheng H-M (2018) Computational design and property predictions for two-dimensional nanostructures. Mater Today 21(4):391–418

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Novoselov KS, Geim AK, Morozov SV, Jiang D, Zhang Y, Dubonos SV, Grigorieva IV, Firsov AA (2004) Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films. Science 306(5696):666–669

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Mas-Balleste R, Gomez-Navarro C, Gomez-Herrero J, Zamora F (2011) 2D materials: to graphene and beyond. Nanoscale 3(1):20–30

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Xu M, Liang T, Shi M, Chen H (2013) Graphene-like two-dimensional materials. Chem Rev 113(5):3766–3798

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Kerelsky A, Nipane A, Edelberg D, Wang D, Zhou X, Motmaendadgar A, Gao H, Xie S, Kang K, Park J, Teherani J, Pasupathy A (2017) Absence of a band gap at the interface of a metal and highly doped monolayer MoS2. Nano Lett 17(10):5962–5968

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Lin YC, Dumcenco DO, Huang YS, Suenaga K (2014) Atomic mechanism of the semiconducting-to-metallic phase transition in single-layered MoS2. Nat Nanotechnol 9(5):391–396

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Lu CP, Li G, Mao J, Wang LM, Andrei EY (2014) Bandgap, mid-gap states, and gating effects in MoS2. Nano Lett 14:4628–4633

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Mak K F, Lee C, Hone J, Shan J, Tony F H (2010) Atomically thin MoS2: a new direct-gap semiconductor. Phys Rev Lett 105(13):136805

  12. 12.

    Wei Y, Xu X, Wang S, Li W, Jiang Y (2019) Second harmonic generation in Janus MoSSe a monolayer and stacked bulk with vertical asymmetry. Phys Chem Chem Phys 21(37):21022–21029

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Lu AY, Zhu H, Xiao J, Chuu CP, Han Y, Chiu MH, Cheng CC, Yang CW, Wei KH, Yang Y, Wang Y, Sokaras D, Nordlund D, Yang P, Muller DA, Chou MY, Zhang X, Li LJ (2017) Janus monolayers of transition metal dichalcogenides. Nat Nanotechnol 12(8):744–749

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Zhang C, Nie Y, Sanvito S, Du A (2019) First-principles prediction of a room-temperature ferromagnetic Janus VSSe monolayer with piezoelectricity, ferroelasticity, and large valley polarization. Nano Lett 19(2):1366–1370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Hu T, Jia F, Zhao G, Wu J, Stroppa A, Ren W (2018) Intrinsic and anisotropic Rashba spin splitting in Janus transition-metal dichalcogenide monolayers. Phys Rev B 97(23):235404

  16. 16.

    Yao QF, Cai J, Tong WY, Gong SJ, Wang JQ, Wan XG, Duan CG, Chu JH (2017) Manipulation of the large Rashba spin splitting in polar two-dimensional transition-metal dichalcogenides. Phys Rev B 95(16):8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Zhou W, Yang Z, Li A, Long M, Ouyang F (2020) Spin and valley splittings in Janus monolayer WSSe on a MnO(111) surface: large effective Zeeman field and opening of a helical gap. Phys Rev B 101(4):045113

  18. 18.

    Zhao XW, Qiu B, Hu GC, Yue WW, Ren JF, Yuan XB (2019) Transition-metal doping/adsorption induced valley polarization in Janus WSSe: first-principles calculations. Appl Surf Sci 490:172–177

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Dong L, Lou J, Shenoy VB (2017) Large in-plane and vertical piezoelectricity in janus transition metal dichalchogenides. ACS Nano 11(8):8242–8248

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Nitta J, Akazaki T, Takayanagi H, Enoki T (1997) Gate control of spin-orbit interaction in an inverted In0.53Ga0.47As/In0.52Al0.48As heterostructure. Phys Rev Lett 78(7):1335–1338

  21. 21.

    Fête A, Gariglio S, Caviglia A D, Triscone J M, Gabay M (2012) Rashba induced magnetoconductance oscillations in the LaAlO3-SrTiO3 heterostructure. Phys Rev B 86(20):201105

  22. 22.

    Xie LY, Zhang JM (2016) Electronic structures and magnetic properties of the transition-metal atoms (Mn, Fe, Co and Ni) doped WS2: a first-principles study. Superlattice Microst 98:148–157

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Song Y X, Tong W Y, Shen Y H, Gong S J, Tang Z, Duan C G (2017) First-principles study of enhanced magnetic anisotropies in transition-metal atoms doped WS2 monolayer. J Phys Condens Matter 29(47):475803

  24. 24.

    Zhao X, Dai X, Xia C, Wang T (2015) Structural defects in pristine and Mn-doped monolayer WS2: a first-principles study. Superlattice Microst 85:339–347

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Li L, Qin R, Li H, Yu L, Lu J (2011) Functionalized graphene for high-performance two-dimensional spintronics devices. ACS Nano 5(4):2601–2610

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Du A, Sanvito S (2012) First-principles prediction of metal-free magnetism and intrinsic half-metallicity in graphitic carbon nitride. Phys Rev Lett 108(19):197207

  27. 27.

    Cai L, He J, Liu Q, Yao T, Chen L, Yan W, Hu F, Jiang Y, Zhao Y, Hu T, Sun Z, Wei S (2015) Vacancy-induced ferromagnetism of MoS2 nanosheets. J Am Chem Soc 137(7):2622–2627

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Son Y W, Cohen M L, Louie S G (2006) Energy gaps in graphene nanoribbons. Phys Rev Lett 97(21):216803

  29. 29.

    Lee H, Son Y W, Park N, Han S W, Yu J J (2005) Magnetic ordering at the edges of graphitic fragments: Magnetic tail interactions between the edge-localized states. Phys Rev B 72(14):174431

  30. 30.

    Guan S-S, Ke S-S, Yu F-F, Deng H-X, Guo Y, Lü H-F (2019) Controlling magnetism of monolayer Janus MoSSe by embedding transition-metal atoms. Appl Surf Sci 496: 143692

  31. 31.

    Kresse G, Furthmüller J, Hafner J (1994) Theory of the crystal structures of selenium and tellurium: the effect of generalized-gradient corrections to the local-density approximation. Phys Rev B 50(18):13181–13185

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Kim YS, Hummer K, Kresse G (2009) Accurate band structures and effective masses for InP, InAs, and InSb using hybrid functionals. Phys Rev B 80(3):1132–1136

    Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Perdew JP, Burke K, Ernzerhof M (1997) Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys Rev Lett 77(18):3865–3868

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Grimme S (2004) Accurate description of van der Waals complexes by density functional theory including empirical corrections. J Comput Chem 25:1463–1473

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Xie Q, Lin W, Yang B, Shu X, Chen S, Liu L, Yu X, Breese MBH, Zhou T, Yang M, Zhang Z, Wang S, Yang H, Chai J, Han X, Chen J (2019) Giant enhancements of perpendicular magnetic anisotropy and spin-orbit torque by a MoS2 layer. Adv Mater 31(21):1900776

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Hasan MZ, Kane CL (2010) Colloquium: topological insulators. Rev Mod Phys 82(4):3045–3067

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Er D, Ye H, Frey NC, Kumar H, Lou J, Shenoy VB (2018) Prediction of enhanced catalytic activity for hydrogen evolution reaction in Janus transition metal dichalcogenides. Nano Lett 18(6):3943–3949

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Wang Q, Wu P, Cao G, Huang M (2013) First-principles study of the structural and electronic properties of MoS2–WS2 and MoS2–MoTe2 monolayer heterostructures. J Phys D: Appl Phys 46(50):505308

  39. 39.

    Kang J, Tongay S, Zhou J, Li J, Wu J (2013) Band offsets and heterostructures of two-dimensional semiconductors. Appl Phys Lett 102(1):666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Wang D, Wu R, Freeman AJ (1993) First-principles theory of surface magnetocrystalline anisotropy and the diatomic-pair model. Phys Rev B 47(22):14932–14947

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Dieny B, Chshiev M (2017) Perpendicular magnetic anisotropy at transition metal/oxide interfaces and applications. Rev Mod Phys 89(2):025008

  42. 42.

    Cong WT, Tang Z, Zhao XG, Chu JH (2015) Enhanced magnetic anisotropies of single transition-metal adatoms on a defective MoS2 monolayer. Sci Rep 5:9361

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Doran NJ (1980) Electronic structure and band theory of transition metal dichalcogenides. Phys B 99:227–237

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Eelbo T, Waśniowska M, Sikora M, Dobrzański M, Kozłowski A, Pulkin A, Autès G, Miotkowski I, Yazyev O V, Wiesendanger R (2014) Strong out-of-plane magnetic anisotropy of Fe adatoms on Bi2Te3. Phys Rev B 89(10):104424.

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundations of China (Grants Nos. 61974123, 61774128, 61874092, 11604275, 61704040, and 61804129), the Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province of China (Grants No. 2018I0017), Science and Technology Key Projects of Xiamen (Grant No 3502ZCQ20191001), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant Nos. 20720190055 and 20720190058).

Funding

None.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Kai Chen carried out the calculation and drafted the manuscript. Zhiming Wu and Xu Li participated in the revision of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Xu Li or Zhiming Wu.

Ethics declarations

Ethnics approvals and consent to participate

None.

Consent for publication

None.

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, K., Tang, W., Fu, M. et al. Manipulation of the Magnetic Properties of Janus WSSe Monolayer by the Adsorption of Transition Metal Atoms. Nanoscale Res Lett 16, 104 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s11671-021-03560-9

Download citation

Keywords

  • Magnetic anisotropy
  • First-principles calculations
  • Janus TMDCs
  • Surface adsorption