Table 1 Comparison of λres, FWHM, S, FOM, ΔD, and QF of cases 1–3 structures at resonance modes
From: Breaking the Symmetry of a Metal–Insulator–Metal-Based Resonator for Sensing Applications
Mode 1 | Mode 2 | Mode 3 | Mode 4 | Mode 5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Case 1 | |||||
λres (nm) | 663 | ||||
FWHM (nm) | 45.00 | ||||
ΔD (%) | 15.61 | ||||
S (nm/RIU) | 600 | ||||
FOM (1/RIU) | 13.33 | ||||
QF | 14.73 | ||||
Case 2 | |||||
λres (nm) | 1143 | 596 | |||
FWHM (nm) | 40.00 | 20.00 | |||
S (nm/RIU) | 1100 | 500 | |||
FOM (1/RIU) | 27.5 | 25.00 | |||
ΔD (%) | 32.68 | 29.52 | |||
QF | 28.58 | 29.80 | |||
Case 3 | |||||
λres (nm) | 1075 | 865 | 756 | 556 | 447 |
FWHM (nm) | 20.00 | 3.00 | 10.00 | 10.00 | 10.00 |
S (nm/RIU) | 1100 | 800 | 700 | 500 | 400 |
FOM (1/RIU) | 55.00 | 266.67 | 70.00 | 50.00 | 40.00 |
ΔD (%) | 80.90 | 53.11 | 85.81 | 85.30 | 86.18 |
QF | 54.30 | 29.10 | 76.30 | 56.10 | 48.10 |